Stop the Mexican SOUP!

For all those who do not know about the subject, in my country the proposal to impose the law is being developed SOUP. Please Latin brother, help us and let's raise our voices to stop this terrible outrage. The more countries adhere to these measures draconian, the easier it will be to implement them to the rest of the nations. Vote to stop Mexican SOPA, let's vote for a free world !!!

Vote against Mexican SOPA

Related Posts:

The coin is flipped: Döring Law (Mexican SOPA), SOPA and PIPA accused of violating users' rights


16 comments, leave yours

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

*

*

  1. Responsible for the data: Miguel Ángel Gatón
  2. Purpose of the data: Control SPAM, comment management.
  3. Legitimation: Your consent
  4. Communication of the data: The data will not be communicated to third parties except by legal obligation.
  5. Data storage: Database hosted by Occentus Networks (EU)
  6. Rights: At any time you can limit, recover and delete your information.

  1.   Keopety said

    and do you think this is useful for something? if in the end they do what comes out of their cocks;
    They do not understand in any other way than giving cane

    1.    Henry said

      @keopety maybe this is not what definitely stops him, if not, how cool isn't it? … However it is better than doing nothing, and it is not only voting, it is also informing other people, many are still unaware of this law and if they do not know it then there is no one to protest. Regards.

      1.    Keopety said

        If you are right, if they do not know it, there is nothing

      2.    Tina Toledo said

        It seems to me that there is a great misinformation: there is nothing to protest about.
        How is the matter? A little chronology:

        1.-Last December 15 at the Mexican Senate the senator of PAN, Frederick Döring presented a proposal to reform the Federal Copyright Law en Mexico.
        2.-The proposal was to add article 151, modify article 231 and the addition of a Chapter III, as well as affect articles 232 and 1 of the Federal Copyright Law Mexican
        3.-This implied that unlike the law HADOPI en Francefor example the Döring Law It does not foresee three previous notices, but rather the owner who has the IP address on record from where the alleged crime was committed is immediately fined, falling into conflict with the dynamic IPs and giving way to massive and unjustified lawsuits.
        4.-The proposal was rejected by the same PAN -the senator's party Doring- because it had not yet been thoroughly reviewed and, if approved in this way, would violate basic rights and create a constitutional controversy.

        Today, for today, that proposal is not on the agenda of the Senators Chamber Mexican not even to be discussed.

        1.    elp1692 said

          Exactly, that law has already stopped for the same reason that they saw that the United States did it, do not worry about that, if in the other Latin countries the rumor is heard that Mexico continues with that law, do not believe it anymore. is in question, it doesn't exist anymore 🙂

        2.    Peter Sunday said

          The end they seek is the same, let's not confuse that for the moment it is useless, that the intentions are the same, it is important to raise awareness of where they want to take this.

          1.    perseus said

            Amen bro ...

  2.   Courage said

    Those who have a blog to transfer it.

  3.   Ozzar said

    In my country, Colombia, they are also once again advancing an initiative similar to yours, a more radical project having sunk in Congress last year. Although our case is more complex, because we must comply with the obligations contracted with the United States in an International Trade Agreement, regarding the legislative uniformity in matters of Intellectual Property. And that is why it is advancing rapidly, ignoring the necessary debate on the matter, by telling them that between the presentation of the new bill and its approval in the first debate, only one month has passed! A record for the Legislature.

    It is these attitudes that I criticize the most; when they try to impose restrictive and sanctioning regulations, without taking into account the scarce social legitimacy it would have. Could it be that they take that of Representative Democracy very seriously, right? We choose them - end of our duty -; They do everything for us ignoring us - they do their duty.

    All in all, my position is that we must find a middle point between the two extremes, weighing appropriately on the hardening of the regime on one side and the absolutism of Internet freedoms on the other; the former being necessary but to the extent that they compromise the latter as little as possible, understood as fundamental guarantees, without confusing them with debauchery.

    1.    perseus said

      I totally agree with you bro 😉

      In my country, Colombia, they are also once again advancing an initiative similar to yours, a more radical project having sunk in Congress last year. Although our case is more complex, since we must comply with the obligations contracted with the United States in an International Trade Agreement

      Many believe that there is nothing to protest about, but we, like you, are subject to the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between Canada, the USA and Mexico. Canada has already adopted its own SOPA law (coincidence ??? ¬.¬), the USA is still in process, where do you think Mexico is? Of course it will remain in force, or do you think you will not be forced to react?

      1.    Ozzar said

        We are in the same situation. The issue of free trade agreements, despite their benefits, creates all this dilemma, when you have to adapt the regulations of the countries that sign them, and more if one of them is the United States, because as always, the nations weak - yours and mine - end up faithfully abiding by their political conditioning.

        On the subject in Canada, have you already approved it? I recently read that there were still several debates about it, especially with a very sensitive issue such as Technological Protection Measures, which is something like a regime parallel to Copyright that is quite problematic.

      2.    Tina Toledo said

        Many believe that there is nothing to protest about ...

        There are many things to protest about, on that I totally agree with you, but not for the specific reason why you opened the topic. That proposal is already dead, so your call seems untimely to me.

        Now, a protest also means acting with responsibility, it is not about protesting for the mere fact of protesting. I do not know that Colombian proposal -partly because out of Colombia seems to have not had much media coverage- I don't know how it affects freedom of expression and how it hinders creativity and the basic right to cultural training and dissemination through the internet.
        Personally OzzarI would be very, very grateful if you could give us more details about it.

        Finally, I recommend a lot of caution because this topic can easily enter the realm of political parties.

        1.    Ozzar said

          Tina, what is happening in my country is that due to the signing of a Free Trade Agreement with the US government, a large part of the Intellectual Property regime needs to be updated to comply with the commitments made in it. Within this adaptation, various issues such as the definition of profit, the Technological Protection Measures and their exceptions, presumptions in procedural matters, administrative and judicial powers, extension of the protection time of the works to natural and legal persons according to the case, addition to criminal regulations ... Where, in particular, the topic of greatest attention is the Technological Protection Measures, since its institution is regulated as parallel to Copyright, and its exceptions - some positive, some ambiguous and others missing - , with its respective fixation on the criminal types that contemplate crimes of violation of economic rights and violation of copyright protection mechanisms, something capricious.

          But, being frank with you, I tell you that the current project is far from the one that had to be withdrawn last year, which was much more problematic, since it compromised the rights of users and fundamental guarantees, especially due process in processes carried out in against it, the right to privacy, personal information, and even potentially, freedom of expression. Today, the greatest criticism of the law process that is being carried out in Congress is its accelerated pace, which is reflected in the defects in the wording of the proposed text, lacking in legislative technique, probably due to the haste. For this reason, the nonconformity is due to the lack of opportunities for a citizen debate open to proposals and changes for the project, which has had minimal information coverage, hence the low impact that the matter has had outside of these lands.

          Greetings.

  4.   Algave said

    Long live Mexico Cabrones !! 🙂

  5.   jose said

    I see myself, in a few years…. using the internet as an outlaw, with programs to avoid being tracked, meditating every step,… .. puuuufff… .. how scary….

  6.   Nonamed said

    It reminds me of a molotov song that said… «VIVA MEXICO CABRONES !!!»

    xD