Who does not know Windows?
That OS that has always covered originality, back when the idea was borrowed from Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC),, and along your way there are more examples to put. Well now with the next Windows 8 It sure will be a success, and I mean it honestly without sarcasm, Windows 8 it will be a success.
Did I go crazy? … not at all. It will be a success yes, because it has implemented (copied) ideas (functions) that have already been a success in Linux distros, for this reason, if you use functions that have already triumphed in the Linux world, imagine what would happen if you also put all that propaganda and publicity that they usually use 🙂
1- For example, we have news regarding the copier:
Isn't that cool? 😀 ... sure, it's JUST a mere coincidence that it looks like this:
Multiple copies integrated into the same window, copy details as well as adding graphics ... they are just coincidences 🙂
2- Preview duplicate files in the copy:
In this version of Windows they polished it, they allow to manipulate several files simultaneously and this, to be honest, is a plus. 🙂
En Windows 7 had the same concept, which curiously resembles what exists in KDE for a long time:
En KDE:
3- Windows 8 on LiveUSB.
As well indicated in the site of HP:
Now Microsoft takes the concept of a live operating system to a whole other level.
Traducción:
Now Microsoft takes the concept of the Living Operating System to another new level.
… No comments… ¬_¬ ...
4- Cloud integration.
Now Microsoft will allow you to store your data in SkyDrive. With a total of 25GB that you can use, there you can store not only music and images, but information about your user account and more.
Come on, that the existence / idea of Ubuntu One It is another of those coincidences of life, which as a disadvantage gives us only 5GB of free space, and for about $ 2.99 per month we will have 20GB more.
Now, from my very personal perspective ... storing multimedia content does not seem so negative to me, however ... storing contacts, passwords and etc in the cloud, it does seem crazy there.
5- New file system.
Protogon, the new filesystem that will move NTFS will appear in Windows 8.
According to ITWorld, this system is similar to ZFS (the Z File System) as well as Btrfs.
..- END
I don't know about you, but actually I would like to have a face-to-face chat with some Microsoft developer, one of these Kakashi-sensei (character from the anime Naruto whose nickname is Copy-Ninja) to see how they would answer my questions ¬_¬
Do you know what will screw me? ...
That Microsoft has not really innovated, that it has only “borrowed” the ideas / experiences that have been around the world for a long time, but that in the end it will take the credit and appear as: “Windows8, the OS that revolutionizes operating systems»...
regards
Windows 8 may have revolutionized the world of OS, but its own world. I have been a user of Windows XP, Vista (gross), 7 and 8 (Developer Preview). But comparing my experience as a Windows and Linux user, it cannot be compared, and I have been a Windows user for more years than Linux, but these years of Linux have been much more fruitful than those of Windows.
-------------
Now the other part, it is normal that Microsoft decides to copy the Linux world, it was already seen with Vista, with its effects, a vain copy of the beautiful effects of KDE, Compiz…. And I'm only talking about effects because that's what an end user sees the most.
Good post, and very good comparison.
That is exactly what happens to me. Linux in these few years has taught me (forced in many cases) to think, to develop logic-based thinking, to solve my own problems, and also ... I like to think that I have served the world something, that at least a little I have contributed 😀
Come on Kage, don't fight. You know how the world works. Let Windows users believe that they have something super new because in the end it is true, they do, which has taken more than 15 years to evolve including things that in GNU / Linux and its desktops, we had of yesteryear. The saying goes: Better late than never.
It's just that it fucks me that it will happen as with Windows Vista ... Microsoft was the LAST to have transparencies, and users thought it was super cool, of course, the consumption was a joke LOL!
It may be the last one at that, but it is the only system that managed to get an OS to start up in less than 2 seconds, and we also admit that Linux is a long way from being used by an average user.
not because linux is a free OS is the best in the world because there are many factors that influence it and one of them is performance, stability and ease of use.
They also influence stability (as you say) and security, and Windows largely lacks these, see if this is the case that on servers (where the main factors are stability and security) Windows is without a doubt the most despised.
You talk to me about stability I have never seen a stable linux in my whole life, in linux if it is not one thing it is the other, the systems have changed and realize that linux is lagging behind it only has outputs in the security of its servers, and lately security in microsoft has increased.
Hackers comment that the reason linux is a secure system is because they have not tried to attack it.
linux is made for expert users and it is a reality, to install a simple program you have to do many things the ubuntu software store has tried to leave that behind but the terminal is still used too much.
A clear example of stability and ease of use is Windows 7, which has the ability to repair itself without the need for a CD. It is something valuable that Windows has and that is very important and innovative. In Linux you are free to create and do whatever you want, but even so it is not a very easy system to use for average users.
I tell you from experience of uses and despite all the damages I use linux from time to time to find out if they have corrected any of their errors.
@Itachi I don't know where you get that Linux is not stable and that it has errors ... in fact, I don't know where you get that "Windows is more stable and self-repairs" What the hell? Come on man, don't be such a fanboy, I would like Windows to repair itself every time it breaks. In fact yesterday without any explanation the System 32 file got damaged on my neighbor's pc and now he doesn't even want to boot Windows from the CD and, magically, Xubuntu does boot ...
Did a hacker say that? Then talk to a real one because the reason is not due to lack of attacks, it is due to lack of abilities; more secure than Linux only BSD.
nano I am talking about linux being unstable from the experience I have had with it and all its distributions are damaged by anything there is no need for viruses for linux to generate errors, I am not against free software but against people who demerits the good work of other companies that even if you do not want it are ahead, free software is an alternative but it is not always the solution to everything, and if you did not know that windows 7 repairs only badly, in case you did not know there is something called backup or backup that leaves your windows completely repaired. or for that you can use a freezer.
@Itachi No human system is free from errors, it would be a lie if I told you that nothing at all always goes wrong in GNU / Linux as some people sometimes try to make you believe, but the rest of your statement is very pretentious, I ask you to please do not talk as if no one here does not know what Windows is and does not know its pros and cons.
I have used Windows from Windows 98 to Windows 7, not as a curious one, but as a day-to-day user, almost always with original licenses and for a year I use GNU / Linux on my personal machines but I still do maintenance and repair Windows for helping my colleagues and family. I honestly do not want to cry remembering all the nightmares that Deep Freeze caused me, the system restore points that revive various malware that cost so much to eliminate, the UAC that when it came out seemed to be something useful but in reality it is more of a hindrance, antivirus (free or paid) that catch anything else except bugs and so many years of bitterness.
In the end I ended up putting all the free tools in Windows that I could, thus dispensing with 90% Freeware and any payment alternative that is not the OS itself, rejecting and deactivating all those wonders that you talk about that almost always more than anything they hinder and slow down the system with what my stay in Windows became modest, until finally, from one day to the next I said to myself, Why not change the OS if I use the same applications and I finish removing myself from here ? Switching to GNU / Linux is a sensible decision if you honestly evaluate the situation, see what you do, and first see if your hardware is compatible (not because of a Linux problem, but because of the manufacturer's secrecy). In this way, other people who have no idea of using a computer beyond double-clicking now use free systems day after day thanks to me that I have installed them and have much less problems using their machines for fun, study or work, unless a specific program is made only for Windows and is not stable to use in the GNU / Linux distros that I install.
anonymous for users ease of use is the most important and that has always been the priority to have a "stable" system like Gnu / Linux for many possibilities it has at the time of use is limited to something that is of vital importance, interaction with users, Gnu / Linux is generally designed in a standard way so that the expert user gives it its visual appearance and its way of use, but it is known that the OS that have better interaction with the user always win because that is what you are looking for in a software.
We could say that Gnu / Linux has many advantages at the software level, but the distributions you use are not completely free, you anonymously who use Debian should know that it is not a 100% free distribution because its kernel has parts of proprietary code which does not convert it. in a free OD but open source. Currently, most of the operating systems that we consider as free consist of proprietary software parts because they are necessary to maintain a certain stability and because reverse engineering the software is very difficult, there is still a lot of development in Gnu / Linux there are many gaps to fill and One of those is the interaction with the user, which goes from installing a program to formatting, and hardware acceleration needs to be worked on a lot, certainly there are no problems with manufacturers because there are drivers for Gnu / Linux and many lack a good acceleration implementation. for hardware, these are things that in themselves make other OS more profitable. If you want to know which are the completely free Gnu / Linux systems go to http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.es.html you will know that not even the much loved Ubuntu is merely free
@elder brother
Windows always crashes "without explanation" on the PC of the ready on duty who wants to have you technical support (or use you as a sucker as the case may be).
And if that disk did not want to bounce, perhaps it is that it was damaged as disks are usually damaged, or do you mean that Windows "only damaged" in both places at the same time?
But urban legends aside Windows isn't that thing that magically (or non-magical) breaks every day.
More instability in that sense I have seen in distros, than an update and bang to format or throw you a weekend fixing everything, or open an application and the graphics system crashes.
@Anonymous
If you have eliminated the virus before, you will not use the restoration system afterwards, as the saying goes, what is the fault of the stake if the toad jumps and gets skewered.
And you calm, that if one day GNU / Linux is used more and especially if it comes to have Private Software (and craks), you will see how malware arrives. Do not come to me with that «that is impossible and the super-security of the super system» because in addition to being false, the same thing the maqueros said and there you have, in what there are more people there are more eyes seeing (with bad intention) and finding loopholes and above all finding people to install freebies. The funny thing is that the ones who make fun of the failure of the maqueros the most are the Linux users and they sin the same.
And note that it is not unusual that when people stop cracking and become more aware of what they install and do not install, "Windows magically improves."
@itachi
It is not Free Software or Open Source. Open Source on paper is the same as Free Software (but without Stallman); Although the name refers to a single freedom, its postulates include all four and as far as it is known there is no extra indicative or addition that says "Open Source is Open Source and Closed Code" which of course would be illogical nonsense and leagues are seen that it would be something forced for sheer convenience. They have certainly invented that later, but it is not something that can be deduced directly from their postulates, that is, "using Open Source and Close Source" is not something that is intrinsically associated with the Open Source philosophy, rather the opposite.
Besides what to use anything just because it likes / serves is what anyone does who is not aware of open or free ideologies; You don't have to have a special "title" for that, much less that title would have to be "Open Source" just because they are alive to put it su name to normal state.
@Ares
You are certainly right in many things. I think that it is not free software or proprietary software as such that makes our computing look bad or good, it is what we install while on Gnu / linux, Mac or Windows we will know that the operating system It obeys the orders of the programs, the OS, whatever it is, is only an arbitrator which gives the resources to the programs that are going to be executed, it is simply that. whatever you design it, but the important thing is who it is focused on. It is good to know that most users go to Windows for that ease of use it offers, the other OS offer ease of use but focused on expert users so we waste time criticizing Windows and the other distros if each one fulfills a function in current computing.
Yes, in two seconds as long as you buy the latest ultra-powerful milk machine. You compare windows and linux on more normal PCs and you will see, I tell you because I tried at a friend's house to put archlinux on the eeePC and it started in 10 seconds, and it only had a gig of ram and a couple of cores, it is not for both the hardware, and surely windows would have taken longer. That is, what I'm going to is that it makes no sense to compare without references. Yes, windows start in 2 seconds…. on a computer of 3000 euros xD
regards
I use windows and I do not believe it, at least in windows it is known to adopt improvements from another system, I have tried linux and the truth ... they have to know how to adopt or copy, as you like, but it has a long way to go, also windows 8 It works fast and I even have all the tools I need, in Linux there are tools that are very tedious to achieve the same as in Windows.
Point 3 I do not know if it is to laugh or just put a pokerface, and the worst thing is that there will be those who believe that they revolutionized the concept ¬_¬
And say it ... it will be like with Christopher Columbus, who is kept in history as the one who discovered the "new" world, when it was not even close to him hahaha.
No comments
It is neither the first nor the last time they will copy things from Linux or Mac.
If that …
http://buscon.rae.es/draeI/SrvltConsulta?TIPO_BUS=3&LEMA=rebozar
Now I read the article
See if your RAE appears - »GFYS 😉
I'm still right
Haha the windoleros are going to have a face with this article ... Hahaha
And I say, are there not other examples that are not with photos of women? Remember that it is not to everyone's liking ...
This one .. if you prefer photos of a naked guy, you let me know .. El Arenoso will gladly put them on you .. Not if when I say it, then you blame your bad milk for the fact that you don't have a girlfriend ... ¬¬
Download the fucking video at night so that you can understand why it is better if he does not have a girlfriend.
I already told you that putting photos of aunts on the computer is vicious reggaeton
And you put avatars of women being a man is from French Dofusers, right? xD
There I took the mania among other things
Well, I had photos of aunts on the screen from before reggetón was invented. And for the record, I'm not a fan of that pseudo music.
I have said it because reggaetoneros are usually the most vicious.
Although of course, KZKG ^ Gaara likes reggaeton (even if he says no)
No matter how much I watch the video, I can't stop thinking that you use very silly and childish excuses to "cover up" that you don't like women. Come on, are you psycho or something? Who told you that when you get mad at a woman, you're going to hit or kill them? Come on, little boy, that bad temper you say you have doesn't even make you a murderer, it doesn't justify the fact that you don't have a girlfriend with the amount of years you have upstairs. And to answer you, it's true, not everything is sex but come on, when you have it, you don't want to leave hahaha
We are here, you have to see me, if you don't see me you don't know how angry I can get and what I can do.
Those reasons don't seem silly to me. apart from the fact that I have not said that I do not like women, that you have invented, also I am not a homosexual sympathizer as I have explained a few times.
So you see perfect that when I get pissed off, I throw something at my wife, hit her on the head and leave her a fool for life, that's fantastic, isn't it? That's good.
According to you, it is better that he has a girlfriend even if he hits her with something than not having her, well, I don't understand ...
So what if Courage likes chicks or not? You already throw dirt on the other side when perhaps no match is going to (Asexual) I'm bi and no one here has complained, I've even been a "noble" way (just one saying xD) I presume I have a girlfriend LOL (and with that I have won or they even think I'm uncle LOL)
But go on, go on ... The delicious thing about the internet is drama and trolling xD
HAHAHA nothing to us, but ... how it fucks him that we insinuate it to him, well here we go and just to fuck him, we repeat it HAHA 😀
Nah Alba, with us there is no mess ... that is, everyone has the right to be with whoever they want, as long as there is respect I am so happy, and I am sure that elav and others think the same.
I'm trying to behave better, not to screw up the Courage so much because I admit that once or twice I spent a bit 🙂
Greetings and a pleasure to read you here again ^ _ ^
It's not that, the problem is that if I have a girlfriend I know I'm going to hurt her
And where the hell would I take photos of guys on the ball ... come on, unless you give them to me, in case the guys go ... LOL !!!
Pf, I don't want to be the devil's advocate, but what difference does it make if they copy it? Will it stop working on Linux? Well that. In addition, if they wanted they could copy it as is (respecting the license, of course), that is the grace of free software. Come on, let's not be ridiculous, all systems copy from everyone, and I don't think there is anything wrong with it, if an idea is good, it is good on all operating systems.
It does not matter if they copy, you have to have a bit of originality, be it Windows, Linux, Mac or BSD
Are we talking about originality? Are you telling me that in Ubuntu, the menu at the top is not "copied" from OSX? Or that the bar on the left is not the same as the one in Windows 7? Come on now, don't make me commune with millstones. I repeat myself, can someone tell me why if we have a good idea it has to be exclusive to an operating system?
You're talking to the least uber-man in the world.
Do not copy one from the other, in any case be inspired
That's why I put copy in quotes. 😉
I think that what my colleague points out is not the simple fact that they copy, but now they show it as something "revolutionary" ...
Hello and welcome 🙂
I understand you, I know that since SWL is, they can take the ideas / code, implement it in their OS and sell it ... or wait, they can't O_O.
As it is under the GPL, they can take the code, use it, but not distribute it in a way that is proprietary, proprietary and earn money from it.
I remember that Apple strongly sued Samsung for this second to have copied Apple's design on their iPhones, this is exactly the same case.
The problem is not in the action, but rather in the results. That later the ignorance and ignorance of many will make them acclaim Windows8 as something that it is not, saying that Microsoft invented the Pause / Renew in the copies, the LiveUSB (as HP already said) and more. This is what bothers me.
Greetings and really, welcome to the site 😀
I hope you don't feel bad about the answer 😉
According to you, next comes Ballmer and patents the window of several copies and the repeated file preview, because that's their "innovation", LOL ...
What they cannot copy is the code, but the concept as it is not patented, they can easily copy it.
So the moral is: "Patent everything, absolutely everything, even when it is bullshit ... but paténtalo, as a security / prevention measure" ????
Not a member, you must have dignity, originality, respect, be a professional ... damn, you have to respect the work of others ¬_¬
You say that because you do not have the possibility of winning millions of euros xD. First we complain that they close the code, then we open the code and we complain that they copy our ideas LOL.
We are worse than women with their dilemmas.
For me they can patent what they want, if it has already been implemented before under GPL they cannot take it away from us. In fact I am only against one type of patent, the "idea patents". How the hell do you patent something that is not tangible and is ephemeral?
Well, so much in Europe you cannot patent software, here we are more advanced, for now ...
It would be fun if KDE and Gnome received little money from each copy of MS WOS 8 as they receive from Android manufacturers to avoid a costly lawsuit although Barnes and Noble is going to reduce that blackmail to pennies.
Regarding the file system, borrowing ideas from BTRFS and ZFS can cost you more expensive than using FAT on Android, which I find idiosyncratic, in his day Tom Tom already switched to ext2 or ext4 I don't remember well, due to a demand for MS.
I give you part of reason friend, the problem is that they did not respect the license, I would be glad that during the launch of the product they put a section giving credit to the ideas they borrowed ¬ ¬.
The problem is not that they copy, since in a certain aspect it is a compliment, the problem is that they shut up the fact of having copied and to whom, I think enough is enough ¬ ¬ !!!
It is fine for them to copy but they incur piracy by not releasing the code according to the GPL licenses which force you to modify or copy something, you have the obligation to release the code and we know that windows would love to do that right (sarcasm ).
Good for Microsoft and its "innovative ideas."
Qt and KDE marking are very innovative technology, I have been using a distro with KDE for 6 months and when I use W7 I feel very limited.
hahaha these microsophytes are copiers, with reason the Sandy has to be bravo .. but dont worry men, linux was the first to have it .. it is like Apple and its touch screen with accelenometers that react to the static of the finger, that now everything the world copies it, you have to come across a song in the chest, but now comes the question ... how much will the consumption of the fucking W8 be?
No, the sandy one has not yet bought the gift for whom I know, that's why write this article
hahahahaha I already understand the reason for the article jhehej BAZINGA !!
I have only one computer (laptop) and my only operating system is Debian with KDE.
I also ripped off all the Windows labels, including the OEM license. And the truth, it was a pleasure.
The only news that would interest me about Windows, would be its decline in favor of free systems.
I am interested in three things about an operating system. Your license, make it safe, and your speed. As you will see, Windows only offers me at most speed, that is, three, one. It is not enough for me.
I have not removed the one at the bottom of Windows ... it serves to remind me every time I see it, that I NOW make better use of the laptop than before, that I use it and have a much better performance than for the that it was designed (as it was thought / designed for Windows hehe). 🙂
By the way, I forgot to say it 😀
The image of the beginning, as well as more wallpapers I took from Artescritorio.com: http://artescritorio.com/tag/windows-8
Even so.
I'd like to give it a try to see how it works. If it keeps the errors of win 7 or better or it is only change of album cover.
I will also try it, I already tried the Developer Preview, and I was surprised by the startup, and I want to see the final version as it looks.
Well, as long as they copy the good things about linux, then better, if it goes well then I'll go from windows 7 to 8, otherwise we'll see.
Stop complicating life, both sides know that these OS (linux and win) are for different users, people who want different things.
for example, I like to play but I also like productivity, so I find myself in the dilemma that everyone here knows… what do I do? I go Linux and work and program or I stay with win and play (but I also work and program although it is not easier to do it than in linux)….
That is the dilemma friends ...
Since I played Xbox360, Wii and PlayStation 3 the same day, I was convinced that computers are not for playing haha, that's what video game consoles are for 😀
The problem is that I don't have any ... LOL !!
@ KZKG ^ Gaara, is it not the same to play Battlefield 3 full graphic on a 23 ″ screen with mouse and keyboard than with a simple joystick.
I haven't played that one, I guess everything has its pros and cons 🙂
to the mw3 yes and above that more people play it is more entertaining.
Console games are too expensive, too expensive. Besides that there are many games that are not for consoles, such as rusty hearts and mmoprg, and finally playing on steam is priceless xd.
Well, hack the PS3 and see how you don't have to pay € 60 or € 70 for each game
That is the same as, buy ps3 € 249, know how to hack or, failing that, ask someone who has another ps3 to do it for you, and pay him some money, well, something I could do on my pc, without having to spend or a euro more, you are saying to do it on a console paying about € 250. Interesting, very interesting XD. Ahh and in the end the console is also exclusive LOL.
But hacks aren't worth much. I have not had the PS3 but years ago the one from the PS2 to my cousin's bakaleta bakaleta cost him € 30 or so (I did not get to hack it), for that price it is worth it
Pay someone else to improve your Playstation when you can do it yourself? I do not see it necessary to pay € 30 to the user on duty.
Not everyone knows how to hack it
Well, you learn, were you born knowing how to install an OS?
Is that hacking people gives them shit, an OS is not the same, because with that you are not going to screw up the computer
No way. Consoles will never compare to the PC in game complexity and power. Let's see if you can play LOMAC on the console, probably only when using the radar you will run out of buttons on the controller!
Nor age for it, that even I already consider myself a joker to play those things.
COME ON! That I'm 23 and I keep buying Pokemon games: / I already got the 3DS as you saw that I sometimes comment with him. Age does not matter, if it entertains you, go ahead, I've always seen games as an escape from reality, a mental break, or I just imagine things xD I see myself in the future, like the 80s, still playing with consoles lol
HAHAHAHA you realize the things he says ... if it's to kill him HAHAHAHAHA.
That's why many times I consider him crazy, I don't respond to what he says, because I'm not always going to play along haha.
Until I quit video games (if I'm not mistaken at 15) I was playing Pokémon games, I wanted to have a team half dragon and half ice all at level 100, and I got it.
Well, now I see them as a nursery for young children, I stopped playing because the Play Station did not take me a game and I got angry, also because afterwards the games absorb my brain and I do not detach myself.
That is something that seems to me that it is for children up to 12 years old or somewhere else, I think we are too old to play little games, both Sandy, you or me.
So I'm not telling you my age.
I also know that you are a carcamal
And you underage 😛.
for gaming consoles ... for everything else Gnu / Linux
I agree that MSFT has always taken ideas from other operating systems, not just Linux, but OSX as well.
Some ideas, he has achieved better, some not. Furthermore, this proves that, unfairly, the ideas end up being those of whoever makes them public and not those who have them.
Finally with what I do not agree, is to say at the end of the post that MSFT has not innovated. Metro UI is a leap forward and I don't think you can say it's stolen from anywhere else.
If someone wants to bust me for defending MSFT, they can do it directly on twitter (@ 42pe), but it seems to me that the points I have made are quite valid.
Interesting post. The laughable thing about most commentators who rant about M $ is that they use Microsoft's OS and even IE to comment on this blog.
Along with its name, there are the icons of the OS and the browser. And they talk about hypocrisy, haha.
Hello and welcome 🙂
It happens that many of those who comment here do so from their work, and there are few companies that allow the use of the OS that the worker wants, that is why you see the Windows symbol 🙂
regards
Sure, because linux sucks. hold windows
I don't know, it's the same old story, Windows copies some technology or feature from another OS and presents it as the new way to use your PC! and then patent up to the double click. It's annoying that this is the case, but it doesn't take my sleep either, total, if I bought a new PC that brought W8 by default, the first thing I would do would be to format and install Linux.
I don't know what makes me more sorry, if the supposed fact that Microsoft "copies" Linux (that I can put several things copied from Linux) or the string of fans in the answers, incredible, should be read.
Hello and welcome 🙂
Could you tell us why "supposed fact" 😀
Luis, I respect your opinion but don't call me a fanatic. I am simply one of those users who have tried both Operating Systems and without being blinded by passion, I know how to recognize the good and bad things in each one.
Coincidentally a friend was here a few minutes ago while testing Precise Pangolin's Alpha2 on a LiveCD. I grabbed a window, glued it to the edge and I get the Compiz Grid effect, where it snaps to the edge of the window. His exclamation was: Miraaa as in Windows Seven, Ubuntu copied it. ¬¬
That's what KZKG ^ Gaara refers to, that effect already existed in KDE for example, before Windows used it, but since Windows has it now, its users think that it was their idea and in reality it is not.
Of course Windows has adopted things from Linux, they insist on calling it "copying" but they don't realize that Linux has also "copied" things. The taskbar appeared in Windows 95 and later it appeared in gNome, the open file windows, with previews of icons were not invented in Linux either, or the recent Ubuntu interface, with the icon bar that on the left, very similar to the one Mac bar, and so I can list other things that have been adopted in Linux and have improved the user experience.
I understand that many are bothered that people think they were implemented, but the important thing is that even if those things are implemented, the interface of each OS is useful to the user.
Ubuntu, or Winbuntu as I call it is a separate case, those do copy, and also blatantly
Hahaha… Well the originality =)
I don't know, always the same ... but what can I tell you…. or the others are very stupid and do not evolve and what they do is be windows bunnies ... since windows send us their win-style packages and it really is more pleasant than the versions that others invented and that is windows .. other operating systems do not reach the public will never be anything ... since we will choose the versatility and model of Windows forever ... well the large percentage that uses and will use windows ... someone should generate a new and intelligent operating system that modifies itself and it adapts to the hardware (I'm already hallucinating hahaha) but that would be better than everything there is now
Yes, of course ... Tell me how Linux can reach more users when 95% of the market is focused on Microsoft or Machintosh? Linux kicks the pride of those two companies as a server, but it has not been able to combat the monopoly of those two companies, and more of Microsoft because of the agreements it has with PC manufacturers, which are just a lot of boot-licks, far apart from closed programs that only work even on a single system, regardless of whether it is Mac or Windows.
Gates in an interview in his beginnings with Windows declared it "We copy what we consider good", well, he admitted it at the time at least because many Mac users at that time (I speak of more than 20 years ago if I am not mistaken) They noticed the aberrant similarities with the other, but that they continue to do the same at this point in life as it is no longer going, it is not that they use Linux or Mac as guinea pigs, they have already become lazy to innovate, and by far.
What in turn already existed in Mandriva, which in turn was in Mac since the time of Maria Castaña.
I didn't know such integration existed in Mandriva 🙂
Thanks for the tip 😀
But it must be said that it is Canoni $ oft's invention, right? ¬¬
And of course, I understand that you don't like Mandriva very well
I don't like Mandriva or Mageia either good or bad 🙂
Well then I must have attributed to you what happened here too:
http://theunixdynasty.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/mandriva-no-es-casi-lo-mismo-que-mierdow/
As always Bill Gay copying GNU / Linux!
If you mean Bill Gates for "Bill Gay" you are in a huge mistake, Bill Gates is no longer at Microsoft, he has shares but no longer occupies the position he held.
But he copied back in the day, didn't he? Bill Gay has copied to the end
It doesn't matter if Ballmer is now
As someone said, it was never bad to complain about the flaws of linux until the arrival of Ubuntu and its sect of irrational Taliban fanatics, turning linux into a pseudo-religion and repeating, year after year, like parrots, the same dogmas of faith, slogans and decalogues, without bothering to check the information.
The problem with linux is that it is still primitive, and very cumbersome for the home user. We have all gone through the experience of installing linux for a family member or friend so that, after a few days, they will come asking you to change it for Windows.
And then there's the childish and unprofessional free software issue. Or the security issues that nobody wants to talk about ( http://www.ubuntu.com/usn ). Of course, the linux Taliban have - predefined - answers to all of this. I've been reading and hearing the same "standard" excuses for years and years,
But in the end, reality is stubborn and ends up prevailing, leaving everyone in their place. And the linux site does not reach 1% share of home computers:
http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-ww-monthly-201102-201202
(And no, it's not because Windows is installed on most computers that are sold. Or do we remember the case of Dell and Ubuntu, and the threats of the Ubuntu Taliban against Dell if it stopped selling Ubuntu computers?)
Jo. I was going to dinner, but seeing your comment I will answer you.
I've been since 2005 or 2006 without windows. Only with linux and so happy. Starting with SUSE now I have Ubuntu. I don't mind paying what it costs, but if the product is of quality. In the case of M $ it is not like that. I'm sorry but it's a kaka. I give you a link about linux. http://quepagina.es/blog/linux/ Look at it carefully so as not to speak nonsense from now on.
If you want to chat a bit about lin vs win, always welcome.
Your comment is loaded with extremism, almost as much as that of the "Taliban" you condemn. These types of people are not exclusive to Ubuntu, there are in many other distros, in Windows and around the world where people are grouped.
In fact, there are problems in GNU / Linux, but your point regarding the security of free software is very wrong. You put a link where Ubuntu vulnerabilities are published, »which nobody wants to talk about»… don't you think they could be published precisely to talk about them?
Making problems public is one of the greatest virtues of free software, so solutions can be applied quickly.
What has always killed linux is that they make applications and interfaces, but honestly they make them very ugly, and that is why Microsoft succeeds, because it makes them similar but FLAMMABLE and that little detail is worth a lot ...
Hmm, well, if I want a "nice" environment, I enter kde, if I want it usable, gnome3, if I need it fast, lxde, something like that I can never do with window $
Obviously on average the interfaces are more "ugly" but of the applications based on qt the story is different
Welcome Gabriel Rivero. Indeed, that variety of options Windows does not have, so +1
Either way, the appearance of Windows is prettier than Linux, which on the other hand Linux has completely copied the Mac App Store, they are almost identical, a negative point for Linux.
This ... first of all welcome. It is your opinion and I respect it, but how is it that Linux has copied the Mac App Store? What are you talking about specifically?
Thanks greetings, I mean that the Ubuntu Store is too similar to the Mac App Store, how it is organized, how it highlights the featured applications, etc. the similarity is striking.
It may be so, the truth is that I do not use Ubuntu, I do not know, but that 1 distro copies a software center, it is not the same as saying that Linux has copied it, the fact that Ubuntu is a little better known does not mean neither that it represents Linux as OS nor that the rest of the distributions do things in a similar way.
Look at Ubuntu, Debian, Xubuntu, Asturix, which are the last ones I tested, they have the same software center copied from Apple, but I'm not saying it's wrong, just that this post denounces that Windows copies many things Linux, but Linux is not exempt from copy.
Greetings.
Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC), It has also copied from other Operating Systems or interfaces. They are not the saints in this story and it is normal, and it can even be understood, that one product copies another if it does it to improve. In fact, I have seen several articles comparing the latest Apple news with things that we have had in GNU / Linux for a long time. Just take a ride over here.
Daslive, I'm sorry, but the wheel cannot be reinvented, it's like saying that Mercedes copied Audi, is there another way to make cars? We make them circular or what XD?
Ah, then it would be more correct to say that Ubuntu has copied Mac ... but that Linux is the one who has copied it, of course not, it is too generalizing, don't you think? 🙂
Indeed, because the distro it copies is Winbuntu, the others are not
If Windows is so BAD ... as linux users have always argued ... and that Linux is the best invention and the most perfect thing that it has ever built ... because it barely has a 1% market share? ?????? I've always had this doubt
Update your statistics. The fee is 9-10%.
Because of the marketing and OEM facilities among other things, don't you think baby?
You should learn that not even linux systems are free in case you did not know, most of the Gnu / linux distros have proprietary code, let's say that 97% of the distros, in a few words, depend on proprietary software, where is the free system that you are talking about You tell me that you can design your system as you want but if you want to do it you must start from scratch from the kernel and I want to know who here knows how to program the linux kernel ??? It is that simple to say that if you think you use free software it is simply a lie, use real free software and you will realize what it means to have a free OS. having a free OS involves correcting and correcting errors. But you know that magically the distros have less but by the use of proprietary software they do not think they have free software because they only have open source.
Why so much enthusiasm? ... but have you seen the nonsense they have done with this OS? ...
Now I go on to explain how good a computer scientist I am (here throwing globs on me) why this operating system ...
MICROSOFT HAS ENCOUNTERED SUCH AN AMOUNT OF UNSELLED TABLETS ACCUMULATION DUE TO HIGH COSTS AND LOW SALES COMPARED TO APPLE ... THAT IT HAS HAD TO REMOVE AN SO THAT CAN USE INCORPORATED TABLETS ...
The 25 gig cloud thing ... DOES ANYONE IN THEIR HEALTH JUDGMENT HAVE FILES OR PRIVATE THINGS UPLOADED ON AN INTERNET CLOUD? BUT IF THAT IS TO OPEN THE DOORS TO THE THIEVES OF INFORMATION ON THE NET! For those who do not know, a cloud is a virtual space where you can hang your "things", totally vulnerable and freely accessible to everyone (seriously I do not know who was the luminaries who invented this).
The thing about changing the document transfer numbers ... THE GREAT FOOL OF THE CENTURY!, It is the same whether you put a green bar on me, a blue one, or one with colored bits coming out or one with a single percentage ... the result It is the same, depending on the Ram Memory you have, you can transfer more documents quickly than if you have little.
And what about the photos ... CRY TO THE SKY ... BUT DOES PEOPLE NO LONGER KNOW THE PHOTOS THAT THEY HAVE ON THEIR HARD DRIVE, IF THEY HAVE DUPLICATED THEM OR WHAT? What happens is that everyone has a bad habit of having all scattered on the hard drive, if you have everything sorted by folders and names there is no reason to put this silly.
AND TO COMPLETE IT ... THE NTFS CHANGE IT FOR ANOTHER "MICROSOFT INVENTION", they have simply done this so that Ubuntu users cannot create their partitions in an apple as they please ...
I SAID IT, ANOTHER BIG SHIT FROM MICROSOFT
I do not know why they discuss so much if the most stable system of the moment is OSX Mountain Lion, it is solid, without errors, with a single backup system and with very few security problems, Linux is getting worse in stability and errors, Windows 7 I improve a lot, but OSX if you want premium performance is your best option, enjoy this Thursday.
Well, it seems to me that you have used Linux versions of 1999 or earlier, and windows you have only used it to play.
Get informed, here is a newbie and common user desde Linux Mint 13 with KDE, which in my opinion looks better than Windows 7, although I wouldn't be surprised if 8 looked like KDE.
How to find out, learn and then we talk.
Hello @Turkish
Linux is a kernel, and if you say that linux is not stable, it is because you have used / seen a version of the kernel that is still in testing. Truth?
Do not misunderstand my answer, I am simply explaining that there are several distributions that use the Linux kernel, plus free tools and some other proprietary thing to shape their operating systems (Distributions) that can be called: Ubuntu, Mint, Fedora , Arch, OpenSuSe, and a long etcetera with different approaches and purposes that do their work under the right hardware.
For this reason, it cannot be said that "Linux is stable" or "unstable" referring to the general GNU / Linux operating systems. I (for example) use Debian Squeeze, and I would like to know which current version of OSX or Windows is more stable and secure than this.
@YoSoyDario already said: «There are so many idiots, plagiarists and useless in the world, that by force they must use an operating system made by and for them; welcome to Windows »
Mepa they forget to copy the stability and security, hehe
Hehehe uff thing that I doubt that they copy.
I would like to see GNU Linux turn on as fast as Windows 8, and security goes Linux is so unstable that it does not need viruses, it damages itself, another little thing not very stable in 64bits so where is your stability ???
From the outset, the speed of Windows 8 to start is due to the fact that the System does not turn off, it just goes to Hibernate .. ¬¬
I think you are misinformed, in case you did not know, hibernation on a computer leaves it as you turn it off, and when you turn on your computer, hibernation is much slower. Realize that if you have ever used 7 since the system must access to a reserved part of the disc….
What Windows 8 does is that it reprograms the chip on the board as well as a cell phone and anchors it to start like a bomb, it is called UEFI ignition. The boards that are compatible with this system turn on faster than others… in mine, for example, it turns on in about 5 seconds…. Hinbernarse is very different to anchor this is a new modern ignition system designed for tablets and pc
It may be that I am misinformed, I only say what I have read on the Internet ...
Ha ha ha Linux unstable what planet are you from in terms of security I challenge you to hack into some linux-based system, if you can, not for something the US national security will use linux-based systems and as for viruses of course they can exist and be made but are immune in linux. As for it being misconfigured and damaged by itself let me tell you that it is not Wintendo to do that. @yaoming I hope you live happily in your fantastic world of Wintendo and fill the pockets of Bill Gates.
In case you did not know it is never my life and I paid for software and I will never pay for it GNU / Linux in case you did not know it is immune to viruses for a simple and simple reason because it is the weapon of hackers and who would infect their own weapon…. creating viruses for any operating system be it Mac, Windows or GNU / Linux is nothing to write home about because everything is done with a programming language, there are hackers who have hacked very large security networks and are using GNU / Linux. When they talk about Linux they only talk about security, tell me about something else or is it that Linux is only used for that security ???
W8 sucks, it's just for watching porn and its users that's what they do. Real systems are not made by mocosoft
I say that regardless of the system that is used, each one uses it because they like it and it is useful in what they do, whether it is windows, linux (distros), macos, it does not matter as long as one uses it and knows how to use it, I say that it does not have to see nothing only criticism of people that I imagine they do not have to spend their time for me both are good of course one has better advantages than the other but neither is left behind
Why do you see the Debian logo? I have the 7 stable and only penguin
I see that they are farting, while they fight that if linux that if windows that if the shell of the parrot, the others are sleeping well and making teak, some selling licenses, others support.
Microsoft has only one good thing, it won the premium arm wrestling and it is the king of the market and for more than 20 years it has been a leader and neither stability nor virulent linuxers are going to turn it around for many more years, and you know why, because this It's for money and money is king ...
That's the way it is, and in 20 years time when Linux becomes popular, the virulent windowseros will appear to try to turn the enemy around. Silver moves the world and there is a lot of money here. Health Linux & Windows one heart….
Windows 8 a crap, the copy of all the same is any windows with a patch and loved metro,
It is not another system, it is just a program or application and yamada metro.
What you want is to impose the tablet that iso the windows 8 is nothing more than marketing the imposition and that people get used to the appearance in order to put the tablet faster. Well, that's my opinion.
Well I installed windows 8 and all that baina, the first thing I disliked was those horrible colors I think that windows fell because at least in colors it was what stood out, then I don't know what that aberration called meter was, so many clicks for one objective , now the most cruel (to say the least)…. I say if the browser has as many buttons as if my pc had a WTF touch screen !!!
To what I have to say, windows 8 is made for mobiles and this if they can go well because what was shown with windows phone I think they are going downhill, which would rescue it in the pc's would be windows 7 and be careful with this since Gnu / linux It has good proposals to grow in the percentage of uses worldwide, the moment is given and I think we should not waste it like that time when Windows Vista disappointed everyone (it still continues to do so but few people take the step to change).
regards
What a beautiful spelling. shit learn to write and then you comment why really I don't believe you shit like that
Well, now that Windows 8 has been released, I have noticed that some useful features have been removed from it, such as creating Ad-hoc networks, I suppose because of its support for tablets.
I have been observing for a while and I can see that that negative image of Windows 8 was dissolving thanks to the bombardment of Microsoft advertising, but even so there are still many who dislike the interface.
Having an OS to our liking today seems almost as important as deciding what kind of clothes to wear for a gala date. Seriously, it's like computers are our life, rather than tools that help us with our lives.
If I must side, I am for GNU / Linux. Apparently the original goal of creating GNU was lost, but the FSF is still working. Microsoft abandoned its corporate image to become more conversational with its consumers, shifting its focus from the office and professional to thinking more of the amateur photographer and music lover.
However you look at it, that has been Apple's focus for years. The terrain Microsoft neglected: the common user. Its radical change in strategy makes it inevitable to meet upset faces, especially when it seems that Microsoft believes that all PCs in the world use touch screens.
What GNU / Linux is primitive? From what point of view? Graphic? Security? Usability? Companies like Microsoft and Apple change their appearance and renew their public images to attract new consumers. If GNU / Linux doesn't do this, does that make it primitive? How is Microsoft mimicking a primitive system?
I recently learned that there is no professional software, but professional people. Professionalism is not measured by the amount of money invested, nor is it measured by the visual appeal of the product. It's like saying that a groomed woman is more professional than another just because of her appearance. The software is similar to humans: what matters is the inside.
Stop being so carried away by appearances and use your brains. It is not possible to advance without riding on the shoulders of another. Software patents shouldn't exist. How can you create something innovative if you are not even allowed to create what already exists? Do the ideas really belong to someone? You can't expect to showcase something good to an audience and not have someone in that audience follow suit.
I agree with it 🙂
Of course, they should not exist but when you take something from someone you should at least recognize that you did not invent it but that you improved it and give credit to the one who invented it not like Apple, many of its fanboys believe that the Smartphone was invented by Apple and It is not like that, the Smartphone already existed, they improved it and they did not even give the inventors credit and with regard to Wintendo of course it would be better for them that way they would not pay the patent and they would say that they invented it as in the case of Office 2003.
What do you mean by primitive? If the CERN collider uses linux based on its systems, it does not use Windows or Apple, of course, as it does not have the economic power to advertise on its OS, these are less known, but for that reason there is the internet to find alternatives to systems they are more secure than Windows and Apple.
Agreed.
It's like ... all so old that there are already twenty thousand ways to do all that without Windows.
The main reason for not using anything from apple, microsoft, or even google, is simply because I don't want to support tyranny and fascism. final point
Fans, refrain from reading!
http://intercambiosos.org/showthread.php?t=28418
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_chomsky05.htm
http://www.magarciaguerra.com/2011/01/razones-por-las-que-no-me-gusta-apple/
http://www.taringa.net/posts/mac/10632044/Apple-censura-y-monopolio.html
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_mediacontrol49.htm
PS: My intention is not to generate controversy, but there are things that should be disclosed like this, and then everyone will take it as they like
To use OpenBSD, it has been said.
THIS GREAT YOUR BLOG AND WHAT YOU COMMENT IS NO MORE THAN THE PURE TRUTH AND RAW REALITY, I AM A FERREO USER OF LINUX AND MAC OS, BUT I WOULD NEVER USE THAT WHY CALLED WINDOWS GOOD FOR YOU BROTHER THERE ARE STILL PEOPLE PREPARED IN THE SUBJECT AND NOT LITTLE SCHOOL ENGINEERS THAT ONLY GIVE PUNISHMENT .. GREETINGS ..
Microsoft really does not know how to keep the lie, and only steals
I think something more obvious happened to you. Don't you think that the win8 / 8.1 interface is quite similar to the way to deploy the applications in gnome 3 or unity?
Hey, does anyone know where he knows if there is something like the "new copier" of windows 8 but for windows 7 ???