|
«Ii-Leakymails zaqulunqwa ngenjongo yokufumana izinto elubala ukusasazwa kunye nokupapashwa kwee-imeyile njengo Iifoto kunye naluphi na olunye uhlobo lwemathiriyeli ngokubaluleka kwezentlalo nezopolitiko oko kunceda abemi bezizwe ezahlukeneyo zehlabathi, kungekhona nje ukubona izenzo zorhwaphilizo kunye nohanahaniso abangamaxhoba abo, kodwa basebenza njengesixhobo kunye nenkxaso ukuze yonke imihla silwe kunye. kumaziko kunye noorhulumente abangafihlisiyo«.
Yile ndlela abadali bayo bachaza ngayo injongo yale webhusayithi entsha, esele ibangela iintloko kumagosa amaninzi aseKirchnerist. |
Le nguqulelo intsha sele ivunyiwe kumazwe ngamazwe WikiLeaks, ifikelele kwii-akhawunti ze-imeyile ezisemthethweni nezabucala zamagosa omgca wokuqala nowesibini karhulumente kazwelonke. Phakathi kwabo batyholwa: Julio De Vido, Nilda Garré, Héctor Timerman, Amado Boudou kunye noHéctor Icazuriaga, phakathi kwabanye.
Ii-imeyile ezifakwe kwisiza, umnini wazo akaziwa, zabhalwa phakathi kuka-2006 no-2011. Azizange zivunywe okanye zikhatywe ngamagosa asemthethweni.
Nangona i-Leakymails iqinisekisa ukuba iya kusasaza ii-imeyile kuzo zonke iindidi zamagosa, kungakhathaliseki ukuba liphi iqela lezopolitiko, kude kube ngoku abo bachaphazelekayo bebengamagosa aseKirchnerist.
Umthombo: TN
Ngubani okhathalayo ukuba yayityiwa yintoni lelekese nguIbarra? Ngaba ngumbuzo karhulumente? Ngaba inomsebenzi woluntu?
Haha… injalo nje. Ndiyathemba ukuba bazibandakanye nabo.
Ndiyavuma Mario. Leyo ikwayinxalenye yengxoxo-mpikiswano malunga neWikileaks.
Ndiyifumanisa inexhala lokuba umntu unokufikelela kwii-imeyile ezininzi zamagosa, uninzi lweakhawunti yeGmail, Hotmail, FIBERTEL, njl. Ayizoakhawunti ze-imeyile ezikwiiseva zikaRhulumente.
Ngaphezu kokukhangela izinto elubala, kum kubonakala ngathi kukunyhashwa kwabucala, nobuntlola kumagosa karhulumente. Ndiyathemba ukuba aba bafana bahambe kakuhle.
Ngaphaya koko, zininzi ii-imeyile ezisuka naku-2007, kwaye ngaba sifumanisa ngoku? Bayisebenzisa njani loo nkcazelo okwangoku? Kuyakrokra kakhulu ukuba oku kuvele kunyaka wonyulo...
Okokugqibela, mhlawumbi andizange ndijonge ngononophelo, kodwa ukuba bayenzela elubala, akufuneki ukuba iiheader ezipheleleyo zee-imeyile zibekho? Ngaba ndifanele ndingabathembi “abezopolitiko” kwaye ndithembe “ngokungaziwayo”?
Hee, bendifunda ii-imeyile ezininzi. Ubuncinci yayibubuvuvu obusulungekileyo….
Ngaba oko kukulwa urhwaphilizo?
Ndisithandile isilogeni... Liyinyani, baninzi abantu abalungileyo kwaye inye kuphela into efunwa ngabantu ababi kukuba thina bantu balungileyo singenzi nto...
Ndiyavuma. Igcwele ii-imeyile zobuqu ezingenaxabiso.
Ewe, kodwa ngokusisiseko (nangona ulwazi lunokuba lukhulu ngakumbi "lufanelekileyo" kunoko olu kuthunyelwa kwetheniphu) ingxaki iyafana: I-Wikileaks iphula ii-imeyile ezivela kumagosa karhulumente (kwakunye neentambo kunye nezinye iintlobo zolwazi). Ngamafutshane, lulwaphulo-mthetho. Umba ngowokuba, ngokuxhomekeka kulwazi “olutyhiliweyo”, umntu unokuthethelela “ngaphezulu” okanye “ngaphantsi” kolu hlobo lwezenzo. Oko kukodwa kubonakala kunomdla kum ukuba ndixoxe.
Wanga! UPawulos.
Oku akunanto yakwenza neWikileaks. Bakhankanya i-Wikileaks ukuba isemthethweni into engekho ngaphezu komsebenzi ongcolileyo, onzima kakhulu. Ayingobantu abafumana, njenge-Wikileaks, ulwazi olunxulumene noluntu, bahlele kwaye bapapashe ... Hayi. Lo ngumbutho weentlola ezinomthunzi ... bade bapapashe iingxoxo zefowuni!
Konke okukhoyo zizinto zabucala, kubomi babucala. Akukho nto inxulumene noluntu. Lo ngumzekelo wohlobo lwabantu urhulumente wase-K anabo phambi kwakhe...
Unuka ngathi ngumcuphi osisimumu. Ngaphezu kwako konke, khuphela uncamathisele ii-webmails. Bakuvulele iakhawunti kaGoogle kwiveki ephelileyo ukuba babeke amabinzana ambalwa aluncedo malunga nelungelo lolwazi kwaye bapapasha ii-imeyile zobuqu (hayi amaxwebhu achazayo anokuba nomdla kwinkululeko yolwazi), kwaye ngaphezulu koko baseka ulwaphulo-mthetho. yokwaphulwa kwembalelwano. (Ubugcisa be-153.- Nabani na ovula ngokungafanelekanga ileta, uxwebhu oluvaliweyo okanye itelegraphic, umnxeba okanye enye into ethunyelwayo engabhekiswanga kuye; okanye obambe ileta ngokungafanelekanga uya kohlwaywa ngokuvalelwa ukusuka kwiintsuku ezilishumi elinesihlanu ukuya kwiinyanga ezintandathu. , loxwebhu, lweofisi okanye elinye iphepha labucala, nokuba alivalwanga, okanye licime okanye liphambukise kwindawo yalo imbalelwano engabhalelwanga kuye.Ukuvalelwa entolongweni inyanga enye ukuya kunyaka omnye kuya kusebenza, ukuba unetyala wazisa omnye. iya kupapasha umxholo weleta, ukubhala okanye ukuthumela.) Ngamafutshane, umsebenzi wezopolitiko uya kwazi ukuba uvela kubani. Ungakhohliswa, le nto yeLeykymails yintlanzi ebolileyo.
Inika umdla. Kodwa ukuba ivela ku-TN ... sele ivumba kakubi ngokwayo.
Hmm .. kuyamangalisa ukuba akukho nto evela kuCiro James, kunye nokuphulaphula uMacri, i-fachohero entsha yaseBuenos Aires ...
Ewe, kwaye nabani na owenza ukwandiswa kweChrome ukufihla iGoogle + wayefuna kuphela ukunceda umsebenzisi agxininise ekukhangeleni, akayena uMark Zuckerberg okanye umlandeli we-Facebook ozama ukutyhala ukhuphiswano phakathi kwe-XD yobuntshatsheli kunye neminye imidlalo? Kunye nee-imeyile ezivela “kuzo zonke iintlanga zehlabathi”? Kwaye kutheni kwiBlogger (yabucala), kutheni kungenjalo kwi-WordPress (simahla)? Kwaye ukuba yeyazo "zonke iintlanga zehlabathi, kutheni ifumaneka ngeSpanish kuphela?" Kwaye kutheni ii-imeyile kuphela (isicatshulwa esidijithali = kulula ukuyitshintsha), kutheni kungekho nto iprintiweyo okanye i-wiretapping? Ndiyazi, kuba ayizukubizwa ngokuba zii-leakymails, kodwa kutheni bekhethe ukusasaza ii-imeyile kuphela (umbhalo okwidijithali = kulula ukuwutshintsha)?
"Umthombo: TN",...
umanzisa indlebe yakhe 🙂 ………