Ikhosi ye-CS50 yeHarvard MOOC
Yintoni endivumele ukuba ndifumane lo msebenzi mtsha
Phakathi kwezinto endizenzayo kwezi ntsuku, kukho ikhosi ye-MOOC efundiswa yiHarvard, CS50 nge edX.orgAndazi ukuba bangaphi kuni abamaziyo kodwa ndiyabacebisa ukuba umnqweno wakho kukufunda ukwenza inkqubo (Kuza nesatifikethi sasimahla esifakiwe, kwaye ukuba awuyithandi inkqubo kukho iindlela ezininzi onokukhetha kuzo), inqaku kukuba bakunika umatshini obonakalayo ukuze usebenze kwaye nazo zonke izixhobo zibandakanyiwe esele zikulungiselele, ke awunakukhathazeka malunga nenye into ngaphandle kokufunda.
Nangona kunjalo, andikaze ndibengumlandeli omkhulu koomatshini ababonakalayo, ke ukufunda apha naphaya kwaye enkosi kwindawo entle ye-AUR sele ndinazo iziseko ezifakiweyo. Into ehlekisayo kukuba umhlanganisi usetyenziswa kule khosi qhwaba ngaphandle kwe gcc, oku kuqala kwandothusa, enyanisweni ngaphambi kokuba ndazi ukuba le compiler ikhona (Ndaye ndafumanisa ukuba kukho umlo ongcwele phakathi kwaba babini kwaye uStallman umnika isifo sentliziyo ngalo lonke ixesha kuchazwa i-clang xD). Kuqala ndaye ndagqiba kwelokuba ndingamhoyi umhlanganisi omtsha kuba ndingomnye wabo bacinga, kutheni zinezixhobo ezimbini ezenza umsebenzi ofanayo?
Iqela leGedit kunye neClang phezulu
Nangona kunjalo ekugqibeleni ndigqibe kwelokuba ndizame umhlanganisi ukuzama izizathu ezibini, bendinengxaki yokuqokelela (ngakumbi ithegi -Iimpikiswano ezisetyenzisiweyo ekubonakala ukuba ayikho kwi gcc) Kwaye okwesibini kuba kolunye uhlaziyo oluqhelekileyo ndiqaphele ukuba IGedit Undiphose icebo lokuba isebenze "Uncedo lwekhowudi" (ikhowudi yokuncedisa) iyafuneka ukufaka qhwaba. Ukujonga oku ndaye ndagqiba kwelokuba ndivavanye ukuba yintoni malunga nokubaleka (kusebenza kuphela kwiArch kunye / okanye iManjaro)
sudo pacman -S clang
Umlingo weza kwangoko =). Ukuba ubeka isikhombisi ngaphezulu kwezilumkiso sikuxelela umkhondo wento engalunganga, ulusizi lokuba kumfanekiso bhanyabhanya uyanyamalala.
- Ukhuphiswano luhlala luvumela ukuvela kwezinto ukuba kuxhamle abasebenzisi.
- Ayizizo zonke izinto ezingekho ngokungqongqo kwi-GPL ezimbi
- Ngoobani abashumayelayo inkululeko yokucinga Kuya kufuneka benze iinkqubo ziguquke ngokusekwe kwiimfuno zabasebenzisi, kuba iingcinga zabantu bonke zibala, hayi abaphuhlisi kuphela. (Inkqubo yakho inokuba nayo yonke into oyifunayo, kodwa ukuba abasebenzisi abayithandi, uyasilela, ixesha)
Ndiyaqonda ukuba le yinto ekwakukhalazelwa ukuba ibandakanywe kuyo gccKodwa ekubeni ezona bango zibalulekileyo zazivela kwiinkampani ezinkulu zabucala, zazingakhathalelwanga. Andiqondi ukuba ngowona mzekelo ubalaseleyo wenkululeko yokucinga kwaye yintoni Vula Umnikezi shumayela kwaye umele.
Ndiyazi ukuba azinjalo zonke, kodwa yinxalenye elungileyo ye uluntu lwase linuxera Ngokuqinisekileyo uziva echongiwe, kwaye ndiqinisekile ukuba ukuba siqhubeka ngoluhlobo, asisokuze sikwazi ukoyisa idesktop. Kuya kufuneka sibeke inzondo phakathi kwethu bucala, kufuneka sibaphathe ngcono abasebenzisi abanokubakho ngcono nokuba babuza imibuzo "esisidenge" okanye "ephindaphindwayo" kwaye kungaphelelanga apho, abaphuhlisi mabayeke ukwenza imfazwe neenkampani zabucala kwaye bagxile ekuhlangabezeni iimfuno, i ukwahlulwa Sisiphumo esithe ngqo soku ndicinga ukuba. Ndiqinisekile ukuba ukuba iimfuno zabanye bezithathelwe ingqalelo, nokuba bavela phi namhlanje eli bali ngelekulo "Iqela le-Gedit kunye ne-gcc liza kwenza i-IDE" o "I-Gcc ivumela abapapashi abancinci ukuba babe zii-IDEs eziyinyani"
Inqaku elilunge kakhulu, kwaye ndiyavumelana nawe 100% ekupheliseni inzondo. Umthi omnye awulilo ihlathi. Okwangoku sineLinux, iFreeBSD kunye nosapho lwe-BSD ngokubanzi, iMac, iiWindows, iSolaris, iUNIX, njalo njalo, kwaye yonke iyimithi yehlathi lesoftware esetyenziswa ngabantu.
Ukwahluka kuyindalo ebuntwini.
Ndicinga ukuba ubaxa ngentiyo. Andiqondi ukuba abaphuhlisi banentiyo kwezinye iiprojekthi, endaweni yoko abanye abasebenzisi bayazenza.
Malunga nento oyithethayo malunga nokunxibelelana ngakumbi nomsebenzisi, kubonakala kufanelekile.
Inkululeko yesoftware yasimahla (ekubonakala ngathi iyabhidisa noMthombo ovulekileyo) zezi:
inkululeko yokusebenzisa le nkqubo, ngayo nayiphi na injongo (Sebenzisa).
inkululeko yokufunda ukuba inkqubo isebenza njani kwaye uyiguqule, uyihlengahlengise iimfuno zomntu (Isifundo).
inkululeko yokuhambisa iikopi zenkqubo, ngaloo ndlela unceda abanye abasebenzisi (uLwabiwo).
inkululeko yokuphucula inkqubo kunye nokwenza olo phuculo esidlangalaleni kwabanye, ukuze uluntu lonke luxhamle (uPhuculo).
Oku akunanto yakwenza "nenkululeko yokucinga," engumbono onxulumene ngokusondeleyo nezopolitiko okanye, ukuba uya kundikhawulezisa kancinane, kwinkululeko kwezoqoqosho.
Inkululeko yokucinga ayinayo, ngokomgaqo, nakuphi na ukungangqinelani nesoftware patent, ovala ngayo ikhowudi yakho, njl. njl.
Yonke le nto, ewe, ucinga ukuba ngokwembono yefilosofi inkululeko yokucinga ephantse yafana naleyo uyicebisayo inokwenzeka.
Ukubulisa
Unyanisile, kodwa ke ndenza ingxelo ngaloo ndlela kuba uhlala ubona amagqabantshintshi azama ukubonisa ukuba isoftware yasimahla yinkululeko yokucinga. Kwaye hayi, umthombo ovulekileyo unokuhlawulwa okanye simahla, isoftware yasimahla isimahla kwaye ivulekile, yile nto ndiyayiqondayo. Into oyikhankanyileyo intle kakhulu, kodwa khumbula ukuba ngaphaya kobuchwephesha, isoftware yasimahla yingcinga okanye ifilosofi, kwaye nangona ndiyazi ukuba bayayenza ukuzikhusela, bangavumeli amashishini abucala ukuba athabathe inxaxheba kwikhowudi, kwaye ayiguqule kwaye / okanye ukongeza imisebenzi yabucala kubonakala ngathi kukhululekile kum ukuyithetha, kwaye iyinyani yonke le nto yokuba kutheni u-clang wazalwa. I-Clang sisoftware yasimahla, nangona kunjalo, ngokungafaniyo ne-GPL, iphepha-mvume layo liyayivumela ukuba iguqulwe ngulowo ufuna, nangona befuna, nanini na befuna kwaye kungekho mntu waziyo (ngokungafaniyo neGPL, ngekhe uguqule ngaphandle kokwenza uhlengahlengiso esidlangalaleni). simahla. Ewe oko kunenzuzo / ukungalunganga ukuba iinkampani ziya kongeza iindawo zabucala kwaye zisengozini xa zamkela, zandisa kwaye zicima
"Kwaye hayi, umthombo ovulekileyo unokuhlawulwa okanye simahla, isoftware yasimahla isimahla kwaye ivulekile, yile nto ndiyayiqondayo."
Kuya kufuneka siyiphephe le mpazamo ixhaphakileyo, kwaye loo nto yenza umonakalo omkhulu.
Isoftware yasimahla inokuhlawulwa ngokugqibeleleyo (okanye hayi, sisigqibo sombhali), enyanisweni, ukuba ufunda i-GPL (Elona layisenisi laziwa kakhulu eSL emhlabeni) uya kubona ukuba ikhuthaza ukutshaja isoftware esiyiphuhlisayo.
Ngokulinganayo kufanelekile ukwahlula phakathi kwabucala (eyakho, yabucala) kunye neyabucala, le yokugqibela ibhekisa ekuthatheni inkululeko (kule meko athetha kuyo uSL).
I-SL ikuvumela ngokugqibeleleyo ukuba UNGAHAMBI inguqulelo yakho eguqulweyo kwaye uyigcine iyimfihlo, ingxaki iza xa ufuna ukwenza inzuzo ngomsebenzi osuka kwabanye ngaphandle kokuhlonipha amalungelo abo.
Into onokuyenza, ukuba awufuni ukwabelana ngekhowudi yakho, kukusebenzisa ikhowudi yabanye abantu ngaphandle kokuyiguqula, uyiqhagamshele kweyakho (Umzekelo, njengethala leencwadi), ushiya icandelo ngalinye lineelayisensi ezahlukeneyo kwaye kunjalo, yile nto i-LGPL eyenzelwe yona.
Kuyinyani ukuba siye saba yipakethi yetrolls kunye neprudes, sihlala sinyusa oku okanye oko umzekelo sithetha kwaye sishumayela isoftware yasimahla phantse ngendlela ethandekayo kodwa ngalo lonke ixesha sifaka inkqubo ye-linux sibaleka ukufaka i-chrome ngelixa sihlasela I-firefox nangona oku kungathandekiyo kwaye kungaphuhliswa yinkampani eneenjongo zokuzimela okanye siyayidelela i-gnome kunye neqokobhe layo ngenxa yomona kuba ezantsi siyazi ukuba namhlanje liligugu kwisithsaba kwindawo ye desktop kwaye sikhetha ukuxhasa i-Distros Ayinakuba negalelo kule projekthi kwaye isebenza kuphela njengamakhalane ngelixa i-distro yokwenyani emele yona kunye nenkampani eyixhasayo iwela kulungiso
"Ndiyayiqonda ukuba le yinto ebikhwaza ukuba mayibandakanywe kwi-gcc, kodwa ukusukela ezona zinto zibalulekileyo zibonakala zivela kwiinkampani ezinkulu zabucala, azikhathalelwanga."
Ewe, kuloo meko kubonakala kulungile kum, ukuba ziinkampani ezinkulu ezithi ziguqule ikhowudi emva koko zabelane ngazo noluntu, kuba zinobutyebi obungaphezulu.
Ngokwenyani bayenzile loo nto kwaye yiyo loo nto ikho i-clang ngoku, ngaba ucinga ukuba olu hlengahlengiso aluzange luzame ukungena kwi-gcc ekuqaleni? Nangona kunjalo, isikhokelo se-gcc esikhokelwa nguStallman ngokwakhe asivali nje kuphela kwiingcebiso kodwa ndiyakhumbula ndifunda ukuba inkqubo yayo yenziwa ngendlela engeyiyo imodyuli kwaye ayinakho ukusebenzisa iinxalenye zekhowudi yokubingelela ngokukuko ukugcina i-hermeticism. Sele siyibonile into yokuba kwi-clang benchmarks iqokelela ngokukhawuleza okukhulu, nangona kunjalo kusafuneka ikhule kuba kusenziwa ii-binaries, ii-gcc zihamba ngokukhawuleza.
Akukho nto iqhubekayo kwinyani, i-GCC ayilawulwa nguRichard Stallman, ikhokelwa yikomiti elawulayo ye-GCC, ukusukela nge1998, enamalungu avela kumzi mveliso nakwizifundiswa.
Xa singasazi isihloko, kungcono sithule okanye sibuze okanye sibuze.
Masibonwabele ubomi ngeli xesha sinako.
https://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html
Hehe kulungile, uwenzile umsebenzi wesikolo, ndiyavuma ukuba ndenze amagqabantshintshi kwaye bendiphosakele, nangona kunjalo yinto endiyicebileyo emva kokufunda uluhlu lwee-imeyile apho kuye kwaphawulwa ukuba uStallman unegunya elininzi kwaye unefuthe elikhulu kwizigqibo enokwenziwa apho.
Okufanayo akususi into yokuba bayazityeshela iingcebiso.
Ndoda, ndicinga ukuba ufike kade kwinkqubo yenkqubo kwaye yiyo loo nto ungakhange ufumanise ukuba lo msebenzi unokusebenza nakowuphi na umhleli usebenzisa i-GCC (okoko nje umhleli ekuvumela oko, kunjalo). Lowo ngumsebenzi owenziwe yi-gedit emva kwezigcawu hayi i-clang, i-clang ngumhlanganisi.
Kwelinye icala akufuneki uthethe xa ungazazi iinyani zangasemva, ukuba awuyithandi i-GCC ungayisebenzisi kodwa ungathethi izinto ongazaziyo.
I-GCC yenye yezona zinto zilungileyo zokudibanisa phaya, njenge-clang. Ngapha koko, i-GCC sisoftware yasimahla kwaye yenye yezona zinto zibalulekileyo kuzo.
Imibuliso kwaye masonwabele ubomi ngeli xesha sinako.
Khange nditsho ukuba andiyithandi i-GCC, yeyona iphambili endiyisebenzisayo, ewe, kusenokwenzeka ukuba sele kuhlwile, kodwa nangona uchanekile ukuba ikhowudi encedisayo ivela kwi-IDE ezinjengee-netbeans okanye i-Eclipse, abahleli abancinci babengenayo Iimpawu ezinjalo ukugcina ukusebenziseka ngokulula kunye nokusetyenziswa kwezixhobo eziphantsi, uClang ikuvumela ukuba ube noncedo lwekhowudi, ikwenza njani oko? Andazi, kodwa yinto ebulela uClang kwaye i-GCC ayinayo 😉
Ukuba ufunda le bhlog uyazi ukuba i-gedit iyenza njani ikhowudi ngoncedo kwaye ingangqinelani.
https://blogs.gnome.org/jessevdk/2011/11/13/gedit-code-assistance-plugin/
Ukubulisa
Ndiyakholelwa ukuba eli khonkco lisebenza ngakumbi kunelakho kwaye liyavumelana nam
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/
IGedit isebenzisa ikhowudi ye-clang's static analyser isixhobo sayo ukuqhuba ikhowudi yokunceda. Esi sixhobo sinokubakho kwaye siyabulela kuyilo lwe-clang yoyilo lweemodyuli.
«Ukuthetha ngokungqongqo, umhlalutyi uyinxalenye yeClang, njengoko uClang eneseti yamathala eencwadi e-C ++ anokuphinda asebenze ekwakheni izixhobo ezinamandla kwinqanaba lomthombo. Injini yohlalutyo emileyo esetyenziswa yiClang Static Analyzer yithala leencwadi leClang, kwaye inakho ukuphinda isetyenziswe kwimixholo eyahlukeneyo nakubathengi abahlukeneyo »
"Esi sixhobo sinokwenzeka kwaye siyabulela kuyilo lwe-clang yoyilo lweemodyuli."
Andiqondi ukuba kutheni unyanzelisa ukukhankanya ukuba i-GCC ayisiyomodyuli, ukuba ibingeyiyo indlela ocinga ukuba inokwenza ngayo iC, C ++, ADA, Objective-C, Java, Fortran.
Enye into ebonakala ngathi inomdla kum kukuzimisela kwakho ukwenza i-GCC ijongeke imbi, zonke iiprojekthi zinengxaki okanye i-GCC ayizukukhetha kwaye yoyisile, yiyo loo nto i-Linux kernel iqhubeka nokusebenzisa i-GCC ukudibanisa.
Kuyandikhathaza kuphela ukuba wenza i-GCC ijongeke kakubi, sisixhobo esenziweyo kwaye iyaqhubeka nokwenza ukuba kubaluleke kakhulu kwaye kuyamangalisa esikusebenzisa imihla ngemihla.
Iimodyuli yi-GCC ngokungangqinelani:
http://lwn.net/Articles/457543/
http://gcc-melt.org/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14072779/how-can-i-run-gcc-clang-for-static-analysis-warnings-only
Ndithetha ngqo le
«I-Clang yenzelwe njenge-API kwasekusekweni kwayo, ivumela ukuba iphinde isetyenziswe zizixhobo zohlalutyo lomthombo, ukuphinda yenze into kwakhona, ii-IDEs (njl. Njl.) Kunye nokwenza ikhowudi. I-GCC yakhiwe njenge-monolithic static compiler, eyenza ukuba kube nzima kakhulu ukuyisebenzisa njenge-API kwaye idibanise nezinye izixhobo. Ukuqhubela phambili, uyilo lwayo lwembali kunye nomgaqo-nkqubo wangoku wenza ukuba kube nzima ukushenxisa isiphelo sangaphambili ukusuka kumqokeleli wonke. »
Ithathwe kwi http://clang.llvm.org/comparison.html, (Kubi kakhulu andifumani apho ndafunda khona ukuba uStallman ngokwakhe uvumile ukuba uyilo lwalenziwe ngabom ngoluhlobo ukuze lungasetyenziswa ngokuchanekileyo zezinye izixhobo)
Elinye inqaku lokugxekwa kufanelekile ukuba likhankanywe.
«Izigqibo ezahlukeneyo zoyilo ze-GCC zenza ukuba kube nzima kakhulu ukuphinda uzisebenzise: inkqubo yayo yokwakha kunzima ukuyiguqula, awunakho ukudibanisa iithagethi ezininzi kubini obunye, awunakho ukudibanisa iziphelo zangaphambili ezininzi kwi-binary enye, isebenzisa umqokeleli wenkunkuma ngokwesiko , Isebenzisa izinto eziguquguqukayo kwihlabathi ngokubanzi, ayiphindi iphinde ibekho okanye ibe yimisonto emininzi, njl. UClang akanazo kwezi ngxaki. »
Ngapha koko ndicinga ukuba awundivisisi kakuhle, ayikuko ukuba ndikhetha i-clang, into ebendithetha yona kukuba ndinqwenela ukuba i-GCC ibinguye ophambili kweli nqaku.
Ngexesha elidlulileyo bendipapashe umbono kule forum, ndiyaphinda kwakhona:
«Ndicinga ukuba uluvo lwakho alunasihlahla, ngaphezulu kwemibuzo yobuchwephesha yisoftware yasimahla. Yiloo nto eyona nto ixhalabisa uMnu. Stallman. Ukusuka kwinto endibona ukuba yeyona ilungileyo kuwe yinxalenye yezobuchwephesha kwaye usekunene kwakho, kodwa xa ungenalo ukhetho kuba inkampani ithathe itekhnoloji yakho, uya kucinga kabini.
Kwelinye icala nge-GCC ungaqinisekisa ikhowudi ngexesha lokwenyani, njengoko ndiyaphinda, uluvo lwakho alunasihlahla. »
Ndicinga ukuba ubethelele isikhonkwane entloko, ngokuqinisekileyo ndinenjongo kwaye andinankolo kangako, kwaye yile nto ndicinga ukuba isoftware yasimahla iye yaba, yinkolo, enyanisweni ndicinga ukuba ngoku ndiyasiqonda isizathu sokuba kubekho imfazwe engcwele.
Kubonakala kum ukuba ngeli nqaku uthatha abantu baya kude nesoftware yasimahla kunye nokugxila kuyo okuyinyani.
Ndifuna ukushiya amakhonkco amabini kwiincwadi ezimbini endinethemba lokuba ubenomonde wokuzifunda ukuze uqonde ngcono izimvo zesoftware yasimahla.
Isoftware yasimahla kuluntu olukhululekileyo
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fsfs/free_software2.es.pdf
Inkcubeko yasimahla
http://www.worcel.com/archivos/6/Cultura_libre_Lessig.pdf
Imibuliso kwaye masonwabele ubomi ngeli xesha sinako.
I -Qunused-arguments ye-CLANG ndicinga ukuba iya kuba nakho ukuphindwaphindwa kwi-gcc ngokudityaniswa komsebenzi -Wunused-function / -Wunused-label / -Wunused-value / -Wunused-variable
Ndiyakholelwa, ngayo yonke intlonipho ngenxa yento oyibhalileyo kwaye endabelana ngayo nenxalenye, ukuba ngamanye amaxesha siyakulibala ukuba kutheni kwaye kutheni isoftware yasimahla yazalwa, eyavela kamva yaba sisibonelelo.
Ifakiwe: I-OSS yi-SL isono umthwalo wentlalo kunye nefilosofi.
I-OSS yinxalenye yezobuchwephesha kuphela sele iqulethwe ngaphakathi kwe-SL kodwa kungenjalo.
I-OSS ibambe nje kuba ijongana nemicimbi yezobuchwephesha ngaphandle kokujongana nemicimbi yokuziphatha okanye yokuziphatha.
Ngayiphi na imeko, kunye nokuziqhelanisa, bobabini baziphatha kwi fanayo - ayifani, iyafana. Ingxaki ngamaphepha-mvume angengawo e-GPL kukuba akuvumela ukuba uvale iifolokhwe ezithile ngaxa lithile; "ingxaki" nge-GPL kwiparadigm yangoku yezentlalo kuba iinkampani azinakho ukudala ukhuphiswano nophuhliso ngokwalo, kodwa ngeenkonzo kunye neeshishini ezinxulumene nayo.
Molo, ndiyavuyisana nawe ngenqaku, eyakho ibonakala inendawo efanelekileyo, endabelana ngayo. Kudala ndisebenzisa i-Linux malunga neminyaka emi-5, kwaye ndiyikhethile ngenxa yenkululeko endinika yona yokukhetha izinto endifuna ukuzisebenzisa kunye nezo ndinazo kwi-PC yam kwaye yeyiphi na, engakuvumeliyo iWindows. Ndiyaqonda ukuba kuyinyani ukuba kukho ukunganyamezelani kwabasebenzisi abathile beLinux kwabanye abangengabo okanye abasebenzisa ulwahlulo olwahlukileyo, kwaye ndicinga ukuba ngumba wenkcubeko, wokungazi indlela yokwamkela abanye ngeendlela ezahlukeneyo. Ndiyathemba ukuba sonke siyayiqonda kwaye singanegalelo eluntwini. Imibuliso evela eCordoba, eArgentina.
Ndiqhwabela izandla isicatshulwa sakho. Ubuntu buye bavela njengeqela ngokubulela ukubeka phambili iinjongo ezimbalwa eziqhelekileyo, kodwa kuye kwenzeka kuphela kwimbeko yomahluko.
Inkululeko yokucinga ayithethi ukuba baya kwenza yonke into eceliweyo, umdwelisi nkqubo uthatha isigqibo sokuba aphumeze nini kwaye nini (ukhululekile ukuba akwenze njengoko ebona kufanelekile). Inkululeko kukuba xa oku kungadibanisi nawe, ungayenza ngokwakho ukuba uyazi ukuba uhlawula njani okanye uhlawula njani umntu ukuba akwenzele.
Izixhobo zikhona ukuba uzisebenzise nokuba uyazithanda okanye akunjalo, ukuba awuzithandi, yenza enye okanye uxhase ukuyiphucula njengoko kusenzeka kuluntu kwisoftware yasimahla, ukuba unemali, yithenge ... kubuhlungu Nabani na okhathaza umhlaba Kwizinto zesoftware yasimahla ezisebenza ngoluhlobo, kukho iiprojekthi ezilungileyo kwaye ziyaqhubeka ukuphucula, ezinye azilunganga kwaye zimile, ezinye bezishiyiwe kumzamo ... yile nto ikhona , Musa ukujija okuseleyo ukuyisebenzisa okanye ukungayisebenzisi, ngoku kumxholo Ukusuka kwinyamakazi akunakuphepheka ukuba amaxesha ngamaxesha «intliziyo yethu encinci enekratshi» izakuphuma isichasene nesoftware yobunini kwaye ngakumbi ukuba iyimbambano, yintoni Siza kuyenza ikarma yethu esiyenzileyo ixesha elide xa sibona UKULUNGA OKUKHULU kokusetyenziswa kwe-wildebeest kunye nesoftware yasimahla !! (:
Andiqondi, obu bugcisa. uthetha ngeGedit njenge-IDE - cof umakhi: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Builder cof - okanye ngaba kukuphambanisa ubuxoki?
Xa uthetha ngentiyo, ndicinga ukuba uthetha umlo ngokuchasene nokunyanzeliswa kwesoftware ethile kunye neefomathi zobunini ezithintela ukhuphiswano nenkululeko yabasebenzisi. Ayiyiyo intiyo, kukuzikhusela ebusela nasekunyanzelweni kwayo. Umzekelo, eSpain ukuba uthengela nayiphi na into ephathekayo yelaptop banyanzelisa ukuthengwa kwesoftware ebizwa ngokuba yiMicrosoft Windows nokuba awuyifuni, kuphela luphawu lweAsus olubonakala lubuyisa inani leWindows ngaphandle kweengxaki, kodwa, emva koko ukusuka kwiinkampani ukuya Ulawulo lukawonke-wonke bafuna ukukunyanzela ukuba uthenge iilayisensi zesoftware ezizizo ukwenza into engenangqondo njengokusayina isikhalazo kwiwebhu, imizekelo: Ukhuseleko lweNtlalo, iOmbudsman, ...
Ayisiyo eyokuba abakhuseli bokusetyenziswa kwesoftware yasimahla bayayicaphukela okanye abayinyamezeli ezinye iingcinga, ingxaki kuxa abo banezinye iingcinga befuna ukunyanzelisa ukuthengwa kweemveliso kubantu besithathu, kunye nezinye izisombululo ezihlonipha oko umntu ngamnye afuna ukukwenza. sebenzisa.
Kwahluke kakhulu.
Hayi, into oyichazayo ikhusela inkululeko yakho, kulungile, into endiyichazayo ngabasebenzisi be-linux abahlasela abasebenzisi beWindows, abasebenzisi abaziingcali abahlasela abasebenzisi abatsha, amaDebianites ahlasela ubuninzi kwaye ngenxa yoko, uhlala elayishwe ngamagqabantshintshi azele izithuko nokuzikhukhumeza.
Ndicinga ukuba uyabona okanye unomfanekiso ongacacanga wezinto, kunye noluntu. Ngokoluvo lwam, isoftware yasimahla ibhekisa kuloo, ukwenza izinto ngendlela ocinga ukuba zibhetele, phakathi kwabanye abaninzi. Akunyanzelekanga ukuba umdwelisi wenkqubo okanye iqela lophuhliso libandakanye izinto ezinomdla kwelinye. Khawufane ucinge ukuba bebeyinyani na loo mthetho, yonke imiboniso ibiya kuba neempawu ezizeleyo kwaye ibinokuphela. Wonke umntu uya kuba nemibono yakhe elungileyo kwaye ayizizo zonke izinto ezahlukeneyo ezinokubandakanywa ... ngekhe kube sisiphelo. Ukuba umntu ufumanisa ukuba akonelanga ukuba iphuhliswe njani inkqubo, kuya kufuneka ayeke ukufuna, enze ifolokhwe (kwaye asebenzise ilayisensi ye-GPL / GNU yokusebenzisa kwakhona ikhowudi ye-ageno) kwaye babandakanye inqaku labo / ukuphuculwa / uyilo kwaye ekugqibeleni bagqibe ukufaka isandla. eluntwini, kwaye ukuba umntu uthatha isigqibo sokuba kuluncedo baya kuyiphumeza. Inkululeko leyo. Ezinye izigxeko ziyinxalenye yesintu, uburharha, isimilo. Akufuneki sithathe izinto ngokungathi singabalinganiswa abaphambili bemiboniso bhanyabhanya engummangaliso ..... akukho nto izakulahleka kuba umdwelisi weprogram esemsebenzini uthumela i-NVIDIA ekoneni, ikhowudi yakhe iya kuhlala injalo nakwizizukulwana ezizayo kwaye wonwabele yonke iintlobo, ulwazi ekwabelwana ngalo kunye nokuziphendukela kwemvelo rhoqo, amadoda aya kutshabalala kunye neempawu ezahlukileyo kunye neempawu, isimilo kunye nabanye. Kodwa ubuchule bakho, iinzame kunye nomsebenzi wakho ziya kuhlala zikhona ukuze nabani na ocinga ukuba ziluncedo akwazi ukuzisebenzisa kwakhona.
Kwaye into ebalulekileyo ekumele ukuba ibalaselisiwe kum, uthi «……. Abo bashumayela inkululeko yokucinga kufuneka benze iinkqubo baguquke ngokusekwe kwiimfuno zabasebenzisi, kuba iingcinga zabantu bonke ziyasebenza, hayi ezo zabaphuhlisi kuphela. (Inkqubo yakho inakho ukuba nayo yonke into oyifunayo, kodwa ukuba abasebenzisi abayithandi, uyasilela, ixesha) »…… kodwa ngokoluvo lwam kukutshintsha ukujolisa, i-gnu izama ukungamsebenzisi umsebenzisi njengomsebenzisi iziko, injongo Kukubeka umntu embindini wesayensi yekhompyuter (andiphindi umsebenzisi njengomthengi nje) kodwa umntu njengenxalenye yoluntu, othi ngamanye amaxesha okanye ubukhulu becala athathe inxaxheba ngokungakhange enze ikhowudi ayithethi ukuba oku kugxila kungalunganga. Kwaye khumbula ukuba nabani na ofumana, athenge okanye asebenzise isoftware ngaphakathi kwilizwe le-gnu, akenzi njalo ngemisebenzi yakhe kuphela kodwa nangekhowudi, ebavumela ukuba bayilungelelanise neemfuno zabo ukuba abanelisekanga yinkqubo yoqobo okanye nokuba ikho ixesha elitsha liyavela. Yiyo kuphela into ebalulekileyo, kwaye kufuneka ikhuselwe. Ewe zikhona iinkqubo ezilungileyo kakhulu, kwaye ezingcono ezizezomnini, kodwa inqaku kukuba bayasibandeza inkululeko, basiqhathe xa besithengisela ibhanari elula (ukuba sidibanisa ingqikelelo ye-GNU) kwaye uninzi luyasaphula imfihlo kunye nokuthembana.
I-PS: Ligqwesile igalelo lakho / usasazo / ulwazi kunye nolwazi. Ngenye yeebhloko zam ekubhekiswa kuzo. Ndiyabulisa kwaye ndiyathemba ukuba niyayiqonda indlela yam kunye nokugxekwa. Ukubulisa.
»Abaphuhlisi mabayeke ukwenza imfazwe neenkampani zabucala kwaye bagxile ekuhlangabezeni iimfuno, ukwahlulwa sisiphumo esithe ngqo koku ndicinga ukuba. »
Yile nto ndiyithethayo, kutheni bequlunqe i-edEdit ukuba banokuphucula i-Emacs, kwaye besithi le nto kutheni beyile i-Emacs ukuba banokuphucula ndibone ukuba sonke siyazi ukuba akuncedi ukuba uzinikele kumzamo wokuphucula ed. Ewe, amadoda okwenyani ngekhe aphucule ikati.
Kwaye ekubeni kunjalo kutheni sisebenzisa iLinux ukuba sinokuqhubeka nokusebenzisa i-Unix endala kunye neenwele kwaye silahle uStallman kunye ne-hippie follies yakhe.
Kwaye njengoko uHomer wayeza kuthi: Ngendlela eyayihlambalaza ngayo ...
Ekunene kwinzipho @juanfgs. "Ukuqhekeka" yinto ekhoyo kuyo yonke inkqubo yokusebenza, nokuba yintoni, kwaye ayisiyonto imbi, ngokuchaseneyo, ukuba iyantlukwano ithetha kakhulu malunga nempilo yenkqubo yokusebenza nokwamkelwa kwayo nakweyiphi na intsimi.
Kufana nayo yonke enye into, kwaye ukubaxa iijanfgs kuyimpumelelo kakhulu, andilwi nayo, ndichasene nokuba krwada kwesixa sokuqhekeka. Ewe kunjalo, ukuba bekungengenxa yalonto, ngekhe sibe ne-linux kunye nesoftware yokuvela ayisoze yenzeke, kodwa ukwahlukana okuninzi kwenza ukuba i-linux ingabinakho ukukhula kwidesktop.
Ukusuka kwimbono yam, ukuba sisidingo, kufuneka senziwe, i-linux yayiyimfuneko, i-devuan yinto evuthayo, i-emac yinto ethandwayo, ubuntu sisidingo (kwaye andisithandi). Ngamafutshane, kunjalo kulungile ukuba ungavumelani ukuba zeziphi kwaye ziphi ezingekhoyo, inqaku konke okugqithisileyo kubi, kwaye i-linux inengxaki yokuqhekeka kakhulu
"Kwaye i-linux inengxaki yokuqhekeka kakhulu"
Xa kuthelekiswa nantoni?
Masithelekise, bangaphi abahleli beetekisi zophuhliso okanye ii-IDE ezikhoyo kwisoftware yasimahla kunye nesoftware yokuthengisa?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments#C.2FC.2B.2B
Ukuba ujonga etafileni zininzi ii-IDE zasimahla ezibonakala ngokwenqanaba elingaphezulu kwesinye ngelixa abanini begxile ekwenzeni imveliso yabo yolwimi olunye. Ukujonga kule tafile ndingakuxelela ukuba isoftware yobunini yahlulwe ngakumbi ngokufuna inzuzo (kwiimeko ezininzi ezingeyomfuneko).
Ukuqhekeka kwiinkqubo zesoftware simahla kubangelwa koku kulandelayo:
-Badwelisi benkqubo bafuna ukongeza ukusebenza kwi-X IDE kodwa bangacwangcisi kulwimi olubhaliweyo
-Iinkqubo azihambelani nefilosofi yee-IDE ezikhoyo zolwimi
-Badwelisi benkqubo bafuna inkxaso engcono kulwimi lwe-X kwaye akukho IDE yangoku ibonelelayo
Kwimeko ye-GCC, ngokungathandabuzekiyo ichasene. Kwaye kungenxa yokuba i-GNU ihlala ikhetha ingqokelela, isitayile se-UNIX (ngokuyinxalenye isichazi esithi GNU asiyiyo i-Unix ukuba uyabona stallman uyayichaza kwiphepha labo), yiyo loo nto ii-emacs okanye i-GCC ziingqokelela ezinkulu zokudityaniswa kwezinto. Isikhalazo sakho ngokusisiseko: »X umphuhlisi akazenzi izinto ngendlela endifuna ukuba bazenze ngayo, kwaye mna (ongafaki galelo nangayiphi na indlela) ndifuna zenziwe ngolohlobo, ke zizidenge ngokungazenzi yitsho nexesha lakho »
Kodwa njengesiqhelo, kulula ukudibanisa isepha opera kwinto oyifundileyo kuluhlu lweposi kunokubeka iesile lakho esitulweni kunye negalelo lekhowudi.
Ndivumelana ngokupheleleyo noFederico kwaye ndicinga ukuba eyona nto intle kukuba nezixhobo ezahlukileyo nezinezixhobo ezininzi esinazo. Ngendlela elungileyo kakhulu.
Kulungile…. esinye isithuba esivela kumhleli odidekileyo, ongenalo nofifi
Yeziseko ze-SL kunye nentiyo engaqondakaliyo yeGNU.
Isoftware yasimahla ineendleko, ngaphaya kwezo zoqoqosho ezinokuhlawuliswa okanye hayi
kubasebenzisi, kukuziphatha kwaye kubiza kakhulu, ngenxa yoko bambalwa abanokukwazi ukuyifumana kunye nabanye
Bambalwa abancedisayo, nangona sonke singayisebenzisa ngaphandle kokuba nofifi lokuba
Imalunga, ufuna ipasta, emva koko uyithengise, ufuna ukuyifaka kwiprojekthi yakho?
emva koko ukuhlawula ilayisensi nge-GPL
simahla, yiba yi-GNU, ho ho ho
"Ukuqhekeka" kuhambelana nendaleko, ngumgangatho obalulekileyo: ukubanakho ukuziqhelanisa nakho kuqinisekisa ukusinda kohlobo.
Ukuba bekungekho ukwahlulwa, besinokuba neemoto zakwaFord kuphela, kwaye iLinux ngekhe ibekho.
Unyanisile, eyona nto kukuba kwiLinux akukho qhekeko, kukho ubukrwada bexabiso eliqokelelweyo lokuqhekeka, kwaye yonke into egqithisileyo imbi. Mane uye kwi-distrowatch kwaye uza kubona ukuba zingaphi ii-linux ezikhoyo, ngaba umdwelisi nkqubo ukhathazeka njani ngenkqubo yakhe esebenza kakuhle kuzo zonke?
"Umdwelisi nkqubo ukhathazeka njani ukuba inkqubo yakhe isebenza kakuhle kubo bonke?"
Ayisiyonto umphuhlisi anokuzikhathaza ngayo, wenza ukuba ikhowudi yakhe yemithombo ifumaneke kwaye wonke umntu ayipakishe ngendlela afuna ngayo.
Mhlawumbi enye i-distro ayifuni nokubandakanya inkqubo kwii-repos zabo, kwaye umphuhlisi akanalo nelizwi kwinto enjalo, kwaye yinto elungileyo ukuyenza, umphuhlisi akangoyena mntu ubalulekileyo emhlabeni.
Ndiyakukhuthaza ukuba uthelekise inani lezinto ezenziwayo kunye neemodeli zeemoto (ekukuphela kokusebenza kwazo kukuhambisa abantu) ngokuchasene nenani lolwabiwo lweLinux (iinkqubo zokusebenza ezinamawaka ezinto ezisebenzayo kunye neendlela zokusebenzisa) kwaye uyakuqonda ukuba "uqhekeko" "Le bathetha ngayo ayongxaki: Nguwuphi umbuzo onzima ngakumbi:" Yeyiphi imoto endiyikhethayo? " okanye "yeyiphi i-distro endiyikhethayo?"
Okanye, umenzi wefestile wenza njani ukuba "iglasi" yakhe isebenze kuko konke ukwenziwa kunye neemodeli kwintengiso?
Ngendlela, kutheni "ukwahlulwa" kungakwenzi ukuba i-linux isilele kwimakethi yeseva? Kuthekani ngee-routers? Kwifowuni ephathekayo?
Ukuqukumbela: Ukuqhekeka akuyongxaki, yinto eyindalo emntwini yokuba ukhululekile ukuba enze le nto ayifunayo. Okuchasene nokunyanzeliswa kwengcinga enye (okanye isibini), yendlela eyodwa yokwenza izinto. Oku "kukungaqhekezi", okunikwa kuphela kukulawulwa kweqaqobana kuninzi oluninzi.
Ukubulisa
Umbhali uDaniel N wayefuna ukusazisa ngokusebenza okuvumela abahleli bokuchana ukuba bafumane ulwazi lwangaphandle kwelinye icandelo lenkqubo. Imalunga noncedo lweKhowudi yeGnome ( https://blogs.gnome.org/jessevdk/2014/04/11/gnome-code-assistance/ ) ukuba nge-D-Bus ivumela ukunxibelelana nemiyalezo yempazamo yomqokeleli othile (kule meko uClang) kunye nomhleli wokubhaliweyo (iGedit). Imiyalezo yempazamo ephoswa ngumqokeleli we-Clang ibandakanya inombolo yomnxeba apho kukho impazamo, kunye ne-plugin yeGedit "gedit-code-aid" evumela ukubonisa ezi mpazamo kwikhowudi yomthombo uqobo.
Yinto efanayo ne-SyncTex, esivumela ukuba sizibeke kuwo nawuphi na umgca wesicatshulwa kwiPDF eveliswe yiLaTeX, kwaye uvule umhleli wombhalo, ubonise ikhowudi yeLaTeX evelise umgca wePDF (kwaye ngokuchaseneyo). Iluncedo kakhulu ukulungisa ingxaki.
Ke ngoko, ngokungathi umhleli wombhalo ocacileyo uba ngumbumbulu-IDE, oqhele ukubonisa iimpazamo kunye nekhowudi ngaxeshanye.
Kulusizi ukuba inqaku elinokuba luncedo ligutyungelwe luluvo oluninzi ngesihloko malunga nenkululeko yesoftware yasimahla, ebalulekileyo, kodwa hayi kule meko.
Ngapha koko, isisombululo silula: dibanisa ababhali bezimvo kwaye ubeke iplagi ye-gcc enxibelelana ne-D-BUS kwaye isebenzise ukusebenza kweKhowudi yeGnome.
I-ERROR:
Isisombululo kukuba ababhali be-Gnome basebenzise i-GCC endaweni ye-CLang yabo "Uncedo lweKhowudi yeGnome", kuba bobabini banokusebenza ngokufanayo, njengoko umntu sele etshilo:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14072779/how-can-i-run-gcc-clang-for-static-analysis-warnings-only
Impazamo yombhali wale posi kukukholelwa ukuba ngenxa yokuba iiGnomes zikhethe uClang endaweni yeGCC, yingxaki yeGCC.
Kufana nabo bakholelwa ukuba iLinux inetyala ngokungabinabo abaqhubi bezinto ezithile zekhompyutha, xa abavelisi benoxanduva lokwenza abaqhubi be-OS apho bafuna isebenze khona.
Ngaba kuya kufuneka sibuyisele umva injineli yeGedit kunye nokuba nomncedisi wekhowudi kwi-GCC? (ubuncinci kuya kuba lula, kuba sinekhowudi)
Kwakhona, ukuba ufunda inqaku olidibanisa (https://blogs.gnome.org/jessevdk/2014/04/11/gnome-code-assistance/) Thetha malunga neengxaki abanazo nge-clang !!!
Umba wesibini kukuba asiyilawuli ngokwenyani i-libclang, ke ukuba kukho nayiphi na into enokubangela ingozi, akukho ndlela esinokuthi sisebenze ngayo ngokulula…… ndiyathemba »
«Asinakukwazi ngokulula ukwandisa iplagi kwezinye iilwimi kunezo zixhaswe yi-libclang»… »Kwi-gedit, sixhasa kuphela u-C (nangolwandiso lwe-Vala) kunye ne-python»
Kucacile ukuba i-clang vs gcc yayisisigqibo seqela le-gnome ngesizathu esithile, hayi ngenxa yokuba kusithiwa "kukusilela" kwe-GCC njengoko umbhali wale post ecinga (eneneni bafumana ukusilela kwi-CLang, ke akukho Isoftware igqibelele, nokuba yeyasimahla, ivulekile okanye ivaliwe
Nibuliso!
blah blah blah.
Ukuba usebenzisa iLinux kwaye uyayinyamezela iWindows… .Ngcono ubuyele kwiWindows, asikudingi apha
Ndibona amagqabantshintshi amaninzi kunye nombhali angenasiseko. Masibeke iinyani etafileni, abaphuhlisi be-GCC bavaliwe kakhulu kwaye abaze bavuleleke kwizinto ezintsha. Iinkampani emva koko zayixhasa iClang kwaye ngoku ivelisa imiyalezo yeemposiso ezingcono kwaye ivumela uhlalutyo lwekhowudi (nokunye okuninzi) nge-libclang. Umzekelo, ukuhambisa ithala leencwadi ukusuka kwi-C ukuya eRust, izixhobo ze-libclang zisetyenzisiwe, hayi kuba singayithandi i-GCC, kodwa ngenxa yokuba benqabile ngokuthe ngqo ukubeka ezo zinto.