Yithi ndlela ntle kwezi logo zimbini (Gecko kunye neWebkit)
Xa 2 months ago kwathethwa lonto I-Opera ifuduselwe kwiWebkit, kwathiwa i Ikamva le-intanethi lalisengozini ukwamkelwa okukhulu kwale njini yewebhu. Ngoku, wonke umntu umangaliswe, iinjini ezimbini eziyilwe zintsha: Servo y Blink.
Kwelinye icala iServo, iphuhliswe yiMozilla kunye neSamsung ngolwimi olutsha olubizwa ngokuba Ukugqithisa. Umhlwa lulwimi oluyilwe yiMozilla ukuba luhambelane, lusebenziseke kwaye lukhuseleke (aluqulathanga zizalathisi ezingenanto okanye izikhombisi ezijingayo). Le njini intsha iza kuqala kwizixhobo eziphathwayo (i-Android kunye neFirefox OS) kunye nakoomatshini abane-ARM.
Ngakolunye uhlangothi, uGoogle wagqiba ekubeni ashiye iWebkit ecaleni kwaye enze ifolokhwe ebizwa ngokuba yiBlink. Ingcamango yakhe: ukunciphisa ubunzima beWebkit. Ulwakhiwo lweenkqubo ezininzi luya kusetyenziswa ukuze iithebhu ziqhubeke nokusebenza xa isiza sihla. Kulindeleke ukuba i-Opera ifake isandla kule projekthi (i-Safari ayizange ithethe nto) kwaye iya kuza kwiChromium kuqala.
Ngendlela, ndiyakuxelela, zombini iinjini zivulekile, nangona i-Blink iya kuphuhliswa ngakumbi emva kweengcango ezivaliweyo.
http://www.infoq.com/news/2013/04/Google-Blink-Mozilla-Servo
Iindaba ezimnandi, ngale ndlela kuqinisekisiwe ukuba iWebKit ayinayo i-semi-monopoly... ewe, ndifumana uphawu lweServo lupholile kakhulu 😀
nantso ke
Yhu ^-^...
Nantso into eyenzekayo kuwe ngokuhlomla ungawafundi amanqaku, hahaha.
Iza kuhamba ukusuka kwi-semi-monopoly ukuya kwi-monopoly epheleleyo, ubuncinci kulawulo, kunye ne-Blink. :/
Amathandabuzo, wonke umntu uyayithiya iWebkit ngenxa yokuba iGoogle iyisebenzisa, kodwa sele inefoloko kwaye ngoku kunye ne-servo baya kuba nenye eyahlukileyo engena kukhuphiswano ... manene akunandaba nje ukuba wonke umntu uhambelana nemigangatho. ye-W3C kwaye unenkxaso eyaneleyo yokuma, iGecko isenamandla kakhulu, kakhulu, kakhulu.
Ndiyavuma
Kuya kuba yimeko efanayo kuba i-Blink ngokuqinisekileyo iya kuqhubeka ihambelana neempawu ezikhethekileyo zeWebKit, ngoko kuya kuba ngathi iyaqhubeka ifana neWebKit njengesiqhelo kwaye akukho nto itshintshileyo.
Ekuphela kwendlela yokubetha i-monopoly iya kuba kukuba uyeka ezo zakhiwo kwaye ulandele imigangatho, ngokuqinisekileyo ayizukwenzeka.
Kwaye zeziphi ezo “zakhiwo zeWebkit kuphela”?
Ndiyazibuza ukuba le mfundiso kule mihla yenye yezo FUDs ezenziwe ukhuphiswano oluthile kwaye abantu baphinda ngenxa yokuba loo nkampani iyalela "inyani" kwiwebhu isitsho.
Bendibhekisa kwisimaphambili se-webkit kunye nokufunyanwa kwesikhangeli. I-Blink iya kuqhubeka nokuxhasa eso simaphambili kwaye iya kuqhubeka nokusebenzisa iparamitha yeAppleWebKit kwi iarhente yomsebenzisi (okanye into efana ne "AppleWebKit"). Ngamanye amazwi, kwiiwebhusayithi akuyi kuba yinto engaphezulu kweWebKit eqhelekileyo.
Ah kodwa oko kuvakala okwahlukileyo ngoku.
Kwakhona, ngaphambi kokuba i-webkit idume, isibetho sasiyi-moz, kodwa akukho mntu wathetha nantoni na kuba yayinguMozilla kwaye ngenxa yokuba ithemba lomntu wonke lalinokulimaza i-IE.
Izimaphambili, nangona zininzi, bezisoloko zithathelwa ingqalelo kuphela -moz kunye -webkit, kwaye le yokugqibela isuka kwiChrome ukuya apha. Izimaphambili -ms kunye no -o azifane zithathelwe ingqalelo yi-websmater.
Kwaye eneneni iMicrosoft sele iyekile ukongeza isimaphambili sayo kuba iyekile ukongeza izinto zovavanyo, iyakongeza kuphela imigangatho, nto leyo eyenza ukuba bathi "IE, njengesiqhelo, isemva ngemigangatho kuba ayibandakanyi -moz kunye -webkit. "».
Into endifuna ukuyithetha kukuba le nhlebo kuphela kwi-Chrome kunye neWebkit yi-FUD nje kunye nokugqithisa, loo meko ibisoloko ikhona, ngaphambi kokuba ibe yi-Mozilla kuphela kwaye akuzange kubekho sikhalazo.
Owona mgaqo-nkqubo ufanelekileyo uya kuba ngulowo usetyenziswa nguMircosoft, kodwa ngokuqinisekileyo abanye kuya kufuneka "bashiye ezo propati bucala kwaye bazilinganisele ekulandeleni imigangatho, ngokuqinisekileyo ayizukwenzeka" (evakala kakubi!, kodwa mna wayibeka yabonakala ngakumbi kuba ndithi le cliché iyabaxa kwaye FUD; akukho nto yobuqu kuba ayiyonto yakho, ndiyazi ukuba yi-clich efashini kwaye bayithetha kuzo zonke iiblogi kwaye ukuba bayayixela. wena ngaloo ndlela yindlela abantu abaya kucinga ngayo) .
@alan: Andiyiqondi imbono yakho. Iphi iFUD? Zeziphi ezo clichés uthetha ngazo?
Masibone, kwelinye icala unyanisile, izimaphambili bezisoloko zimbi, nokuba zenziwe ngubani. Ingxaki ngeWebKit yayikukuba isabelo sayo semakethi sikhule ngokukhawuleza kwaye isimaphambili saso songamela zonke ezinye, saba luhlobo "lwe-Internet Explorer 6 entsha." Kwafika indawo apho abaphuhlisi balibala malunga nezinye izimaphambili kwaye basebenzise nje -webkit; kwaye okubi ngakumbi, basebenzise ubhaqo lwe iarhente yomsebenzisi ukuxhasa kuphela loo njini kwaye ngaphandle kwezinye, kwaye kulapho zaqala khona izikhalazo.
Le ayisiyo-FUD okanye imeko eyedwa, ibihlala isenzeka kwizikhangeli ezidumileyo xa zichaphazela inkxaso yabancinci. Kwenzeke kuqala kwi-IE; kwaye nangona usenokuba awuzange uyiqonde, kunye neFirefox, kodwa kwinqanaba elincinci kuba ayizange ibe sesona sikhangeli sidumileyo kunye nokugxekwa okuqhele ukuvela kuluntu lweOpera. Ndiyazi oku kuba ndingumsebenzisi weso sikhangeli iminyaka emininzi kwaye kwakubuhlungu ukufumana iindawo ezininzi ezixhasa kuphela isiphequluli seMozilla, kodwa izikhalazo zawela ezindlebeni ezingevayo ngenxa yokuba yayiyiFirefox kwaye "yayilungile."
Ngoku ngeWebKit kwakungenakwenzeka ukuba ungayihoyi ngenxa yezinga lokwamkelwa kwalo. Ndiphindaphinda amazwi am, ekuphela kwendlela yokuthintela oku ukuba kuqhubeke ukwenzeka kukushiya iipropati ezikhethekileyo kwaye uzikhawulele ekulandeleni imigangatho, yiyo loo nto bezalwe.
Ngoku ekubeni wonke umntu ebonile ukuba zimbi kangakanani izimaphambili, umkhwa iya kuba kukuzishiya. I-Opera, njengesiqhelo, yayiyeyokuqala. Ngokokwazi kwam, wayishiya iminyaka yakhe edlulileyo kwaye ukususela ngoko watolika i-CSS3 njengokuba injalo. Kwaye Blink, Ngokusuka koko ndikufundileyo, ayizukubeka naziphi na izimaphambili ezitsha kodwa ngenxa yezizathu ezihambelanayo iyakuhlala ixhasa -webkit kwaye ndingabheja ukuba nayo iya kuba ne iarhente yomsebenzisi iyahambelana ke, njengoko benditshilo, kuya kuba ngathi akukho nto itshintshileyo, ubuncinci hayi ixesha elide kakhulu.
Besele ndiza kuphendula kanye le nto uyithethayo kumhlathi wesithathu (ndikholelwe, ibiphantse yafana) kwaye enyanisweni ngokubanzi siyavumelana phantse kuyo yonke into esiyithethayo, ngaphandle kwezigqibo, andazi ukuba kutheni.
Ndiyahluka kuphela kwisiqendu sakho sesithathu, kwaye ngokubanzi, kuloo yebo ye-FUD kuba isikhalazo sonke sinjengokungathi iWebkit yayikuphela kwembali okanye enye kuphela ngoku; Ayilophulo nje elibi kodwa lijoliswe kuyo. Ubukhulu becala, okwangoku, imeko engaqhelekanga yezimaphambili iyafana kuzo zombini iWebkit kunye neMozilla, endaweni yoko, iWebkit yenza idemokhrasi into eyayifudula iyizwilakhe; kodwa ngokungekho ngqiqweni eli phulo lifana nokuba iWebkit yayikuphela kwayo kwaye ngokuqinisekileyo "ubuzwilakhe."
NgeWebkit, le meko ayihoywa, kungekhona ngenxa yokuba ayinakwenzeka, kodwa ngenxa yokuba abo bathe bathula ngaphambili ngenxa yokuba kwakufanelekile kubo ngoku batsho ngenxa yokuba inceda ukuba bakhuphe i-FUD kwaye bavelise i-matrix yombono.
"Isabelo esikhulu seChrome kunye neWebkit" ziingxoxo ezilahlekisayo zokwenza ukuba kubonakale ngathi kuyavakala kwaye kunenjongo yokukhalaza ngoku (kwaye inokuba yenye iFUD "iChrome inolawulo olupheleleyo lwewebhu" xa iChrome ingumdlali we-3 kuphela. , ukusonga Inesinye kwisithathu kuphela semarike. Xa le ntlebendwane ichasene neChrome yaqala, yayinesabelo esincinci kuneFirefox kwaye inyuka. Kwaye ewe, iFirefox nayo inaloo kota kwaye ingaphantsi ibekwe kwaye yaphula iwebhu kunye nezimaphambili zayo kunye nokuphunga ngokuthanda, kodwa inqaku kukuba akukho mntu wakhalaza; kwaye abakhalazi namhlanje nangona oko kungayekanga ukuthanda iFirefox; Ngokuphambene noko, baziphatha ngokungathi bekungekho namhlanje kwaye abazange babekho kwaye bakhalaza kuphela ngeChrome, eyenza kucace ukuba akusiyo isikhalazo esinenjongo kodwa ukuba yonke into ayikho ngaphezu kweFUD kunye ne-prefabricated clichés, ngoko abantu balandela. bona.
Yintoni engaphezulu kwe-monopoly kunoGoogle?
Ngaba iRekonq okanye iMidori (iwebhu) iya kutshintshela kule njini (Blink)?
IWebkit ayinyanzelekanga ukuba ife.Enyanisweni, iApple inokuqhubeka nophuhliso lwayo.
Iindaba ezimnandi, bendisele ndinexhala malunga ne-webkit monopoly.
ngoku iya kuba monopoly kaBlink
Ndizakunamathela kwi-Servo, ayibonakali isempilweni kum ukuba inkampani yamazwe ngamazwe ese-US njengoGoogle ilawula lonke ulwazi kunye nobuchwepheshe.
IMozilla yinkampani yezizwe ngezizwe ezinze eMelika.
Kwaye ukuba kungenxa ye-Samsung, yindawo yezizwe ngezizwe esekwe kumkhuseli waseYankee waseMzantsi Korea.
Ukuba isuka kuGoogle, ndiyathemba ukuba baya kwenza umzamo wokupolisha injini yokukhangela, nangona ijikeleza kwi-Intanethi ukuba iMozilla kunye neSamsung zenza enye nayo.
Nibuliso!
I-Servo yile njini evela kwiMozilla kunye neSamsung
Iya kuhlala injalo, baya kuqhubeka nokuphuhlisa iiwebhusayithi "ezilungiselelwe" zeChrome
"Ulwakhiwo lweenkqubo ezininzi luya kusetyenziswa ukuze iithebhu ziqhubeke nokusebenza xa isiza sihla"
Kwaye yayingeyiyo na loo nto yayisele iyinzuzo iChrome / iChrome ibonelela ngaphezu kwezinye izikhangeli?
Oko kukuthi, ukuba ithebhu enye iphahlazeka, ayichaphazeli abanye kwaye isikhangeli asivali ngokupheleleyo.
Ukuba yiloo nto kanye, kungcono ukunamathela kwiWebkit.
Ngaba uyilo olunemisonto emininzi luthetha ukuba iya kuba sisitya izixhobo zeqela lethu?
Ndiyibona inje.
Ulwakhiwo olunemigca emininzi luthetha ukuba ithebhu nganye yinkqubo eyahlukileyo. KwiFirefox kukho ulwakhiwo lwemisonto emininzi (ithebhu nganye ngumsonto ngaphakathi kwenkqubo enye)
Ingongoma kukuba namhlanje akukho zicelo ezinekhono lokwenyani lokusebenzisa i-multi-core ngendlela yokwenyani, umzekelo wale nto i-compressor yefayile ephantse isebenzise isiseko esisodwa ... yibone ngaloo ndlela 🙂
Kwinqaku lokuqala ithi nge-webkit eyaba nzima ngakumbi
Loo nto malunga neethebhu ezinemisonto emininzi bubuxoki obuninzi.
Ngamaxesha endikhe ndasebenzisa iChrome, iChromium kunye ne-SRWare Iron, xa iphepha elisuka kwithebhu liqhekeka, isikhangeli sisonke siyawa kwaye kuye kwafuneka ndigqibe kwelokuba ndikhuphe isikhangeli sonke.
Ingaqhelekanga. Imeko yakho ... Ndisebenzisa iChrome iminyaka, iChrome yokuqala kwaye ngoku iChromium, kwaye andikhumbuli ixesha lokugqibela le nto uyithethileyo yenzeke kum (mhlawumbi iminyaka emi-2 eyadlulayo), kwaye lelinye lamaxesha ambalwa ithebhu. iye yantlitheka.
Kuya kuba kuhle ukuba unokuxela i-Bug, mhlawumbi yi-plugin ethile, andazi. Kodwa ukuqala, kunqabile ukuba iphepha lehle, ngenxa yozinzo lweLinux. Nangona mhlawumbi into efanayo akufanele yenzeke nge-distros eyahlukileyo.
Andazi ukuba iBlink iya kuba semgangathweni, kodwa iya kuba yi-monopoly njenge-webkit.
Masikhumbule ukuba uGoogle uhlawule i-Opera ukuba isebenzise iWebkit, inyani kukuba uGoogle yintengiso enkulu kwaye uyalutshabalalisa ukhuphiswano,
Ndiza kuhlala noServo
Ukuqala, iWebkit ayisiyiyo yodwa.
Okwesibini, andiyazi ukuba unobungqina bokuba uGoogle uhlawule i-Opera "ukusebenzisa iWebkit" okanye ukuba yiFUD nje.
Okwesithathu, ngaba ukuhlawulwa nguGoogle kubi? kuba uGoogle ebesoloko ehlawula iMozilla kwaye ngaloo mali yenze iGecko kwaye ngoku iServo. Kwaye iMozilla ibisoloko iyipro-Google, enyanisweni iFirefox yayisisixhobo sokuqala esisetyenziswe nguGoogle ukunyanzelisa "imigangatho" yayo kwaye ithathe iwebhu apho ifuna khona.
Ngoko ke kubonakala ngathi ukuqhwanyaza kunokujika kube yinto AYILUNGILEYO kuphuhliso lwewebhu, kuba yonke imifuniselo ye-css3 imisebenzi ayizukuba ne-xej: -blink-box-shadow:
Endaweni yoko, ngumsebenzisi oya kuthi avule lo msebenzi kwibhrawuza ngokwamkela uvavanyo lweCSS.
Oku kukufa nje kwenzuzo yophuhliso lwewebhu kwinqanaba lobuhle kuba akukho msebenzisi uqhelekileyo oza kuyenza isebenze le misebenzi, ke abaphuhlisi abayi kuchitha ixesha labo ngokwenza amaphepha amatsha kuba abantu abasebenzisa isikhangeli "esona sisetyenziswa kakhulu" abakwenzi oko. ukwazi ukuzonwabela
Oko kukuthi, ndifumana umbono wokuba oku kukhula kukhulu kuphuhliso lobuhle kwihlabathi lewebhu, i-injini yokuqhwanyaza kaGoogle Chrome iza kubeka ibrake yesandla enomtsalane kuyo.
Le nkqubo ayizukwenziwa nguChrome kuphela kodwa nayiMozilla.
Ebonakala ngathi ilungile kum kuba ayilunganga kuphuhliso lwewebhu, okanye kubasebenzisi, kancinci kwiwebhu, ukuba izinto zovavanyo ziyasetyenziswa kwaye zinyanzeliswe ngaphandle kokuba yimigangatho ngokuqinisekileyo ayiyi kuxhaswa ngokupheleleyo kwaye ngokuchanekileyo ngumntu wonke. ukuxhasa ngokuthembekileyo umgangatho.
@alan "...AKULUNGILEYO kuphuhliso lwewebhu..." mmmmm... ekugqibeleni amaphepha aya kuzaliswa nge-javascrit (JQuery, njl.) ukuze kuthathelwe indawo iziphumo zovavanyo lwe-ccs3. ergo amaphepha ewebhu acothayo!!!!!
Bendingazi ngeMozilla, ungabelana ngomthombo wolwazi? (ukuba unayo esandleni) ukufumanisa ukuba yintoni ingcaciso enikwe yiMozilla
Ukwenza amaphepha aneempembelelo akusiyo imbopheleleko, unokusebenza kunye nento ekhoyo kunye nemigangatho. Ndiyakhumbula ukuba xa i-CSS3 kunye ne-HTML5 yayingekho kwimephu (kodwa sele ifuna ukubulala i-Flash), iiwebhusayithi ezilula kodwa ezisebenzayo zakhuthazwa kwaye kwakunokwenzeka ukuzenza: zisebenza, zinobuchule, zikhangayo. "Okuncinci kuninzi" kwabayili befashoni bangene kuyilo lwewebhu.
Kwaye kunye neziphumo, kuyenzeka ukuba yenziwe ngento ekhoyo ngoku, engaphaya komkhethe andazi ukuba "bacotha kakhulu" kangakanani na kune "indlela yangoku" (engakhanyi kakhulu, ayikho. ukuba kunjalo, iinguqulelo ezimbalwa ezidlulileyo ndenze iphepha elinemvelaphi embalwa (mhlawumbi emininzi) kwi-gradients kwaye kwiFirefox scrolling yayiyoyikeka ukuba kwakungcono kakhulu kum ukusebenzisa imifanekiso yangasemva, emva koko yaphucuka kancinci kodwa andiyenzi. yazi ukuba injani ngoku - kwaye kwezinye iibhrawuza umahluko phakathi kokusebenzisa imifanekiso eyenziwe ngaphambili kunye ne-CSS gradients yayiphantse ingabonakali kodwa ngubani onokuthi indlela endala ayinakuba ngcono?-).
Nangona kunjalo, masiye kwinqaku lakho kwaye sitsho ukuba kuyimfuneko ngokwenene ukusebenzisa ezi ziphumo, kwaye iindlela ezintsha zingcono kwaye ngoko kuya kuba yinto ekhethiweyo yokuqala.
Kuyavela ukuba AWUNAYO imeko engcono, kuba ingezizo zonke iibhrawuza ezixhasa ezi zinto zingekho mgangathweni (kwaye ezo zizenzayo zinokungazixhasi ngokuchanekileyo) emva koko kuya kuvela ukuba kusafuneka wenze omnye umsebenzi. ukuhambelana nezinye iibhrawuza kwaye ubeke zonke ezo zikripthi kwaye unomsebenzi ophindwe kabini; ngaphandle kokuba ushiye ngabom (njengesohlwayo sokuxhasa umgangatho) kwaye uxhasa kuphela ezo zikhangeli (s) eziphosa izinto ngokukhawuleza (kunye nemigangatho yokunyanzelisa).
Ke ngoko imeko imbi kakhulu kunale uyicengayo, ke kufuneka ube nazo zombini ezi zinto, hayi nje "embi"; Kulapho akunjalo ukuba ihlasela ngokuthe ngqo iwebhu evulekileyo nesemgangathweni.
Andiyifumani into yeMozilla, kodwa ndiyibonile nje idityaniswe kwenye indawo apho ndibone ezi ndaba zijongiwe.
Abakhange banike sizathu sikhethekileyo, kwaye akukho sizathu sifunyenweyo ngaphandle kokuba (ngoku) izimaphambili zithe ngamaxesha amabi kwaye akukho mntu ufuna ukusondela kuzo.
Kwimbuyekezo, apha ndishiya ikhonkco kunye nedatha kwizinto ezininzi ezimbi zolu qheliselo:
http://paulirish.com/2012/vendor-prefixes-are-not-developer-friendly/
PS: Ndiyabulela kumlawuli owenze "umlingo" wokulungisa impazamo yam.
Yeyiphi eya kuba yeyona ikhawulezayo ngalo mzuzu ndicinga ukuqhwanyaza