Bekufanele ngibhale okuthunyelwe ngale mpikiswano ithunyelwe ku-LWN. Futhi ukuthi i-LLVM / Clang compiler iqala khathazeka kuhlu lwamakheli lwe-GNU.
Kudala kwakukhona umhlanganisi obizwa nge-GCC oneminyaka engaphezu kwengu-25 ekhona eqhubeka nokuhlonipha kakhulu ilayisense yakhe yamahhala neyokukopisha, kanye nokuba ngumhlanganisi osetshenziswa yi-linux kernel kuze kube muva nje yiFreeBSD. Noma ngubani owayefuna ukufunda ukuthi angakhula kanjani ku-C noma ku-C ++, usebenzise i-GCC ngokungakhathalekile ukwakheka komshini wabo. Kodwa-ke, i-GCC yahlushwa okuthile imfihlo, ngokwengxenye kungenxa yefilosofi yalabo abayisungulayo futhi ngokwengxenye ngenxa yokuthuthuka kwesitayela sesonto lombhishobhi, lapho kwenziwa khona ukulawula okunamandla ngokwakwenzeka ku-GCC nokuthi yini eyayingasekho (manje hhayi kangako kepha isekhona), eyavula indlela ukwakhiwa kwamaphethelo angaphambili nezinye izinto i-GCC eyagcina izisebenzisile. Ukuze ufunde kabanzi ngomlando omfushane we Ama-EGCS, Ngishiya lesi sixhumanisi.
Khonamanjalo, e-University of Illinois e-Urbana-Champaign cishe ngo-2002, iphrojekthi yocwaningo yaholela ekwakhiweni komhlanganisi owenziwe ngendlela ehlelekile ukuze izinto ezingazodwana ezifana nezingaphambili, ama-generator ekhodi kanye izilungisi. Bayambiza LLVM ngoba ekuqaleni bekungumshini obonakalayo osezingeni eliphansi kepha wagcina ungaphezu kwalokho. Futhi bamnika ilayisense yakhe, okwakungu kufana ne-BSD (mahhala, hhayi i-copyleft, ehambisana ne-GPL). Ngemuva kweminyaka, i-Apple yaba nentshisekelo ku-LLVM futhi yayamukela ngezinhlelo zayo zokusebenza ze-iOS ne-OS X, kanye nokwakha (futhi udedele ngaphansi kwelayisense yamahhala efanayo ne-LLVMi-front-end yakho ebizwa klabalasa, kwe-C neNhloso C. Okubi kungenzeka ukuthi kufakwe i-LLVM / Clang ezinhlelweni zokuphatheleneKunjalo nge-CUDA compiler evela ku-NVIDIA ne-IDE XCode evela ku-Apple.
Kepha ngolunye usuku emasontweni ambalwa edlule kuhlu lwama-emacs, phakathi kwengxoxo ngemodi yokuqedela eyenzelwe uClang, I-Dimitry gutov uthi "Ngatshelwa kudala ukuthi uRichard Stallman wazonda kakhulu uClang ophikisana nokufaka ikhodi eyisebenzisa kuma-emac. " Lokhu kamuva kwaholela kwenye ingxoxo ku-clang nesoftware yamahhala lapho URichard ngokwakhe uyacacisa: «Inqubomgomo yethu akukhona ukwamukela ushintsho kunoma iyiphi iphakheji ye-GNU engasebenza noClang kepha hhayi ne-GCC. Ama-Emacs ngeke akhuthaze abantu ukuthi basuke eGCC. Uma sinikezwa ithuba, sizokhuthaza ukusebenzisa i-GCC ngaphezu kweClang. "
Ngemuva kwesikhashana, kuvela u-Eric Raymond (odume ngokudala iThe Cathedral neBazaar, kanye nencazelo yoMthombo Ovulekile), ohlabelela i-joust, ukunyathela isigamu, ahambe athi ukuthi i-LLVM / Clang ibiyimpendulo ekumelaneni kwephrojekthi ye-GCC ekubeni isebenzisane kakhudlwana, kanti uClang udlula i-GCC ngezinyathelo ezimbalwa zobuchwepheshe. Ngokusho kwakhe (futhi kukhombisa ividiyo kusuka enkulumweni kaChandler Carruth), abathuthukisi bakwaClang babuze uStallman ukuthi ngabe kukhona yini isizathu esenza ukuthi ukuphela kwangaphambi kweGCC kungaphendulwa kube yimitapo yolwazi enamandla engaxhunyaniswa yinoma yiluphi uhlelo olufuna ukwehlukanisa ikhodi yomthombo. UStallman uphendule wathi inhloso eyodwa ye-GCC gwema izinhlelo zokuphathelene nokusebenzisa noma yiziphi izingxenye zayo, ngakho-ke bagwema ngamabomu izinto ezahlukahlukene kungenzeka ngabe ngabe bakusebenzise ukusetshenziswa okunjalo …… ..bebekucabangele impendulo engasisizi. Babefuna ukudala ama-IDE namanye amathuluzi abelana ngekhodi yokuhlanganisa futhi i-GCC ayizange ibavumele, ngakho-ke ukudala i-Clang bese uthumela i-GCC ku / dev / null. Onjiniyela be-GCC bagxumela kuye beluma ukungaziswa ngokugcwele (ngeqiniso lokuthi uClang udlula i-GCC ngezindlela ezimbalwa zobuchwepheshe). Phakathi kokufeba, kuvela uStallman esho lokho I-LLVM ukuphonsa emuva okwesabekayo, hhayi ngenxa yezizathu zobuchwepheshe kepha kuphela ngelayisense yayo engeyona eye-copyleft ezuzisa i-Apple.
Ngemuva kwalokho i-athikili ye-LWN inikezela ngezigaba ezinde ngokuzimelela kwe-GCC nezinyathelo abazifakile ngamabomu ukwenza kube nzima ukusebenzisa ukumelwa kwangaphakathi ngezinhlelo zokuphathelene, ku Ukukhishwa Kwelabhulali Ye-GCC Runtime okuxazulula umbuzo wokuthi ngabe i-GCC kufanele ihlanganise ikhodi lobunikazi. Ngingathanda futhi ukufaka icala le- I-FreeBSD (isanda kukhishwa inguqulo 10, esikhundleni se-GCC nge-LLVM / Clang njengomhlanganisi omkhulu). Uhlobo lwakamuva lwe-GCC abalusebenzisile kwakungu-4.2.1 (okwakamuva okunelayisense ye-GPLv2) kanye noma uhlanya bebezoyibuyekeza enguqulweni ene-GPLv3 (bafuna nje i-BSD ngaphandle kwe-GPL), ngakho-ke i-LLVM / Clang iza kubo njengegilavu.
Ngamafuphi, enye impi empini yaphakade yeGPL vs BSD.
Akuthandeki, ake abathuthukisi babulalane bodwa.
Futhi-ke, sinesisebenzi esisodwa esingenelisekile ukusebenza ku-Microsoft nase-Apple.
Uqinisile, ngisekela ukuthi isoftware ihlale imahhala ukuze noma yimuphi umuntu akwazi ukuyifunda (leso yisona sizathu kuphela esenza ngisekele futhi ngisebenzise iLinux), kepha ekugcineni abahleli baba negama lokugcina.
I-athikili enhle, ngihlala ngithanda izindatshana ze-diazepan, zivela kokujwayelekile.
Iqiniso ukuthi kuwumcabango wobuphukuphuku ohlangothini lwe-gcc, ikakhulu ngesikhathi umdali we-LLVM enikeza ikhodi ku-gcc futhi bayala, i-CLang yakhelwe ukuze ama-IDE akwazi ukuqinisekisa ikhodi ngesikhathi real ukuthi akusizi kuphela izinhlelo zokusebenza eziyimfihlo futhi kuvula imithombo evulekile efana ne-KDevelop noma i-QtCreator ngaphandle kwabahleli abaphambili njenge-Vim, Kate, emacs, njll. Ngicabanga ukuthi into efanayo izogcina yenzeka ngama-egcs futhi izongena ngaphansi kwelayisense ye-gpl ngokushesha nje lapho i-linux ingahlanganiswa nalokhu njengoba kwenzeka ngama-egcs
Uma bengakwazi ukuthuthukisa i-EGCS kanye / noma bayenze indawo engcono kakhulu ye-CLang, ngizoya ku-CLang naku-LLVM.
Ngubuwula? Angicabangi kanjalo. Iqiniso lokuthi i-GCC ayinakusetshenziselwa ukudala isoftware yokuphathelene kuyindlela yokubeka phambili ukuthuthukiswa kwesoftware yamahhala futhi ungasebenzisi ithuba layo ekwakhiweni kwesoftware ephathelene. Kuyindlela yokuvikela isoftware yamahhala ngakho-ke kufanele ixhaswe. UMnuz Stallman uqinisile impela, yisinyathelo esibuyela emuva. Ngaphezu kwalokho, izinkampani ezifana ne-Apple, njengoba kushiwo ku-athikili, zizohlomula ku-LLVM / Clang ngaphandle kokufaka isandla ngokuphelele emphakathini nangaphandle kokunikeza udumo kule phrojekthi.
Jabulani bantu!
Kokubili i-GCC ne-LLVM / CLANG ingahlanganisa isoftware ephathelene, okungakwazi ukuguqulwa yi-GCC futhi kungenzi lezo zinguquko zaziwe. I-LLVM / CLANG ingaphinde inikezwe ilayisense njenge-gpl, umehluko omkhulu phakathi kwalokhu ukuthi kwi-LLVM / CLANG kufanele basebenzise i-C ++ futhi labo be-GCC bebengafuni ukuyibona noma ukuyipenda kuze kube muva nje. Ngokombono wami esikhundleni sokubhala kabusha i-GCC ibe yi-C ++ njengoba benza manje bekufanele ngabe bafaka izakhiwo ezisekelwa yi-GCC futhi i-LLVM / CLANG ayinazo nezilimi lezi zokugcina futhi zinekhodi ehlanzayo futhi zigcina igatsha labo lokuthuthuka.
Ngicabanga ukuthi umbono wakho awunasisekelo, ngaphezu kwezinkinga zobuchwepheshe yisoftware yamahhala. Yilokho okukhathaza kakhulu uMnu. Stallman. Ngokwalokho engibona kukuhle kakhulu kuwe yingxenye yezobuchwepheshe futhi wena ungakwesokudla sakho, kepha uma ungenayo inketho ngoba inkampani yathatha ubuchwepheshe bakho uzocabanga kabili.
Ngakolunye uhlangothi nge-GCC ungaqinisekisa ikhodi ngesikhathi sangempela, njengoba ngiphinda, umbono wakho awunasisekelo.
1-Uma i-GCC yenza imfoloko ye-LLVM / CLANG kanye nenkampani iphinde iyinikeze amalayisense njenge-GPL, yonke ikhodi abayifaka kumfoloko ethiwe izoba ngaphansi kwe-GPL futhi leyo ye-LLVM kuzodingeka icele imvume yokuphinda ilayisense futhi ifake ku-repo yabo. Ngiyakwazisa ukuthi uhlobo lwelayisense iMIT (XORG, WAYLAND, ...) noma i-BSD (FreeBSD, ...) livumelekile njenge-LLVM
2 - Nge-GCC akunakwenzeka ukusebenzisa ukuqedelwa kwekhodi okuzenzakalelayo noma ukuqinisekiswa kwekhodi ngesikhathi sangempela ngokusebenzisa umtapo wezincwadi owunikezayo ngokungafani ne-CLANG
3 - I-LLVM yisixazululo esiphakeme se-GCC hhayi kuphela ezobuchwepheshe kepha futhi nangokusebenza kahle i-LLVM / CLANG binomial ithatha uhhafu ukuyihlanganisa
Phila i-GNU ne-GPL!
Bona ukuthi bangazenzela yini i-CLang ngotshwala, ukugembula kanye nama-sluts.
Hheyi?
Cha, Richard. Iqiniso lokuthi i-SELinux ingumsebenzi we-NSA akusho ukuthi noma yiliphi elinye ithuluzi elingeyona ilayisense le-GPL (njenge-LLVM / CLang) livela kumatrix afanayo.
Ngokuzimisela, bengicabanga ukuthi kunesizathu esizwakalayo salokhu, kepha ngiyabona ukuthi i-FSF iyabambelela ngaphezu kukaSatoru Iwata noma yiliphi ilungu le-MAFIAA.
Kuyabonakala, ukuthi awulifundanga uhlu lwamakheli futhi uhlala nalokho okushiwo yilo mbhalo phakathi kwemigqa.
Kunikezwe izimpikiswano ezinengqondo, ngisho nezinketho zobuchwepheshe, kepha noma kunjalo, kuvame kakhulu ukufunda isihloko bese ungena ngqo kumazwana.
Ñuhhhh GCC + Emacs. Uma ufuna ukusinda thatha isandla sami (stallman)
AmaPuritan azongixolela, kepha kufanele ngikusho: Angikaze ngimthande uStallman, futhi kubonakala kunjalo ngalezo zinsuku zami zonke.
Awukwazi ukuba nomqondo ovaliwe kangaka. Ubonakala njengomuntu oshisekayo ngokweqile, uhlanya, futhi yebo, noma ngabe kufanele ahlonishwe kangakanani ngempumelelo yakhe nokuthi yini ayimelelayo, angimthandi.
Ngiyavuma. Ekuqaleni ngangimthanda kakhulu, kepha manje ubonakala ngokweqisa ...
Extremist ... crazy ... ngokweqile ... yebo, kuya ngokuthi uyibuka kanjani. Kimina, uMnu Richard Stallman ungumuntu ononembeza omkhulu emphakathini. Incazelo yempilo yakhe ibilokhu futhi iwukuthuthukisa umphakathi, hhayi isoftware. Kunomehluko phakathi kwesoftware yamahhala / isoftware yomthombo ovulekile, ngoba eyangaphambili ibheka izingqinamba zenhlalo nezokugcina ngezinkinga zobuchwepheshe.
Umlingani ka-Elav, akusiwo umbuzo wokuba ngumhlambululi noma cha. Isoftware yamahhala yazalwa njengenhlangano yezenhlalo futhi yilokho uMnu Stallman akuvikelayo, njengoba kwenza abaningi.
Awukwazi ukuba nomqondo ovaliwe kangaka. Ubukeka njengomuntu oshisekayo ngokweqile, uhlanya, futhi yebo, noma ngabe kufanele ahlonishwe kangakanani ngempumelelo yakhe nokuthi yini ayimelelayo, angimthandi. "
Empeleni, kuphambene. Inhloso ukuthi noma ngubani angangena ngokukhululekile kwisoftware ngaphandle kwanoma ngubani ovimbela ukusetshenziswa kwayo ngokuguqulwa kokuphathelene futhi njengoba ngishilo ekuphawuleni kwami kwangaphambilini, babeka phambili futhi bagcizelele ukwakhiwa kwesoftware yamahhala.
Ngicabanga ukuthi udida ukushisekela elinye igama. Ukushiseka ngokweqile kuyabulala, njengoba umlando ukhombise kahle. Igama olifunayo lingaba likhulu kepha ngaphandle kwalolo radicalism isoftware yamahhala kanye nokunyakaza kwe-GNU / linux bekungeke kube khona, okungenani njengoba sazi namuhla. Mayelana nento engasile, ngeke ngiphikisane nawe, kepha ngokubona engikubonile kule minyaka embalwa, abantu abasile abayona leyo misangano.
Ngalesi sigaba ngifuna ukusho ukuthi ukunyakaza kwamahhala kwesoftware akuyona nje ukunyakaza kwamakhompyutha kuphela, kepha futhi kungokwenhlalo futhi kufanele kuvikelwe. Futhi uma u-Elav kufanele ube ngogombela kwesakhe. Izinkampani ezinjenge-Apple noma iMicrosoft ngeke zinqikaze ukusizakala ngalezi zimo. Kumele sakhe ukuqwashisa maqondana namalungelo abasebenzisi kanye nabantu bebonke.
I-PS ngiyibiza ngo-Elav ngoba ngiyamphendula kepha ukuphawula kubhekiswe kuwo wonke ama-GNU / linuxers.
Jabulani Abantu!
@Xlash: SIR!… Ngiyabonga! Yilokho ebengikudinga ukukufunda. +1
Ngiyakukopisha, ngiyaphrinta bese ngikubeka eceleni kweBhayibheli. (Okwerekhodi: hhayi ngaphakathi noma ngaphezulu kwalo).
Ekugcineni, sibonga lesi sinyathelo nomzamo kaLinus nomphakathi, kukhona okufezwayo okushintshe umhlaba:
"Kukhona i-Linux yangaphambilini ne-MANJE ene-LINUX".
+ 10
E @Elav:
Angixolisi kepha bekufanele ngithi:
Okunye okuthunyelwe yangaphambilini kungithandile, kepha hhayi lokhu ... futhi uma kuqhubeka kanjena: mhlawumbe kuzoqhubeka kube njalo izinsuku zami zonke.
Ungavali ingqondo. Ubonakala ushiseka ngokweqile, uyahlanya, futhi uhlonipha kakhulu okufezile (lesi sithangami) nokuthi yini oyifanele ... Angikuthandi (ukuphawula kwakho).
😀 - hehe! manje usungazizwa (kancane) ngokufana ne-RMS. udinga nje ukuba ne-diffusion-trajectory efanayo naye, futhi-ke, uzizwe ucishe ufane ncamashi.
Sanibonani cuñao!
Angiqondi ukuthi kungani uStallman evaliwe kangaka. Ngibeka engcupheni yokuthi ngicabanga ukuthi i-LLVM ikhululeke kakhulu kune-GCC, ngoba inika inkululeko yokuyisebenzisa ngisho nasezinhlelweni zokuphathelene. Yebo, ngiyazi ukuthi ukuvinjelwa ku-GCC kungasiza isoftware yamahhala, kepha kubonakala kungenangqondo kimi ukuthi iphikisana ne-LLVM ngaleyo ndlela.
Phendula ngokucaphuna
UStallman akavaliwe. Lo mbhalo uthambekele kakhulu emibonweni yomuntu siqu yombhali.
Eqinisweni, izinqumo ze-GCC ikakhulukazi ngobuchwepheshe. Ku-GCC bafuna modularity futhi bayakwenza, kepha ngendlela ehlukile (ukugwema izinkinga ezikhona ku-CLANG).
Ukuze uthole olunye ulwazi https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-01/msg00176.html
Yilokho uRaymond akubhalile futhi kukhona izimpendulo zonjiniyela.
Lokhu kuzwakala kimi ukubona ukuthi ngubani onakho okukhudlwana ... I-ego, kunjalo.
Bobabili abahlanganisi bahle kakhulu. Kepha njenganoma yiliphi ithuluzi, kuya ngokuthi ulisebenzisa kanjani.
Umuntu angabhala ikhodi yamahhala ku-C # bese enza umcibisholo ngeLinux.
Ngicabanga ukuthi lapha kufanele ube ne-pragmatic ngaphezulu. UStallman kufanele abe nombono futhi angayeki ukulahlekelwa yindlela yakhe. Okukhathazayo ukuthi umphakathi okhona awuqhekeki nokuyinto eyenzekayo. Into enengqondo kunazo zonke ukuthi yize ilayisense le-bsd likuvumela ukuthi lisetshenziswe ezindaweni zobunikazi, inqobo nje uma ababhali baziwa (futhi nokuthi okuthole kubo) basebenzisa umqondo ofanayo kodwa nge-gpl v2 noma ngaphezulu ..
Ngenhlanhla, u-stallman akaze azwakale isikhathi eside. Enye, uhlelo lwekhompiyutha noma i-compiler, ayisoze yaba ngumbuzo wezenhlalo, ngaphandle kwalokho kuhlale kunezinye izindlela ezingekho mahhala! kodwa uma kumahhala.
Mayelana ne-llvm clang, impikiswano ayinangqondo, ngoba umthombo uzohlala ukhona, ukhishwe ngaphansi kwelayisense ye-bsd, ngakho-ke kuyisoftware yamahhala, ukuthi inkampani ingayisebenzisela izinhloso zayo zobumnyama, akusho ukuthi ngeke usakwazi finyelela ikhodi yoqobo, kepha ngiyabona, akekho lapha onenkomba, ngaphandle kuka-2 noma u-3.
"Uhlelo lwekhompyutha noma umhlanganisi akusoze kwaba ngumbuzo emphakathini"
Ngabe uqonde ukuthini? Ngiyakuhlonipha ukuthi awuyivikeli inhlangano ye-software yamahhala njengoba kwenza abanye abaningi, kepha ukuphika lokho okushiwo isoftware yamahhala kubonakala kungahloniphi kubantu bakho abatshala isikhathi esiningi, imali nomzamo ekuyivikeleni nasekuyidaleni.
Vele, i-llvm iyi-software yamahhala kepha lokho akusho ukuthi ukuguqulwa kwayo nokukhishwa kwayo kuyikho. Umqondo awukona nje kuphela ukufinyelela ngokukhululekile isoftware yasekuqaleni, kepha futhi nokuguqulwa kwayo. Uma ngenza uhlelo futhi ngalwabelana nawe, ngingathanda ukuthi wenze okufanayo kubantu ongabanikeza ikhophi yenguqulo yakho eguquliwe. Lokhu yilokho isoftware yamahhala ne-copyleft evikela ngakho-ke, ngumbuzo wenhlalo.
"Kodwa ngiyabona, akekho lapha onomkhondo, ngaphandle kuka-2 noma u-3."
Angazi ukuthi ufike kanjani kuleso siphetho lapho imibono ethunyelwe lapha ibhekisa kwifilosofi nenkululeko yesoftware ngokuqhathanisa umehluko phakathi kwezinhlobo ezimbili zamalayisense, noma ngabe ayahambisana.
Impilo yansuku zonke ye-accountant engazi lutho ngohlelo iluthinta kanjani uhlelo lwe-accounting oluhlanganiswe nomhlanganisi onjalo?
Akunjalo, inqobo nje uma ngikhululekile. Kepha isihloko engibhekana naso kumazwana kungenye, uDiazepan. Ngikhuluma ngokusetshenziswa kwesihlanganisi se-X ukuhlanganisa isoftware ephathelene nokuphathelene, mayelana namalayisense asetshenziswe kumhlanganisi ngamunye nokwehluka kwawo, ngiphinde ngikhulume ngenzuzo ye-GLP kune-BSD, njalo ngokubuka kwenkululeko yeqiniso.
I-LOL, ethi akekho umuntu onombono ngamagama aqinile kakhulu kumuntu othi isoftware akuyona inkinga yezenhlalo.
Kufanele ungaboni noma okungenani ube yi-myopic ukuze ungayiboni, lapho kukhona ngisho namazwe afudukayo (ngamaphesenti amakhulu noma amancane) ukuyokhulula isoftware, lapho yiyo yonke imithombo yezindaba yamazwe ngamazwe inanela ukuthi isoftware ephathekayo iyithuluzi le Ubunhloli ngezinga elikhulu, lapho umuntu ocebile kakhulu emhlabeni ezinikele ngqo kuhlelo lokusebenza.
Okufanele kufundwe.
... Ngifisa sengathi kuzwakale ama-stallmans amaningi nama-pandevs amancane ...
Lo mbhalo uthambekele ngandlela thile, ukuqala ngesihloko, ngoba labo okufanele babuzwe ukuthi ngabe "bayahlanya kancane" yi-LLVM, ngoba yibo abakhononda kabuhlungu.
Futhi ngale ndaba, ungabona ubuzenzisi balabo abaqala ukugxeka lokho abakubiza ngokuthi "ukwahlukana" nokuthi "kubi" kanjani ngesoftware yamahhala.
Kepha lapho umuntu ehambisana nalokho akushoyo nakwenzayo, elandela umugqa wakhe futhi angavumi ukuthi isihlanganisi samahhala siba yipulatifomu yokungenamkhawulo kwabahlanganisi abanobunikazi, yebo-ke, Phila isikhathi eside, wonke umuntu enze izimfoloko!
Isoftware yamahhala yinhlangano yomphakathi kusukela ekuzalweni kwayo ngencazelo.
Ngokuphathelene neGPL vs BSD:
“INkululeko 3 ifaka phakathi inkululeko yokushicilela izinhlobo zakho ezilungisiwe njenge-software yamahhala. Ilayisensi yamahhala ingagunyaza nezinye izinhlobo zokushicilelwa; ngamanye amagama, akudingeki ukuthi kube yilayisensi ye-copyleft. Kodwa-ke, ilayisense edinga ukuthi izinhlobo eziguquliwe zingabi mahhala ayikwazi ukubhekwa njengemahhala. "
“ICopyleft (echazwe kafushane kakhulu) umthetho ngesisekelo sokuthi, uma usabalalisa kabusha lolu hlelo, awukwazi ukwengeza imikhawulo yokuncisha abanye inkululeko enkulu. Lo mthetho awuphikisani nenkululeko eyinhloko, kunalokho uyabavikela. "
Njengoba ukwazi ukubona, i-copyleft, yize ngesikhathi esifushane isusa inkululeko ethile, kodwa esikhathini esizayo iyayivikela. Yingakho uMnu Stallman evikela i-GPL: "Umsebenzi wami kwisoftware yamahhala ukhuthazwa umgomo onengqondo: ukusabalalisa inkululeko nokubambisana."
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html
«Umthombo ovulekile uyindlela yokuhlela, isoftware yamahhala yinhlangano yezenhlalo. Ngokunyakaza kwamahhala kwesoftware, isoftware yamahhala iyimfuneko yokuziphatha, inhlonipho ebalulekile yenkululeko yabasebenzisi. Esikhundleni salokho ifilosofi yomthombo ovulekile iphakamisa imibuzo maqondana nokuthi "ungayithuthukisa" kanjani isoftware, ngomqondo osebenzayo nje. Igcina ukuthi isoftware yokuphathelene ayisona isixazululo esifanelekile ezinkingeni ezisebenzayo ezingaxazululwa. Ezimweni eziningi, lapho kukhulunywa 'ngomthombo ovulekile', okuhle nokubi akubhekwa, kuphela ukuthandwa nempumelelo. "
Sengivele ngiphawule ngayo kaningana futhi ngilokhu ngiyiphinda, i-linux ngokujwayelekile ngithanda kakhulu, kepha uma kukhona engikuthandayo nge-linux umphakathi. Lapho ukwazi ukweqa phansi eweni ukuze uqhubeke nombono wokuthi "uvaliwe" ngokuthi "isoftware yamahhala" khona-ke uyabona ukuthi umhlaba ubheke phansi. Ngicabanga ukuthi ekuqaleni kwayo isoftware yamahhala ibicacile, namuhla indaba yehlukile.
Ngicabanga ukuthi abaningi bebengakacaci ngemigomo nezinhloso zelayisense le-GPL. Ilayisense ye-GPL ivumela kakhulu kepha inomkhawulo wokungavumeli inzuzo kusuka ezinhlelweni ezinelayisense nayo. Ngivumelana noStallman, kepha hhayi ukweqisa kokusebenzisa kuphela isoftware yamahhala. Ukuthi umsebenzisi ufuna ukusebenzisa i-LLvm / Clang kuyilungelo labo, kepha ukuthi i-SLF ifuna ukufaka i-GCC esikhundleni se-LLVM / Clang kungaba ukuphikisana nezimiso zesoftware yamahhala.