Njengomgaqo ngokubanzi, ndizithatha njengegqwetha labucala babasebenzisi be-Intanethi. Nangona kunjalo, ngakumbi nangakumbi ndicinga ukuba yenye yezo zinto apho kungakulunganga ukuthatha indawo egqibeleleyo, ngokupheleleyo okanye ngokuchaseneyo. Kuyabonakala, Ukungaziwa kwi-Intanethi kuneendleko ezingaphezulu kunokuba umntu esenokucinga kuqala, kwaye ayizizo zonke ezilungileyo.
Ngokuchanekileyo, kwiintsuku ezimbalwa ezidlulileyo ndafumana a nqaku Inomdla kakhulu kuDavid Davenport, ochasa ukungaziwa kwe-Intanethi. Nasi isishwankathelo seengxoxo zabo kunye nezimvo zam kwicandelo lokugqibela.
Ubungozi bokungaziwa kwi-Intanethi
Unxibelelwano olungaziwayo luthathwa njengelitye lembombo lenkcubeko ye-Intanethi ekhuthaza ukwabelana kunye nenkululeko yokuthetha, kwaye ngokuchaseneyo nokuchasana nokusekwa. Ukungaziwa, abaxhasi bayo bathi, kuqinisekisa ukuba oorhulumente abanakho ukuhlola abantu kwaye ngaloo ndlela baqinisekisa ubumfihlo kunye nenkululeko yokuthetha.
Ngokuka-Davenport, le mbono ayilunganga kwaphela. Ngokuvumela unxibelelwano olungaziwayo, ubeka emngciphekweni wokuwa ngokuthe ngcembe amaxabiso agcina intando yesininzi. Ixabiso lenkululeko yethu asikokungaziwa, kodwa kukuphendula.
Lonke uluntu lwala maxesha ludinga uhlobo oluthile lwendlela yokwenza izigqibo yokubakhokela, kunye nenkqubo yolawulo (amapolisa nezomthetho) ukuqinisekisa ubulungisa nokuthobela imithetho. Ngokukodwa kwimimandla yedemokhrasi, abemi banika "imvume" yabo kule mibutho ukusombulula iingxaki okanye ukungavisisani okunokuvela, kunokuba bathathe inyathelo ngokwabo. Ngokumohlwaya ngokuziphatha gwenxa, uluntu lujolise ekuthinteleni ukuphindeka kolwaphulo-mthetho olunje kunye nokuthumela isilumkiso esicacileyo kwabo banokulingwa ngokufanayo ukuba baphule amalungelo abanye. Inkqubo yedemokhrasi ikwabandakanya ulawulo (unyulo kunye nemithetho) eqinisekisa ukuba amabhunga olawulo akanakho ukusebenzisa kakubi isikhundla sawo. Ngokucacileyo, ukusonjululwa kwako konke ukungabikho kokusesikweni, nokuba kubandakanya abantu, amaqela abantu, okanye urhulumente uqobo, kufuna ukuba abo banoxanduva baphendule.
Ukuqukumbela, imibutho yedemokhrasi kufuneka ifundise abantu ukuba babe ngabemi abalungileyo kwaye bathathe amanyathelo okuthintela ukungaziphathi kakuhle; iya kuba bubudenge ukungagcini uxanduva lokuphendula "njengomnatha wokhuseleko" kwimeko apho konke oko kusilelayo.
Iziphumo zokungaziwa
Ukuphendula ngoxanduva kufuna ukuba abo banoxanduva lokuziphatha gwenxa banokuchongwa baziswe ematyaleni. Nangona kunjalo, ukuba abantu bahlala bengaziwa, ngokwenkcazo abanakuchongwa, okwenza ukuba kungabikho nto ibenza baphendule. Abameli bonxibelelwano olungaziwayo kwi-Intanethi, ke, vula umnyango kwiindlela ezininzi zokuziphatha kakubi nokuziphathaNgelixa ushiya amaxhoba kunye noluntu luphela lukhuselekile ngokupheleleyo.
Izenzo zolwaphulo-mthetho ezisekwe kwi-Intanethi ezinje ngokuqhekeza, ukudala iintsholongwane, ukukhanyela uhlaselo lwenkonzo, ubuqhetseba bamakhadi etyala, ukulandela umkhondo kunye nobusela besazisi kuyanda. Okwangoku, uqikelelo lomonakalo obangelwe zezi zenzo zolwaphulo-mthetho lulinganiswa kumawaka ezigidi zeedola ngonyaka, kodwa indleko zomntu, ngokubhekisele ekuphulukaneni negama kunye nokuthembakala kwabantu abaninzi, kunye nokonakala ngokubanzi kwesimilo. , ayinakulinganiswa.
Ngelixa olu lwaphulo-mthetho lusenza umonakalo kuluntu, kukho imeko enobungozi ngakumbi yokungaziwa. Kwimeko apho unxibelelwano olungaziwayo luye lwaxhaphaka, emva koko ayizukufumaneka kubemi abaqhelekileyo kuphela, kodwa nakurhulumente nakulawulo. Oku kuyakuvumela ukuvuza ngokungakhethiyo kwezinto ezibuthathaka kakhulu, ukuhlawulwa kwezinyobo ukuze kufunyanwe izivumelwano ezinengeniso, unyulo lunokubanjwa, kwaye kuthathwe amanyathelo ngokuchasene nabachasi bezopolitiko, bonke bengohlwaywa.
Abanye banokuthi oorhulumente sele besebenzisa ukungaziwa ukufihla ukusebenza ngokufihlakeleyo, ke ngekhe kubekho mahluko. Nangona kunjalo, oorhulumente abenza ezi zenzo ngoku benza ngokungekho mthethweni. Abo babandakanyekayo bayazi ukuba yimpazamo kwaye bayazazi izohlwayo xa umntu ethe wabanjwa, yiyo loo nto etyhafisa wonke umntu, ngaphandle kwabona bathembekileyo okanye abanalwazi. Kuluntu apho kulawula ukungaziwa, la mandla okuthintela ayaphela.
Inkululeko yokuthetha
Ilungelo lokuthetha ngokukhululekileyo yinto ebalulekileyo kwisithethe sedemokhrasi. Isizathu soku silula: izimvo zinceda ukuguqula uluntu, kwaye nayiphi na imbono, nokuba ingaqhelekanga kanjani ekuqaleni, inokuba luncedo ekugqibeleni. Abemi akufuneki, ke ngoko, bathintelwe ngokungafanelekanga okanye bohlwaywe ngokuvakalisa izimvo zabo, nokuba bacinga ntoni.
Umbono wokuba inkululeko yokuthetha kubandakanya ukukhusela izimvo ezahlukileyo kutshutshiso nakwintshutshiso, kodwa kananjalo Inxalenye yokucinga ukuba umntu uyaziwa. Ngelixa unxibelelwano ngokungaziwayo lungeyomfuneko kwinkululeko yokuthetha, iqinisekisa ukuba akukho zithintelo zingenasizathu okanye zisohlwayo. Ke, kunokucelwa, ngaba izibonelelo zokungaziwa zingaphezulu "kweendleko" zayo, njengoko abameli bayo bebanga?
Inkululeko yokuthetha ikakhulu ichaphazela ukukhuselwa komntu ngokuchasene nokusetyenziswa gwenxa kwamandla, nokuba kukwezopolitiko, ngokwenkolo okanye ngenye indlela. Unxibelelwano olungaziwayo, nangona kunjalo, kunokwenzeka ukuba lusebenze ngakumbi kule nkalo. Kumazwe angoozwilakhe nakumazwe angenademokhrasi apho inkululeko yokuthetha ifuneka kakhulu khona, le mimandla ayinakulwenza olu hlobo lonxibelelwano kwasekuqaleni.. Kwakhona, imiyalezo ethunyelwe ngokungachazwanga ayinakulindeleka ukuba ibe nempembelelo enkulu kubo. Kuphela kuxa lowo uthumela umyalezo esaziwa kwaye uluvo lwakhe luthenjwa apho into ayithethayo inokuba nefuthe eluntwini. Ukuba unxibelelwano alwaziwa ngokwenene, kunzima ukuseka ubudlelwane obunje, kwaye ke ukuthembela kunxibelelwano olungaziwayo ngokubetha impempe, ukwazisa umhlaba ngokunyhashwa kwamalungelo oluntu, okanye ukumisela iqonga lezopolitiko, kuyaxutywa. .
Isiphelo
Abameli bonxibelelwano olungaziwayo bathi ukungaziwa kubalulekile ekuqinisekiseni inkululeko yokuthetha kwi-Intanethi, kwaye oku kungaphaya kobubi obunokubangelwa kuko (ubuqhetseba bekhompyuter, njl.njl.). Ngamafutshane, kukho abo basebenzisa imela yasekhitshini ukwenza ulwaphulo-mthetho, kodwa loo nto ayenzi imela imbi okanye igwetywe kukodwa.
Ngokuka-Davenport, olu luvo alulunganga. Uxanduva lokuphendula lusembindini wesiko ledemokhrasi kwaye lubalulekile kuzinzo loluntu olukhululekileyo nolunobulungisa.. Ukususa lo "mnatha ukhuseleko" kuya kukhuthaza inkohliso kuphela kwaye kukhokelele kulwaphulo-mthetho olonyukayo, ukwandisa inani lamaxhoba angazukufumana ubulungisa. Okubi, abo basemagunyeni banokusebenzisa ukungaziwa ngeenjongo zaboUkuphelisa naluphi na uhlobo lokuphendula kumagunya alawulayo.
Ngokudabukisayo, kukungathembani koorhulumente okuphembelela ingxolo yonxibelelwano olungaziwayo njengendlela yokuqinisekisa inkululeko yokuthetha. Isiphumo sokungachongwa, nangona kunjalo, sikhuthaza ukusetyenziswa gwenxa kukarhulumente kunokuba sithintele kwaye sinefuthe elincinci kwinkululeko yokuthetha.
Ngokombono wakhe, indlela eya phambili icacile: yamkela uxanduva lokuphendula kunye nokwala unxibelelwano olungaziwayo. Abemi abanomdla banokusebenzisa izixhobo zonxibelelwano ezintsha ukuthatha inxaxheba ngokupheleleyo kurhulumente. Inkululeko yethu iza ngexabiso lokuhlonipha umthetho, kwaye ngenxa yoko kufuneka sikwazi "ukuphatha into ayenzayo okanye angayenziyo". Ukutshintshela kuhlobo lokuthatha inxaxheba kukarhulumente yeyona ndlela ilungileyo, ekhuselekileyo, nozinzileyo kunaleyo ikhutshwa lilizwe elingaziwayo lokungaziwa.
Uluvo lwam: ukugxeka inqaku laseDavenport
Ngokunyaniseka, ndifumanisa ukuba iphepha likaDavenport licacisa kakuhle kwaye lidibanisa ezona mpikiswano zichasene nokungaziwa kwi-Intanethi. Kanye ngenxa yeso sizathu ndaye ndagqiba kwelokuba ndabelane nawe.Andivumelani namanqaku akho amaninzi, kodwa ndiyavuma ukuba iyachaza kwaye iyaziphikisa izimvo zakho kakuhle. Kwakhona, ndicinga ukuba kukho inyani kwinto ayithethayo kwaye kusempilweni ukungakholelwa ukuba ukungaziwa kuhlala kuyinto elungileyo.
Nangona kunjalo, kubonakala kum ukuba iDavenport iyakulibala oko Ukungazichazi yinxalenye yedemokhrasi. Ngapha koko, esona senzo sisisiseko semibutho yanamhlanje yedemokhrasi isekwe kukungaziwa kuvota. Ngale ndlela, ifuna ukuqinisekisa ukuba abemi bakhululekile kulo naluphi na uxinzelelo okanye ukunyanzelwa xa bevota. Kwelinye icala, kukho iimeko xa ukuthatha uxanduva ngento oyithethayo okanye oyenzayo kungakhokelela ekuziphindezeleni, njengokulahlekelwa ngumsebenzi. Ngenxa yeso sizathu, ukukhusela ukungaziwa kwezinye iingxelo kunokusebenza.
Nangona kunjalo, eyona mpazamo inkulu kwinqaku laseDavenport yile ayizizo zonke izenzo zethu ezifuna ukuphendula. Oko kukuthi, inyani yokuba uGoogle ulandelela okwenzayo, ngaliphi ixesha, ukusuka phi, njl. Ayinanto yakwenza nokuziphendulela okanye "ukuthatha uxanduva"; ayisiyonto ngaphandle kokuxhaphaza umntu ongoyedwa ohlola abantu, ngaphandle kokuba sazi ngokupheleleyo, osebenzisa olo lwazi ngeenjongo zorhwebo kwaye, ngaphezulu kwako konke, ohambisa olo lwazi koorhulumente abathile xa bayayicela, ngaphandle kokwazisa abanini bayo bayo olo lwazi okanye izizathu zokuba benze njalo.
Ekugqibeleni, Umntu uyazibuza ukuba ngaba ukungaziwa kunokwenzeka kwi-intanethi. Ngamanye amagama, ukusukela ngexa izixhobo zethu zichongiwe ngenani, kuya kuhlala kukho umntu okrelekrele ngokwaneleyo ukuba angasilandela, nokuba senza iinzame zokungabonakali.
Wena. ucinga ntoni?
Lo iya kuba ngumcimbi oya kuhlala ufumana ama-hives.
Ukusuka kwimbono yam, ukungaziwa kufuneka kuncitshiswe, kuyenzeka kakhulu ukuba uninzi luzimele ngasemva ukuze luthethe izinto zobudenge kunye nokungahloniphi ngaphandle koloyiko lokohlwaywa. Ndiyabulela kuye, ukungabikho kovelwano kwinethiwekhi kuye kwalahleka, kugcwalisiwe ngabathiyileyo kunye nabantu abaza kukhuphela kuba ebomini bokwenyani akubaniki isibindi. Ngexesha elithile eladlulayo ndafunda ukuba abantu abazithiyileyo ngabantu abangenisa izimvo zabo, abangakwaziyo ukuveza izimvo zabo buqu kwaye oko kubangela ukudana kwabo, abakubonisa kwinethiwekhi.
Ndiyakholelwa ekubeni maninzi amanqaku apho ukungaziwa kuyasebenza, umzekelo, ivoti, isikhalazo xa sijamelene nemeko enobungozi, kodwa ndiyakholelwa ngokuqinisekileyo ukuba nabani na othi okanye enze into kuthungelwano, kufuneka ASOLOKO elawula, abe "yindoda ", ukongeza, bonisa uluvo okanye isikhalazo ngendlela yobuqu, ukuzazisa, kuvumela" kangangoko kunokwenzeka ", ukunika isisombululo esifanelekileyo kwaye kwangaxeshanye sinokuqinisekiswa.
Ukubulisa
Kwaye ngubani umgwebi ukumisela imida? Oorhulumente okanye mhlawumbi "indibano yamadoda alumkileyo"?
Amanqaku owabeka "ekunciphiseni" ukungaziwa ngokuchanekileyo lawo aphakanyiswe ngabo bafuna ukulawula inethiwekhi; leyo ibingalahlekanga ngaphezulu, bayenzela "okuhle" kwethu. Ndingayiphendula loo ngxoxo ngebinzana elisetyenziswa kakhulu elizweni lam: "... ebeya kuba ulahla isofa hayi umfazi okrexezayo." Into yokuba iitrolls kunye nabathiyileyo bazifihla emva kokungaziwa ukuze bakhuphe i-traumas zabo, i-phobias kunye ne-philias ayithethi nangayiphi na indlela ukuba lonke uluntu luyabahlawulela, kuphela "ziingxoxo" zeentshaba zenkululeko ezihlala zisilumkisa " iingozi "ze-Intanethi kunye" nokusetyenziswa ngokungakhathali "kwayo.
UCharlie, ukwenza nje ingxoxo-mpikiswano kwaye uqhubeke nokubonisa umba: kuwe, ngaba ungabakhusela ubumfihlo babasebenzisi ngaphandle kokukhuthaza ukungaziwa kwi-Intanethi? Oko kukuthi, ngaba umntu unokuhlukanisa omnye komnye? Ngaba zikhona iindlela zokukhusela imfihlo yomsebenzisi engabandakanyi ukungaziwa?
Kwaye, nangayiphi na imeko, ucinga ukuba (ukungabinakho) ukungaziwa kwi-Intanethi kunokwenzeka ngokusemthethweni?
Wanga! UPawulos.
Molo Pablo, enkosi kakhulu ngokuthathela ingqalelo, ndiza kuzama ukuzicacisa ngeyona ndlela ifanelekileyo yokwenza ukuba ndiqondwe.
Ndiqala kumgaqo wokuba urhulumente ngamnye (kwaye ke ngoko wonke urhulumente njengentetho yombuso), ngokoluvo lwam, bububi obuyimfuneko ekusebenzeni koluntu njengoko sisazi kwaye KUFUNEKA kugxilwe ekumiseni imigaqo yomdlalo evumela ukuhlala Impucuko yabemi bayo (imithetho) kunye nokukhusela ukugcinwa kunye nokuhlonitshwa kwabo, kokubini eluntwini okanye kwilizwe nakwamanye amazwe (ubudlelwane namanye amazwe). Ngayiphi na imeko, nakwezoluntu oluhlala luqwalaselwa sisininzi njengeparadigms yedemokhrasi (amazwe aseNordic, eSwitzerland, njl.njl.) Urhulumente kufuneka enze imisebenzi yengcinezelo kwabo baphula imigaqo yomdlalo.
Ngoku, akukho mfihlo kuye nakubani na othi (noorhulumente) kudala bethathela ingqalelo ngakumbi ekulondolozeni umdla wamaqela abambe amandla ekonakaleni kwabemi abaninzi (kwaye apha umntu ngamnye ubeka la maqela anikwe igama abona bantu babathandayo: iibhanki, ii-oligarchs, ipati, njl. njl. "okanye" bafundise kwakhona "abo bathathwa ngokuba banokuba yingozi Kucacile ukuba ulawulo kubemi belizwe elinemida emiselwe ngokucacileyo ngumthetho kunye namaziko aqinisekisa amalungelo awafani nalawo akhoyo kumazwe anoozwilakhe kunye nolawulo lwamapolisa.
Ndiyaqonda ukuba ubumfihlo abufani nokungaziwa, okwenzekayo kukuba, ngokoluvo lwam, owona mthombo uphezulu wokuqinisekisa eyokuqala ubukho besibini; Makhe ndichaze, ngokwethiyori, ukuba bucala kufuneka kuqinisekiswe yimithetho egxile ekukhuseleni amalungelo abemi kurhulumente, kodwa ukuba ndiqala kwingcinga ephuhliswe ngaphezulu kokusebenza kakubi kwamazwe kunye nokuphathwa kwemithetho esekwe kwiminqweno yabo. , kuphela kukungaziwa igama apho kunokwenzeka ukuba abemi bafumane inqanaba elithile lokhuseleko kurhulumente. Ngaba ukhona umntu oye waqaphela ukuba oorhulumente banomdla "kulawulo" lwe-Intanethi ngokuchanekileyo lolona lawulo lwentando yesininzi kunye nabona basemagunyeni kunye nabacinezeliyo? Ngaba ayinakuba sisizathu esaneleyo sokusilumkisa eso?
Ukongeza, ngokoluvo lwam, kukho esinye isoyikiso esikhathaza njengokulawulwa kwamazwe, esisenzo semibutho yolwaphulo-mthetho, ulwaphulo-mthetho lwekhompyuter kunye nobunqolobi. Iya kuba bubudenge ukucinga ukuba inyani yokupheliswa kwemfihlo iyakususa ubugebenga be-cyber, kuba izaphuli-mthetho ziya kuchongwa ngokulula, kunokwenzeka ukuba ukubiwa kwesazisi kuyonyuka ukufihla ulwaphulo-mthetho lwabo. Ubomi bubonakalisile ukuba xa ii-arhente zogcino-mthetho zisenza imisebenzi yazo, izaphuli mthetho zinokubanjwa kwaye uluntu lukhuselwe.
Ngokumalunga nokungaziwa ngokupheleleyo kwinethiwekhi, ndicacile ukuba ayibikho, akunakwenzeka kwaphela, nokuba kuhlalutywe ngokwembono yezobuchwephesha, kodwa kunjalo, izixhobo zokungazichazi igama zomelele ngokwaneleyo ukunyanzela amazwe ukuba anciphise Ukungenelela, ukuba kungenxa yokungabikho kwezixhobo zokusihlola sonke; kwaye ngaphambi kokuba ndize nengoma ye-Snowden, i-NSA kunye nezinye iileta ezi-3, mandicacise ukuba ayifani nokuqokelelwa kolwazi njengokuchongwa kwabo BONKE abantu kunye nemvelaphi yolwazi, ukumbiwa kwale datha sele intsonkothe ngokwaneleyo ukugcina izihlwele ezikhulu zikhuselekile.
Ndicinga ukuba ndiye kude kakhulu kwaye ndishiye ezinye izimvo zingaphuhliswanga, kodwa ndingathanda ukugqiba ngemibuzo embalwa: Ngaba sikulungele ukubeka ukhuseleko lwethu lwabucala ezandleni zamazwe? Ngaba amava (kwaye ndingatsho ngakumbi, imbali) ukuthethelela esi sigqibo?
Umbuliso…
Egqwesileyo. Iintshaba zenkululeko zihlala zisebenzisa ingxoxo efanayo ukusinciphisa amalungelo kunye nenkululeko: ngokulungileyo kunye nokulwa "nabantu ababi."
Imibuliso. UPeter.
Kumbhali wokuqala ndingathi "uxanduva lokuphendula" yeyona nto ithandwa kakhulu kulawulo lozwilakhe. Masibeke i-chip kubemi ebachonga ngalo lonke ixesha. Oko kukuvumela ukuba ulandele iintshukumo kunye nezenzo zakho. Singabathintela ekwenzeni zonke iintlobo zolwaphulo-mthetho kwaye abantu abathembekileyo baya kukhuseleka. Ayisiyiyo kuphela into yokuba akukho lungelo lokungaziwa, kukho nelungelo lemfihlo.
Ndingathanda ukubona le ndoda ine-ID yayo ibhalwe ibunzi ebunzi kunye neGPS enekhola, ifowunelwe umnxeba, iposi ivulwe ngabantu besithathu, kunye neekhamera zevidiyo ezirekhoda ubomi bakhe. Apho wayengasayi kuphinda ahlekiswe "kukuziphendulela."
Kwaye okona kubi kuko konke oku kukuba kubomi bokwenyani sele besilawula ngeefowuni eziphathwayo kunye ne-Intanethi ...
Akubonakali kugabadele kakhulu kum okanye ukuba noxanduva lukwimo yobuzwilakhe. Ukuziphendulela yinxalenye yomthetho, apho sonke sinamalungelo noxanduva. Phakathi kokukwazi ukubona ukuba ngubani owenze ulwaphulo-mthetho, nokuba yikhompyuter okanye "yinto eqhelekileyo" kunye nelahleko yabucala kukho umhlaba womgama
Kubonakala kucacile kum ukuba awuhlali kwimeko yobuzwilakhe, ngethamsanqa kuwe, kunganzima ke kuwe ukuqonda indlela kaWindóusico; Ndikholelwe xa ndikuxelela ukuba akukho ukuzibaxa kuyo.
Ngokuchanekileyo urhulumente ekufuneka ebekelwe imida, eqala ngokuhlelwa kolwaphulo-mthetho kunye nokuphela kokukwazi ukungenelela kubomi babucala babemi, nokuba, ngenxa yokungazi, ukungazi okanye ubudenge, ngokuzithandela benza ubomi babo esidlangalaleni iinethiwekhi.
Okanye kuba bafuna ukuyenza ibe sesidlangalaleni?
Musa ukuba yinxalenye elungileyo yabasebenzisi benethiwekhi ezifana noFacebook benza ubomi babo kunye nemimangaliso esidlangalaleni. Twitter, njl? Lumka, ukuba LONKE ulwazi oluyimfihlo abalupapashayo lwenziwa ngokuzithandela ngokupheleleyo, ngaphandle koluvo lincinci kwimeko ezininzi, zeziphumo zeli nyathelo.
Sebastian, akukho buhlobo phakathi kokumisa ngobuninzi kunye nokuthintela ulwaphulo-mthetho. Jonga iingxelo zikaSnowden.
Inqaku leli lokuba, ngelixa sifuna ubumfihlo, sifuna ukusuka kwindawo yokujonga abo bethu bangakhange bachaphazeleke kulo mba.
Masibuyele umva iindima ngomzekelo. Masithi umntu othile ungene ekhompyutheni yakho esebenzisa iindlela zokungazichazi igama, okanye bayakukhubekisa, okanye bade bakuhlasele, bethatha ithuba lokungaziwa kwabo ukuze babulale okanye benzakalise umntu osondele kakhulu kuwe. Ngaba uza kundixelela ukuba ngekhe uthande ngelo xesha ukuba uRhulumente okanye amaPolisa abenolawulo kummi ngamnye ukuba azi ukuba ngubani owenze loo nto?
Okwangoku ukuba singamaxhoba, izinto sizibona ngokwahluke kakhulu. Kungenxa yoko le nto esi sihloko siphikisanayo, nangona kungekho mntu ufuna umhlaba we-Equilibrium-world, ngekhe ibe yinto embi ukukwazi ukulandela abantu abathile xa kufanelekile.
Oko kucinga ukuba, nangayiphi na imeko, urhulumente / igunya lenza okanye lifuna ukwenza into ... ewe, ndithetha ndikwikona yomntu ohlala kwimeko yokungohlwaywa.
Makhe ndigqwethe ingcinga yakho ngakumbi. Khawufane ucinge ukuba impimpi eqeshwe lilizwe elikhulu edweliswe kwi-Ibex 35 ingena kwikhompyuter yam.Ngaba ucinga ukuba amaPolisa okanye uRhulumente waseSpain angalusebenzisa olo lwazi ngokuchasene nabanamandla? Babeza kuyila nayiphi na into engekhoyo kwaye abo baphuli-mthetho babeza kuhamba nayo.
Umthetho awusetyenziswa ngendlela efanayo kuwo onke amacandelo entlalo. Ukuphulukana nokungaziwa kuya kunceda kuphela abo banamandla kunye nabo banokufikelela kulo lonke olo lwazi (amapolisa namanye amagosa). Akubonakali kulungile kum ukuncama inkululeko + ukungaziwa ngenxa yokhuseleko, eyangaphambili ibaluleke ngaphezulu (izaphuli-mthetho zohlwaywa ngokuphulukana nenkululeko ngesizathu). Unokuhlala kwilizwe elikhuselekileyo ngaphandle kokuphelisa ukungaziwa kwakho. Ndifumana abantu abangaziwayo yonke imihla kwaye andinasidingo sokubachonga ukuba bahambe ngokuzolileyo.
Kunjalo. Ngale ndlela, njengoko benditshilo kolunye uluvo, ndicinga ukuba kungangcono ukwahlula phakathi "kokukhusela imfihlo" yabasebenzisi kunye nokukhuthaza ukungaziwa kwi-Intanethi. Azifani. Ngoku ndiyayiqonda.
Wanga! UPawulos.
Uqikelelo ngqo. Uninzi ludibanisa ubumfihlo nokungaziwa kwaye zombini azisetyenziselwa injongo enye. Yile nto ndiyithethayo ngengcaciso yam ngasentla.
Molo Elav!
Kudala-dala, kodwa ixesha le-looooong lokuba ndingakhange ndifunde into enomdla, enkosi ku-@usemoslinux ngesi sihloko.
Ngokwam, NDIYAVUMELANA ngokupheleleyo nesindululo sikaDavid Davenport kunye nendlela ekulunge ngayo ukuba wena, u-Elav, kwaye sisebenzise i-linux ucacise umahluko omkhulu phakathi kwemfihlo nokungaziwa. Kule logic, ndingathanda ukwenza uluvo ku usemoslinux: ngaphakathi kolawulo lwentando yesininzi, akukho voti engaziwa kuba unelungelo lokusebenzisa ilungelo lokuvota yimfuneko ebalulekileyo ukuba ubhaliswe kwirejista yonyulo, kwaye ukwazi ukuvota kwindawo yokuvota kubalulekile ukuzazisa nesiqinisekiso esikhutshelwe le njongo. Ngaphandle kolo lwazi akukho mntu uvotayo.
Yiyo ke le nto inkqubo yokuvota ingenziwa ngaphakathi kokungaziwa, nangona ekugqibeleni ngubani-okanye ngubani-uvotelweyo ngasese kwaye sinelungelo lokugcina imfihlo yolonyulo lwethu.
Kunjalo sithandwa sam. Akukho mntu uvota ngaphandle kokuchaza igama lakhe, kangangokuba kumazwe apho kukho inqanaba eliphezulu lokungafundi, abantu abangakwaziyo ukubhala amagama abo abanalo ilungelo lokuvota.
Ingxaki kukuba ubumfihlo kunye nokungaziwa akunakuhlukaniswa njengamagumbi amabini azimeleyo. Ukuba kufuneka ndichongwe ngawo onke amaxesha, ndiye ndilahlekelwe yimfihlo (ndiyabona ukuba ayinakuphepheka). Izinto endizithandayo, ubuhlobo bam kunye nemibono yam akufuneki ibekho esidlangalaleni okanye kurhulumente.
@Tina Toledo, ivoti ayichazwanga. Ayinasazisi sokuvota kwaye ayinakulandelwa. Amanyathelo olawulo okuthintela ubuqhetseba kunyulo awananto yakwenza nako. Kubonakala kulungile kum ukuba singazichonga ngokukhuselekileyo kwi-Intanethi, kodwa kubonakala ngathi akukho ngqiqweni ukuba saziwe ngamaxesha onke (nabani na angangenelela kubomi bethu babucala ngaphandle kwemvume). Iinjongo zethu kwinethiwekhi kufuneka ziphandwe kuphela ngumyalelo wenkundla, hayi ngexesha lokwenyani "lokuthintela".
@windowsico Apha ukuvota kunyanzelekile kwaye bonke abo bavotayo kufuneka babhaliswe kwirejista yoluntu. Iphepha lokuvota eliyimfihlo (nokuba inkundla yonyulo okanye nabani na ochazayo ukuba ngubani ovotele bani) inxulumene ngakumbi nemfihlo kunokuba ungaziwa.
@Diazepan: xa ndifunda amagqabantshintshi abhaliweyo malunga nayo, kuyacaca kum ukuba uninzi lwabantu luphazamisa ukungaziwa kunye nelungelo lemfihlo. Kwaye ndingathanda ukwenza umzekelo: Ndihlala ndibhala kule bhlog njengo-Tina Toledo, ligama lam lokwenyani kwaye andikaze ndisebenzise isifumbathiso kunye nomfanekiso we-avatar yam ifoto yam. Ke ngoko andizazisi: bayalazi igama lam nobuso bam. Ngaba oko kuyandithintela ekunikeni uluvo lwam ngokukhululekileyo? HAYI.
Nangona kunjalo, ukulawulwa kwesi siza kunokufikelela kwidatha yam eyimfihlo kwaye eyimfihlo kwaye ndinelungelo, kwaye banembopheleleko, ukuyigcina ngasese kwaye ingathengisi nayo.
ukungaziwa.
1. m. Umntu okanye imeko engaziwa.
engaziwa, ma.
(Ukusuka kwi-gr. Ἀνώνυμος, ngaphandle kwegama).
Isilungiso Kuthethwe ngomsebenzi okanye ngokubhala: Oko akunalo igama lombhali wayo. Iifayile ze-U
2. Isilungiso Wathi ngombhali: Ngubani igama lakhe elingaziwa. U. tcsm
3. Isilungiso Com. Yathi kwinkampani okanye kuluntu: Oko kwenziwa zizabelo, uxanduva luthintelwe kwinkunzi abayimeleyo.
4. m. Ileta okanye iphepha elingatyikitywanga apho kuthethwa into ehlaselayo okanye engathandekiyo.
5m. Imfihlo yombhali efihla igama lakhe. Hlala ungaziwa.
Ukuba bucala.
1. f. Indawo yobomi babucala onelungelo lokuyikhusela nakuphi na ukuphazamiseka.
IVoti ayifani, yiyo loo nto kufuneka ubhalise yiyo loo nto kufuneka uzazise ngaphambi kokuba uvote. Kwaye ayaziwa kuba kubalo akukho mntu waziyo ukuba yeyiphi (okanye nantoni na) oyifakileyo kwibhokisi yokuvota (okanye nantoni na).
Umnumzana Davenport ukhusela isibhengezo sezixhobo "zokungazichazi igama" (mandisebenzise eli gama) kuba uyakholelwa ukuba abo bangaziwayo bangazizaphuli mthetho. "Kubomi be-analog" abantu bayabufihla ubuso babo ukuze bangaziwa. Izikrelemnqa zinxiba iiglasi zelanga, iminqwazi, ii-visors, ii-balaclavas, iiwigi, iminqwazi yezithuthuthu, ... ukufihla ubuni bazo. Indoda okanye ibhinqa ayinakubufihla ubuso bayo ngeenjongo zomthetho? Ndingacinga ezininzi. Inkululeko yokuthetha iqinisekiswa kuphela xa kungekho ukunyanzelwa kwaye ngenxa yoko ufuna ukungaziwa.
Izolo eSpain bekukho umboniso oxolo ubiza ukuba kwenziwe uhlolo-zimvo ukuba lukhethe phakathi kobukhosi nedemokhrasi. Ewe, iqela lamagosa asebupoliseni laqala ukubuza isazisi (DNI) sabaqhankqalazi, babhala idatha yabo kuluhlu kwaye bathatha iifoto.Uyakubona ukunyanzelwa? Kutheni le datha irekhodwa? Bafuna ukukoyikisa ngokususa ukungaziwa kwakho? Ndicinga njalo. Ngaba uyazi ukuba ndafumanisa njani ngaloo nto? Ndikhe ndabona ividiyo efakwe kwi-Intanethi ngumntu ongaziwayo. Ukuba ukungaziwa kuyaphela, izikhalazo ziya kuncitshiswa (ayithi sonke sifuna ukuba ngabafel 'ukholo) kwaye siyakuhlala kwihlabathi elibi.
Impazamo: Apho ndibeka khona idemokhrasi, bendifuna ukubhala i-republic (bendizakucinga ngantoni).
@Tina Toledo -> Ivoti engaziwayo -> «ayinalo igama lombhali wayo».
Umbhali.
1. m. kunye f. Umntu ongunobangela wento ethile.
Isizathu.
1. f. Oko kuthathwa njengesiseko okanye imvelaphi yento.
@windowsico ayaziwa. Ezincwadini zeetafile zokuvota kubhalwe amagama omvoti kunye nenani lemvulophu ofake kuyo ivoti. Ivoti yabucala.
Ukuba kwilizwe laseTina Toledo kunokwenzeka ukuba ufumanise ukuba ngubani umvoti ovotelweyo, ndiyaxolisa ngokungabuthatheli ngqalelo ubuzwe babo. Yindlela enokuxoxwa kakhulu yokuvota kwaye thina baseYurophu siyalibala ukuba ikhona, enje ngesigwebo sentambo okanye ukuba bonke abemi banokuphatha imipu.
I-PS: Lihlazo ukuba andikwazi ukuhlela imiyalezo yam, kuye kwafuneka ndiyigcwalise nge-Spam (ukuba umlawuli angadibanisa imiyalezo ndingavuya kakhulu).
@ Windóusico: Kuqala kubonakala kum ukuba mna nawe asinalo uluvo olunye malunga nokuvota. Okwakho ivoti yivoti apho ukhetho luchaziwe ngelixa lam lilungile kwaye isenzo - esidlangalaleni okanye sabucala - ukuveza ukhetho olukhethiweyo.
Kwilizwe lam-i-United States yaseNyakatho Melika-ngemini enye yonyulo ungavota ngeendlela ezahlukeneyo: ukuvota nge-elektroniki, ngokuvota, kwi-Intanethi okanye ngeleta. Konke kuxhomekeke ekubeni umvoti uhlala phi kwaye ilizwe ngalinye lilungiselele njani indlela yokuvota. Kwelam icala, kuba ndihlala eMexico okwangoku, ivoti yam yamva nje yayiyileta yembalelwano-
Ngoku, kutheni ivoti ingaziwa? Kuba kanye yintoni enika ixabiso elisemthethweni kwivoti yam, kwaye kuyo yonke inkqubo, kukuba siqinisekile ukuba ngubani onokuvota kwaye ngubani ovotileyo. Ngamanye amagama, umvoti ngamnye uzibonakalise ukuba uyakwazi ukusebenzisa ilungelo lakhe lokuvota. Ngaba inyani yokuba uvoto - ndicinga ukuba ndisebenzisa ivoti yam - apho ndavakalisa khona ukhetho lwam alunalo igama lam, iyenza ivoti yam ibe "yivoti engaziwayo"? HAYI. Kwenza kuphela unyulo lwam lube lolwabucala, kwaye loo nto kuphela ukuba ndiyafuna kuba akukho mthetho ungavumi ukuba nditsho ukuba ngubani okanye yintoni endiyivoteleyo. Njengomzekelo wokugqibela ziindawo zokuvota ezidumileyo ezenziwa ziinethiwekhi zeTV ezilindele iziphumo zezonyulo ixesha elide, kunye nenqanaba eliphezulu lokuchaneka.
Oku kundikhokelela ekubeni ndithathele ingqalelo into, nasiphi na isenzo esenziwa ngokungaziwa asinalo ixabiso lomthetho kwaye, kwezinye iimeko, kunokuba zizenzo ezingekho mthethweni. Ithetha ntoni le nto? Ukuze ndenze ikhontrakthi okanye ukuthengwa kwayo nayiphi na into elungileyo okanye inkonzo kufuneka ndiyenze, ngenkani, egameni lomntu othile, iqela okanye iziko elinobuntu obusemthethweni. Akukho lungelo linokubangwa ngokungaziwa: akukho mthetho okanye amalungelo asisiseko njengamalungelo oluntu, kuba ukuze ubonise ukunyhashwa kwala malungelo kunyanzelekile ukuba ubonise kuqala ubukho bexhoba.
Kwangokunjalo, ngaphakathi kolo luhlu lweembono, inkululeko yokuthetha ayisiyontando yesininzi okanye ilungelo leriphabliki ... lilungelo lomntu. Kwaye amalungelo oluntu ahamba ngaphaya kwawo nawuphi na umgaqo-siseko, imithetho yendawo, iinkolo, kunye noorhulumente bezopolitiko nezoqoqosho.
Ngoku, yeyiphi iGoogle, iMicrosoft, oorhulumente okanye into oyithandayo noyithumela kwi-intanethi eyaphulayo ayisiyo eyethu ... YIMFIHLO YETHU. Ngaba ngenene ucinga ukuba uGoogle unomdla wokwazi ukuba igama lam ndinguTina Toledo? HAYI. Kubantu bakaGoogle ndiyisampulu kuphela kubalo: Ndingomnye wesigidi kunye nesiqingatha sabasebenzisi abahlala eMèrida, Yuc. Mex.; Ndingomnye wamakhulu amathandathu anamashumi amabini abantu abathi kwi-80% yokukhangela kwabo bavele igama elithi "Beatles" ... njalo njalo. Abanamdla wokwazi igama lam okanye ubuso bam ... nakweyiphi na imeko abanomdla kuzo yiminqweno yam kunye nokuziphatha kwam kunye nokufumanisa ukuba bahlasela ubumfihlo bam. Kubo ndingaziwa ngokungathandwa kunye notyekelo oluthile.
Kodwa kukho enye into ebaluleke kakhulu: akukho lutshintsho kwezentlalo, kwezoqoqosho okanye kwezopolitiko olwenziwa ngaphakathi kokungaziwa. Uqhushululu notshintsho kwezentlalo nakwezopolitiko lwenzekile ezitratweni, ezikwereni, kumabala emfazwe nakwizakhiwo zikawonkewonke. Isibakala sokuba singawahoyi amagama abo bonke abo bantu - kuba ngokubanzi sazi kuphela amagama eenkokheli- ezenza (ba) ubunzima obuthatha (ba) ezitalatweni kuqhankqalazo akubenzi bangaziwa, kuba ekugqibeleni nganye Bashiye intuthuzelo kunye nokukhuseleka kwamakhaya abo ukuze babeke emngciphekweni imizimba yabo, inkululeko kunye nobomi babo. Kungenxa yoko le nto amazwe amaninzi emisa amatye ezikhumbuzo kumajoni awo angaziwayo, angafaniyo nokungaziwa.
Ukungaziwa kuyinto yasendle kuba ekuphela kwento esiyiphumezayo ngokuhlala ngaloo ndlela kukungabonakali kangangoko kunokwenzeka, kodwa asivelisi lutshintsho. Omnye umntu, amagqabantshintshi apha ngezantsi, wazama ukusebenzisa isicatshulwa esivela ku-Benjamin Franklin-ngethamsanqa elibi kangangokuba uDiazepan walungisa iphepha- elifundeka ngoluhlobo: “Abo bangalahla inkululeko ebalulekileyo ukuze bathenge ukhuseleko lwexeshana, abafanele nenkululeko kwanokhuseleko ”. Apha ubuncinci ukubonakaliswa kokubini kufanelekile:
1.-Khusela kuzo zonke iindleko ukungaziwa -ngabucala- kwi-intanethi, ayilulo ukhuseleko lwethutyana ekubhekiswa kulo nguFranklin?
Nabani na wasebenzisa, ngokungaqondakaliyo, ibinzana likaBenjamin ukuphikisana nokuma kwakhe ngokungaziwa, waqinisekisa ukubeka-nangona isipeliti-umbhali wesicatshulwa, kungenxa yokuba wayesazi kwangaphambili ukuba leliphi ibinzana elinempembelelo ngakumbi ukuba umbhali umntu owaziwayo hayi umntu ongaziwayo?
@Tina Toledo, andinaxesha lokufunda ngononophelo oluninzi, kodwa ukujonga ngaphezulu ndingaphendula oku kulandelayo:
E-Spain ivoti ayichazwanga kuba umbhali akachongwa. Akunakwenzeka kwaye ubuqhetseba bonyulo abunakuphepheka (phanda inkqubo yethu yonyulo kwaye uza kubona). Ndingatsho ukuba ndivotele u-X kwaye bubuxoki obo. Akukho mntu uya kwazi (kuphela ngumbhali wevoti) kwaye kwenzeka into efanayo ngemisebenzi ebhalwe ngoonobumba abangaziwayo okanye abangaziwa.
Ivoti yakho ayiyiyo eyabucala. Okomzuzu owabelana nevoti yakho nabantu ongabaziyo akusekho njalo, ayinamsebenzi ukuba umthetho uyalikhusela ilungelo lakho lokuba nemfihlo. Kuya kufuneka ungazi kakuhle xa ukholelwa ukuba olu lwazi alubalekisi kwinqanaba labucala. Ukuba besinokukhetha usodolophu kwilali enabemi abangama-200 ngenkqubo "yabucala yevoti", wonke umntu ebeya kwazi ukuba ngubani ovotele bani (enkosi ebantwini abakwibhodi yonyulo) kwaye iyakuba yintlekele leyo inkululeko yokuzikhethela. Kwaye ukuba awuyiboni ingxaki yevoti yakho yabucala, andizukuqinisekisa. Qhubeka nenkqubo yakho ekuhambela kakuhle.
Icacisa uMgaqo-siseko waseSpain wango-1978 kwisihloko sawo esingu-III. KwiCortes Generales, inqaku 68:
ICongress yenziwe ngamalungu angama-1 ubuncinci kwaye ubuninzi bama-Masekela angama-300, anyulwe ngumntu wonke, okhululekileyo, olinganayo, othe ngqo kunye ne-SECRET suffrage, phantsi kwemiqathango emiselwe ngumthetho.
-http: //www.congreso.es/consti/constitucion/indice/titulos/articulos.jsp? ini = 66 & fin = 96 & tipo = 2-
Kwaye iyanda kwisynopsis:
2.4. Ivoti mayibe IMFIHLO. Olu phawu luchaphazela nomgaqo wenkululeko, kuba yenza ukuba kuthintelwe ukunyanzelwa okanye ukuphazanyiswa kwivoti evulwe ngokukhululekileyo. Ke ngoko, ukongeza ekuqinisekiseni umgaqo wenkululeko yobugcisa bobugcisa. 16.2, unyanzelisa ulawulo lonyulo ukuba lubonelele ngeendlela zobugcisa kunye nezinto ezibonakalayo eziqinisekisa le mfihlo (iminquba, iibhokisi zokuvota, njl. Njl.). Qaphela, nangayiphi na imeko, ukuba ukufihla lilungelo kwaye AKUKHO MBOPHO. Akukho nto ithintela ummi ekubeni enze esidlangalaleni intsingiselo yevoti yakhe, kwaye, enyanisweni, oku kwenzeka rhoqo rhoqo ngexesha lomkhankaso wonyulo kwanomhla wonyulo.
-http: //www.congreso.es/consti/constitucion/indice/sinopsis/sinopsis.jsp? art = 68 & tipo = 2-
@Tina Toledo, andiqondi iikowuti. Ndivote kwizihlandlo ezininzi (umasipala, ingingqi, jikelele kunye neYurophu) kwaye ewe, ivoti iyimfihlo (njengoko ingaziwa) .Yintoni oyibalaselisa nge-SECRET? Ukuba uyibeka kuba ivoti yethu iyimfihlo ngokwenene, ndiyavuma, ngokungaziwa ukuba yi-100% yabucala.
Ndikufumanisa kuyinto embi ukuba abantu bachonge iqela lezopolitiko ngokungathi liqela lezemidlalo (iiflegi, iibheji, ipropaganda, ...) kwaye abayitshintshi ivoti yabo nokuba kwenzeka ntoni. E-Spain kukho abantu abanje kodwa ayisiyonto iqhelekileyo e-United States of America babeka iipowusta kwigadi yabo ukubonisa ukuba bavote ngohayi. E-Spain ayibonwa (ngaphandle kwamacandelo e-radical and militant).
Urhulumente wase-US ukhathazekile yimicimbi yase-Watergate kwaye ukusukela oko waqinisekisa abantu ukuba abantu abangaziwayo ngabantu ababi, abanokuziphatha okuthandabuzekayo kunye neenjongo ezimbi. Ndiyabathanda abantu abanjengo "Deep Throat" kwaye ukuba bayayithatha i-Intanethi bayakushiyeka ne-esile labo emoyeni. ESpain sinesiko elikhulu lokungaziwa kuncwadi nakwezobugcisa obuhle, siyazingca ngobukho babo kwaye asibunciphisi umsebenzi wabo ngenxa yokungabikho kwesiginitsha.
Ndiyaqonda ukuba kukho abantu abakhetha ukhuseleko kunkululeko, ngowona mbuzo wesimilo kunayo nayiphi na enye into. Ndiyayihlonipha imbono yakho.
Uxolo Iwaka @ Windóusico ngokungaphenduli ngethuba. Ndiyabulela kakhulu ngokuzisa ityala likaWilliam Mark Felt - aka "Deep Throat." I-WM Felt ichanekile yeyona meko yokusetyenziswa ngokungalunganga kokungaziwa:
Xa u-Edgar J. Hoover-owayesakuba ngumlawuli we-FBI- wasweleka ngoMeyi 1972, uFelt wayengomnye wabagqatswa ukuba baphumelele kuye, nangona kunjalo uRichard Nixon wanyula uPatrick Grey III njengomlawuli omtsha weBhunga, eshiya uMark Felt njengowesibini kulawulo oluphezulu FBI.
Yayingumbulelo kwesi sikhundla awathi uFelt wafikelela kulo lonke ulwazi oluqokelelwe ngabaphandi be-FBI unyaka-ukusukela ngoJuni 1972 ukuya kuJuni 1973-okoko zonke iingxelo zaqala ukudlula ezandleni zakhe ngaphambi kokufikelela eGrey.
UFelt wayesazi kakuhle ukuba olo lwazi lunamandla, kwaye lunika amandla nangakumbi xa olo lwazi luqulathe izinto ezingekho mthethweni ezenziwa nguMongameli waseMelika, ngenxa yoko wagqiba kwelokuba alusebenzise olo lwazi ukuze axhamle uNixon.
URichard Nixon wayesazi kakuhle ukuba u-Felt "ngu-Deep Throat" kwaye ibinguye ovuza ulwazi kwiintatheli uCarl Bernstein noBob Woodward. Bobabini uNixon noFelt badibana ngoJuni 23, 1972 ngengcebiso kaH. Haldeman- unobhala kamongameli- owathi "uMark Felt ufuna ukusebenzisana kuba unamabhongo."
UMark Felt, ngokungafaniyo no-Edward Snowden, akazange ashiye isikhundla sakhe ... ngokuchaseneyo: ngelixa wayevuza ulwazi phantsi kwegama elithi "Deep Throat" wayalela imisebenzi engekho mthethweni ye-FBI. Bobabini yena noEdward Miller bagunyazisa ugqogqo olungekho mthethweni - imisebenzi eyaziwa ngokuba yi "black bag" imisebenzi - ngethuba elisusela kunyaka ka 1972 ukuya ku 1973. Bobabini u "Deep Throat" Felt and Miller babekwa ityala ngo 1980 ngale misebenzi bafunyanwa benetyala lokwaphula imithetho. amalungelo oluntu.
Ngo-Epreli 1974 "uMqala oManzi" wayifumana into awayeyifuna: UNixon wanyanzela uGrey ukuba arhoxe njengoMlawuli we-FBI kwaye wonyula uMark "Deep Throat" Felt njengoHoover osisigxina. URichard Nixon uzakuveza ukurhoxa kwakhe kwiinyanga kamva-Agasti 8, 1974-
Ngokwembono yexhoba?
Masibone, kwiminyaka emi-5 eyadlulayo ndaya kuhlala kwindlu endikuyo ngoku, ngeloxesha kuqhekezwe ukuqhekezwa kwesi-7 kubamelwane bam kwaye imoto yam ibiwe (unyaka nje ndigqibile ukuyibhatala).
Kwaye ndiyaphendula, hayi, andikhethi kuphila ubomi obubekwe esweni ukuze ndibambe lowo undikhubekisayo usuku olunye (ngakumbi kuba ukubeka iliso ayisiyonto yalonto).
Olu hlobo loloyiko oluveliswe yile propaganda ingentla kanye yile nto ilungileyo uGeorge Carlin wayethetha ngayo xa wathi:
"Udidi oluphezulu lukhona ukuze lube nayo yonke imali ngaphandle kokusebenza, oluphakathi lokwenza wonke umsebenzi kunye nolusezantsi ...
Kwaye kulandelela abantu ukuba kukho into ekufuneka yenziwe, ilungile kwaye yenziwe, kodwa into echanekileyo kukuba bayatshutshisana EMVA kokwenza impazamo kwaye ukuba uyakrokra ukuba bayahlola phantsi komyalelo wejaji, hayi ngokungagqibekanga.
Abasebenzi: Ewe, baya kumsukela okoko nje benokuthi "banezinto", kungenjalo, ukuba loo mfana ucime okanye wafihla yonke into efumanekayo akunakwenzeka ukuba bambambe. Ok ngalonto? Kungenxa yokuba ubuncinci ndikhetha ukuba emnyango wendlu yam, kwipali elula, kufuneka kubekho ikhamera enye yokujonga ... oko kukuthi, ngaphandle ...
Anditsho ukuba sinebhakhowudi ngasemva entanyeni kwaye sinokulandelelwa naphina (liliphi iliso, ngenxa yokuba awuyidingi ibhakhowudi ye-elektroniki, kunye neselfowuni yanele), kodwa ubuncinci ukuba kukho ulawulo ngaphezulu izinto ezithile. Kwaye ungathethi eyakho kubomi bemihla ngemihla, kodwa ubuncinci kumnatha, andiyiboni iphosakele.
Lowo ungenatyala, akoyiki nto, kwaye ukuba uluhlobo lomthetho (nokuba ubukele iphonografi ngokusemthethweni) akufuneki ufihle nantoni na, ke ngoko, awudingi kungaziwa. Into oyifunayo sisikhangeli esilungileyo, kunye nokufikelela kwiindawo ezingenamgaqo-nkqubo wazo obavumelayo ukuba bathathe ulwazi lwakho bayokuthengisa khona.
Ndikholelwe, into yokuqala ehamba ngengqondo yakho kwezi meko "kuya kwenzeka ntoni ukuba bekukho umntu othandekayo endlwini yam xa bengena ...".
Ingxaki kukuba kweyona meko imbi, ukuba umntwana ubulewe, yintoni uncedo lokufumana lowo ukwenzileyo? Akukho kwanto izokubuyisela umntwana kuwe. Yimpindezelo ecocekileyo leyo, kwaye ukuyifuna kwangaphambi kokuba benze into ethile kuwe kukungazithembi (kwinqanaba lengqondo). Ngokwam, kubonakala ngathi yindlela yobugwala kakhulu yokuphila, kwinqanaba elifanayo nokungafuni ukuqhuba ukuze ungafi ngengozi, okanye ungaphumi endlwini ukuze ndingabethwa ngumbane.
Inyani yile yokuba ikhamera ayinikezeli nasiphi na isiqinisekiso sokuba awuzukuba neengxaki, nokuba ufuna ukuyibeka, mayibe yikhamera YAKHO, ngaphakathi kwindlu YAKHO, apho kuphela unokufikelela kwividiyo hayi kubantu besithathu.
Iinkcukacha-manani zikhona, kumazwe anobukrelekrele ngakumbi ulwaphulo-mthetho alunciphi, apho isigwebo sentambo siphunyezwa, ulwaphulo-mthetho alunciphi, uloyiko lokohlwaya alunamandla ngaphezu kwendlala.
Kwaye kwinethiwekhi, ndisengangummi olungileyo nothembekileyo, ofuna ukugxeka esidlangalaleni isimilo esibi sikarhulumente okanye iqela lolwaphulo-mthetho (kwezo zixhaphakileyo kurhulumente) Ngaba andizukufuna ukungaziwa ukuze ndikhusele ukuthembeka kwam ukuziphindezela ngokwasemzimbeni ngokwenza into elungileyo?
Andiqondi ukuba lo mzekelo unento yokwenza nokukhusela imfihlo okanye ukuphelisa ukungaziwa, yeyona ngxaki yezokhuseleko kwinethiwekhi nakwiinkqubo; Yiza, ukuba inethiwekhi yakho ayikhuselekanga kwaye usebenzisa iWindows nge-IE, phantse ubamema ukuba bangene kwikhompyuter yakho. Ukuba ushiya indlu yakho ushiya ucango luvulekile ngophawu oluthi "ndikwiholide ndiye elwandle kule veki," ungawabeka ityala amasela agqobhozayo athabatha izibonelelo zombane? Okanye ngaba lityala lamapolisa? Kulawulwa "amasela kwindawo yokuhlala?
KwakunguBenjamin Fraknlin owathi kwiminyaka engamakhulu amabini eyadlulayo: "Abo banikela ngenkululeko yokhuseleko abafanelekanga ukuba nayo."
Yintoni iDavenport eposayo ayikho enye into ngaphandle kohlaziyo lombono olandelwa ngabo bonke oorhulumente abangoozwilakhe.
Ukulungiswa «Abo banokulahla inkululeko kubalulekile ukuthenga ukhuseleko okwethutyana, abayifanelanga inkululeko okanye ukhuseleko »
Kwaye ngokukaSamuel Adams, olo khuseleko lwethutyana kukuthula. Nantsi imeko ekuthethwa ngayo yonke into:
Kwimeko yoxolo, ubutyebi, kunye nokunethezeka, inzala yethu iyakulibala ubugcisa bemfazwe, imisebenzi elungileyo, kunye nenzondelelo eyenza ookhokho bethu bangoyisi. Yonke into yobugcisa yorhwaphilizo iya kusetyenziswa ukukhulula iqhina lomanyano elenza ukuba uxhathiso lwethu lube namandla. Xa umoya wenkululeko, ngoku ophilisa iintliziyo zethu nowenza ukuba izixhobo zethu ziphumelele, ucinyiwe, amanani ethu aya kukhawulezisa ukonakala kwethu kwaye asenze ngokulula ngakumbi amaxhoba obuzwilakhe. Ukuba uthanda ubutyebi kunenkululeko, inzolo yobukhoboka ngaphezu komzabalazo wenkululeko, goduka ngoxolo. Asibuzi uluvo lwakho okanye izixhobo zakho. Yehla uze ukhothe izandla ezikondlayo. Ngamana imixokelelwane yakho ingangakusindisi kakhulu kwaye izizukulwana ziyakulibala ukuba ubungummi wethu.
Ndiyavumelana nesikhundla sakho, ndiyavuma ukuba iimpikiswano zakho zicwangciswe kakuhle kodwa andivumelani kwaphela nazo zonke.
Ndingomnye wabo bakholelwa ukuba ngokuchanekileyo ukuvela kwenethiwekhi, kunye nokwenzeka kokungaziwa okungachazwanga ukusukela oko yabekwa kwasekuqaleni, kuvumele ummi ophakathi ukuba abenalo iqonga ukuze ilizwi labo livakale kwaye lingenza imvumelwano phakathi koontanga babo, hayi ebusweni bamandla ombuso kodwa nkqu nasebusweni kwimithombo yeendaba edala uluvo, ukucinga ukuba amazwe (nkqu uninzi lwentando yesininzi kunye nobuninzi) aya kuba ngabagcini benkululeko yokuthetha kwaye amalungelo abo bonke ayinto yobuntwana kakhulu.
Ukuba sithatha ilizwe-kwaye ke ngoko oorhulumente njengomboniso wale nto-njengobubi obuyimfuneko ekuhlalisaneni eluntwini, ubuninzi bezikhundla zabemi banazo ngaphandle kwezakhelo ezisekwe ngurhulumente (kunye nolawulo lwayo oluhambelanayo), indawo ebhetele esiya kuba kuyo ukunciphisa amandla abo kuluntu. Ayonwabisi into yokuba amapolisa athi, njengeyona ndlela iphambili yoorhulumente abangoozwilakhe, abeka ugxininiso olukhethekileyo ekupheliseni ukubanako "ukungaziwa" kwabantu.
Kwelinye icala, amandla afezekisiweyo ngamajelo eendaba amakhulu-enza ukuba babenethuba lokuseka iiparadigms zento "echanekileyo kwezopolitiko" ekufuneka kuthi sonke sihlale esidlangalaleni, kwintlungu yokubethelelwa emnqamlezweni nokuhlaziswa, nangona kungekho ngasese. siyavuma. Kuphela kukungaziwa apho kunokwenzeka ukuba uzitshabalalise ezi paradigms kunye nokuba uninzi lwoluvo luchazwe kumandla eendaba.
Molo uCharlie! Enkosi ngokuthatha inxaxheba kunye nokufaka izimvo zakho.
Ndiyalingwa ukuvumelana nawe kwinto yonke. Nangona kunjalo, umbuzo ongumbuzo wale post kunye nentandabuzo ethe yavela xa bekufundwa inqaku laseDavenport (nangona zininzi izinto azithethayo endingavumelani nazo) yile ilandelayo: ukungaziwa kuyinto elungileyo kwaye ikhuselekile kuzo ZONKE iimeko? Kwaye, njenge-corollary, ngaba "iindleko" zokungaziwa ngokupheleleyo zingaphantsi "kwezibonelelo" zayo?
Kuyavela kwakhona ukuba ndibuze ukuba into ekufuneka siyikhusele yimfihlo okanye ukungaziwa (kuba azifani ncam).
Ngokunyaniseka, ngoku ndinamathandabuzo ngaphezu kokuqinisekileyo.
Ihagi! UPawulos.
Ndivuma ngokupheleleyo, kweli nqaku bathetha kakuhle kakhulu ngokungaziwa kwaye ukuthetha inyani baphantse bandenza ukuba ndiqiniseke, kodwa ulungile into enye kukuba "unikezele ngeakhawunti" ukukhusela uhlanga loluntu kunye nenye into kwiinkampani ezinje ngoGoogle noFacebook. babe ngoosozigidi ngokuhamba kwethu kwiwebhu. Kwimeko ye-Facebook elungileyo, abantu banikezela ngokwabo idatha yabo. Kodwa uGoogle uyi-HDP enkulu kuba isebenzisa ukusetsha kwethu yonke imihla, ulwazi lwethu kwi-imeyile, ukuncokola nosapho lwethu ... ngamafutshane, ndikhetha ukungaziwa kulwazi lwam buqu olucebisa enye i-HDP
Inqaku (loqobo), ngokoluvo lwam, alifanelanga ukuphinda-phindwa okanye ukubonisa ukungabi nangqondo kwalo.
Andikholelwa ukuba "uyalibala" ukuba enye yezinto zomthetho "zentlalo yedemokhrasi" agcwalisa ngayo umlomo wakhe, kukucinga ukuba umsulwa, kwaye ukuba uxanduva luyafunwa, kufuneka kube kude kube semva kokuba ityala uzibophezele, awuzange wenze njalo, okanye uphele ngokuba ngabemi abavalelwe ngokungenammiselo "njengenyathelo lokuthintela" (jonga imithetho emitsha yesikhululo senqwelomoya esele uyazi ukuba leliphi ilizwe).
Ngapha koko, andicingi ukuba udida ukungaziwa kunye nemfihlo, yinto nje esasaza ubuxoki.
Inomdla! Ukucinga ukuba umsulwa yindawo elungileyo kakhulu.
Ukwanga kwaye ndiyabulela ngokujoyina ingxoxo!
UPawulos.
Siphila kwinkcubeko elawulwa luloyiko ... Inkcubeko yoloyiko abasifaka kuthi ngalo lonke ixesha ...
Njengoko i-cypherpunk u-IgnorantGuru yathi: i-cryptography sisixhobo sokuba abaguquli kufuneka bazise ulwazi olugcinwa yinkqubo egcinwe ngompu.
I-Cryptography + ukungaziwa, ewe, isandla ngesandla.
Kodwa ke, ukongeza ekukhuseleni abatshakazi abazama ukunceda abantu, bakwanceda oozwilakhe abalawula le nkqubo. Umahluko kukuba sele benazo iindlela zonxibelelwano lwabucala, banemithombo emininzi yokulufikelela. Endaweni yoko, abantu abanakuzenzela nto xa kuthelekiswa.
Nabani na ofuna ukuqhubeka nokufunda malunga nesi sihloko ukusuka kwinqanaba lokujonga ubuchwephesha be-cryptographic, ndikuthumela kulo myalezo ulandelayo (ngesiNgesi esipheleleyo):
http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/biography-of-a-cypherpunk-and-how-cryptography-affects-your-life/
Hambani ngoku! Inqaku elibalaseleyo kwikhonkco, ngoku ndiphonononga yonke indawo kwaye sele ndiyifakile kwiibhukumaka zam, enkosi kakhulu ngokudibanisa ...
Inqaku elihle kanjani. Enkoso ngokwabelana.
Ndicinga ukuba iDavenport iyalibala ukuba asihlali kwilizwe elifanelekileyo apho ungabeka khona uluvo lwakho ngaphandle koloyiko lokuziphindezela kwaye apho zonke izimvo zihlonitshwa naphina zivela khona, nangona kufuneka nditsho ukuba kuyalingana nolawulo oluthile kubasebenzisi kodwa ngaphezulu Abazondayo kodwa liqela elincinci kuphela elitshiza ityhefu kwi-Intanethi ngoko ke ayifanelekanga ukuba ithelekiswe ... kwaye wonke umntu unelungelo lokufuna ukungaziwa kwaye ukungaziwa akungqinelani nokuba ngumntu ombi okanye ngaba Ukuya kwi-extremes njengaseSpain apho yahlawulwa khona i-canon ngenxa yokuba umzi-mveliso ucinga ukuba uza "kubaphanga" ngokuthenga nje iirekhodi zeentombi. Siya into enokwenza ukuba iinwele zime nkqu nakubantu abanempandla .
Ndicinga ukuba ekupheleni kosuku ngento eqhelekileyo ukuba ayingabo bonke abantu abangaziwayo kwinethiwekhi abayingozi eluntwini ... kodwa njengoko besitsho, ingqiqo yeyona nto ingabalulekanga kakhulu
Ndisithandile isigwebo esiphelweni, bendingazi
Andiqondi ukuba uMnu. Davenport uyakulilibala ilizwe esihlala kulo, ndicinga ukuba usisithethi nje kwabo bafuna "ukulawula" umhlaba wonke. Ayisiyongxaki yokuba uninzi lweempikiswano zabo zingqinelane nezo zikhuliswe nguMnu.Eugene Kaspersky, intshatsheli ekudalweni kwesazisi esidijithali "ipasipoti" ethe, ewe, inenkxaso yomhlobo wakhe uVladimir Putin, "umongameli" wabo bonke abantu baseRashiya kunye nalowo wayesebenza noKaspersky kwi-KGB; Okanye ngaba ikwenzeka ngamabona-ndenzile? ...
Ityala Ngaba soze siqiniseke?
Uluvo lwam lungelona grey ... ludyojwe ngamava akho, masithi ngakumbi ukuba andichasani nokungaziwa, ukuba sithanda, kubonakala kulungile kum ukuba umntu ngamnye uchongiwe, iyandichukumisa ngokuzimeleyo ukuba bonke abantu abazixhalabileyo bakhuselekile ngokungaziwa yiphose yonke into ohlangana nayo ... kwaye ndiyibona rhoqo kweli hlabathi lesoftware yasimahla ..
Ndingomnye wabo bacinga ukuba ukuba uneebhola zokungcolisa umntu okanye iprojekthi kunye nokuthuka nge-intanethi, kuya kufuneka ke ube neebhola ukuze uzenze ngegama lakho lokwenyani okanye iprofayili, kungenjalo, uligwala, inja ukukhonkotha kodwa kungaluma, Kungenxa yoko le nto ukungaziwa kungabonakala njengesinye sezizathu zayo yonke le manga yobugwala (ngokoluvo lwam akukho mbalwa). Kutheni le nto ndisithi ngwevu? Kuba oku kum kudlulela ngaphaya kwesoftware, iindlela zokuziphatha zixubekile, kunye nemodeli yoqoqosho.
Into yokuqala endizakuyigxininisa kukuba iikhonsepthi zenkululeko kunye nokuziphatha gwenxa kufuneka zicace gca, kum ukungaziwa okuphakamisa "ngumthetho wehlathi" okanye owaziwa ngokuba "ngumthetho wabona banamandla", kunye nokuziphatha kakubi okulandelayo Ndithetha ukuthini? Masiqale kwisiseko sokuba ndingomnye wabo bacinga ukuba abantu abalunganga ngokwendalo, ndicinga ukuba banobundlobongela kwaye bayabawa, ke ngoko ukuba sibashiya bangaziwa, ubuncinci ndiza kubuya ndibhengeza , kwaye kuphela ngabo bayaziyo indlela yokuzikhusela kwi-Intanethi abangazukuchazelwa, abanye basenokuxhelwa kwaye baxolelwe into ebizwa ngokuba "ngabaphangi" abafuna ukuyenza nabo, kuba bekungekho sigwebo ukusukela Yonke into iyakuhlala kuLutho, oku kuya kuphucula inani labaphuli mthetho bekhompyuter, kuyacaca ukuba ukuba sicinga ukuba abantu benza ngokuthembeka kunye nokuziphatha ke le modeli ingalungela kuba ngenxa yokholo oluhle lwabantu ngekhe yenza nantoni na ngokuchasene nabanye, NANGONA, umxholo we ndinendlela yokulawula abantu, siwela kolunye ugqithiso .. ngubani olawula isilawuli?, ngokunyanisekileyo kule nto andinampendulo, kwaye andicingi ukuba nabani na unakho, nakuphi na ukuqonda komcimbi kuya kufuneka kuyile into evumayo ukulingana kwabo bonke.
Kwelinye icala nangaphezulu ubambeke kule ndawo yokugqibela .. ayisiyiyo ukuba unako "ukuhamba ujonga abantu kuba ewe" ... imeko efanelekileyo iya kuba kukungaziwa kodwa ukuba uthumela ikaka ukuba kukho into ekuvumela ukugwetywa, kwaye ukusebenzisa kuphela xa uthumele ikaka (kulapho imigaqo yokuziphatha ingena khona ..)
Ngokubhekisele kwinxalenye yezoqoqosho, nditshilo kuba sikhulele kuluntu apho ukwabelana kungathandwa, apho ukuzuza kufana namandla, apho imali ifana nempumelelo, ingaphaya kokuqiqayo ukuba konke oko sikudlulisele Indawo yesoftware, kwindawo yokungaziwa, uninzi luya kuba lufuna ukweba ii-akhawunti zebhanki, iiprojekthi zabanye abantu, njl., Zonke ukuze "ziphumelele" okanye zizakuthi hayi kum? Okanye bazakundixelela oko kwindawo engaziwayo, apho wenza khona into oyenzayo, ngokulula abanako ukuloba, kuba "sonke asichazwanga" akulingeli? ...
Ukungaziwa kwam kufana nokungabinakuchazeka kwabantwana okusetiweyo, oko kukuthi, abo baneminyaka engaphantsi kweminyaka engenasiphelo abanakufikelelwa.
Ngayiphi na imeko, la ngamatyala amancinci, awabalulekanga kangako kwaye akukho mntu, akukho rhulumente okanye nantoni na eya kuzikhathaza ngokwazi ukuba ngoobani abo baphangi, amadangatye, njlnjl. Abaxhonywe kwi-intanethi, ukusukela oko bazi ukuba ngubani oyinyani ekufuneka uyazi i-ip yakho kunye ne-ip yikhowudi eyaziwa ziinkampani ze-broadband kuphela kwaye ndicinga ukuba iyimfihlo, ngaphandle kokuba unamandla athile kwezopolitiko ongazi.
Kwelinye icala, awuyi kufumana i-hacker yokwenene kulula kwaye bathambekele ekubeni babodwa.
Ngokuphathelele le ndlela, ekuphela kwendlela yedemokhrasi ephantse yaphela yayiyi-agora yeGrisi yakudala, kodwa namhlanje akunakwenzeka ukuyenza, kuba kukho izigidi zabantu elizweni hayi amakhulu kwidolophu-yaseburhulumenteni. Ingxaki kwindlela yethu kukuba yonke into yonakele kakhulu kwaye sanelisekile ukuba sikwazi ukuhlala kwaye singabulawa.
Ngapha koko, umbono wakho umnyama kakhulu, andazi ukuba ngubani owakukhulisayo, kodwa bandifundisile ukuba kuhle ukuba sabelane kwaye simanyane, okuninzi kufundwa ecaweni, mhlawumbi yile nto uswelekileyo.
Ngokumalunga nesoftware yasimahla, kufanele ukuba ibe luluvo lokwabelana kwaye ukuza kuthi ga ngoku andikaboni nantoni na engqina ngenye indlela.
"Ngokubhekisele kwindlela, ekuphela kwendlela yedemokhrasi ephantse yaphela yayiyi-agora yaseGrisi yamandulo" Ngokwenene? Ngolwazi lwakho, akukho makhoboka namabhinqa anelungelo lokuvota; Ngamanye amagama, yonke into ihambelana, nkqu neparadigms ekucingelwa ukuba siyayazi ...
Ewe, besele ndiyazi loo nto, kodwa ukungahoyi loo nto, inkqubo yayiphantse ibe yedemokhrasi ngokupheleleyo.
Ubuyatha abudibananga nokungaziwa, kweli phepha linye ubona abantu abanesithombe, igama, ifani kunye nedilesi yebhlog yabo ekhubekisa nokunyelisa abantu okanye amaqela. Kwanele ukuba bahlala kwelinye ilizwe ngenxa yobubhanxa babo ukuze bangohlwaywa.
Ndicinga ukuba eyona nto intle kukuba abo bangaphezulu kwelo nqanaba, bafunde ukungathathi into efundwayo kwinethiwekhi njengento yobuqu, kwanele ukwazi ukuba ubuxoki abuxabisekanga nokuba butyikityiwe.
Kwaye xa kufikwa kwizikrelemnqa, ke, awunyanzelekanga ukuba ube "novakalelo" kangako, akukho mntu ulahlekelwa yinwele enye ngenxa yokuba ekhubekisiwe, kwaye engavuki nesifo sohudo kusuku olulandelayo emva kokuba umntu ebakhumbuze ngonina.
+ 100
"... Ngubani olawula isilawuli?", Ndicinga ukuba sisitshixo. Kungenxa yoko le nto ndicinga ukuba kulula (kwaye kunokwenzeka) ukuzikhusela ngokuchasene nabagculeli, iitrolls okanye iintiyo kunakwamazwe. Okwenziwa ngabokuqala, ngokubanzi, kukwenza ulwaphulo-mthetho apho kuthi, ngokwethiyori, sikhuselwe ngumthetho, ngelixa abokugqibela ingabo bayenza le mithetho ilungele bona nokuzikhusela. Kunokwenzeka ukuba amazwe aya kusilela ukusikhusela kwizinto zangaphambili kodwa ABAYEKE bayeke ukuzikhusela ngokuchasene nathi.
UCharlie, ndikubonile uvelisa le ndlela inye yokulwa urhulumente okanye umbono amaxesha amaninzi. Ndidla ngokwabelana nabanye, ukunyaniseka kuwe. Nangona kunjalo, kubonakala kum ngathi kukho ukungangqinelani okusisiseko kwimpikiswano yakho. Kwelinye icala uthi kunzima ukuzikhusela kumazwe kwaye kwelinye icala uthi oko kukhusela okwenziwa ngabagculi, njl. kukho umthetho (oko kukuthi, urhulumente). Ayindivaleli. Sishiywe phi: ngaba ilizwe lilungile okanye libi? Ukuba "bububi obuyimfuneko", njengoko usitsho kolunye uluvo, kwaye ukuba imeko inye isiqinisekiso (kwezinye iindawo, anditsho kuzo zonke) inkululeko ezithile ezisisiseko, kutheni ungalweli ulawulo olukhulu lwemicimbi ethile inxulumene ne-Intanethi? Lumka, xa ndithetha ngommiselo andicingi ngokuhlola kukaRhulumente kuwe okanye ukuthintela inkululeko yakho yokuveza izimvo zakho, njl. kodwa kwimithetho ekhusela imfihlo yabasebenzisi. Ityala le-European Union yiparadigmatic: banyanzela uGoogle ukuba enze "ilungelo lokulityalwa."
http://www.lavoz.com.ar/ciudadanos/en-un-dia-google-recibio-12-mil-pedidos-por-derecho-al-olvido-en-europa
Wanga! UPawulos.
Into endiyithethayo kukuba ubuncinci, ukuzikhusela kubagculeli kukho imithetho, ethi kwiimeko ezintle, ilawulwe ukuba isetyenziswe ngoorhulumente, nokuba yeyabo okanye iphantsi koxinzelelo kwabanye abachaphazelekayo (iibhanki, umzekelo); Ngamanye amagama, ummi angalifumana inqanaba elithile lokhuseleko, KODWA xa ingxaki yabemi ikurhulumente, UKUBA sijijekile, kuba xa kusenziwa oko bambalwa kakhulu amathuba okufumana ukhuseleko, kuba uninzi lweziganeko ekufuneka zibonelele ukhuselo, ngandlela thile, phantsi kolawulo lukarhulumente. Ewe uchanile, uluvo lwam oluchasene norhulumente lomelele kakhulu, phantse lomelele njengolawulo oluthi "ilizwe lam" lizame ukundisebenza. Ngokubhekisele kwi-dichotomy oyitolikayo kwingcaciso yam phakathi "kwamazwe amnandi okanye amabi", njengokucaciswa, ndicinga ukuba zimbini iintlobo zamazwe: ezimbi nezimbi ... possible Kungenzeka ukuba ukutolikwa gwenxa kwengcaciso yam kufanelekile Ukuphulukana nomxholo endenze kuwo, njengoko yayiyimpendulo kumagqabantshintshi e-x2tete11x.
Nangona kunjalo, ndiyavuma nawe ukuba imithetho iyimfuneko ukukhusela ubumfihlo babemi, kodwa ndiyakholelwa kuyo phantsi kwezi ndawo zimbini: ukuba mayikhuthazwe kwaye iqulunqwe ngabemi kunye neyesibini, ukuba kukho inkululeko yokwenyani yezomthetho zenze zisebenze. Indawo yokuqala inokwenzeka ukufezekisa, ngokuchanekileyo kwizixhobo ezibonelelwe yinethiwekhi ukufezekisa ukuvumelana kwabemi kwimiba enjalo, kodwa okwesibini ndiyabona inzima KAKHULU, kuba amagunya ezomthetho, ngandlela thile, Imiselwe kwaye iphendule ngakumbi kwimidla yoorhulumente kunakwimeko yemithetho. Ukucacisa uBenjamin Franklin kancinci malunga neendaba kunye noorhulumente, ndikhetha uthungelwano olomeleleyo kunye noorhulumente obuthathaka kunaleyo ichaseneyo.
Enkosi ngenqaku lakho kunye nezimvo zakho, ndicinga ukuba ukukhuthaza iingxoxo zolu hlobo kuluncedo kakhulu kuwo wonke umntu. Ihagi…
Andivumelani, ingathi umntu othile ufunda iposi abayithumela endlwini yam ingekafiki, ukuze aqiniseke ukuba ayikho kwinto enokuchaphazela uluntu.
Ukongeza, nangona i-intanethi ivumela izinto ezininzi, ayisiyomzimba, awunakugxeka mntu ngokwenza nantoni na kwi-intanethi, kuphela ukuba bayenza ngobomi bokwenyani, ngaphandle kobuqhetseba.
Ngendlela, iWindowsPress ayichazwanga kwaye siyayisebenzisa, ukuze ungaziwa kwi-intanethi, kodwa ukwala naliphi na iphepha elingakhuthazi ukungaziwa, uya kuba ngumda kakhulu.
Njengamaxesha onke, iziqwenga zakho zoluvo zinika into eninzi yokucinga. Kule meko, ngaphandle kweempikiswano ezilungileyo zikaDavenport, ndihlala kumgca omnye noCharlie Brown, ngoba? kuba umngcipheko uya kuhlala umkhulu kakhulu xa kungekho mntu ungaziwayo, xa imeko iba yi-Orwell 1984, kwaye oko kukunyuka konxibelelwano, unxibelelwano ngalo lonke ixesha kunye nazo zonke izixhobo, amandla afihlakeleyo anenethiwekhi yokujonga ngokungenamda, ndiyayiqonda into ayibiza ngokuchonga ngokubhekiselele kuxanduva lokuphendula, kodwa isiphoso (ngokokubona kwam) eDavenport kukuba igweba yonke into kwicala lolwaphulo-mthetho ukuba ingabizwa ngokuba yeyommi ngeenyawo, ulibale umlingani omkhulu, kwenzeka ntoni xa "ulwaphulo-mthetho" eyeka ukuba ngummi, xa enyanisweni ingurhulumente, okanye inkampani enkulu? Nini kungekho mida kulwazi olunokufunyanwa ebantwini ngaphandle kwemvume yabo? Ngubani olawula xa kwanele ukuqinisekisa "ukuhlonitshwa komthetho"? Ngokuchanekileyo ukuba ukungaziwa kuvumela intlonipho yenkululeko yokuthetha, ukucinga ngendlela eyahlukileyo ngaphandle komngcipheko wokuphindezela, ukuqinisekisa inkcaso. Ewe, oku kungaziwa akuchazi ukuba akukho semthethweni, kodwa ingxaki iyafana kwakhona, engekho semthethweni kabani, oonogada okanye umlindi?
Nangona kwabanye kunokubonakala ngathi impikiswano "yeNgxelo eNcinci" isekude, yazi ukuba elizweni lam kukho umthetho onokukufaka entolongweni "ngolwaphulo-mthetho" lobungozi bangaphambi kolwaphulo-mthetho, into enje ". Okwangoku awukenzi lwaphulo-mthetho, kodwa indlela ohamba ngayo, nangawuphi na umzuzu uyayenza, ke uya engxoweni xa kunokwenzeka ... »Ngaphandle kokuthetha oko banokubopha nabani na xa beziva ngathi yiyo.
Ndiyavumelana Aqalb8. Njengoko uMarilin Manson eyibeka ngokufanelekileyo, "uloyiko luyathengisa." Uloyiko lukuthengisela ii-alamu, izixhobo, i-inshurensi, ii-alamu ezingaphezulu, imivalo, imivalo engcono. Xa uloyiko lusongamela, icandelo lethu elisengqiqweni linika indlela: Oko kukuthi, siyeke ukucinga ngokucacileyo, ngokusengqiqweni.
Kumazwe amaninzi ukusweleka kwingozi yenqwelo-mafutha maninzi amathuba okuba kwenzeke kunokuba usweleke kumzamo wokuphanga. Nangona kunjalo, abantu abakhohliswe ngamajelo eendaba (ikwayileyo le ikhuthaza ubundlobongela), banexhala ngakumbi ngobusela. Uloyiko lwalugqithile kwisengqiqweni. Masicinge umntu ophuma angene esitalatweni enxibe ivesti yombane. Amathuba okufa ngombane kwisaqhwithi aphantsi kakhulu. Siza kuthi uloyiko lumgqithile loo mntu ekucingeni ngokucacileyo.
Imibuliso. UPeter.
Kuya kufuneka ubone imovie ethi "Bowling For Colombine", ukuba awuyibonanga, thetha ngezo zinto.
Enkosi. Ngokuchanekileyo, ibinzana likaManson livela kwifilimu ebalaseleyo.
Ukubulisa. UPedro
Ndineseva ezinikeleyo kwaye ndinalo iphepha .onion.
Apho ndiyonwabela inkululeko epheleleyo, kwaye xa ndisithi ndigqibile ndithetha ukuba ABSOLUTE
Kwaye andaziwa apho.
Laa mfo usebenzela nsa. Ukubulisa.
Imibuliso kubo bonke nakubo bonke. Inqaku elilunge kakhulu kunye nengxoxo entle kakhulu.
Uluvo lwam luhambelana naleyo yeX11tete11x. Umntu, njengezilwanyana, zezona zilwanyana zibulalayo. Sisoyikeka kangangokuba side sihlasele, sibulale okanye soyise omnye komnye.
Kuya kuba mnandi kakhulu ukucinga ukuba bonke abantu banemilinganiselo yokuziphatha ebanceda ukuba baziphathe ngokuchanekileyo. Kuya kuba mnandi kakhulu ukucinga ukuba ukuba nabani na kuthi unamandla okwenza kunye nokuzilungisa ngentando yakhe, ngaphandle koloyiko lwesiphumo, ngekhe sonakaliswe lelo gunya. Kodwa imbali yoluntu igcwele amatyala apho abantu bangeniswa khona ukuze baphelise ukuxhatshazwa kwabantu abanamandla, baphele, kungekudala emva koko, besenza kwaukuphathwa gadalala okufanayo, ngamanye amaxesha kukhulu.
Ungathini ukuba nabani na kuthi angenza le nto siyifunayo kwi-Intanethi? Ngaba singamelana naloo mandla ngaphandle kokuzonakalisa? Ngaba awucingi ukuba ukuba sonke singaziwa ngokupheleleyo, i-Intanethi iyakuphelela ekubeni yi "Wild West" apho abo babenoomatshini abangcono kunye nolwazi oluninzi banokuphela bebeka abanye phantsi?
Uluvo lwam malunga nomntu lunokuba mnyama kakhulu kwaye luyintlekele, kodwa ukuba siyijonga kwakhona imbali yoluntu, inyani yeyokuba ngokobuqu, ayindinike themba lukhulu. Enkosi kwaye ndiyathemba ukuba khange ndikhathaze okanye ndikhubekise mntu.
Kwaye kuya kwenzeka ntoni ukuba umntu unokufikelela kuyo yonke idatha yakho, ukuze abone iifoto zentombi yakho oyigcina kwiselfowuni?
Mamela kwaye ufunde iincoko zakho?
Yintoni eya kubathintela ekukuphathiseni kakubi, okanye bathathe naluphi na uhlobo lwenzuzo, ukuba ubuntlola buba kwicala elinye?
U-Snowden uvuse inyathelo elikhulu malunga noku (imfihlo, ukungaziwa, njlnjl.), Kodwa yena ngokwakhe, ophume idatha "enkulu" (mandisebenzise eli gama lase-Argentina), nangona kunjalo wabuza ukuba isazisi sakhe sityhilwe kumaphephandaba abalulekileyo njenge "U-Guardian kunye ne-Washington Post bakhuphe isazisi sika-Snowden ngesicelo sakhe, kwiintsuku emva kokuvuza. Ucacise indlela yakhe yokuyeka ukungaziwa ngale ndlela ilandelayo: "Andizimiselanga kuzifihla ukuba ndingubani kuba ndiyazi ukuba akukho nto ndiyenzileyo."
Kodwa njengoko watshoyo uPablo, imfihlo ayifani nokungaziwa.
Kananjalo uluvo ngalunye luya kuphawulwa kakhulu ngokuba lixhoba okanye umenzi wobubi. Ndicinga ukuba kufuneka senze ulwazi ekusebenziseni esikunika oko kubizwa ngokuba "simahla" kwi-Intanethi. I-Goolgle ayinakukunika nantoni na "simahla" xa sisazi ukuba kuphela kwaye kuphela kuchithwa ukusetyenziswa kombane kwindawo yokugcina iinkcukacha, nokuba incinci kangakanani, sisazi ukuba ikhona eminye imiba. Iphakamisa ulwazi malunga nendlela esizisebenzisa ngayo iinethiwekhi zentlalo, indlela esiziphatha ngayo kwi-Intanethi ngokubanzi. Kodwa isigqibo sokugqibela sixhomekeke kuwe, ayenziwa ngomnye umntu ukwenzele, nguwe ogqiba ukuba wenzeni ngedatha yakho; Kwaye ndiyazi ukuba kunzima kanjani kuye nawuphi na umsebenzisi oqhelekileyo ukuba azikhathalele ezi zinto.
Omnye umba kukuzikhethela ukuba uRhulumente welizwe ngalinye awanike iinkampani ezahlukeneyo, kwaye azivumele. Ewe, ukuba uyayivumela kwezinye iinkampani, ngakumbi ababoneleli nge-Intanethi (ISP).
Uhlalutyo oluncinci kunye nolunomda, ndicinga ukuba zininzi izinto ezishiyiweyo, kwaye andifuni ukwenza umyolelo.
Ukubulisa kunye nokuwola.
I-PS: xolela ukuthembela kunye nomxholo.
Umthombo weWikipedia.
Isizathu sokuba u-Snowden abonakalise ukuba ungubani esidlangalaleni kukuba ngokwenza oko waba ngumntu oluntu, eyindlela efanelekileyo yokuzikhusela "ekufeni ngengozi"; Kulungile, ngomsindo owawudalayo, urhulumente wase-US wayenexesha elinzima kakhulu lokulungiselela "ukuguqulwa kwezempilo" kwaye eqinisekisa umhlaba ukuba awunanto yakwenza nayo. Nawuphi na umntu owayelilungu lombutho wezobuntlola walo naliphi na ilizwe otyhila iimfihlelo wazi kakuhle ukuba uneendlela ezimbini: abe ngumntu kwaye athandaze ukuba urhulumente wakhe angabinabuganga bokubamba iindleko zopolitiko zokumbulala okanye afune ukukhuselwa kwinkampu yotshaba . »; Ngokucacileyo uSnowden akanazo iinwele zesidenge kwaye ukhetha ukuthenga imigaqo-nkqubo emi-2 yoxolo lwengqondo. Kodwa ke, ukuba ufuna ukukholelwa ukuba uyenzile ngenxa yesibindi okanye ukunyaniseka kwaye wonwabile yile nto, kulungile, akukho mntu, kholwa kuyo kwaye uphile ngokonwaba ...
Wayenokwenza ukuba izinto zasesidlangalaleni zaziwe ngabantu ngaphandle kokungaziwa, nangona kunjalo.
Ngaba wayesisidenge ngokuzityhila?
Nangona kunjalo, ulonwabo lwam luya kwenye indawo. Kwaye oku akuchaphazeli nantoni na ebomini bam, nokuba ujonga imilenze emine yekati kunye neyesihlanu, ayindichaphazeli. Le ngcaciso nje, akukho nto.
Ukubulisa nokuwola.
Eyona nto ifunwa kakhulu yimfihlo, hayi ukungaziwa kwi-Intanethi, ukungaziboni ii-imeyile zethu okanye ukufaka isalathiso kukhangelo lwethu, ubuncinci ngokungasebenzi, yeyona nto siyifunayo.
Ngabarhanelwa bolwaphulo-mthetho kuphela abathi bajongwe, ke ukuba bayayihlonipha imfihlo, akukho nto iya kuthi ingachazeki. Ngaphandle kweemeko ezigabadeleyo.
Kunjalo. Ndiyavuma ngokupheleleyo.
Kwaye ngubani oza kuba sisiqinisekiso sokuba oku kuzalisekisiwe? Ngubani oza kuchaza oko kohlwaywa ngolwaphulo-mthetho?
Inye into ukunika idatha yakho kwiziko elijongene nokulawulwa kwedatha yoluntu enje ngeRENIEC kunye / okanye i-SUNAT ePeru, kwaye enye yeyenkampani efana noGoogle efuna ukuba usebenzise igama lakho lokwenyani ukuba ube kwinethiwekhi yoluntu njenge-Google + (ubuncinci, inkqubo yokuqamba igama kaGoogle ivumile ukuba inyuse inqanaba lamagama ekuthiwa kude kube ngoku akukho kuFacebook nokuba umntu anganakho ukwenza into eguqukayo kule nkonzo). Kungenxa yoko le nto ndiyithandile i-Diaspora *, nangona kufuneka ndivume ukuba bambalwa abantu basetyhini kule nethiwekhi.
Kwicala lomxholo wokungaziwa kunye nobomi babucala, eyokuqala isetyenziselwa ikakhulu ukuvota kunye nengxoxo, kwaye okwesibini kukugcina isidima somntu ngamnye siqhubeka.
Into endothusayo kukuba abantu ekuthiwa bayayazi malunga nale micimbi bathetha ngendlela edidekileyo kangangokuba umntu angayiqondi, ethi ibandakanye nokwazisa ukungazi kwingcinga eyaziwayo.
Ukongeza, kuyaphazamisa ukuba i-NSA isebenzisa amaqhinga asetyenziswa ngabona bantu basasazwayo abakhoyo eLatin America ukuqhubeka nokungaxeli kunye nokuchaza gwenxa la magama kwaye ngenxa yoko abayiqondi eyona ngxaki ikhoyo.
Ekupheleni kosuku, lihambile ixesha lokususa i-MPAA kwi-W3C (enkosi kubo, iMozilla inyanzelwe ukuba isebenzise inkqubo ye-DRM kwiFirefox).
Ayinamsebenzi ukuba imigaqo-nkqubo yabucala iyabavumela ukuba benze le nto bayifunayo ngolwazi lwethu. Ayinamsebenzi ukuba banokuyigcina "ngonaphakade." Ngubani okhathalayo ukuba bazitshintshe ngaphandle kokwazisa abasebenzisi okanye ukubamkela kwakhona? Ii-imeyile zakho akufuneki zibucala, baya kuzibona nazo. Iifoto zakho ayizizo ezakho, uzinike zona kwaye zinokwenza nantoni na eziyifunayo ngazo.
Kodwa ungakhathazeki. Kungenxa yokhuseleko lwethu. Kulunge ngakumbi ukulungelwa kwakho, kukulunge ngakumbi kwakho. Ayinamsebenzi nokuba bathathe izigidi kwidatha yethu ukuze basihlole. Ayinamsebenzi nokuba ayingorhulumente wethu, kodwa ngurhulumente wase-US, ozinikele ekulawuleni lonke olu lwazi. Hleze sibe ngabanqolobi ukuba abayibukeli into esiyenzayo ngalo lonke ixesha.
Bathengisile ngalo ibali, kwaye uyakholelwa. Ngaba ucinga ukuba idatha ibiwe kwikhompyuter yakho, bangakhathazeka ngokufumana kwakhona? Oku ayikuko ukhuseleko lwethu, bayenzela ukwenza imali, kwaye bakhuseleke. Banokuthi bebe ikhompyuter yakho, bafake isikhalazo kwaye bayibuyise kuphela ukuba bayifumene ngengozi.
I-Intanethi + iMicrosoft + Apple + ii-smartphones + i-Facebook zenza iphupha likaStalin lifezeke. Okanye iphupha lokulawulwa kwabantu ngoorhulumente boonopopi bemibutho yezemali. IDavenport sisixhobo nje kwinkonzo yokudala umbono wolawulo lwepro. Masingabi zizidenge kakhulu ukuthethelela ulawulo. Bekusoloko kukho iigusha, ngoku zidijithali. Ii-androids zobuzwilakhe ziphupha ngeegusha zombane ...
V yeVendetta !!!
Iphupha likaStalin lalilula: "Cima zonke iinethiwekhi, dubula abantu baseCERN kwaye wonke umntu one-abacus uthunyelwa eGulag eSiberia ..."
Ngentlonipho yonke ndiza kunika umbono wam:
Ndicinga ukuba ukuba andinanto ndiyifihlayo, kutheni ndingahlali ndingaziwa? … Andikuthandi ukungaziwa; Ndiyahambelana nezenzo zam. Enkosi!
Ngentlonipho yonke emhlabeni. Enjani inqaku elipapashiweyo ...
Olu hlobo lwempikiswano kwidolophu yam kuthiwa yiDEMAGOGY.
Thelekisa imibutho yanamhlanje nedemokhrasi ...
Idemokhrasi, idemokhrasi, idemokhrasi ... Nedemokhrasi engakumbi ... Xa wonke umntu eyazi ukuba ayisiyontando yesininzi le, ukuba ayingongxowankulu.
Oh yam ...
Ndicinga ukuba oorhulumente (kunye neenkampani zamazwe ngamazwe emva kwabo) bafuna ukuthintela inkululeko. Inkululeko yethu. Kwaye izizathu zingaphezulu okanye ngaphantsi kweziqhelekileyo: ngokulunga kwethu kunye nokulwa nabantu abangalunganga. Ngesizathu sobunqolobi, namhlanje amalungelo nenkululeko anqunyulwe eMelika. Ngeso sizathu sinye i-US ihlasela amazwe ukuba ibaphange.
Ndichasene nokuthintela amalungelo nenkululeko kwi-intanethi. Kodwa ndiyaqonda ukuba ukuqhubela phambili kwetekhnoloji kudlula umthetho we-intanethi. Into engekhoyo kukumisela umthetho kwi-intanethi. Kwaye oko akuthethi ukuthintela amalungelo okanye inkululeko. Kuthetha ukuba iindlela ezintsha zolwaphulo-mthetho zamkelwe kwaye zohlwaywe. Kuba ukungena ekhompyutheni yomnye umntu lulwaphulo-mthetho. Kwaye kufuneka ihlawulwe. Kananjalo ayinakuba yitikiti apho banokungena kwiikhompyuter zethu ukuze bebe, basebenzise, njl. Kwahlukile ukuthi ukungaziwa kufuneka kuthintelwe kwaye nelungelo lokuba ngasese licuthwe.
Imibuliso. UPeter.
Ukungaziwa kungumsebenzi oyimfuneko kwesi sizathu sincinci, imibutho ilawula ubomi bethu.
Yonke into uyilo olukrelekrele, emhlabeni yonke into ibubuxoki, kwaye uthatha isigqibo sokuba bubuphi ubuxoki obukholelwayo: http://gutl.jovenclub.cu/asegurando-linux-al-maximo
Inkululeko yokuzikhethela konke endikuthethayo
Inkululeko yokuzikhethela ayithethi ukwenza le nto ndiyifunayo.
Ngamazwi ka-Saint John Paul II, "Inkululeko ayiquki ekwenzeni oko sikuthandayo, kodwa ekubeni nelungelo lokwenza oko kufanelekileyo."
Mholweni! Busuku benzolo
Ndiza kuzama ukucacisa ngamagama ambalwa ukuba ndicinga ntoni ngaphandle kokungena kwiinkcukacha zokuba amagama athetha ntoni ngolwimi.
Ubulungisa babusoloko bukhona, nangaphambi kokuba kubekho ikhompyuter kwaye babezinikele ekuphandeni "iinyani", ayengamaxesha apho ukuqikelelwa kwezibakala kwakungekho msulwa de uphando lwe "nyaniso" lungqine ngenye indlela.
Namhlanje bafuna ukuba sikholelwe ukuba ubumsulwa bokuba sinetyala de iinyani zibonakalise ngenye indlela.
Yima ucinge malunga nokuchaphazeleka kwalo mbandela, bhengeza nabani na enetyala de kuqinisekiswe ngenye indlela.
Yinto efunwa ngurhulumente wobuzwilakhe okanye hayi, ukuze oyikise abo bacinga ngokwahlukileyo okanye abo banobungqina bokuzisa la magosa karhulumente ematyaleni kuba ngabo kanye abaqalekisiweyo.
Ndithanda kakhulu ukungaziwa, ndingumntu olungileyo, ndiyayazi kwaye loo nto yanele kum, andifuni abanye bafumanise ukuba ingaba ndingumntu olungileyo "ndihamba nam", ukuba ndiyehla Imizila emva koko ineenyani kunye nobungqina obunokuqinisekiswa ukuba bayanditshutshisa bade bandigwebe xa kukho imfuneko ... ngumsebenzi wabo
ngenxa yokuba sihlawula umvuzo wabo ... singalibali ukuba bangabasebenzi bethu.
Molo, ulungiso olunye.
Inkululeko yokuthetha ayiloxabiso "ledemokhrasi", lixabiso "leriphabliki". Idemokhrasi yindlela nje yokhetho lwabasemagunyeni, kwaye namhlanje kukho uninzi "lwedemokhrasi" apho inkululeko yokuthetha isisithethi esikuhlawula entolongweni.
Inkululeko yokuthetha inokwenzeka kuphela kwinkqubo apho ezomthetho zizimeleyo ngokupheleleyo kwisigqeba, esiqhele ukuba sijolise kubuhlali.
Ayisebenzi kumazwe apho amagosa abo abhengeza ukuba "nabani na ophumelela unyulo, wenza le nto ayifunayo." Ewe, zikhuselwe kakuhle kumalungelo avumela ukuba benze kwaye bathethe into abayifunayo.
Igama elithi "idemokhrasi" liye lahlanjululwa kwaye lahenyuza kwinqanaba lokuba ulawulo lweqela elilodwa njengeChina lithathwa njengedemokhrasi ngenxa yokuba bahlala beqhuba ukhetho.
Umbutho wobukumkani obufana nowesiNgesi ukhululekile, apho umntu anokuthuka ukumkanikazi esidlangalaleni, phantsi komqathango wokuba anganyatheli umhlaba wesiNgesi, oko kukuthi, ebhentshini.
Ukuthi ukungaziwa kuyisixhobo sokungekho semthethweni kukuphambukisa isifundo njengoko kuhlala kusenzeka njalo. Ulwaphulo-mthetho lubangelwa kukunqongophala kwemfundo kunye nokulingana kwihlabathi, kwaye ukunqongophala kwemfundo kunye nokulingana kukhuthazwa ngabo banegunya (abangoozigidi abambalwa) kwaye abafuni lutshintshe. Esinye sezixhobo zalo luloyiko, "kufuneka woyike ulwaphulo-mthetho olunokubangelwa ngokulula kukungaziwa."
I-PS: Kwafuneka ndishiye igama lam kunye ne-imeyile ukuze ndiyithumele 😛
"Ulwaphulo-mthetho lubangelwa kukunqongophala kwemfundo kunye nokulingana kwihlabathi"
Kwicala lezemfundo, 'tamo' ivumile.
Kwicala "lobulungisa" ... ukusuka apho ukuya ekucingeni kwabaphelisi bomthetho wolwaphulo-mthetho, kukho inyathelo.
Kukunciphisa isidima somntu sibe yinto nje yezoqoqosho: "Ulwaphulo-mthetho lukhona ngenxa yobundlobongela bokomfuziselo obuqhutywa yinkqubo yongxowankulu, ngenxa yomahluko ongenakulungiseka phakathi kwabo unabo nabo bangenalo."
Ukuba bekunjalo, ngekhe kubekho izaphuli mthetho ezinje ngama-35 avalelwe eVenice namhlanje.
eli phepha kunye nenqaku likhulu.
(Masibone ukuba abayicimi ngoku)
Uluvo lwam malunga nokungaziwa kukuba ungakhetha ukuba ngumntu okrwada othetha amagama amabi okanye angangumntu onemigaqo kunye nokuziphatha kuloo nto umntu ukhululekile ukuyikhetha yinto elungileyo malunga nokungaziwa.
Kwimeko yam ndiyathanda ukuba ngumntu olungileyo ongathandi ukuthetha amagama amabi kwabanye abantu kodwa kulungile ukukhumbula ukuba bahlala bekho abanye abantu abachasene nokulunga hahaha ukungaziwa kuhlala kuluncedo kufuneka usebenzise ngokuchanekileyo 🙂
Abo banamandla ngokuqinisekileyo banamandla ngokwaneleyo (kufanelekile ukungafuneki) ukuhlawulela ukungaziwa, ukuba bakubona kufanelekile. Ngapha koko, amanyathelo ngokuchasene nokungaziwa ... ngubani othathe isigqibo?