Linux for Dumies II. The distributions.

GNU / Linux distributions

Although you already have a superficial idea of ​​what it is Linux In general, perhaps the most important point is, in fact, the ecosystem.

Linux as such it is not a unique operating system, I mean, it is not like Windows o Mac OS X, in fact, there are many Linux, put it in some way.

Linux itself is an ecosystem based on the components GNU / Linux, is what you should know so as not to get into unnecessary complications, and this ecosystem is made up of distributions (distros). Distros are simply complete operating systems based on the GNU system and the Linux kernel; each one built for a type of user or for some type of function, they can go from having a very general purpose (such as being easy to use) to having a very specific one (such as distros focused on testing the security of a system).

A frequent question I am always asked is «How many distros are there?»And the answer I always give is«many«. It is not because it is unpleasant, heavy or simply lazy, but there are actually many, I do not know if there is a record that counts the number of distros that exist but at least I can say that at least there are at least 150 distros, but it is possible that number is easily exceeded, and in the long run, the number of distros does not matter, I doubt that anyone can get to try them all; and to top it all, there are always new distros coming to light ...

But of all the distros that exist, there is a group that can be crowned as the most popular distros, which are by which Linux is generally known, not by one specific, but by many, these are:

  • Ubuntu
  • Linux Mint.
  • fedora
  • archlinux.
  • Opensuse.
  • debian
  • Mandriva / Mageia.

It should be noted that the order in which they are named does not represent their importance or hierarchy, I simply ordered them like this ...

Now these are the main distributions of Linux, but this does not mean that they are the best or the most important, they are simply the most popular and for which many people know Linux, maybe some more than others, but nothing else from there.

As they are all based on a free collaboration environment, each team in charge of each distribution and each community is given the task of always offering support and helping with the advancement of many things, for example the team of Fedora (sponsored by Red Hat) always makes interesting contributions like making desktop environments like gnome-shell they work without graphical acceleration and also do a lot of experiments

Debian for example is the mother distro of Ubuntu (and grandmother of all derivatives of Ubuntu) and is known for being the most stable distro of all (or at least one of the most stable), it has a huge community and this has generated a gigantic "library" so to speak, of .deb packages (equivalent to the .exe of windows) making it one of the best options for users who come from Windows regarding the appearance of the parcel.

Ubuntu is known as «the distro that has contributed the most to Linux»Because that is why half the world recognizes Linux, But this is not so, no distribution is more than another, You are never You must fall into this line of thoughts since Ubuntu would not be Ubuntu without Debian and in turn, this would be nothing without all the contribution that others have made to the nucleus Linux nor to the community. Although it can be given the name of the best-known distro, because it is.

What is that of a distribution based on another?

Simple, being under free licenses, the distributions can be used as one wants, and that implies that I can build a distribution from another. It is like taking the bases of a distribution and starting from that start to build your own, with what you want it to have.

Example of this is Ubuntu with Debian; Ubuntu take of Debian some of its repositories, its packaging bases and things like that (so as not to fall into technical things) and from that it creates programs to manage the system in a simpler way, adds its own repositories and all that. And then it comes Linux Mint, which is based on Ubuntu and what it does is add more pre-installed packages and certain extra programs created by themselves and so on; Any distro can be based on another, no matter what it is and if it is based on another in turn.

Each distro has its own and you have yours in each distro.

This phrase was told to me by a friend a long time ago when I was beginning to know this world, it refers to the fact that each distro is focused on something, be it a general purpose (such as being easy to use, or being super stable) or how to be oriented to something more specific (distros made only for servers or scientific development).

Distributions are always born with a purpose and it is to satisfy the needs of some type of users, at the beginning of Linux there were people who wanted a graphical and simple to use interface and then the Mandrake (which later became Mandriva) that well, it offered that, a nice system graphically and simple to use and then it comes Ubuntu, even simpler to use, and in fact, then comes Linux Mint, even simpler to start using than Ubuntu; This is a perfect example of the birth of a distro, a specific purpose, which can then be transformed into something more general.

Another phrase very much remembered by me is «Mac adapts you to it, Windows adapts to your paradigms and you adapt Linux to your tastes«... this is one of the most interesting things about Linux, which does not adapt to you, you adapt it to you according to you want and to the level you want, so much so that something extraordinary happens in this world, and that is a distribution Linux can come to represent your ideals, tastes and personality How? in a thousand ways ...

There are people who, for example, like everything to work the first time, they like stationery and being able to have everything within reach of a click, people like me who think that it is more efficient when you can do things quickly and without too much ceremony and that it also looks nice, users like that are the ones we generally use Ubuntu or any end user oriented distro.

There are others who prefer maximum simplicity and total minimalism, they want a light, fast, responsive and efficient system; no applications that they do not use or anything that weighs too much, they prefer to do things by hand and there we have the users of Archlinux o Gentoo.

And there are those who say «I prefer the old but stable«, Known to us as Debianites (xD), who really don't care if they have an older version of some program as long as it works fine for them and is not unstable.

And those are just examples of the thousands of representative possibilities of Linux, a distro can not be adaptable but representative of you.

In short, distros create a world of very interesting possibilities, and we have not yet gone deeper into the varieties of Linux; what comes in the other installment is the universe of desktop environments.

From now on, the opinions are yours.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

*

*

  1. Responsible for the data: Miguel Ángel Gatón
  2. Purpose of the data: Control SPAM, comment management.
  3. Legitimation: Your consent
  4. Communication of the data: The data will not be communicated to third parties except by legal obligation.
  5. Data storage: Database hosted by Occentus Networks (EU)
  6. Rights: At any time you can limit, recover and delete your information.

  1.   curefox said

    Good entry Nano, I like this kind of post so that people who do not know anything about Linux document themselves and get to know the penguin system for themselves.

    1.    dwarf said

      Well, they are for that but the purpose of these posts is to collect opinions and improve the content of the topics because with Linux for Doomies I will do lectures at universities

  2.   diazepam said

    Distros are like perfumes. Hundreds of varieties and each one targeting a certain target.

  3.   elruiz1993 said

    there are as many distros as pokemon 😛

    1.    proper said

      Tuxmon… I CHOOSE YOU !!!!

      1.    Tucked said

        Billmon Poison Windows Attack XD

  4.   jamin samuel said

    Good article !!

  5.   kondur-05 said

    there are 150 pokedistros catch them all now

    1.    jamin samuel said

      AAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA

  6.   stuartlinux said

    excellent post Nano !!!!!…. there is nothing like a good system developed with the Linux kernel !!!!

  7.   jasmont said

    Another phrase very much remembered by me is "Mac adapts to it, Windows adapts to your paradigms and you adapt Linux to your tastes"

    Mac it's like gourmet food: overpriced for the little they serve.
    Windows It is like junk food: harmful, not very nutritious, but many like it.
    Linux It's like home-cooked food: Nothing like arepas with refried beans and grated cheese on a Friday night.

    1.    dwarf said

      Marico do not put copyright because I already stole that phrase xD

      1.    jasmont said

        LOL!!! It's not about stealing it, it's about sharing it! xD

        By the way, bro! In your tutorials you will have something like «What to do in case of error disk driver / tmp not ready or present«? The netbook has already started to screw me ... = (

        1.    dwarf said

          Head over to the wn forum, and detail the problem well to see what we can do to help you.

          But from what I see there are peos in your fstab

          1.    jasmont said

            I would like to know what that is one day ... hehehe!

          2.    jamin samuel said

            ahahahaha jasmont I understand your situation xD

            here in Venezuela we say Peo when there is a problem

            that is to say: chamo you got into tremendous trouble ..
            translated it would be: chamo you've gotten into a big problem xD

            ahahahahahahaha ... of course we are clear that but they are flatulence xD ahahahahahaha

          3.    jasmont said

            We are clear, mine, that we are both Venezuelans! Hahaha!!! xD

          4.    jasmont said

            Rather, the three of us in this reply thread (including @nano) are Venezuelans! 😉

  8.   mitcoes said

    Why do you always forget Sabayon?

    I try them all, I use an Ubuntu or Mint + a backup one, with 2 root directories and two / home and a swap on a 2 Tb disk.

    Arch does not recognize modern GPT partitions in his installer - more than 4 per disk -

    Sabayon installs just as easy as Ubuntu.

    The version with XFCE is the fastest you can now install and stands out for its 1000 Hz kernel, which together with Ubuntu Studio with its low latency kernel not updated to the latest version is almost never the best for multimedia.

    Ubuntu or Mint are fine but to try others, SUSE and FEDORA in rpms, Chakra - arch fork only KDE -, Archbang - arch with openbox - or Kahel - arch with gnome - before arch outright - and of course Sabayon They should be IN MY UNDERSTANDING, those that will be recommended and that each one stays with the one they like the most, and with the desktop that they like the most.

    Currently for speed / performance I prefer Sabayon XFCE, but to a newbie I would recommend Xubuntu or Ubuntu Studio, both with XFCE for an old computer, or who want it to go fast.

    On a modern machine a Mint Cinnamon or a Sabayon Cinnamon would be my recommendation.

    1.    jamin samuel said

      That's right .. SolusOS is also recommended ...

      it comes with codecs and relevant applications already installed ... kernel that is updated like libreoffice etc !!

      that distro will be famous ...

      1.    mitcoes said

        SolusOS seems very interesting to me, FOR TESTING, but it is still in alpha state.

        Based on debian, LMDE is more mature and for a newbie better Ubuntu / Xubuntu / Ubuntu Studio or Mint13 both in its version Mate and Cinammon even Sabayon as I said before for its speed of an exceptionally configured kernel. in fact if I made another distro I would copy the settings of the Sabayon kernel.

        1.    dwarf said

          Well I personally must say that SolusOS Eveline is in steady state, alpha is SolusOS 2 so you are a bit confused.

        2.    jamin samuel said

          Ubuntu or mint can also be used by advanced users ... I don't necessarily have to say that it is for novices, I know engineers who like to use Ubuntu because it saves them time and work and also makes a mess with that system 😉 ...

          It could be said that depending on the use case X distribution could be more convenient for you but it does not mean that you cannot use this other one (for example)

          Greetings dad - ... ahh I saw the sabayon thing and I liked it

    2.    dwarf said

      I do not forget Sabayon, the thing is that even if it is said that it is a distro for newbies, in many ways it is not.

      Sometimes sulfur / rigo crashes and never wants to open and has problems with its Gnome versions, thus entangling new users (I went through that).

      Second, when you are very new, one of those who know nothing, but NOTHING about Linux, not having a meta-package system is a problem since they cannot get installable packages with a simple double click.

    3.    Angel_Le_Blanc said

      Arch, installer ?, the Arch installer is yourself

  9.   Windousian said

    You came up short nano. DistroWatch has registered more than 300 distributions. Who knows how many are really active.

    1.    dwarf said

      That's why I said, 150 is an easily beaten number xD

  10.   jasmont said

    The new ones, the brand new ones, we must have something that adapts to our learning process. When one searches in, for example, Google Linux distributions for newbies, the first thing that comes out is the ubuntu dynasty. In my case, in the first attempt to migrate to linux, I downloaded the first thing that crossed my mind: Opensolaris (Over time I knew that it was something very different from linux), BackTrack and finally, Ubuntu 10.10, so far I just installed Xubuntu 12.04 because my pot demanded it that way. Not even in my mind, at that time, did it occur to him to go through the existence of Sabayon, SolusOS o Eveline Solus OS 2.

    For now we must think that every day there are (we have) more people migrating to Linux, either out of curiosity, to learn or because they are already up to Güindos' mother.

    Greetings to all!

    1.    v3on said

      backtrack? hahaha you started with BT? xD
      I started with Ubuntu, bought a magazine that had a series of "courses" on how to install it, and all that, it's called Computer Hoy, and I said "why not?" and so it was xD

      hahaha backtrack xD

      I'm not making fun of it, it's just that I'm funny xD
      It is as if to learn to ride a bike you used a jumbo jet of the air force xD

      1.    Jasmont said

        Hahaha!!! Do not worry! Even I am amused in these times! What makes me laugh the most is the comparison of the Bike with the Jumbo Jet ... hahahahahahahahahahahaha !!!!!

        1.    jamin samuel said

          Exile Jasmont .. and what are you currently using?

  11.   Jacobo hidalgo said

    nano, I think you have an error in the name of the articles, it should be Linux for dummies and not "doomies." Please check the meaning of these words because I think you are using the wrong word in the names of these articles.

    By the way, these articles are very good.
    Greetings from Cuba.

    1.    KZKG ^ Gaara said

      Greetings bro 🙂

  12.   Digital_CHE said

    Dummies is a low-voltage insult ...
    You are not going to attract people to Free Software by insulting them.

    It takes no effort to replace Dummies with Beginners

  13.   yio643 said

    I would say that the most stable distro is gentoo, in fact it is for x64 platforms, there is no better support even more than they should, although it declines in the practicality point since it takes a long time in the installation of packages is what I miss since I have to compile a good time and if not see me right now writing from windows because I did an upgrade every year and it has 1 day to finish but then Hello stability 😀

    1.    KZKG ^ Gaara said

      I have not tried Gentoo precisely because of that ... I don't have much time to invest in compiling and much less ... I need to work, that time is never enough haha.

      1.    jamin samuel said

        Ok sir worker .. you should then use Linux Mint 13 to save more time xD ahahahaha

      2.    Angel_Le_Blanc said

        I installed it without X or anything graphic and even so it is difficult and takes a long time to compile, but it is the pinnacle of all linux, it is very powerful.
        Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, Arch and Gentoo That's the traditional ladder of enlightenment, although there are other paths. How to go from Ubuntu to Arch and then to Gentoo.

  14.   Luis said

    Nano, the topic you propose is good and gives for more. For example, stop and broaden the issue of graphical environments, that is, one normally has to choose the distro and the environment with which they want to use it, and these two issues are closely linked, to the extent that there are those who accept or reject a distro for graphical environment issues.

    I started with Ubuntu, then I tried Mint, openSUSE, Debian, and at the moment I am dual-booting with Fedora 17 (xfce) and SolusOs. This last one seems too good to me to have so little time, I hope the community supports this project, which in a few years could become one of the most popular.

    The observation about dummies-doomies is pertinent, the correct expression is dummies.

    regards

    1.    dwarf said

      In fact, the graphic environments are directly another point to be discussed, one apart 😉

  15.   Sergio said

    Debian is more unstable than the crest, right now I'm using windows because that thing sticks to me as soon as I start it.

    1.    Tucked said

      I differ. Debian is one of the most stable "distros" you can find, behind it is a community of the most rigorous that you will find in GNU / Linux.
      And look that I use Ubuntu (Lubuntu) and here is another story, but currently it has not caused me problems and that I am using the Utopic version that has not even reached alpha.

      Maybe you have configuration errors in GNOME-Shell, that this desktop is very green. I recommend you change to XCFE, LXDE, Openbox, Flubox which are lighter

  16.   darkar said

    Very good post, except for the dummies, you would only have said newbies or something.

  17.   mrCh0 said

    Good post, some simplicity for new ones and so that those of us not so new know how to explain it .. sometimes it happens to me that I can't find the words to explain to others WHAT Linux is. : S

  18.   Tucked said

    Most of the comments come from Ubuntu. For my part, although the web does not recognize it, I am also in a flavor of Ubuntu (Lubuntu). CLaro may not recognize it because I use the Utopic version, which is not even in alpha yet.
    : 3 I come from the future