Umfanekiso onomdla kakhulu endiwufumene kwi-a IkhowudiNinja, iblogi kwi-intranethi yaseCuba apho uthelekiso lwenziwa ngokubaluleka kobu buntu babini emhlabeni.
La madoda mabini afa ngenyanga enye yaloo nyaka. Steve laligqalwa njengegorha ngokubanzi, ngelixa Dennis yayingahoywa ngokubanzi lihlabathi. Bambalwa abadwelisi benkqubo abalaziyo ixabiso lokwenyani lomsebenzi we UDennis Ritchie Bafunda ngokufa kwakhe.
isono Steve Jobs ngekhe ibekho iPhone, iPad, iPodt Macintosh. Ngaphandle UDennis Ritchie ngekhe ibekho C. Ngaphandle C hayi hay Unix, Windows o Linux. Ngaphandle C hayi hay C ++ ni Injongo-C. Akukho nto IMacOS Xokanye iOSokanye Photoshopokanye I-FLStudiookanye Firefoxokanye I-Safari, ni Google Chromeokanye Isikhululo sokudlalaokanye I-XBox. Enyanisweni, i-90% yezicelo zehlabathi zibhalwe ngaphakathi C o C ++ o Injongo-C. Ukuba ucinga ngayo, Dennis ifanelwe yimbeko yethu, yazisa oku.
Ingxaki kukuba abaninzi abazi ukuba kukhulu kangakanani ukutsiba ukusuka kwiilwimi ezikhoyo ukuya kwiC (eyaqala ukubonakala ngo-1969). De kube ngoko, abaninzi abadwelisi benkqubo basebenzisa indibano okanye olunye uhlobo lolwimi olusekelwe kuyo. Nangona i-C yayingenziwanga ukuba iphatheke phakathi kwamaqonga, ukulula kwayo kwavumela abaqulunqi ukuba bavele phantse kuzo zonke iiplatifomu ezikhoyo, okubangelwa ezininzi izicelo eziphathekayo. UC ubenempembelelo enkulu kwikhompyuter, mhlawumbi njengazo zonke ezinye iilwimi.
Ukuba ufuna ukwazi iinkcukacha ezithe vetshe ngembali yolu lwimi, funda
eli nqaku linika umdla.
Olunye ulwimi lwamandulo (1959) olwaluhambele phambili kakhulu kwaye lwalunempembelelo, nangona lwalungadumanga njengoC (mhlawumbi ngenxa yokuntsokotha kwalo) ibe yiLISP.
Kwaye Ngaphandle kweNjongo C okanye i-C ++, ngekhe kubekho iJava.
Ngaphandle kweC ++ ngekhe kubekho iJava, kodwa iNjongo C? kum iyaphela.
Kwaye ngaphandle kweePC ngekhe kubekho C LOL
C yavela ngo-1972. I-PC ngo-1981.
kodwa ngaphandle kwePC's C, nokuba ingakanani na, iya kuba luncedo oluncinci kuthi :), ngaphandle kokuba njengabasebenzisi, ufuna ukwenza ipasta ngetumata kunye neC ivumba XD.
Kwaye uSteve Jobs akazange aqulunqe iPC, wayila inkqubo yokusebenza kwemizobo, eyenye into, into ebengayi kuyenza ngaphandle kukaC.
USteve Jobs akazange ayile nto. Ujongano lwegraphical lwayilwa nguXerox kunye noApple (hayi uSteve Jobs kodwa abasebenzi bakhe okanye abaphuhlisi nantoni na ofuna ukubabiza ngayo) ukhuphele uyilo kodwa uJobs akazange aziqambe kwanto ngokwakhe, wayeyingqondi kwintengiso.
Oko kukodwa akusiyo imfanelo yakhe ... umfana naye wayekhathalele imbonakalo kunye noyilo, ngakumbi iifonti.
uSteve Jobs akazange ayile inkqubo yemizobo, wayithenga/ wayiba kwi-xerox
Kodwa, ukuba sele uphoxile, uxolo ngokukuxelela :)
Inyani kukuba ndiyibonile le meme kancinci (le okanye ezifanayo).
Okokuqala, awudingi uSteve Jobs ukuba aqinisekise umzobo kaRitchie (nangona basweleke kufutshane). Eyona nto imbi onokuyenza kukunxulumanisa ukufa kwakhe nokomnye, ekubeni ukuzithelekisa kunika ingcamango yokuba umkhumbula ngenxa yeMisebenzi kungekhona ngenxa yeemfanelo zakhe, kwanokuba uzenza ngenye indlela.
Inyaniso kukuba andizange ndiyibone incoko okoko wasweleka uRitchie, apho, xa sithetha ngokufa kwakhe, igama likaJobs alibonakali. Kubonakala ngathi abaninzi basebenzisa igama likaRitchie kuphela ukugxeka uJobs nabakhuseli bakhe kungekhona kuba bekhusela imbonakalo yakhe, nto leyo ebuhlungu.
Ayikokugxeka iphepha, kukubonakalisa ngokubanzi ngesihloko.
Un saludo
Ndiyayiqonda ingongoma yakho, xa kwasweleka iMisebenzi wonke umntu wayehlazekile, mna ngokwam ndathi "kulungile, hlwempu, enye encinci, sonke sisahamba" kodwa kunjalo.
Emva kwexeshana ndafumanisa ukuba uRitchie uswelekile kubusuku obungaphambili, nto leyo eyandenza ndaziva ndibuhlungu kwanokuba nootitshala ngokwabo ngaloo mini beza nobuso obude ukuza kufundisa iiklasi (I study science science). Ngapha koko, ngala mini sasithetha ngesihloko nootitshala kwaye sixoxa ngezinto ezinomdla malunga nokuba uRitchie wayeyintoni kwaye ngebanjani ngoku ngaphandle kwakhe…
Kwaye ayikokujongela phantsi uJobs, ok, wayenemibono yakhe eqaqambileyo, kodwa akasondeli nakwisitrato azifumana ekuso uRitchie, kukho isizathu sokuba aziwe njengotata wecomputing yangoku.
nano, Ndiyacinga umqhaphu Unyanisile ngokupheleleyo; Kutheni ungathinteli kuphela umsebenzi we imisebenzi kodwa nangona, kwiimeko ezininzi, umntu wakhe ukuzama ukukhulisa umsebenzi we Dennis?
Yintoni malunga nokungqina? ...leyo ibiyingqondi enye ingeyiyo? ...ukuba bubugwenxa ukuthetha ngaphezulu komnye kunomnye? Siyachaneka xa silinganisa ukufaneleka komnye kufuneka sikuthelekise nenye.
Inyaniso kukuba le grafu, ngokudabukisayo, yenza i-disservice URitchie
Andiyiboni ngolo hlobo. Andiqondi ukuba lo mfanekiso unenjongo yokususa kwiMisebenzi, kunokuba ugxininise ukuba ukufa kwakhe kwakhankanywa kulo lonke ihlabathi ngokungathi nguThixo, nangona kunjalo uDennis wayengenjalo, xa ngokwenene umsebenzi wakhe wawubaluleke kakhulu (okanye ngaphezulu). ) kunaleyo yeMisebenzi.
+1
I-elav <° iLinux wathi:
“Andiyiboni ngolo hlobo. Andiqondi ukuba loo mfanekiso ufuna
thabatha uzuko kwiMisebenzi, endaweni yoko ubalaselisa ukuba ukufa kwakhe kwaba
echazwe kulo lonke ihlabathi ngokungathi nguThixo,
Noko ke, ekaDennis yayingenjalo, ngoxa eneneni yayingumsebenzi wakhe
"Kwakubaluleke kakhulu (okanye ngaphezulu) kuneMisebenzi."
Ke ingxaki kukuba omnye wanikwa unyango olwahlukileyo emva kokufa kunomnye, ngoku iyeva ucinga kwenzeke ntoni?
Ndiyavumelana, kwakhona, ngokupheleleyo nawe. umqhaphu
Kodwa ngokunzulu, yintoni ingxaki ngeMisebenzi? Ndiyaphinda ndithi, kwasetyenziswa imisebenzi kuba wasweleka ngenyanga nonyaka omnye noDennis, injongo ayikokumthelekisa ngokwembono yokujongela phantsi omnye okanye omnye. Mhlawumbi yayingayi kuba yiMisebenzi, mhlawumbi yayiza kuba nguBill Gates okanye omnye umntu.
Andazi uTina, mhlawumbi imakethi yabathengi, i-capitalism, amasebe kunye nemisebenzi nganye inefuthe kwirhafu emva kokufa komntu ngamnye. Ingongoma yeyokuba, ngaphandle kukaDennis Ritchie, iMisebenzi ibingekhe yaba yeyona CEO ikrelekrele kweyakha yabakho.Ngamanye amazwi, uDennis bekufanele ukuba ufanelwe yimbeko yokuba uMnumzana wakho Imisebenzi eyifanele. Kuyikhonkco, u-Ritchie kufuneka aqatshelwe njengomdali wekhompyutheni yokuqala, umdali weetyhubhu ze-vacuum, umdali wombane ... njl njl njl ... abanye baxhomekeke kwabanye ...
Ushiya uElav ohluphekileyo kuba ufunde i-imeyile awayeyithunyelelwe nguKitty kwaye unomsindo kakhulu, yiloo nto ethetha ezo zinto.
I-elav <° iLinux wathi:
Andazi uTina, mhlawumbi imarike yabathengi, ubungxowankulu,
amasebe kunye nemisebenzi nganye nganye iphembelele irhafu
emva kokusweleka komntu ngamnye.
Ngokuchanekileyo ... kubonakala kum ukuba ukufa kwe imisebenzi ngokungafaniyo ne URitchie Yayinosasazo olukhulu lweendaba, ngoba? ke, kutheni imisebenzi Ibiyimithombo yeendaba ngaphezulu URitchie. Ngokombono wam, oku akubonisi ukungabi nabulungisa, njengoko loo grafu izama ukubonisa, kodwa nje umphumo womxholo apho umntu ngamnye aphuhliswe khona.
isibindi, yeka ibalcony UElav, ndoda, yintoni engalunganga ngokuvuya ukufumana i-imeyile evela Kitty?
I-elav <° iLinux wathi:
"Kodwa serious, yintoni ingxaki ngeMisebenzi?"
Andazi... kutheni ungabuzi ukuba ngubani obhale le "article" http://elsoftwarelibre.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/dennis-ritchie-el-verdadero-genio-que-la-mayoria-desconoce/?
Nangona siyayazi le ndawo kuba siyindwendwela kakhulu kwinqanaba elithile, asinanto yakwenza noko kupapashwa apho, oko kukuthi umbhali waloo blog unezimvo zakhe, ezifanayo okanye azifani nezethu...kodwa hey. , sele uyayazi le okanye hayi? 😀
Mna ngokwam ibindikhathaza kakhulu indlela osingathwe ngayo umba wokubhubha kukaJobs. Kubonakala ngathi utata weekhompyutha uswelekile, umntu owathi, ukongeza kwinguqu kwishishini letekhnoloji, wanikela ngeebhiliyoni zeerandi kwaye ngale minikelo iye yafunyanwa iyeza loMhlaza... ndiyayiqonda?
Mna ngokwam, ewe, indlela eyayiphethwe ngayo yayindikhathaza...
Ngoku, malunga noDennis ... kwenzeka ukuba iMisebenzi iyadunyiswa, nangona kunjalo, phantse akukho nto ikhankanywe nguDennis. Ndicinga ukuba oku kukhankanywa kancinci ukuba lo ebenabo bekungafanelekanga ngandlel’ ithile, oku akuthethi ukuba ukuze kukhankanywe ngakumbi, iMisebenzi okanye umsebenzi wakhe ngoku kufuneka uthotywe.
Ndivuma into? …
Kwakungekho mfuneko yokuba uDennis afe, andifuni sizathu sokucinga ukuba iMisebenzi yayingenamvelaphi ngeendlela ezininzi. Usomashishini, usomathuba, ewe ... wayebobabini, kwaye oku akufuneki ukuba kube kubi, kodwa nanini na ucinga nge-Apple ucinga ngeMisebenzi (kunye nolunye), makhe sibone ukuba bachaza njani ukuba kutheni bemangalele i-Samsung kuba ngokutsho kwabo. , i-Apple yaqamba ingqikelelo yeThebhulethi, ¬_¬... sukuchukumisa i- ______ yam, kuba iipilisi bezisele zibonwa kwi-StarTrek...
Phofu. Ndiyaxolisa ukuba ndithe ngqo kwaye ndingenza ubuhlungu, kodwa kubonakala kum ukuba iMisebenzi ifumene iimfanelo ezingezizo zakhe, bamncoma ngento "ayiqambe" ngoku sele ikhona, nangayiphi na imeko wandisa abanye. Iingcinga/izimvo, kufana nokubalela Ubuntu ukuba iLinux ibe apho ukhoyo namhlanje.
Ukubulisa 😀
Wayefanele ukuthetha oku ngezantsi
UTina, ubuhle bokuhlanganisa abalinganiswa babini kukuba udala umahluko omkhulu kunokuba uthethe ngoDennis kuphela. Sele uyazisile inkcazo yento, enye yayinobuhlobo kakhulu kumajelo eendaba kunomnye. Nangona kunjalo, ndiyakholelwa ukuba oku kubi, kuba kugqwetha inyaniso kunye nembono abantu abanayo malunga negalelo lomntu ngamnye kwi-computing nakwiteknoloji.
Ethetha ngolibele.
Ibali likaDennis Ritchie.
Indikhumbuza isiphelo esibuhlungu sikaNikola Tesla owayefuna amandla akhululekile, acocekileyo kuwo wonke umntu.
Yeyiphi i-capitalism kunye ne-archetype yaseMelika ecinyiweyo kwiincwadi zenzululwazi.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9×5-s68Nt-I
Kanye emva kokufa kweMisebenzi, enye yezona "iphephandaba" okanye "iidayari" ezinzulu eMexico zapapasha inqaku apho bathelekisa imisebenzi kunye neNewton kunye neMozart, engabonakali nje ukuba ayilingani kwaye ingenangqondo kum, kodwa ingenangqondo kwaye ingenangqondo.
Kum iMisebenzi ngomnye woosomashishini abasebenzayo kumaxesha amva nje, (kwaye oko akuyoncomo) kunye nomntu onohlobo oluphuhlileyo lobukrelekrele (oko kukuncoma); Kodwa ayingomntu endimfumana encomeka ngokuziphatha, ingenguye nomyili wezinto ezixabiseke kakhulu kwiimveliso ze-Apple.
U-Ritchie akazange abe ngumntu owaziwayo, kodwa ukufa kwakhe okusondele kakhulu koko kweMisebenzi kwenza abantu abaninzi, abawuxabisayo umsebenzi wakhe, bazive becatshukiswa kukungahoywa xa kuthelekiswa neMisebenzi.
Mhlawumbi bobabini babenobugcisa obuphuhliswe kakhulu (kunye obungaqhelekanga) kwiindawo ezahlukeneyo; kodwa ingxaki apha yingxaki ephambili. Ngaba kufuneka sixabise i-genius yeshishini lekhompyuter kunye nemveliso (kunye nawo onke amathuba, kunye nokuxhaphaza kunye nemvelo yayo enenzuzo) ngaphezu kobuqili bokudala ikhompyutha (iprogram)?
Ndibhala oku ndakhumbula uBart Simpson exelela uKrusty ukuba abantu bayamhlonela kwaye bemncoma ngaphezu kwazo zonke izazinzulu namagcisa exesha lakhe. Mhlawumbi yiloo nto kukho amanani esenzo se-Krusty
kunye neMisebenzi, heh.
Ukubulisa
Ndicinga ukuba ingxoxo endiyiphakamisileyo ayikho malunga nokufaneleka okanye enye into eyenziwa nguMisebenzi. Ngokukodwa, ungumntu endingamxabisiyo ngokugqithisileyo. Kwaye, ewe, kuyinyaniso ukuba yayibaxiwe kumajelo eendaba, kodwa olo hlobo lwento alukwazi ukulawulwa.
Kubekho iingcaphephe zokwenyani zomculo ekungekho mntu ukhe weva ngazo. Kwaye ukufa kwakhe akuzange kuthethe nto ebantwini. Ekugqibeleni ngumbuzo wokuthandwa.
Kulo nyaka uGil-Scott Heron usweleke kwaye akazange abe nesiqingatha sosasazo lweendaba ezenziwa ngu-Amy Winehouse. UCesaria Évora naye wafa kwaye akukho nto. Ucinga ukuba ndenza iimemes ndibathelekisa? Andiyenzi loo nto kuba ikhangeleka ibubuntwana kum nangenxa yokuba nam akufunekanga ndiwadibanise omabini amagama.
Ingongoma kukuba ukuba ufuna ukuwuxabisa umsebenzi kaRitchie, kufuneka uwenze ngokuzimeleyo kuba kungenjalo awuwuxabisi umnikelo wakhe omkhulu kodwa kunokuba "ungcono kuneMisebenzi."
Kutheni iMisebenzi isetyenziswa? Kutheni le nto iJobs isabizwa ngegama lokusweleka kukaRitchie? Ngaba ufuna ukuyikhusela ngokwenene?
Inye impendulo yeyokuba iJobs ibingayi kusetyenziswa ukuba ibingaphikiswa ingcinga yokuba ihlabathi liyahanahanisa kwaye alinalwazi, uRitchie ebengcono kunoJobs okanye uRitchie ebeyingqondi kanti uJobs engenguye.
Kowam uluvo andizange ndithethelele iMisebenzi, kwaye akangomfanekiso endiwuxabisayo okanye endimthethelelayo, ndibonisa nje ukuba bubuhanahanisi ukuyikhusela ngokumfamekileyo iMisebenzi njengoko kusetyenziswa uRitchie ukumgxeka.
Nangakumbi kuba ndikholelwa ukuba uRitchie unento eyaneleyo yokuba kwimbali yekhompyutha ngaphandle kokusebenzisa uthelekiso olungancedi nganto umzobo wakhe.
Kwaye ngaphandle komntu owenza iimpazamo ezincinci xa ebhala i-elav, abayi kuqonda ukuba kwelo binzana akusiyo i-subjunctive engafezekanga edlulileyo yesenzi i-haber, kodwa isalathisi esilula.
Kwakhona loo nto "Macintosh" (ngaphandle kokuba loo ndlela ngenjongo) iyonakalisa amehlo akho.
Yiza, xhego, yilungise
Ngokukrakra, oku kufana noBuntu kunye nezinye ii-distros, abo banemali batyala imali kwintengiso kwaye kuba kukho intengiso, okuseleyo akubonwa.
Isibindi, yiya kubamba iibhola ze-blonde yesikolo samabanga aphakamileyo oyithandayo. Ndenze kuphela iCopy/Paste yenqaku apho ndenze khona iposti..
Ukuba ubunombona ububhanxa busuka buphele tu kuba khange ububone obu buso buncinci anabo.
Ngapha koko, andizithandi iiblondes okanye iimidgets, njengoko ndachazayo kudliwano-ndlebe noSandy. Ngendlela, i-blondes ayinayo iibhola, kwaye ayinayo nayiphi na abafazi hahahaha.
Ukuba awubhalanga, xelela umbhali egameni lam ukuba ayothatha izifundo zolwimi, kwibanga lesi-5, kulapho bandifundise khona tenses hahahaha.
Ikaka, ikaka, ikaka. Yeyiphi itypo endinayo ngalo Ñ...
Okumangalisayo kukuba, igama elithi "ukuchwetheza" alichanekanga kakhulu, kuba lilizwi elingeyomfuneko, into echanekileyo yayiza kuba "kuchwetheza", hehe.
Ukuziphatha: ukusebenzisa ulwimi ngokuchanekileyo kuhle kakhulu, kodwa akufuneki sibe ngabagqwesileyo kwibhlog.
Hugo omkhulu 😀
Yinto nje yokuba i-extremist igqwethwe yi-extremist hahahahaha.
Lityala likaElav elo, wandifundisa lonto
Umntu kusenokusoloko kukho impazamo kodwa oko sele inqanaba eliphezulu Hoyganism ngumbhali yokuqala
Asikokuzibaxa izinto, bunzulu.
Kwaye yiloo nto umntu obeka "i-webos" kwii-imeyile athi?
Ungandisoli ngempazamo zakho ngoku. Andikufundisanga nto kwaye uKitty khange andithumelele naziphi na ii-imeyile ozikhankanyayo. Kwilizwe lam elibizwa: Brete, Chanchullo kunye neGossip.
Makhe sibone, into oyithandayo uKitty yinyani, kufuneka ujonge zonke izinto zomntwana ozithethileyo kwileta eya ku-EsDebian, indlela ondixelela ngayo nge-blonde evela esikolweni sam esiphakamileyo, kakuhle, yiloo nto, ivakalelwa HAHA.
Kwaye lanto ka "typing" lityala lakho kuba umntu endambona ebhala elo gama nguwe.
Ungazenzi, zange wandibona ndibeka "typing" 😛
https://blog.desdelinux.net/mac-lion-para-unity/#comment-1323
Lee carcamal
Yiza, uyadika ngamankazana, hamba uye uthule LOL
Ngoku uye wabetha kuloo nto, masibone ukuba ithatha ixesha elingakanani.
Ingcebiso. Xa ucaphula igama nelizwi kwinqaku, okanye inxalenye yalo, equlethe iimpazamo zopelo okanye zegrama, bonisa ngokucacileyo ukuba yeyiphi indawo ekhankanyiweyo nalapho kunokubakho impazamo, yongeza:
[sic]
U-"sic" libinzana lesiLatini elithetha "nje" okanye "njengoko injalo" kwaye libonisa ukuba isicatshulwa sithetha ngokuthe ngqo, sihlonipha umthombo wokuqala kwaye sikwahlula kuzo naziphi na iimpazamo zegrama okanye zopelo ezinokuthi zikhona.
Ukubulisa
Uthelekiso lusoloko luyinto engathandekiyo, kodwa…
Andizange ndibenayo "i-iPhone", kwaye andicwangcisi ukuba nayo. Ngoba?
Ngenxa yezizathu esinokuqwalasela "ifilosofi."
Andizimisele ukungcatsha indlela yam yokucinga ngemveliso, nokuba ilungile kangakanani na, andikhathali.
Njengoko “uRichard Salman” watshoyo, “inkululeko ifuna ukuzincama, kwaye ndikulungele...
Ukubulisa
Ngaphandle koko, ngeendleko ze-iPhone, uthenga ifowuni enkulu oyithandayo.
Elo cwecwe lefowuni linegama: Samsung Galaxy SII
Kwaye kungekhona kuphela i-Samsung Galaxy SII, kodwa abanye, nangona andazi ngakumbi kuba i-misanthropes ayifuni ifowuni yeselula.
Ndifunda i-biography yeMisebenzi ngoku ... kwaye inyaniso kukuba, iimvakalelo zam ezimbi ziqinisekisiwe. Ngokomgaqo, andiyithandi ifilosofi ye-Apple okanye yeMisebenzi. Ndiyawuthanda umgangatho weemveliso kunye nolunye umbono wabo wemfezeko yokugqiba, kodwa andiboni ukuba ekugqibeleni banegalelo kwihlabathi elingcono. Kufana nento embi malunga neMicrosoft, ngexesha layo, iphindaphindwe ngewaka ... umba wonke wamalungelo omenzi kunye nokunye ... buaaaaagggg.
Xa ndithetha inyani, ndandingamazi kwaphela uMnu. Dennis Ritchie, kodwa ndandimazi uJobs, yaye ndicinga ukuba mntu ngamnye wayeyingqondi kumsebenzi wakhe.
Inyaniso yokubakhumbula emva kokufa kwabo luxanduva okanye nantoni na ofuna ukuyibiza ngayo, kumntu ngamnye, kwimeko yomsebenzi, benza ingxolo enkulu, kwimeko kaDennis Ritchie akunjalo, kukho ezinye izimvo. apho kuphela uDennis Ritchie okhankanywe (umzekelo iqhosha http://alt1040.com/2011/10/muere-dennis-ritchie-creador-del-lenguaje-de-programacion-c ).
Kukho abanye apho kukhankanywa uSteve Jobs kuphela, kodwa uninzi lujolise “kwimpikiswano” evezwa zizithuba apho kukhankanywa aba babini, sele befile, masibayeke.
Ngokumalunga nesithuba, sele ndikhankanyile, enye nenye inokubaluleka kwayo kwintsimi yayo, andinakutsho ukuba enye ibhetele kunomnye, nganye inendawo yayo.
Phendula nge quote
Ndivumelana naloo post okanye meme. Ndaphinda ndayithumela kuFB nakuG+
Kulihlazo ngokwenene indlela ubomi bomntu oye wakopa izinto okanye, nangayiphi na imeko, wenza imali ngokusekelwe kwiimpumelelo zabanye, wanconywa. Kwaye uRitchie wabekwa phantsi kwetafile. Ngamafutshane, yayingumbandela wezimvo. Abahlobo bam baka-“Maqueros” bayandicaphukela xa ndithetha kakubi ngothixo wabo.
Yimbeko leyo ifanelwe yimbeko.
Ungasathethi ke, ndincoma le movie ye-semi-biographical:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0168122/
Kuyayonwabisa kwaye kubalisa ibali elilungileyo malunga nokuba izinto zazinjani (ngaphezulu okanye ngaphantsi, kunjalo)
Ukufa kweMisebenzi kunye noRitchie kuthelekiswa nokufa kweNkosazana Diana waseWales (ngo-Agasti 31, 1997) kunye noMama uDade Teresa waseCalcutta (ngoSeptemba 5, 1997). Bobabini basweleka kwisithuba esingaphantsi kweveki, nangona kunjalo ihlabathi lonke lobuntatheli lanika ingxelo epheleleyo yokufa kukaLady Di, ngelixa ukufa konongendi kwakungenxa yolwazi kuphela.
Kwabo bangama-apile, uSteve Jobs ubalelwa kwizinto ezininzi angazange aziqulunqe. Umzekelo: Impuku, ekubeni yenziwa eXerox. Ithebhulethi yayisele ikhulelwe kwiminyaka engama-60 kunye ne-70 kwaye abokuqala babonakala kwi-80s ngaphandle kokuphumelela. Into awayenzayo kukuba ebeyazi indlela yokuyifaka ngexesha elifanelekileyo kuba indlela yokuphila yanamhlanje yahlukile kweyama-80s.
UDennis Ritchie akadalanga i-C kuphela, kodwa kunye ne-Unix kwi-AT&T Labs. IiMacOs yinkqubo yokusebenza esekwe kwi-BSD kwaye ii-OS ze-BSD zisekwe kwi-Unix (Unix-Like). Ke iiMacOs zinxulumene ngokusondeleyo ne-Unix.
Uzuze umfanekiso ogqwethekileyo uSteve Jobs ngenxa yokuba uhlawulisa amalungelo abenzi beengcamango kwaye ndiyazibuza: Ngaba iMisebenzi ihlawule uDennis Ritchie ngokusebenzisa iingcamango zakhe kunye nezixhobo ezenziwe yilo mva? Andikuqinisekisi.
Yekani ukuba nomona, bangaphi kuni abanqwenela ukuba neengcaphephe zezi ngqondo zimbini?
omnye lichule, omnye usomashishini olula
Ndivele ndacinga into embi ngoDennis Ritchie, malunga nemisebenzi, ndiyafunga ndathetha into enye nostallman.
umbuzo, ingaba yinyani ukuba uRitchie webe umsebenzi wabafundi bakhe waza wawuthatha???….
Akukho bungqina boku ... ngoko yi-FALLACY.