Distribution over time of Linux distros

Dear readers!

The main objective of this short article is to make known to those who do not know it or have seen it only in passing and perhaps as a curiosity, an image that shows us the Distribution over time of Linux distros. It will be like an enjoyable tour - why not? - on a map that I consider very informative and interesting.

Without further introduction let's get into the matter.

The First Three Distros according to the GNU / Linux Distribution Timeline

So that they can accompany me properly through this tour, the first thing they should do is download from the site «GNU / Linux Distribution Timeline»The image representing the Distribution over time of Linux distros. In this way we will communicate through a GUI and not one consul,

Linux Distribution Timeline - Wikipedia

On that website they offer version 12.10 dated 2012-10-29, which can be downloaded in different formats. Let's thank the site managers who present themselves as A.Lundqvist y Mr Rodic. Similarly Fabio loli gives us an updated image to date that we can view from Wikipedia.

We open the image, which is really tall and narrow, and we select the zoom to 100% to read the names with some clarity. By the way we see a part of the - excessively large - tree of Linux distributions.

Navigating the very instructive image and without entering into a fussy philosophical-historical discussion about who came first, if the chicken or the egg, we inform ourselves that the older projects or First Distros were Debian, Slackware y Red Hat, in the order from top to bottom, or from left to right if we rotate the image 90 degrees to the left.

Of course we will meet distros which They are NOT descended from any of the First Three and that they were alive at least until the end of 2012, the date the image was published. Among them we will mention webOS, Openwall, OpenWRT, Devil, SmothWall GPL, Puppy, Black Jug, Linux Console,  Sorcerer, GoboLinnux, RIP, NixOS, SliTaz, Enoch (Gentoo is a derivative of it), Alpine, Rock, Linux From Scratch, 0 (yes, exists or existed a distro with that name), Ark, uClinux, Coyote, BrazilFW, Zeroshell, ELinOS, KaelOS, Penaut, CRUX, Arch, Specifix, Openfiler, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera for which I omitted or disappeared between 2012 and 2016, for the new ones that were born in the same period, or for those that will come.

We want to point out that the firstborn of Slackware was SuSE, who brought him to life being extremely young. Red Hat also had early offspring in WGS Linux Pro, but the life of that son was very short.

  • It is clear that the oldest Distributions in the Linux universe and that also remain alive today are, Debian, Slackware y Red Hat.
  • LThe previous statement does not mean that they are the most comfortable distributions for, or preferred by, the end user or by you.

Size of each family of the First Three Distros

This image is good to rotate to appreciate it from different positions. If we rotate it 90 degrees or even place it upside down, it is still evident that the More numerous offspring is Debian. Why is it, one wonders? I don't think it's because it's the most sexy y hot of the First Three. 😉

The sizes of the families of two Debian children are also significant: Knoppix y Ubuntu.

Then the family follows Red Hat, and finally the Slackware.

  • From a comparative point of view we can affirm that the order in terms of Family size of each of the First Three Distros is: Debian -> Red Hat -> Slackware.

Linux is very fragmented. Which distro do I select?

In an article I published titled «Freedom of choice«On June 24, 2013, I presented my ideas on how to choose a distribution given the real existence of too many distros, and I referred to the Trunk Distros or First Distros as a good starting point. Both there and here I maintain that Each one chooses according to his or her opinion, understand or reason. We cannot give an Infallible Guide in this regard.

In another article titled «Why am I using Debian on my desktop?«, Published on March 27, 2013, I explained my reasons on that subject and it is not very difficult to infer that I still maintain them. 😉

  • Can you deny that Linux is fragmented?. What went from being a Solar System with its Sun Linux and its three planets Debian, Slackware, Red Hat, to being a whole Universe with Galaxies, Suns and other Astros?.
  • You dear reader or the end user, you must choose wisely which distribution will be your preferred among the vast ocean of existing distros. The Ranking of the most popular can be a good starting point.
  • We also invite you to follow the articles published or to be published in DesdeLinux, which will surely help you get a decent desktop or server from two distributions strongly oriented to the business environment OpenSuSE (SuSE-Slackware) and CentOS (Red Hat), or from Debian.

Conclusions

  • After the tour, have each reader draw their own conclusions and comment on them

Until the next installment!


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

*

*

  1. Responsible for the data: Miguel Ángel Gatón
  2. Purpose of the data: Control SPAM, comment management.
  3. Legitimation: Your consent
  4. Communication of the data: The data will not be communicated to third parties except by legal obligation.
  5. Data storage: Database hosted by Occentus Networks (EU)
  6. Rights: At any time you can limit, recover and delete your information.

  1.   Omar said

    I swore, that SuSE was a derivative of RedHat ... Oh surprise it is the daughter of Slackware ...

  2.   fico said

    Hello Omar. I have until 7 PM today to respond to comments. Tomorrow will be another day. Your confusion may come from the format of the packages that RHEL, CentOS, SuSE, OpenSuSE and others use, which is the RPM.

  3.   pedruchini said

    In that "timeline", where is Lxle, based on Lubuntu?

  4.   karlggest said

    Hey.

    Slackware is at least two months older than Debian. And none of the three is the first distribution, which can be seen in the graph itself. In fact, in Wikipedia they point out two interesting things (1):

    1) The continuity between SLS and Slackware, which in some way would point to both as the first complete distribution.
    2) Frustration with SLS as a cause for Ian Murdock to start the Debian project.

    As for SuSE Linux, it was first based on Slackware, but later on Jurix (2). The resemblance to Red Hat at first was practically reduced to the packager, although it is now common for them to develop or push technologies together, such as btrfs.

    (1) https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/SLS_Linux_(Softlanding_Linux_System)
    (2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SUSE_Linux_distributions#Origins
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SUSE_Linux_distributions#SUSE_distributions

    Health!!

  5.   fico said

    I repeat that I only have until 7 pm today to respond to comments. Tomorrow, I promise, I'll answer any other.

    Pedruchini, I think you mean the acronym LXDE that identifies a Desktop, or desktop environment, characterized by its low consumption of hardware resources. I think it is the lightest of the most popular desktops such as GNOME, KDE, Cinnamon, MATE, XFCE, and LXDE itself. I recommend you visit https://blog.desdelinux.net/escritorios-debian/
    so you have an idea about it. It does NOT mean that LXDE is unique to Debian. Quite the opposite. You can find how to implement it in many other Linux distributions.

    1.    joselu68 said

      Hello, Pedruchini is right. Lxle is a distribution, with LXDE desktop, derived from Lubuntu 😉

      1.    fico said

        You're right. I found out from you, Pedruchini and Joselu68, that such a distro exists. I just visited distrowatch.com, and indeed it is LXLE based on Debian, Lubuntu. Thanks for the clarification!.

  6.   fico said

    Thanks for commenting and clarifying, Karlggest. In the article we only state that they are "the first distros to stay alive to this day", regardless of their further development. It is undeniable that, in one way or another, the three mentioned distros fit into that group. Many of them were born as Projects and later became distributions as such.

  7.   HO2Gi said

    Sorry but Ututo is not derived from Ubuntu? as well as Tuquito-Linux

    1.    fico said

      En http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ututo They inform us that UTUTO, a distribution that is inactive, is from Argentina, and is based on GENTOO

  8.   fico said

    "Tuquito" is based on Debian, Ubuntu. It's Argentina, with Cinnamon desks. GNOME, LXDE, according to distrowatch.com

  9.   Mauro said

    How about using a newer version of the chart? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg

    1.    Francisco said

      He came to suggest the same. : thumbsup:

    2.    Luigys toro said

      Thank you very much for your contribution, we have updated the original article 🙂

  10.   Federico said

    Good Sunday day, Mauro. Thanks for comment. I visited the Wikipedia page you mention with my Links2 console browser, and the image is certainly more updated. Habit plays tricks on us. Copy rights remain “Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Andreas Lundqvist, Donjan Rodic”. But in the File History – File History, Konimex updates it until January 28, 2016, because its original authors decided not to update it anymore. Let's see if Luigys, the Administrator of DesdeLinux, you can update it with a caption that references the Wikipedia link. Thank you again, Mauro, for such an accurate observation.

    1.    Luigys toro said

      We have updated the main image, I take this opportunity to thank you for the enormous work you do for the community DesdeLinux, the article is an excellent vision of the distribution over time of the various Linux Distros. It is important to know the entire transition that Linux has had to become what it is today, in the same way it also gives us a futuristic vision of everything that is possibly coming to us.

  11.   Federico said

    Luigys: from my Links2 I thank you for your comment. Let see if I finish the first post about CentOS Hypervisor today. Eduardo Noel is downloading the repositories li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el7/x86_64/ and others, with the necessary multimedia packages to make a desktop. This week he is on vacation. For next week I will have them in my possession. Greetings and success.

  12.   Luis Tz Fernandez said

    The sheer variety and fragmentation of Linux distributions pose a real problem. If free software is not corrected, it will never be able to measure up to proprietary software. It is necessary for the creators to unite and pay more attention to the philosophy of Richard Stallman, it is necessary to combat proprietary software on all fronts.