Ndidla ngokufunda i Iibhloko zebanon, yaye iindaba zanamhlanje nje zibangela umdla kum.
En Canonical bavumelana nayo Boot Safe, yixhase, naxa uninzi loluntu lwethu (njenge iSiseko seSoftwe sasimahla asiyixhasi)
Namhlanje Canonical ecaleni Red Hat bapapashe umbhalo othetha ngesi sihloko, kuquka neengcebiso malunga nendlela yokuphumeza Boot Safe ngendlela yokuqinisekisa ukuba kuhlala kuthathelwa ingqalelo ukuba umsebenzisi kufuneka abe nolawulo olupheleleyo nolupheleleyo lwale ndlela.
Ewe, ndivumelana nento, i-BIOS ngokubanzi kwiikhompyuter zethu sele iphelelwe lixesha ixesha elide, ibifuna utshintsho ukwenza unxibelelwano phakathi kwehardware kunye nesoftware (i-firmware ibandakanywe ngokucacileyo) ulwelo olungaphezulu, iphucule kwaye isebenzise ngakumbi i-hardware yethu. , yinto nje yokuba akukho mntu sele ethabathe "inyathelo eliya phambili." Ingayiyo Microsoft Unike kwaye lixesha kuphela eliya kusixelela ilizwi lokugqibela, kodwa ngenxa yokuba kunjalo Microsoft othe wathabatha inyathelo, yiyo le nto ndimalayo. Ungandibiza ngokuthi "Taliban" ewe, kodwa xa inkampani / iCIA yenze KAKHULU ngokuchasene nento endiyisebenzisayo kwaye ndiyithandayo (Software Free), ekugqibeleni xa wenza intshukumo entsha iya kuhlala ivelisa amathandabuzo, uloyiko kunye nokugatywa.
Canonical Kwinqaku lakhe uyavuma ukuba ukhathazekile Boot Safe, kuba ukuba umsebenzisi uthenga ikhompyutha nge IWindows8, le khompyutha iya kuba nayo Boot Safe en ON, enokwenza kube nzima (okanye kuthintele) i-distro yakho ekufakeni (Ubuntu), kwaye le yinto ecacileyo ukuba iyasikhathaza sonke.
Canonical akaphikisi nangaliphi na ixesha Boot Safe, kuphela ukuba icebisa ngamandla ukuba abantu be-hardware babandakanye inketho yokubeka OFF Lo matshini (uKhuseleko lwe-Boot), bakwacacisa ukuba kufuneka kubenobuhlobo kwaye kube lula ukuqondwa kunye nokusebenzisa kumsebenzisi, kuba abangenamava kangako abanakukwazi ukuyitshintsha le nto ukuba akukho lula ngenene.
UJeremy Kerr (Ingcali ye Canonical), UJames Bottomley (Umphuhlisi weKernel) kunye UMateyu Garrett (uNjineli oPhezulu weSoftware kwi Red Hat) baye banikezela ngezimvo zabo, kunye nezivumelwano ekufikelelwe kuzo kwi PDF kubizwa: Impembelelo yoKhuseleko lweBoot kwiLinux
Ngapha koko, oku ngokungathandabuzekiyo kuya kuphakamisa i-wave yokugxeka, kunye nomdla omkhulu ... into endiyincomayo kukuqala ukufunda PDF, emva koko ugxeke okanye ungagxeki 😉
Phendula nge quote
Ndicinga ukuba isihloko asihambelani nenqaku le-PDF okanye isiqingatha sokugqibela sesithuba. Ukutsho ukuba iCanonical kunye neRed Hat ixhasa iWindows 8 Secure Boot ayilunganga. Okokuqala, ngenxa yokuba uKhuseleko lweBoot aluphumi kwiWindows 8, luphawu lwetekhnoloji entsha evelayo njengotshintsho lweBIOS. Ingxaki luhlobo lophumezo olufunwa nguMicrosoft; Loo fomu yeyona nto iphakamisa amathandabuzo kwaye, ngokubhekisele kuyo, inqaku elikwiPDF liyavela.
Akukho mntu uchasene nokutshintsha i-BIOS; Ewe, abantu abavela kwi-Kernel, i-Red Hat kunye ne-Canonical baye bahlalutya esi sindululo esitsha esivela ku-Microsoft ngokweenkcukacha kwaye, njengoko simi, siya kuthintela ukufakwa kwesofthiwe engagunyaziswanga yi-Secure Boot.
Yiyo loo nto becebisa indlela elula yokuyikhubaza okanye utshintshe uluhlu lwesoftware evunyelweyo ukuze iLinux ifakwe.
Ngokucacileyo, kungakhathaliseki ukuba i-MS ifuna ukudunyiswa kangakanani na imfuno ye-Secure Boot, inempembelelo kwinkululeko yomsebenzisi, kwaye akukho mathandabuzo ngayo.
Ndiyanyanzelisa, zombini inxalenye yokuqala kunye nesihloko sokungenwa asilungile.
Phendula nge quote
Molo Martin,
Okokuqala wamkelekile kwindawo.
Ingxaki kukuba isiphakamiso esiKhuselekileyo seBoot, njengengcamango, into entsha, into entsha okanye ikamva "livela" livela kwiMicrosoft, mhlawumbi ayiveli eRedmond ngokwayo, kodwa isindululo sihlala sidityaniswa kwiWindows8, kuba nguye "ongaphakathi". ngaphambili." "Kunjalo.
Inyaniso elula yokuba uKhuseleko lwe-Boot luyingxenye ye-UEFI kwaye ingeyonxalenye ye-Windows8 yinkcukacha yobugcisa ewe (kwaye ngokucacileyo iyinyani ngexesha elifanayo), kodwa umbuzo wokuba iWindows8 inokufakwa kunye ne-SecureBoot ivaliwe, okwangoku kwaye kude kube ngoku. Into endiye ndakwazi ukuyifunda ibonakala ibonisa ukuba hayi, ukuba unekhonkco elichaza ngenye indlela ndingavuya kakhulu xa ndiyifunda.
Ngokucacileyo, akukho mntu uluchasayo utshintsho, yinto ephelelwe lixesha, ifanele ukuphucuka okukhulu kangangexesha elithile.
Molweni kwaye kwakhona, wamkelekile kwindawo.
Molweni enkosi kakhulu.
I-Boot ekhuselekileyo yinto ye-UEFI eyaqala ukuphuhliswa kwe-Intel ngo-2000. Zonke izabelo, nokuba zi-LiLo okanye i-Grub endala, zinenkxaso ye-UEFI; Ngaphezu koko, uninzi lweebhodi zoomama zinenkxaso ye-Security Boot, kodwa ikhubazwe ngokungagqibekanga.
Ingxaki yindlela iMicrosoft efuna ngayo iphunyezwe kuba ayizukuvumela isoftwe entsha ukuba yongezwe "kuluhlu olumhlophe" lwe-Secure Boot ukuze isayinwe ngesitshixo esigcinwe kwi-firmware.
Njengoko usitsho, iWindows okwangoku ayinakukwazi ukusebenza ngaphandle koKhuseleko lweBoot; Ke ukudambisa le ngxaki baye bacebisa ezinye izisombululo ngaphandle kokulawula i-UEFI; kodwa kunokuba iphunyezwe ngendlela engathinteliyo, ngokuchasene noko uMicrosoft afuna ukukwenza.
Phendula nge quote
Endaweni yoko, ingxaki isendleleni iMicrosoft efuna ukuba iphunyezwe (ngamahlakani ayo ii-OEMs) ukuze iWindows8 isebenze.
0_0 Inika umdla...
Inkcazo egqwesileyo, kwaye yayinjengoko ndoyikayo ... iMicrosoft ngomdla wokwandisa ukhuseleko lwayo (okanye ukunciphisa ukungakhuseleki kwayo, nangona kunjalo ufuna ukuyibona) iya kusilimaza sonke, abasebenzisi beWindows okanye hayi.
Enkosi ngondwendwelo lwakho kunye nezimvo.
Ukubulisa
Ngokuchanekileyo, ingxaki ayikho kwi-UEFI okanye i-Boot eKhuselekileyo, kodwa kwi-craziness yeMicrosoft ekhathazeka ngokukhawuleza malunga nokhuseleko, kodwa endaweni yokwenza imveliso elungileyo ifuna isisombululo esithintela inkululeko yabasebenzisi.
Yonke into eyenziwa yiMicro$ kukwenza imali kuwe.
Abagqithisi kunye neeradicals njengoko bebehlala benjalo, kwaye ke bayandigxeka xa ndihlala ndithatha umbono omfiliba ngayo yonke imveliso "entsha" yeMicrosoft.
Phofu sihlobo, kumnandi nyhani ukuba nawe apha 😉
Haha KZKG^Gaara kuba nawe ufumene ukugxekwa kwi-UL kwinqaku elinye nakuMartín hahaha
Ndandingayiqondi laa Courage 0_0U
Damn, umdala ngokwaneleyo (Tamkhulu) ukuba uyiqonde ...
http://usemoslinux.blogspot.com/2011/10/canonical-y-red-hat-avierten-peligros.html
Oh ewe, sele ndifundile...
Kwaye ngelixa sisekuyo, isihloko asingalunganga okanye singalunganga, i-Red Hat kunye neCanonical AKUKHO ukuchaswa (njengoko kunjalo ne-FSF) kwi-Secure Boot, kude nayo, bayayixhasa kodwa kuphela ngeenguqu ezithile, njengokuba nenketho elula yokutshintsha ukusuka kwi-ON ukuya kwi-OFF.
Ukuba isihloko sasichanekile ngakumbi, ewe, ndiyavuma, yayilusuku oluxakekileyo kum kwaye emva kokupapasha inqaku ndakwazi ukufunda iPDF (kwaye hayi ngokupheleleyo, kuba bendingenaxesha laneleyo) .
Andiqondi ukuba kukho into eninzi yokuthi hayi?
Ndiyabulela (njengoko ndenze ngaphambili) uMartin ngenxa yenkcazo yakhe, nokuba injongo yakhe yayikugxeka nje ukugxeka, ukukhomba iimpazamo okanye okuchaseneyo akunomdla kum, ndafunda into entsha ngala mazwana kwaye yiloo nto ibalulekileyo.
Wowu!!! ebusweni bonke besanti.
Mamela ngokufuna ukwazi, usuka phi uArenoso? andikayifumani...
KZKG ^ Gaara = Kazekage Gaara evela eNaruto Shippuden, uyintloko yelali efihliweyo entlabathi kwaye ihlasele ngesanti kunye nezinto.
Hahaha kanye.. Wow ukufumana isiko… Cofa apha Hehehe
Haha ndiyaqonda, ndandingayazi loo anime
Hahahahaha.. Sandy hahahaha andayiyeka yintsini xa ndibona lonto hahahahaha
Kulungile, ndiyifumene, bendiyazi iNaruto kodwa andizange ndiyibone, ndicinga ukuba ayisositayile se-anime kum.
Ndonele yilento:
Kwaye ngubani okuxelele lonto? 0_oU
Ngaba bekuku-UL?
Haha ewe, yayiyi-boss ngeposi, ndandingazi ukuba i-RAE yenze umonakalo omkhulu, ndandinokwaneleyo ukuba undibize ngokungafundileyo malunga neNaruto hahahaha.
Hahahaha bakubetha apho, ngokuba isibhanxa hahahahaha
Asikuko nokuba awufundanga, nto nje awunalwazi lungako njengathi... HAHAHAHAHA
Hayi, ndathi "vantana" kanye kwinqaku le-UL, akukho Hoyganism engapheliyo hahaha
Hahahaha jonga ndatsho kudala kwiblog ka elav ndangena edangatyeni nabanye abafana.
I-Hasecorp kunye neCanoni $ kaninzi bezikwi-cahoots kwaye ixesha lindingqine ndilungile. Kwaye loo nto yeRed Hat ibonakala imbi kakhulu kum, jonga, bendinentlonipho kubo kodwa kubonakala ngathi bazakuphulukana nayo.
Andivanga.
Ngaba iCanonical kunye ne-HR ayinangqondo ngokubuza ngokuthobekileyo ukuba ukusetyenziswa kwe-EFI kungathintelwa?
Ngaba akucaci kakuhle ukuba injongo ayikho konke ukunyusa ukhuseleko (ukhuseleko kwi-Windows? Kuyahlekisa) kodwa ngokuchanekileyo ukukhusela ukunyuka kwe-GNU / Linux?
Ngaba ayiyonyani ukuba i-EFI ibandakanyiwe kwizixhobo ze-Apple ixesha elide kwaye ngenxa yoko awukwazi ukwenza into elula njengokusebenzisa i-GNU/Linux ephilayo CD okanye i-USB kwi-Mac?
Ngalo mlinganiso, kwasekuqaleni asiyi kukwazi ukuqhubeka nokwenza into elula njengokuzama i-distros kwimowudi ephilayo kwiikhompyuter ezintsha, sihamba ne-pendrives yethu kwizindlu zabahlobo bethu ukubafundisa i-GNU / Linux ngaphandle kokuyifakela. ..
Nabani na ongaboniyo ukuba le yindlela ecacileyo echasene ne-GNU/Linux akanangqondo kakhulu.
Molo wamkelekile UAliana 😀
Ngokucacileyo, ayisiyiyo kwaye ayikaze ibe yimfihlo ukuba iMicrosoft ayinayo izivumelwano "ezisemthethweni" okanye "zikawonke-wonke" kunye nabavelisi behardware kunye nabathengisi, yiyo loo nto impendulo yayo: "Abathengisi bezixhobo ngabona baya kuba nolawulo kwiSecureBoot" luhanahaniso nje.
Siza kubona, kuba uHP kunye noDell baye baphawula ngale nto, andikafundi eli nqaku kodwa ndiceba ukulifunda kwaye ndilibeke apha kwindawo.
Molweni kwaye kwakhona, WAMKELA !!!, kumnandi ukuba nawe apha 🙂
Ewe andikhumbuli kakuhle, Intel ixhasa iGnu/Linux, kodwa kwimeko yecomputer ezine AMD ndibona ingxaki enkulu kuba noko kwiIntel ubuchwephesha sele bukhona kwaye ndiyathandabuza ukuba iIntel izakumamela iMicrosoft ngalo mqondo. ukusukela, ewe, i-Intel i-100 % iyahambelana neLinux kunye nabasebenzisi beWindows okanye beLinux abayi kukhuphela okanye balayishe ngenxa yokuba uKhuseleko lwe-Boot luvaliwe.
Ubuncinci i-amd inengxaki enkulu apho.