We have talked a lot of this new distro, which is already penetrating deep into the computers of many ... Why has SolusOS succeeded in such a short time? We already discussed it, and honestly it has quite a few positive points, however; this humble geek is still not convinced.
Why am I not considering using SolusOS yet? ... Why even though everyone (or almost everyone) has had favorable results with this distro, I am still skeptical?
SolusOS as everyone should know by now, it is a distro based on debian-squeeze (stable), but this will be the case for now, because in the next version 2 will be based on the upcoming stable of Debian: Wheezy.
Maintained by ikey (creator of LMDE) that no longer works on its first creation (I repeat, LMDE), now develops / maintains SolusOS, which from my point of view does, it comes to fill the void that LMDE is leaving (or left) in the community, and precisely it comes to fill it because it is almost the same.
But hey, I don't think there's any need to explain what SolusOS is, far from it 
What I said at the beginning, even though it has many positive aspects, I do not find reasons to use it.
Can anyone tell me what SolusOS gives me, that I can't get it directly from Debian?
I don't want to sound like an anti-SolusOS by any means, I just don't have enough confidence in this project so far. Clarify !, I'm not saying that it will fail far from it, just that I prefer to install Debian + Environment + applications well using Debian Squeeze (current stable), using Wheezy (testing), Sid, or simply all through apt pinning, why use SolusOS.
Why?
Well, Debian is a project tested and approved by time, it has its pros and cons like everyone else, but for the good of all it is a distro (and project) already stable, tested. So directly using this distro, its packages, its application / package incorporation policy, guarantees us a satisfactory result.
While SolusOS does, it uses the Debian repositories, so it has a robustness acquired from its parent (Debian), nonetheless; it does not follow Debian's package check-in policy, but has its own. For example, in Debian Wheezy (testing) (for better or for worse, for X or Y reasons) Xfce4.10 is still NOT available, I guess because it still has bugs or something like that, while SolusOS incorporates it without any problem.
There are more examples, but it is not the objective of this post.
I repeat, I am not an anti-SolusOS by any means, only that at this moment I prefer to use (I trust more) Debian with its official repositories, its huge team of maintainers, and their jealousy and care not to have bugs (even when the latest versions of the software take a long time to be available), to install a distro that uses Debian repositories yes, but has its own package inclusion policy, and whether or not it uses Debian repositories ... it is (ultimately) maintained by a single person.
Another really important reason is that I am a user in love with KDE, so SolusOS is definitely not for me 
When SolusOS version 2 is stable, I will download it and possibly install it on my office PC, however Debian will continue to reign on my laptop as in recent months.
I hope I have not hurt anyone's feelings, and although it may seem uncertain to some, I have tried to be as objective as possible, because I have no resentment with this distro far from it (in fact, I think it will rank No.2 or No.3 quickly), I just need absolute certainty that everything will work OK, 120% security, and technically I don't know; but psychologically SolusOS doesn't give me this.
Greetings 
PD: Yes elavSolusOS is aimed at an audience that doesn't want to configure Debian a lot to get it ready, but instead wants to install a distro and have everything ready, but I'm not that audience 