Ta yaya har Mir zai iya shafar mu?

Karatun bangaren hira da Clem lefebvre inda yake bayar da ra'ayinsa akan Mir, Na fara tunani Ta yaya har Mir zai iya shafar mu?

Bari mu dauki misali mai sauki: LibreOffice. Rarrabawa da yawa sun karɓi wannan Office Suite lokacin da abin da duk muka san ya faru, koyaya, wannan ba yana nufin cewa ba za mu iya shigar da wani madadin ba, ko da namu OpenOffice.

Debian misali har yanzu ya hada da Office a cikin rumbun adana su, kuma zamu iya shigar da shi idan muna so Shin ba zai zama daidai da hakan ba Mir? Kodayake Canonical kawo wannan sabon sabar zane mai zane ga dukkan nau'ikan Ubuntu, babu wani dalili da zai sa ya kamata a cire daga wuraren ajiyewa zuwa Xorg o Wayland, don haka sauran na * buntu har yanzu suna iya amfani da waɗannan sabar zane. Shin kun fahimci maganata?

A wannan bangare, bana tsammanin akwai wata matsala, kuma ina fatan da gaske akwai. Tuni wasu masu haɓakawa na KDE sun yi ikirarin cewa ba za su tozarta ƙoƙarinsu ba wajen tallafawa Mir (a yanzu), kuma cewa za su ci gaba da amfani da su Xorg o Wayland.

Saboda haka Kubuntu zai iya gudanar da aikin sa kuma ba lallai bane ya yi amfani da wani rarraba a matsayin tushe kamar yadda wasu ke hasashe. Kodayake a bangaren Xfce Ban ga wani rubutu game da shi ba, saboda ina tunanin abu daya ya faru da shi Xubuntu.

Ni kaina nazo nayi wannan tunanin Canonical ƙari da maƙasudin farkon don con Ubuntu, kuma wancan Mir Zai iya zama ƙarin mataki ɗaya a ƙoƙarin ƙirƙirar samfuran da kawai za su iya amfani da su.

Tuni ya faru da Unity, wanda ke girka shi a cikin wasu rarrabuwa kodayake ba abu ne mai yuwuwa ba, ya zama babban abin damuwa ne saboda rashin dakunan karatu waɗanda babu su a wasu wuraren ajiyar kayan, a cikin Debian misali.

Yayi, bari mu ce zai zama kamar haka, menene Canonical yana so ya zama apple del FLASH, cewa suna son ƙirƙirar nasu dandamali, kuma cewa sune suke yanke shawara mai kyau ko mara amfani ga mai amfani. Shin ya kamata mu damu?

Da kyau, idan kun kasance mai amfani da Ubuntu kuma ba kwa son layin da wannan distro ke bi watakila, amma sauran zamu iya ci gaba da rayuwa cikin lumana. Kodayake yana da matukar damuwa da yawa suna tunanin hakan GNU / Linux es UbuntuMu da muke cikin wannan duniyar sun san cewa ba gaskiya bane, kuma don haka muke nan, don fayyace wa duk wanda yake da shakku.

Linearshe: Ban san ku ba, amma Mir bai shafe ni ba musamman. Idan a ƙarshe ana iya amfani da shi a cikin sauran rarrabawar, to mafi kyau, mafi kyau .. idan ba zai iya ba, to Xorg yana ci gaba tare da ci gabanta, wanda yana iya zama sannu a hankali ko menene, amma bai mutu ba. Me suka yi imani?


Bar tsokaci

Your email address ba za a buga. Bukata filayen suna alama da *

*

*

  1. Wanda ke da alhakin bayanan: Miguel Ángel Gatón
  2. Manufar bayanan: Sarrafa SPAM, sarrafa sharhi.
  3. Halacci: Yarda da yarda
  4. Sadarwar bayanan: Ba za a sanar da wasu bayanan ga wasu kamfanoni ba sai ta hanyar wajibcin doka.
  5. Ajiye bayanai: Bayanin yanar gizo wanda Occentus Networks (EU) suka dauki nauyi
  6. Hakkoki: A kowane lokaci zaka iyakance, dawo da share bayanan ka.

  1.   Yaren Arangoiti m

    Na yarda da ku gaba ɗaya Elav. Da kaina, ya daɗe tunda na daina Ubuntu, saboda haka, yanke shawararsu yayin da suka kawo min su. Ina tsammanin abu ne mai kyau game da Linux, akwai abubuwa da yawa da za a zaɓa daga yadda ya faru da ni, idan bayan dogon lokaci na kasance tare da Ubuntu kuma na daina yarda da shawararta, ba ina magana ne game da ingancin samfurin, saboda akan haka za a sami miliyoyin ra'ayoyi, saboda ba komai ga wani, wannan don rarrabawa ba zai kasance ba.

    Gaisuwa.

    1.    kari m

      Ba na tsammanin Ubuntu zai cire Xorg daga wuraren ajiyar sa ... amma hey, bari mu ga abin da ke faruwa, duk da haka, saboda rashin hanyoyin, ba za mu daina amfani da GNU / Linux ba 😀

  2.   Simon m

    Ta wani bangare bidi'a tana da kyau. Xorg gaskiya ne cewa sabar zane ce wacce ta riga ta cika shekaru kuma baya yin aiki mafi kyau a yanayin yanayin tebur na zamani.
    Wayland tayi kamar amsar amma bisa ga Canonical ba ta cika mafi ƙarancin buƙatun Ubuntu + Unity.
    Matsalar ita ce idan Canonical ta haɓaka Mir don Unity ya gudana a kanta, Ina tsammanin Unityayantar ba za ta iya yin aiki a kan wani sabar zana ba, tunda wannan zai zama aiki da yawa da kurakurai masu wahala.
    Ina tsammanin mafi kyawun abin zai kasance don toungiyar don yin aiki a kan Mir kawai amma samun zaɓi (kamar yadda ya zuwa yanzu) don amfani da sauran ɗakunan tebur / zane-zane tare da Ubuntu wanda Unityaya ba zaɓi bane mai dacewa.
    Wannan shine ruhun da Canonical ya kamata ya girmama, wanda shine abin da ke bambanta Linux daga rufaffiyar OS: 'yancin zaɓi ga mai amfani.
    A gefe guda kuma, Mir na iya juyawa, lokaci ya yi, kyakkyawan madadin azaman sabar zane don wasu ɓarna kuma a aika da shi zuwa waɗancan yanayin da kewayen distros / tebur da na'urorin, tunda babban abin da ke haifar da haɓaka Mir shi ne cewa ana iya sauƙaƙe Ubuntu cikin sauƙin zuwa na'urorin hannu (wanda yayi kama da nasara a yau).

    1.    diazepam m

      Da gaske yana biyan buƙatu. Al'amari ne na kula da ci gaban ƙasa wanda suke so suyi ƙasarsu ta kansu

      http://www.muktware.com/5341/wayland-incapable-delivering-what-mir-can

  3.   Bajamushe m

    Babbar matsalar ita ce don OpenGL yayi aiki tare da tebur a Wayland da Mir, dole ne a sake rubuta LibGL tunda yana da dogaro da X11, shi yasa suke amfani da OpenGL ES tunda LibGLES ba sabon lib bane; A Wayland suna shirin tallafawa OpenGL a nan gaba tare da WaylandGL amma da farko suna son dakatar da yarjejeniyar; Wannan shine dalilin da yasa game da tebur akwai X.ORG na ɗan lokaci kuma Valve idan banyi kuskure ba tuni na faɗi cewa wasannin su zasu dogara da X11, kuma basuyi shirin tallafawa Wayland ba, a cikin zasu ga ƙari da yawa a cikin yarjejeniya (duba hanyoyin haɗi) a nan gaba.

    Wayland na wannan lokacin yana aiki ne kawai don tsarin da aka saka

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTMyMjQ
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTMyMzI

  4.   marubuci 1993 m

    Idan kun gani, wannan shine abin da rarrabuwa mai farin ciki yake: idan har distro ta juya baya ga masu amfani da ita, zamu tafi ga azzalumi less

  5.   kunun 92 m

    Kayi babban kuskure a ra'ayina, tabbas zaku iya ci gaba da amfani da xorg ko wayland, amma a ƙarshe tare da direbobi masu mallakar, ya dogara da wane sabar zasu tallafawa! Babu wani abu kuma, kuma mutane da yawa zasu ci gaba da amfani da direbobi masu mallakar mallaka, wannan na iya nufin a ƙarshe idan idan mir ya sami goyan bayan nvidia da amd, ana amfani da wannan sabar ta duk masu lalata.

    1.    Dah 65 m

      Da alama na karanta wani wuri (Ba zan iya tuna inda ba, don haka ba zan iya danganta shi ba), ana taimakawa Wayland kai tsaye ko a kaikaice ta RedHat, Intel da Samsung (wataƙila saboda batun Tizen).

      Ina tsammanin waɗannan kamfanonin 3 na iya samun tasiri sosai akan Nvidia da ATI fiye da yadda Canonical ke da (tare da ko ba tare da bawul a baya). Ka yi tunanin idan Intel ta yanke shawarar sanya firmware a kan masu sarrafa su wanda hakan zai sa su zama ba su dace da Mir ba kuma kawai za su ba Xorg / Wayland (ban sani ba ko zai yiwu, hasashe ne kawai): wane shawara ATI da Nvidia za su yanke?

      Wannan ya ce, idan Mir ya ci gaba da sauri fiye da Wayland, ko kuma ya fi Wayland kyau, ina tsammanin za a karɓe shi ko'ina a ƙarshe. Idan ta wata hanyar ce, Canonical na iya ma goyi baya kuma ya shiga hanyar Wayland bandwagon; Gabaɗaya, ya riga ya canza ra'ayinsa wasu lokuta.

  6.   marianogaudix m

    Na yarda da kai Elav. Akwai rarrabawa da yawa waɗanda zasu yanke shawarar kansu game da ko amfani da Xorg, Mir ko Wayland.
    Dangane da kwarewar da suke so su baiwa masu amfani da su.

    Na ce Don Linus Torvads ko Alan Cox matsalolin Gnome ko Kde baƙi ne ga KERNEL, kuma waɗannan matsalolin suna cikin layin waje.
    ...............................................................................................................
    Don haka Torvalds da Alan Cox sun soki kalaman Miguel de Icaza

    http://www.muylinux.com/2012/09/03/torvalds-y-alan-cox-critican-los-comentarios-de-miguel-de-icaza/

  7.   marianogaudix m

    Na yarda da kai Elav. Akwai rarrabawa da yawa waɗanda zasu yanke shawarar kansu game da ko amfani da Xorg, Mir ko Wayland.
    Dangane da kwarewar da suke so su baiwa masu amfani da su.

    Na ce Don Linus Torvads ko Alan Cox matsalolin Gnome ko Kde baƙi ne ga KERNEL,
    ...............................................................................................................
    Don haka Torvalds da Alan Cox sun soki kalaman Miguel de Icaza

    http://www.muylinux.com/2012/09/03/torvalds-y-alan-cox-critican-los-comentarios-de-miguel-de-icaza/

  8.   Joseph m

    Ubuntu yana ƙara ƙaura daga masu amfani da Linux kuma yana jan sabbin sababbi, ina nufin, masu amfani waɗanda ke da distros 10000 da aka girka a kan kwamfutar kuma suna da sha’awa a duk lokacin da suka da ƙaura daga Ubuntu, amma akwai wasu nau’ikan masu amfani waɗanda kawai abin Me suna sha'awar samun OS din da yake aiki tsayayye wanda Ubuntu yake soyayya da shi, na fadi haka ne daga gogewar da nayi, abokai da abokaina sun nemi in girka Ubuntu wanda suke da abokai fiye da lokacin da suka ga an saka Ubuntu a kwamfutar tafi-da-gidanka suna neman a girka musu lol.
    Wannan sharhin ya dogara ne akan abin da na gani, ba wani abu ba, kuma ra'ayina ne, af, kyakkyawan shafi, kuma ina son post ɗinku elav

  9.   Lionel m

    mutane, yawan fada akan ko mir yana da kyau ko mara kyau ko kuma menene; tare da ƙafafunmu a ƙasa kuma da ma'ana, yaya muke nesa da aiwatarwa zuwa tebur? 13.10? 14.04? 14.10?. gaskiyar ita ce babu wanda ya san lokacin da ya fito ko yaya za a aiwatar da shi, kuma kamar yadda na sani ba ma samun damar yin amfani da lambar don gwada shi ta kowace hanya.
    Ka ɗan sassauta mu jira shi ya fito sannan mu yi gardama.

  10.   mai sharhi m

    Ba na son kalmomin da yawa da ƙarfin hali.

  11.   mai sharhi m

    Ba ni da masaniya sosai a kan batun sabar zane, amma na yi imani da ka'idar Darwin game da zabin yanayi; a ƙarshe, mafi kyawun (s) zasu tsira.

  12.   ba suna m

    Pointaya daga cikin ma'anar, buɗewa kawai yana cikin ɗakunan ajiya na debian, a cikin sifofin debian na gaba babu shi, kamar yadda zamu iya karantawa a cikin bayaninsa:
    -
    Wannan kunshin canji ne, maye gurbin marufin OpenOffice.org tare da marufin LibreOffice.

    Ana iya cire shi cikin aminci bayan haɓakawa.
    -

    1.    kari m

      A cikin Gwajin Debian:

      sudo aptitude search openoffice
      p docvert-openoffice.org
      v libming-fonts-openoffice
      p libopenoffice-oodoc-perl
      p openclipart-openoffice.org
      p openoffice.org
      p openoffice.org-base
      p openoffice.org-calc
      p openoffice.org-common
      p openoffice.org-dmaths
      p openoffice.org-draw
      p openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0
      p openoffice.org-emailmerge
      p openoffice.org-evolution
      p openoffice.org-filter-binfilter
      p openoffice.org-filter-mobiledev
      p openoffice.org-gnome
      ....

      1.    ba suna m

        sunan kunshin ya wanzu, amma ba a buɗe kansa ba ne, amma za a wuce zuwa libreoffice

        daga gwajin debian:

        gwaninta nuna openoffice.org
        Kunshin: openoffice.org
        Sabo: eh
        Hali: ba a girka ba
        Versión: 1:3.4.0~ooo340m1-7
        Fifiko: ƙari
        Sashe: masu gyara
        Developer: Debian LibreOffice Maintainers
        Gine-gine: duk
        Girman mara nauyi: 121k
        Ya dogara da: libreoffice
        Bayani: ɗakin samar da ofishi
        Wannan kunshin canji ne, yana maye gurbin marufin OpenOffice.org da
        kayan kwalliyar LibreOffice

        Ana iya cire shi cikin aminci bayan haɓakawa.
        Shafin gida: http://www.openoffice.org

        1.    kari m

          MMM. Gaskiyane .. Kuskurena ..

  13.   maras wuya m

    Na duba, daga abin da nake karantawa, a halin yanzu kusan babu abin da aka rubuta. Watau, Mir babu shi kuma kamar yadda marubucin wannan rukunin yanar gizon ya ce, bai kamata ku yi kuka da abin da ba shi ba tukuna.
    http://shnatsel.blogspot.com.ar/2013/03/yet-another-opinion-on-mir-you-never.html

    Wataƙila, waɗanda ke Canonical sun fahimci shawarar da ba ta dace ba da suka yi rabin lokaci kuma suka ƙare da amfani da Wayland ko abin da android ke amfani da su (ko wasu yatsu daga cikinsu)

    Af! Shin akwai wanda yayi kokarin wayland ??
    A nan ne umarnin don Linux Linux
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wayland

    Gwada tattarawa zuwa chakra amma ana buƙatar sabon sigar tebur don yamma. Abinda ya ja hankalina shine yadda ƙananan fakitin suke. Ina mamakin yawan albarkatun da zasu kashe.

  14.   Ignatius Jara m

    Android tana da sabar aikinta don gudanar da aikace-aikacen kuma babu wanda ya ce komai.
    Ubuntu yana son aikace-aikacensa suyi aiki akan wayar ubuntu da kan ubuntu pc, don haka kun sanya app ɗin ɗayansu kuma tunda dukansu suna amfani da mir, dukkansu suna amfani da qt / qml, don haka aikin aika wannan aikace-aikacen tsakanin tsarin shine ƙwarai Saukake.

    Don cimma wannan, X.org ko Wayland basa aiki, don haka mahimmin abu shine ƙirƙirar wani abu naka. Shine abin da ake yi a wannan duniyar. Idan baka son abu, canza shi ko kayi da kanka. Wannan shine abin da Ubuntu ke yi da abin da duk rikice-rikice ke yi.

    Gaisuwa 🙂

    1.    mitsi m

      Gabaɗaya sun yarda, suna da matsala tare da wayar Ubuntu, Xorg, direbobinsu da jinkirinsu idan aka kwatanta da Android, suna ɗaukar mai kyau na Android - kuma sama da duk abin da suka sa ya dace da direbobi - kyakkyawar Wayland kuma suna yin wani abu mai aiki su.

      Waɗanda suke Wayland, waɗanda suke da jinkiri sosai, suna yin fushi saboda sun ga cewa za su ci ƙasa, musamman ma tunda sun dace da masu kula da Android. Wa zai so ya saka hannun jari a cikin masu kula na musamman don Wayland?

      Idan Wayland na son yin nasara a kan Mir, dole ne ya zama ya dace da masu sarrafa Android ko fara da ɓarna mai yawa ko da tare da Xorg ko kuma ya zama mafi kyau da mugunta fiye da Mir, wanda su da kansu suke shakku.

      A gefe guda kuma, kamar yadda ake shigar da mods na Android, masu amfani da Linux masu amfani za su girka wasu abubuwan na daban, wadanda za su yi amfani da damar wayar ubuntu, da kuma GNU / Linux duniya idan wayar Ubuntu ta yi nasara a tsakanin jama'a, wanda ina fatan za zama babban fa'ida, koda kuwa amfani da wasu harkoki irin su Manjaro ko Sabayon.

      1.    msx m

        +1

  15.   bawanin15 m

    elav bai buga wata kasida ba game da fa'ida da rashin fa'idar wayland idan aka kwatanta da xorg? Ba ni da masaniya sosai a kan waɗannan batutuwan kuma a gaskiya ba ni da masaniya game da mahimmancin wannan batun a nan gaba.

    1.    kari m

      Ba ni da masaniya sosai game da waɗannan batutuwa ko dai .. Dole ne mu bincika ..

    2.    erunamoJAZZ m

      Tsarin gine-ginen Wayland yafi sauki fiye da na X11. Wannan saboda X11 aka yi tunanin zamanin manyan kwamfutoci (ba PC ba) don masu amfani da yawa don haka yana kawo abubuwa da yawa a cikin API. Madadin haka Wayland an tsara ta don zamanin yanzu, inda kawai mai amfani guda ɗaya zaiyi hulɗa tare da PC.
      Wannan yana nufin cewa a nan gaba, ya fi sauƙi a kiyaye wannan lambar, kuma wannan a gaba ɗaya, tunda akwai ƙananan layi a cikin API, yana da ɗan sauri.

      http://wayland.freedesktop.org/architecture.html

  16.   msx m

    Kowannensu ya buge Ubuntu da wani dalili na daban. A wannan yanayin, wasu shawarwarin dabarun Canonical da wasu maganganun su suka haifar da martani mai zafi daga duniyar F / LOSS - wataƙila da sun tayar da batun ba tare da girman kai da yawa ba, labarin zai kasance daban.

    Ba tare da la'akari da abin da aka faɗi game da Ubuntu ba, akwai haƙiƙa kuma gaskiyar abin da ba za a iya musantawa ba: ita ce kawai rarrabawar da za ta iya gasa da gaske tare da Windows da MacOS dangane da ƙwarewar kayan aiki, kayan haɗi da ƙwarewar OOTB (Mint ba ya ƙidaya saboda asali yana da saurare Ubuntu).

    A yau da nake nesa da aikin sana'a wanda ya shafi adm. na sist Na ganshi yana BANGASKIYA cewa na'urori masu gudana kamar masu buga takardu na gida ko sikanan iska - ma'ana, kai tsaye an haɗa su da PC- ko ta hanyar hanyar sadarwa har yanzu yana da haɗari wanda ke buƙatar awanni na gwaji da kuskure da karatun fasaha don warwarewa.

    Potentialarfin GNU + Linux yana da ban sha'awa amma idan babu yarda a yanke shawarar gina rarraba wanda yake USABLE OOTB to kawai hakane, mai yuwuwar amfani mai yawa a cikin wasu keɓaɓɓu.

    Ubuntu ita ce kawai hanyar da zan iya haɗa komai da ita kuma na san za ta gane shi, daidai yake idan ina son haɗa haɗin injina a cikin GNU + Linux iri ɗaya ko kuma hanyoyin sadarwa daban-daban.
    Yayi, ƙarancin sauƙin aikace-aikacen GNOME wani lokacin yana batawa amma aƙalla suna _ aiki_.

    Sancho barks, sigina cewa mun ci gaba!

    1.    maras wuya m

      Amma menene ƙwarewar kayan aiki, ba kwaya bane? kuma ana sarrafa abubuwan bugawa tare da kofuna. Bari mu ce bashi da alaƙa da Ubuntu

      1.    i m

        Kwanan baya na sayi kwamfutar hannu wacom, na haɗa ta zuwa buɗewa, kuma don zana ... Na haɗa komai (mai kunnawa2, mai ɗaukar hoto 2 mai amfani da na'urar daukar hotan takardu, guitar ta hanyar haɗin USB ..) kuma ni har yanzu ina jiran lokacin da ya sauke ni. Zan iya cewa zan iya haɗa komai zuwa OpenSUSE kuma nasan cewa zai iya gane min shi .. abin da ba zan taɓa faɗi ba shine kawai ɓarna ce take aikata shi, wani abu da mutane suke amfani da Ubuntu ba su daina faɗar, yawanci ba tare da bayar da gudummawa ba ga wata jarabawa ba (ita ce mafi sauki, ita ce wacce ta fi sanin abubuwa da yawa, ita ce wacce ta fi wanki tufafina best).

        1.    msx m

          Shin sharhinku yana nuna hadadden mataki na biyu? Domin duk da cewa OpenSUSE ya kasance sama da Ubuntu tsayi, wannan sabon ɓarna yana kan leɓun kowa yayin da aka buɗe OpenSUSE zuwa ƙaramin da'ira.

          Da yake amsa tambayoyinku, openSUSE distro ne wanda shima yana da kyau HW da tallafi na gefe. tunda rarrabawa ne da aka tsara shi don ɓangaren kasuwanci tun daga farko inda dole ne komai yayi aiki.
          Fedora shima ya sami ci gaba sosai a kwanan nan a fagen buga takardu, kodayake har yanzu bai ƙara tallafi ga sauran sassan yankin ba.

      2.    msx m

        Ba da gaske ba. Idan ku masu kasala ne don karanta litattafan, sauƙaƙe zazzage duk abubuwan ɓatarwa da zaku iya samu kuma gwada yawancin su "kawai kwaya" da "shigar kofuna" suna gano kayan aikinku.

    2.    Thunder m

      Da kyau, nayi tsammanin kun san abubuwa da yawa game da komai, amma da alama baku san cewa dacewar Hardware ya dogara da Kernel ba, eh, akan Linux Kernel, wanda Ubuntu BAZAI SUNA a shafinsa ba, kuma ga abin da ba da gudummawa kaɗan, ee ba dai gyara ɗan yadda kake so ba.

      Mir 'yar karuwa ce, ya kamata ku karanta sakonnin manyan masu haɓaka, kamar su Aaron Seigo (a kan Google+) da Martin Gaëbler (a shafin sa na hukuma), da kuma tattaunawa tsakanin su da Uncle Mark.

      Kuma zan iya ba da shawarar ka karanta "Ext4 Blog", akwai wani rubutu wanda Malcer yayi bayanin abin da ke faruwa tare da Mir sosai, zan bayyana shi da kaina, amma ya kamata ka tsaya, ka ga abin da za ka gaya mani.

  17.   Leo m

    Tambaya:
    Idan Ubuntu ya cire Xorg, abubuwan sa zai dogara ne akan Mir. Yanzu, idan wani yayi amfani da Debian ko ya zubar kuma yayi amfani da Launchpad, GetDeb, ko wasu wuraren adana bayanai, to shin zasu girka Mir? Kuma idan kunshin Debian ko abubuwanda aka samo basu haɗa shi azaman abin dogaro na zaɓi ba (a bayyane zai iya karya dogaro da Xorg), shin baku iya amfani da waɗancan hanyoyin ba?

    1.    erunamoJAZZ m

      Abu mafi ma'ana shine cewa suna yin warper ko wani abu makamancin haka don nade Mir kuma suyi dace dashi da X11 API. Rashin dacewar baya a kan tebur wawa ne. Hakanan, a bayyane yake cewa sun sanya Mir don kasuwar Wayar hannu, bana tsammanin masu amfani da sigar PC na al'ada suna wahala ta kowace hanya de

  18.   feran m

    Yana da kyau cewa "duk da nadamar" sauran hanyoyin sun wanzu, kuma mu da ba mu dogara da Ubuntu yin abubuwanmu na yau da kullun ba, ba shakka ba ma tare da Yesu a bakinmu. Yanzu ya zama cewa dukkanmu zamu koma Ubuntu don abubuwa suyi aiki? Murna

  19.   trichomax m

    Taya murna game da mukamin da kowa da kowa saboda ra'ayoyin think. Ina tsammanin wannan shine karo na farko da na karanta game da wannan batun da nutsuwa. Kamar yadda aka ambata, Ubuntu kowa ya buge shi, Ina jin irin wannan karin magana tun lokacin da take. Lokaci yana tabbatar da Canonical right, lallai abin birgewa ne inda Ubuntu ta iso yau, ya rufe bakuna da yawa, amma wasu koyaushe suna fitowa. Tabbas tarihi ne cewa tsarin hada hadar kayan aiki da farko tsakanin Ubuntu ne b ko iOs… ko windows, ba kuma na de na… duk wanda baya ganin yawan ubuntu da aka nufa kuma tabbas duk duniya software kyauta shine ba haka bane ba da pa ganin shi kuma tabbas ba zasu fahimta ba. Ni kaina a matsayina na mai son kayan aikin kyauta ta hanyar falsafa, ina matukar alfahari da abin da Ubuntu ta samu saboda sakamakon da ba za a iya gwadawa ba ... Bayan duban wayar hannu ta ubuntu, zan gaya wa al'umma cewa idan sun ƙara sauraren ubuntu, wani zakara zai yi musu waƙa da yawa. Hatsuna zuwa Canonical kuma tabbas tsawon rai ya rayu !!!

  20.   Baku m

    Fannoni daban-daban ne: ba daidai yake da kwatanta software da kayan more rayuwa ba.

    Matsalar MIR da Wayland ita ce domin waɗannan sabobin nuni su fara, duk software dole ne a ba da rahoto ga waɗannan sabobin.

    Matsalar da MIR ke iya haifarwa ita ce cewa dukkanin sabobin nuni suna fara karɓar kansu da kansu, kuma rashin daidaituwa ya fara wanzu tsakanin wannan dandalin na penguin.

    Tabbas, duk al'umman zasu hade wajejan Wayland don maye gurbin Xorg.

  21.   kondur05 m

    umm zai kasance cewa ubuntu a ƙarshe zai daina zama Linux susp .. suspicius …….

    1.    kwasuwa m

      A'a, lallai ne su bunkasa kwayarsu kuma hakan ba zai taba faruwa ba

    2.    DanielC m

      Bazai yuwu ba, ya kamata ya fara daga farko kuma da kyar suka daina yadda suke ta aiki.