|
Eli nqaku livela kwingcaciso endiyifumene kuyo I-linux kakhulu xa ndandifuna izinto zeposti zam malunga IGnome 3.2: Inkqubo? Gnome OS? Ngaba akusekho nkxaso kumaqonga e-NO-LINUX?. |
Umfundi wale portal wazibuza ngakumbi nangaphantsi, ngokuhlekisayo, ukuba abantu baseGnome babetshaya. Olunye u-AntiUbuntu oguqukayo (andinguye u-Ubuntu obugqithisileyo, kuphela ukuba andabelani nabo bathanda ukuhlekisa okanye ukuhlekisa ngabanye ngomnqweno kuphela wokukhusela okanye ukuthoba into, nokuba bangabasebenzisi beNkqubo yokuSebenza leyo ) uphendule ngekhonkco kwiWikipedia Isivumelwano seCanonical.
Ngokuchaneka ngokupheleleyo umbhali weposi, u-MetalByte, ubonakalisile ukuba umgqabazi uyaphambukisa ingqalelo kwaye i-Gnome ayingcwele ngokuchanekileyo njengoko ibingathanda ukuvela, kwizibakala ezininzi, kubandakanya nokwaphulwa kwemigangatho ye- freedesktop.org.
Imigangatho ethi, ngokungathandabuzekiyo, ubumbano lweShell kunye neNdawo yokusiNgqongileyo ye-KDE, phakathi kwabanye-kwaneGome ngeendlela ezininzi-imbeko.
Hayi ngenxa yeso sizathu iyekile ukubiza ingqalelo yam, hayi njengegqwetha kuphela, kodwa njengomsebenzisi woBuntu.
Ulwazi olufunyenwe lusisityebi, kwaye bendifunda kwaye ndifunda kwakhona iphepha elinye (1) lesivumelwano sephepha-mvume eliphakanyiswe yiCanonical kwiiyure ezimbalwa kwaye kukho idatha enomdla.
Okokuqala kufuneka sikhumbule ukuba Ubuntu buphuhliswa yiCanonical Ltd. hayi yiCanonical Foundation, ngesizathu esilula, uShuttleworth wenza inkampani, hayi iSiseko.
Okwesibini, musa ukuhanjiswa sisihloko sekhonkco, kuyinyani ukuba sinokufumana izihloko ezingavumelekanga ngokucacileyo, kodwa azithethi nto. Apha eArgentina, yonke into engavumelekanga ngokucacileyo ivumelekile.
Andiwazi umthetho waseNgilane kunye nolawulo apho iCLA ingenisa khona kwigatya layo le-12.
Ngoku, iWikipedia iyasichaza isivumelwano seCanonical esikwisigaba seSivumelwano seLayisensi yabaNikeli. Okokuqala, ke, kufuneka sazi ukuba yintoni le yokugqibela.
Ngokwe-Wikipedia Isivumelwano selayisensi yomnikeli (CLA) ichaza imigaqo apho ipropathi enomgangatho ophezulu wokuqonda inegalelo okanye yabelwa inkampani okanye iprojekthi. Kuqheleke kakhulu kuMthombo ovulekileyo.
Kukho izizathu ezibini ezikhuthaza ii-CLAs: (1) ukuyikhusela ngcono iprojekthi, (2) okanye ukuphinda wenze ilayisensi ngaphandle kokubonisana nomnikeli.
Ewe, olu hlobo lwelayisensi lusetyenziswa, kwaye phakathi kwabanye:
- Apache Software Foundation
- MySQL
- OpenOffice.org
- Fedora (Red Hat) CLA Fedora, iyafana neCanonical.
- ICanonical Ltd.
- Zend kuba Isakhelo seZend
- Isiseko seSoftware sasimahla
- Django
- Node.js
- I-Diaspora
Ndibona kufanelekile ukuhlalutya amanye amagatya e-Fedora-Red Hat CLA kwaye ndiyithelekise ne-Canonical, hayi kuphela ngenxa yokufana okukhoyo kwiklasi, kodwa nangenxa yomahluko ocacileyo.
Kodwa kwakhona, ngenxa yethala rhoqo leCanonisoft ngaphandle kokujonga abanye abadlali boMthombo oVulekileyo.Siyaqala, kwiCLA Canonical yayo icacisa kwaye ichaze iinjongo zekhontrakthi, kwaye izichaze "njengomnini welungelo lokushicilela".
Ke, into abayenzayo bacela umnikeli / umphuhlisi ukuba agcwalise ifom apho babela khona ilungelo lobunikazi kwi-Canonical (kunye neFedora apho kufanelekileyo) kwaye emva koko bafumana ilungelo lasimahla, elingenasiphelo, nelungelo lehlabathi lonke, ukusebenzisa ikopi, lungisa, unxibelelane kwaye wenze ukuba ifumaneke kuluntu (ukuba ufuna nge-intanethi) kwaye usasaze, kwimeko nganye kwifomu yoqobo okanye eguqulweyo, igalelo elenziwe okanye "ikhowudi enelayisensi" ngokuyibiza ngandlela thile.
Izibonelelo ze-Canonical kum lilungelo lehlabathi liphela, elingakhethiyo, elingenasibonelelo kunye nelungelo lokusebenzisa, ukukopa, ukulungisa, ukunxibelelana nokwenza ukuba kufumaneke eluntwini (kubandakanya ngaphandle komda nge-Intanethi) kwaye usasaze, kwimeko nganye kwindawo yoqobo okanye ifom eguqulweyo, amaGalelo aBelweyo njengoko ndinqwenela.
Igatya II CLA Canonical.
Ngoku, uqhubeka njani umphuhlisi? Khuphela ngokulula i-CLA kwaye uthumele i-imeyile ukuyincamathisela kwaye nasemzimbeni we-imeyile ithi: "Ndiyasamkela isiVumelwano seNkxaso yabaNikeli beCanon." Oku kuyenzeka kwi-CLA yeCanonical, ethe yabangela umdla kweli nqaku.
Elula njengaleyo.
Olunye uthelekiso neFedora CLA-Red Hat.
Okokuqala, kufuneka sazi ukuba ukuphuculwa kwesoftware ka-Ubuntu akuthethi ukuba kufuneka kubambelele kwi-CLA, kuyakufuneka ukuba isoftware ephuhlisiweyo okanye eguqulweyo yenzelwe ikhathalogu yeSoftware ebonelelwe yi-CLA, umzekelo nakuphi na ukuguqulwa kwezalathi njl.
Nangona kunjalo, ngokwe-CLA, umphuhlisi unika i-Canonical ngokupheleleyo isiqinisekiso selungelo lokushicilela, kusengqiqweni ukuba iCanonical iya kuba nguMgcini.
I-asayinimenti yenziwe ukuba kuqinisekiswe ilungelo lokushicilela elingakhethiyo, elingenaRoyal, kwaye elinokusetyenziswa ngonaphakade, ukukopa, ukuguqula, ukunxibelelana nokwenza ukuba kufumaneke eluntwini (ukuba unqwenela njalo nge-intanethi) kwaye usasaze, nangayiphi na imeko, khowudi yokuqala okanye uhlengahlengisiwe.
Ngamanye amagama, iCanonical isekwe ngendlela efanayo neCanonical yokuvuza umphuhlisi. Amagatya 1 no 2 ngokwahlukeneyo.
Akukho nto inokunikezelwa ukuba ingumxholo wesinye isivumelwano okanye ikhontrakthi yengqesho (igatya 9) okanye ikhowudi enokuthi okanye yophule amalungelo obunini.
1. Ngokwenjenje ndinikezela kwi-Canonical ngesiqinisekiso esigcweleyo sayo yonke ilungelo lokushicilela ngoku okanye kwixa elizayo sixhasa nakweyiphi na indawo emhlabeni nakweyiphi na iGalelo elabelweyo. Ukuya kuthi ga ngoku ukuba esi sabelo singasebenzi, kwaye sixhomekeke kumalungelo eCanonical apha ku-5 apha ngezantsi, ndinika iCanonical ilayisensi yomhlaba wonke, engakhethiyo, engenabukhosi kunye nelayisensi engapheliyo yokusebenzisa, ukukopa, ukulungisa, ukunxibelelana nokwenza ifumaneke eluntwini (kubandakanya ngaphandle komda nge-Intanethi) kwaye usasaze, kwimeko nganye kwifomu yoqobo okanye eguqulweyo «Imirhumo eyabelweyo» njengoko inqwenela.
2. Izibonelelo zeCanonical zindinika ilungelo lehlabathi liphela, elingakhethwanga, elingenaburhulumente kunye nelungelo lokusebenzisa, ukukopa, ukulungisa, ukunxibelelana nokwenza ukuba kufumaneke eluntwini (kubandakanya ngaphandle komda nge-Intanethi) kunye nokusasaza, kwimeko nganye ifom yoqobo okanye eguqulweyo, iGalelo elabelweyo njengoko ndinqwenela.
Amagatya 1 kunye no-2 we-CLA Canonical
Ngokwenxalenye yayo, iFedora-Red CLA ithi:
2. Umnikeli weSibonelelo seLayisensi. Unika iRed Hat, Inc., egameni leProjekthi, kunye nabamkeli besoftware esasazwe yiProjekthi:
(a) Unaphakade, ongakhethiyo, kwihlabathi liphela, ohlawulelwe ngokupheleleyo, ongenalungelo lasebukhosini, ilayisensi yelungelo lokushicilela elingenakuguqulwa lokuvelisa kwakhona, ukulungisa imisebenzi ephuma kuyo, ukubonisa esidlangalaleni, ukwenza esidlangalaleni, i-sublicense, kunye nokusasaza iGalelo lakho kunye neminye imisebenzi evela; kwaye,
(b) isigxina, esinganyanzelekanga, kwihlabathi liphela, ehlawulwe ngokupheleleyo, yasimahla, engenakuguqulwa (ngokuxhomekeke kwiCandelo 3) ilayisenisi yelungelo elilodwa lomenzi wechiza, lokulisebenzisa, lokulisebenzisa, nelokuthengisa, lokungenisa elizweni, kunye nelokutshintshela igalelo lakho kunye nemisebenzi ethathwe kuyo, apho iphepha-mvume elo lisebenza kuphela kulawo mabango amalungelo awodwa abenzi abachaphazeleka nguMthetho wakho wedwa okanye ngokudityaniswa kweGalelo lakho nomsebenzi owungenisileyo. Ngaphandle kwelayisenisi enikezelwe kweli candelo, unelungelo lonke, isihloko kunye nomdla kwiGalelo lakho.
Igatya 2 CLA Fedora.
Ukubuyela kwi-Canonical, kwigatya lesi-3 kucingelwa ukuba kufuneka iqondwe njengeSoftware, exhaphake kakhulu kwimicimbi yesivumelwano.
Kwaye ithi igama elithi Software elisetyenzisiweyo KWAKUNYE nakwikhontrakthi, libhekisa kuzo zonke iinkqubo zekhompyuter ezenziwe njengenxalenye ye- Inkqubo yeCanonical. Uluhlu oluthi, ngenxa yezizathu ezicacileyo, lunokuhlengahlengiswa amaxesha ngamaxesha.
Kwigatya lesi-4 uqikelela igalelo elabelweyo njengohlengahlengiso okanye uphuculo olwenziwe kwikhowudi ngumphuhlisi omnye.
Elinye lamagatya anomdla ngowesi-6, kuba kuyo i-CLA inyanzela iCanonical ukuba inikeze ikhowudi ehambelanayo, kwaye phantsi kwemiqathango "yeLayisensi yeSoftware yasimahla", ngokwenkcazo enikezwe yi-FSF ngalo mbandela kwaye uhlaziye ixesha ngalinye .
Kodwa, lo ngumnyango ovulekileyo ukuba uya kuthanda, kuba iCanonical, ngokokubona kwayo, inokwenza ukuba isoftware ifumaneke eluntwini phantsi kweminye "imigaqo yelayisensi", engafaniyo "nelinye ilayisensi". Njengoko sele sibonile, oku kuqhelekile kwaye yenye yeenjongo zesiVumelwano seLayisensi yomnikeli.
I-Canonical iya kwenza ukuba iGalelo eliKhutshelweyo lifumaneke eluntwini phantsi kwe- "Free Software License", ngokwenkcazo yeli gama elipapashwe yiFree Software Foundation amaxesha ngamaxesha. I-Canonical inokuthi, ngokokubona kwayo, yenze ukuba iGalelo elabelweyo lifumaneke eluntwini phantsi kweminye imigaqo yelayisensi.
Igatya 6 CLA Canonical
Into efanayo iyenzeka ngeFedora, kwinqaku lesi-2 - (a) i-CLA yenza iFedora-Red Hat kwi-sublicense, ngaphandle kokukhankanya phantsi kwayiphi imigaqo okanye phantsi kwelayisensi
Xa kuthelekiswa, i-CLA kaFedora ivumelekile kwaye, ukuba uyathanda, iyingozi kwimithombo evulekileyo, kuba iCanonical's CLA iyinyanzela ukuba isasaze phantsi kwe-FSL okanye phantsi kweminye imigaqo yelayisensi. Endaweni yokuba uFedora-Red Hat angabanelayisensi kunye ne-sublicense phantsi kwayo nayiphi na ilayisensi kunye nemigaqo ayifunayo.
Kodwa okona kubalulekileyo kuko konke, kwaye oko kuzikhusela, ukuba uyafuna, kweCanonical ngokuchasene neFedora, kukuba i-CLA yamva nje kwinqanaba 2 - (b) igunyazisa uFedora-Red Hat, phakathi kwezinye izinto nakwiimeko ezithile. I-CLA iyacacisa, ukuthengisa igalelo lomphuhlisi.
Ngokukwanjalo, iCanonical ayizukunyanzela umphuhlisi naliphi na ilungelo lobunikazi elaphulwe ngumqambi, esebenzisa ilungelo lakho lobunikazi nokuba ungowesoftware okanye iGalelo elabelweyo.
[…] I-Canonical ayizukuqina okanye inyanzelise ngokuchasene nam nawaphi na amalungelo awodwa omenzi omthetho anyhashwa ndim ndisebenzisa amalungelo am obunini bam kwiSoftware kunye / okanye kwiGalelo elinikezelweyo.
Umhlathi 7 kwiCLA yeCanonical efanelekileyo.
Ngokuchasene noko, iFedora-Red Hat, kwigatya lesi-3 le-CLA yayo, ishiya kuvuleke amathuba okuba, kwimeko yesimangalo esinokubakho, isabelo singawa kwaye uMnikeli uxanduva kwinkundla.
Kwicala le-Canonical, umphuhlisi akazukunyanzelisa naliphi na ilungelo lobunikazi ngokuchasene: (a) Canonical; (b) nabani na ofumana iSoftware okanye iGalelo Elabelweyo yiCanonical; (c) Nabani na ofumene iSoftware okanye iMirhumo eyabelweyo phantsi kwelayisensi yeSoftware yasimahla xa amalungelo awodwa omenzi wechiza anyhashwa kukusetyenziswa kwelungelo lokushicilela. Yiyiphi ingqiqo.
Andizukunyanzela okanye ndinyanzelise naliphi na ilungelo elilodwa lomenzi wechiza ngokuchasene (a) neCanonical (b) nakubani na ofumene iSoftware kunye / okanye iMirhumo eyabelweyo evela kwiCanonical okanye (c) nabani na ofumene iSoftware kunye / okanye neMirhumo eyabelweyo phantsi kweLayisensi yeSoftware yasimahla, apho ilungelo elilodwa lomenzi liphuliweyo nangayiphi na kubo isebenzisa amalungelo obunini kwi-Software kunye / okanye kwiGalelo elinikezelweyo. […]
Umhlathi 7 CLA Canonical.
Ngenxa yoko sinokuthi i-CLA, esetyenziswa rhoqo kwilizwe lomthombo ovulekileyo, inengqiqo ngokupheleleyo kwaye iyathetheleleka. Ukongeza, uthelekiso lwee-CLA zeFedora-Red Hat kunye neCanonical ziveza izinto ezithandekayo kumaqela, apho zombini (amaqela kunye neenkampani) zixhamla khona.
Ngokuqinisekileyo eyona nto iphikisanayo kukuba zombini iinkampani (nditsho zombini kuba sihlalutya ngokufutshane zombini) zigcinelwe i-sublicense. I-Fedora CLA-iRed Hat ithi oku ngokuvulekileyo kodwa ayicacisi ukuba izakupapasha yiphi imixholo, ubuncinci phantsi kwayiphi na imigangatho eya kuyenza kwimeko yesicombululo.
Kwimeko yeCanonical, inyanzelekile ukuba isebenzise iLayisensi yeSoftware yasimahla ngokuhambelana nemigaqo yeFree Software Foundation, kodwa inokutshintsha ngokungenamkhethe imigaqo yelayisensi, njengoko kuchaziwe kwiCLA, "eminye imigaqo yelayisensi" ngaphandle koku kuthetha , kuyo nayiphi na imeko Kwiimeko ezininzi, sebenzisa iphepha-mvume elingelilo okanye lokuthengisa
Ndikucebisa ukuba ufunde Iprojekthi yeHarmony, ebangela umdla kakhulu.
Ndicinga ukuba endaweni yokuthetha nje kungangcono uthathe imizuzu eli-10 kwaye uhlalutye umba osondeleyo. Ndiyakuthetha oku kwaye ndinika umzekelo umzekelo wezimvo ezikhuthaze ukufundwa kunye nendibano yokungena.
Uninzi olungavumelani neCanonical / Ubuntu okanye "ukwamkelwa" kwayo, endaweni yokujonga izinto ezinenjongo, zibhenela kwizikhalazo ezingenzi nto ngaphandle kokuvelisa iiFlamme kwaye zingasisi ndawo.
Okokugqibela, andinaxanduva lokusetyenziswa kwento esele ithethiwe, luhlalutyo olusisiseko lwe-CLA, kule meko, zombini iinkampani.
Kulungile, ngokwayo i-canonical iseyinkampani (kwaye inelungelo lokushiya ezo "ndawo zivulekileyo") ... mhlawumbi ngoku ngumhlobo wakhe wonke umntu, lowo wenza iLinux ifumaneke ebantwini. kwixesha elizayo abantu bazakuqala ukuzibuza; Kwenzeka njani ukuba ndibaluleke kakhulu? Ngaba abasebenzisi abazizigidi ezingama-200 abaziphakamisanga kwiminyaka emi-4? Mhlawumbi emva koko umntu uqala ukuthandabuza isenzo sabo. Okanye akukho mntu ukhumbula uGoogle? Khange aqale nje ngokuba ngumkhangeli olungileyo…. Njengoko benditshilo, kum ziphelo ezivulekileyo kuphela ...
Mhlawumbi umzekelo kaGoogle wawunesiqingatha kakhulu, kodwa kuyinyani ukuba banalo njongo, nokuba bayayiphumeza okanye akunjalo ngomnye umcimbi. Ukuba ujonga iLinux, yinkqubo yokusebenza enokubizwa ngokuba izinzile, kodwa namhlanje iinguqu ezininzi ziyenzeka kwi-X…. Ayisiyiyo i-Canonical kuphela kodwa i-distros kwi-gral. bajonge ukungena emehlweni abasebenzisi ... ukuba bayaqhubeka ngoluhlobo, andicingi ukuba iinjongo ezicetywayo azizukufikelelwa. Lumka, ndihlala ndinika umbono wam ukude! = D
Ndiyavuma evulekileyo yaphela. Malunga ne-200 yezigidi zabasebenzisi, ayinakuthelekiswa neGoogle, ngakumbi kuba ukukhula ukuya kwinani labasebenzisi kufanele ukuba kwenzeke:
I-1- Ukuba kwihlabathi le-GNU / Linux olunye ulwabiwo alusasetyenziswanga, kwaye akunakwenzeka, kukho iimveliso ezinobungakanani okanye obungaphezulu kobuntu.
I-2- iWindows, ngesizathu esithile, iyekile ukusetyenziswa phantse kakhulu.
3- Ukuba ungena kwintengiso yeetafile, ii-Smartphones kunye nezinye, kuya kufuneka ubone ukuba ikwamkele ntoni.
4- Phakathi kwabanye.
Ndicinga ukuba ngaphezulu kwe-utopia kwaye emantla ukujongana nayo.
Ngoku ayisiyiyo ukuba ungumhlobo wabo bonke, kodwa namhlanje uyinto yokugxekwa, evelisa kwaye engavelisi mveliso, kuyabonakala kwindawo ahlala kuyo. Kuyenzeka ukuba izinto ezininzi ezigxekayo malunga nenye ikwakhona kwezinye. Okanye into ifunyenwe kwaye ngaphandle kokuyicoca isetyenziswa njengokugxeka okwonakalisayo, kwaye kuphela yi-5 'sifumana inyani eyahlukileyo. Njengoko isitsho njalo, kulula ukubona umququ kweliso lomnye umntu. Ngale nto andithethi ukuba i-Fedora-Red Hat yi-ogre, kodwa ngumzekelo nje.
Mhlawumbi, umthombo ovulekileyo uyimodeli yeshishini.
«Bazimisele ukungena emehlweni abasebenzisi ...» Siyavuma ngokupheleleyo
Ndiyavuma bafo! Ndicinga ukuba kuphakanyiswa ntoni uMartín kweli nqaku kuyamangalisa, kuba ngokubanzi Ubuntu ugxekwa kuphela x ukugxeka (trolls) kwaye amaxesha amaninzi xa ujongisisa iingxoxo esiziqondayo ukuba 1) aziyonyani okanye 2) ezinye ii-distros zenza okufanayo okanye "zibi kakhulu ". Ngamafutshane, yingxoxo enomdla evulwa nguMartín. Ngokunyanisekileyo ndandingabazi ubukho beelayisensi zenkxaso. Ngokuqinisekileyo, ubukho bayo bunengqiqo kodwa andizange ndicinge ngayo.
Ndiyavuyisana nawe Martín! Elinye inqaku elihle kakhulu!
UPawulos.
Inqaku lakho linomdla kakhulu, njengoko besitsho "akukho mntu umaziyo usebenzela yena" Yiyo loo nto sihlala sizifunda iikhontrakthi!
Umbuzo ulungile, kuba ayingombuzo wemithetho, kodwa sisicwangciso-qhinga. Inye into enelungelo lokushicilela, enye ilayisensi, enokuba ngubani na.
Yintoni egqithisiweyo lilungelo lokushicilela. Kwaye ukusasazwa kweCanonical, ngokomgaqo, kunye nePhepha-mvume leSoftware yasimahla, unako, ukuba kukho imfuneko, yokuguqula imigaqo yelayisensi. Apha ukutolikwa "kweminye imigaqo yelayisensi" kuyangena. Kuba "eminye imigaqo yelayisensi" ayifani "nelinye iphepha-mvume".
Kwimeko ye-Fedora, ngokufanayo, kuphela kukuba i-Fedora-Red Hat ayenzi ilayisensi okanye i-sublicense phantsi kwayo nayiphi na ilayisensi. Ungayenza phi, nini kwaye njani. Nokuba, ngokungafaniyo neCanonical, iFedora-Red Hat ichaza ngokucacileyo ukuba, kwisimangalo ngenxa yekhowudi eyabelweyo, "uyazilungisa kwaye isabelo siyawa." I-Canonical, ekuphela kwereferensi eyenzayo koku "kukuthintela ukuhanjiswa komsebenzi ngaphandle kwamalungelo okanye oko kuyimveliso yesivumelwano okanye isivumelwano sengqesho nabantu besithathu." Into enengqiqo kumacala omabini yinto efana namaLungelo oNene kunye "nobubi obufihliweyo bento." Xa uthenga into kwaye ufumanise ukuba inezinto ezimbi, iziphene, ezinokuthi, ukuba ubusazi kwangaphambili, ngewungazange uyithenge, unokuphinda uyibuyise intengiso nangaphezulu ukuba umthengisi wayenokholo olubi. Ewe, la magatya abeka into efanayo.
Olona ncedo luphambili kwabo basebenzisa i-CLA bayifumanayo, kwaye bathatha iCanonical njengomzekelo: Ukuba ungumphuhlisi, uguqula okanye uphuhlise isoftware efakwe kwikhathalogu eqhotyoshelwe kwiCLA, unikezela ilungelo lobunikazi eliqinisekisa ukuba awophuli ilungelo lomenzi ungenza njalo. Uyavuma kwakhona ukuba ungathathi manyathelo ngokuchasene neCanonical, nabani na ofumana isoftware yeCanonical, okanye nabani na ofumana iSoftware phantsi kweLayisensi yeSoftware yasimahla. Kwakhona, iCanonical ayinyanzelisi nantoni na ngokuchasene nawe, kubandakanya nomsitho wokuba iiCanonical zitshintshe iimvume. Kukho uhlobo lokukhuselana, ngokucacileyo nguMgcini, ayikho enye into. Kakhulu kangangokuba wena, umphuhlisi, nangona ugqithisile ilungelo lokushicilela, ungaqhubeka nokwenza into oyithandayo ngekhowudi, kodwa kuya kufuneka wazise iCanonical kwaye uyihlonele inkqubo-sikhokelo ye-CLA, engqongqo kwaye iphela izuzisa zombini. Oko kukuthi, iinjongo 1 kunye 2 zesithuba.
I-Fedora - Red Hat CLA igcina ukujikeleza entlokweni yam, hayi ngenxa ye "sublicense", kodwa ngenxa yokuba igunyazisiwe ukunikezela ngokuthe ngqo kunye / okanye ukuthengisa ikhowudi.
Kule mihla ndinika imbuyekezo kwezinye ii-CLA, kwezo zikhankanyiweyo.
Inqaku elihle, libhalwe kakuhle, libhaliwe kwaye liphandwe kakuhle. Izinto ezinjalo kunzima ukuzibona kwezi ntsuku! Ayisiyiyo kuphela kwi-intanethi, kodwa ikwacingelwa ukuba "lutyelelo lopapasho" lolunye usasazo.
Ngokumalunga nesihloko, bendingenalo nofifi lokuba zikhona ezi layisensi kwaye xa ndithetha inyani ubukho bazo abubonakali ngathi bunengqiqo. Ngaphandle kwamatyala apho ikhowudi yeCanonical iguqulwe khona, kodwa ngaba i-GPL ichaza into efanayo, ngaphandle kokunikezela ilungelo lokushicilela? Andiwuqondi umohluko phakathi kokunika amalungelo kwinkampani okanye ukuthatha nje iprojekthi kwaye uyilandele ngokwakho, unikwe umzekelo ukuba isoftware inelayisensi phantsi kwe-GPL, phantsi kwamanye amaphepha-mvume avumela ukuphinda-ilayisensi ibe lelinye ibali .
Phaya ngaphandle into endiyithethayo ibubudenge, imithetho ayisosuti yam yomeleleyo.