Yanayin rashin tsammani
Mai zuwa fassarar labarin ne "Dubawa ga abyss" daga shafin Benjamin Otte
Ina tsammanin ba zan iya barin matsayi na na ƙarshe kamar yadda yake ba. Zan fara da jera jerin abubuwanda nake ganin sune hujjoji game da aikin GNOME. Ba na son yin magana game da mafita, kawai ina so in jera su ne, saboda ba na tsammanin su ilimi ne na gaba daya. Mutane da alama ba sa magana game da wannan sosai.
1) Masu haɓaka Core sun watsar da ci gaban GNOME.
Misalan kwanan nan sune Emmanuele (Bassi) da Vincent (Untz). Dukansu sun faɗi buƙatar neman wani abu daban, babu motsin rai.
2) GNOME yana cikin karancin ma'aikata.
Yana da wahalar bayyana shi a taƙaice kuma a taƙaice. A cikin ƙananan lambobi: GTK yana da mutum 1 da ke aiki na cikakken lokaci a kai (Biliyaminu kansa). Glib ma bashi da wannan. Ina tsammanin juyin halitta yana da irin wannan yanayin (cikakken abokin ciniki na imel). Hakanan zamu iya kokarin gani Kididdigar Ohloh na GNOME (ya haɗa da fakiti 131, gami da GStreamer da NetworkManager). Zaka ga karancin masu ba da gudummawa a shafin farko wanda ke nuni da cewa aƙalla akwai masu haɓaka cikakken lokaci 20.
3) GNOME aikin Red Hat ne.
Idan sun duba Atsididdigar Ohloh kuma watsi da mutane 3 waɗanda suke aiki kusan na musamman akan GStreamer da 2 waɗanda suke aiki tare da fassarar, zasu sami ma'aikatan Red Hat 10 da wasu 5. (Shafi na 2 ya nuna ma'aikatan Red Hat 6 da 8 na sauran tare da masu fassarar / masu rubutun 6.) Wannan ya ba aikin GNOME sanadarin bas na 1.
4) GNOME bashi da buri.
Na fahimci cewa a 2005 lokacin da Jeff Waugh ya bayar maganarsa 10 × 10 (ya kai kashi 10% na kasuwar nan da shekara ta 2010. Ba a cimma manufar ba). A lokacin, aikin GNOME da gaske ya sami abin da aka tsara: yanayi mai kyauta da aiki. Tun daga wannan lokacin, ba wanda ya iya kafa sabon buri don aikin. A zahiri, GNOME a yau tana bayyana kanta a matsayin "al'ummomin da ke yin babbar software," wanda yake mara kyau kamar abin da kuke samu don haɓaka software.
Babbar matsalar rashin samun manufa shine ba za ku iya auna kanku ba. Babu wanda zai iya gaya idan GNOME 3 yafi ko ya fi GNOME 2. Babu ƙimar awo da aka sani. Hakan ma yana haifar da takaici a wurare da yawa.5) GNOME yayi asarar kasuwa da mutunci.
Ba na son in nuna bambance-bambancen Linus, amma dai sahihan bayanai ne na hakika wadanda tare suka haifar da karancin masu amfani da GNOME da masu ci gaba:
Distros suna canza GNOME don wasu mahalli (ya ambaci Unity da Cinnamon) maimakon aiki tare da GNOME.
Tsoffin magoyan bayan GNOME (ya ambaci Nokia da Suse) suna nuna wariya ko watsi da GNOME gaba ɗaya.
Manyan aikace-aikacen tebur (suna ambata Firefox, LibreOffice, Inkscape, da GIMP) ba su canza zuwa GNOME 3. Ba fifiko a gare su.
Masu amfani da GNOME ke niyya suna watsi da kwamfutocin tebur don na'urori (Wayowin komai da ruwan da Allunan) waɗanda GNOME baya aiki da su.
Yanayin Kyau
Bayan GUADEC 2012 (taron shekara-shekara na masu amfani da GNOME da masu haɓaka a Turai) an sanar da cewa nau'in GNOME na 3.12 za a kira shi GNOME 4 kuma ana sa ran a cikin Maris 2014. Sun ce tsalle tsakanin 3 da 4 ba zai zama ba kamar yadda ya faru kamar wanda ke tsakanin GNOME 2 da 3. Har ila yau, an shirya ƙaddamar da GNOME OS, nasa rarraba GNU / Linux. Kuma abin da zai iya zama mafi hauka: kai 20% rabon kasuwa zuwa 2020.
Harshen Fuentes:
http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2012/07/27/staring-into-the-abyss/
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTE0ODg
http://www.slideshare.net/juanjosanchezpenas/brightfuture-gnome
20% na wasa.
Ina so inyi tunanin shekarar 2020 din ma, saboda kamar yadda wannan "al'umma" take rarrabuwa, daga ciki wasu daga cikin mu zasuyi ta dattako, wasu kuma suna komawa gnome 2, wasu kuma na daban, ya rage a gani idan gnome din har yanzu yana iya isa 4… ..kuma bayan wannan kayi tunanin kai 2020.
A cikin sakon ya manta game da Xfce wanda ya ɗauki safar hannu abin birgewa tare da 4.10 ...
1. Wannan tutar ko duk abin da suka nuna a hoto suna kama da layin Metro da Window8 ...
2. Me yasa a cikin lahira mai binciken SysRescCD 2.80, Midori, ya bayyana kansa a matsayin Mac !! ???
Mozilla / 5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit / 535 + (KHTML, kamar Gecko) Shafin / 5.0 Safari / 535.4 + Midori / 0.4
WTF!
Kar ku tambaye ni, koyaushe ya faru dani kuma ban taba sanin yadda zan gyara shi xD
Macintosh; KO; Intel Mac OS X… kamar wannan ko karara? 😛
Ba zan iya yin izgili game da GNOME ba amma dole ne in yarda cewa sun yi ƙasa da ƙasa a 'yan kwanakin nan kuma ba na son ganin sun faɗi, amma ba zan miƙa hadaya ba ta amfani da yanayin da bai dace da ni ba.
Game da hoton murfin, tir da shi bai yi daidai ba, kusan kwafin rashin kunya ne na xD. Shin za su yi wani abu na jirgin karkashin kasa? Damn, bana tsammanin wannan shine "ƙaramin tashin hankali" tsalle xD
Nah, banyi tsammanin haka ba, zamu amince cewa akwai GNOME na ɗan lokaci (bayan duk yana ɗaya daga cikin keɓaɓɓun muhallin Linux) kuma sama da duk abubuwan da BA ZASU YI KOYI DA KYAUTA BA !!!
Ba shi da magana…
"Wani lokaci don daukar matakai biyu gaba dole ne ka dauki mataki daya baya." Har yanzu ina fatan cewa mutanen da suke jin dadi sun fahimci irin babban wautar da suka aikata ta hanyar barin gnome 2, cewa ko ta yaya za su ci gaba da aikin azaman gado na gnome ko wani abu makamancin haka.
"Ba na son in nuna busa Linus"
🙂
Ni kaina, bana jin daɗin abin da gnome yake yi, na yanayin da na gwada, wanda na fi so sosai don aikinsa da kyawawan halaye shine xfce. gnome 2 suma sun so ni sosai, yanzu gnome 3 suna da tsauri.
Ina so in haskaka aya ta 4, wacce ta fi mahimmanci a gare ni… Xfce: «Tebur mai haske amma mai aiki», LXDE: «desktopananan tebur mai amfani», KDE: «Tebur mai kyau, cike da ayyuka» ... Gnome. .. To ... Yana da mahimmanci? .__.
Na gwada xfce, kde da nawa tebur mai haske ya fito, na sami gnome 3 dadi kwarai da gaske, zan bukaci goge wasu bayanai dalla-dalla, amma kyawawan dandano sune dandano tb.
Abin da mai hana gnome mai sona shine ɗan yaron a wannan shafin. Labari mai dadi amma, Maman, wawa har yanzu yana tsaye a nasa hanyar.
Idan banyi kuskure ba (wanda bana tsammani) Benjamin Otte shine babban mai shirya GTK + kuma na GNOME ne. Bana tsammanin ni mai kin jinin GNOME ne.
A ganina dalilan da Biliyaminu ya bayar a cikin labarin da kuka raba baya tallafawa da'awar da ya lissafa. Misali, faɗin cewa don taken ko manufa, ba a sadu ba, (cewa Gnome ya yi a 2005 don 2010), yana nufin "Gnome ba shi da manufa"; gabaɗaya yana waje da duk wani mizanin ma'auni na hujja ko hujja.
Ban sani ba ko abin da ya fada gaskiya ne a wurare daban-daban. Abin da na sani shi ne cewa ba a bin taken kowane ma'ana, abin da ya ƙunsa.
Ban taɓa karanta wannan Biliyaminu ba, amma labarinsa zai zama kyakkyawan misali na bayanin "tabloid" (don bala'in girmamawa "da" mai burgewa "(don gabatar da ra'ayoyi na motsin rai da son zuciya kamar suna jayayya).
Na gode.
Kuna raina mai shirin GNOME.
Yayi kyau. Nace hakan, banda cikakkun bayanai, Gnome 3 yayi min daidai. Abin da na fi so shi ne batun tsoho, don haka duhu ban san wanda ya zo da wannan ba, da alama ba ya buƙatar yarjejeniya daga kowa. Hakan yana da sauƙin gyara.
Toooda kashi na farko gaskiya…. depresses kadan.
Na sami damar karanta labarin cikin Turanci kuma ina son ƙarin bayanin. A GNOME 3 na na, musamman ma faduwar ta zama kamar mai ban sha'awa, amma duk da haka suna bukatar sake tunani game da alkiblar su, saboda da alama wani aiki ne mai ci. Yana sanya ni tebur mai aiki wanda ba haske kwata-kwata kuma hakan yana rasa ƙasa da ƙasa da XFCE.
A matsayina na keɓaɓɓe ga LXDE, zan iya gaya muku cewa lokacin da Canonical "ta saye shi", ya fara kawo cikas ga ƙungiyoyi daban-daban, wasu shugabannin ma sun yi murabus. Nace abu daya ya faru da Jar Hat. Na sami labarin wannan ne domin ina daga cikin theungiyar Commons, sadaukar da kai sama da komai don taimaka wa masu magana da Sifaniyanci.