Do you remember the first lawyer bot, well now he is being sued for not having a "title"

AI

The case in question has caught the attention of many, as it could mark the replacement of many professions.

A couple of weeks ago, we share here on the blog the news of the first "lawyer bot" powered by artificial intelligence from DoNotPay. Which is now being sued by the Edelson Law Firm.

The lawsuit against AI is on the table in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco. The reason: said artificial intelligence does not have a law degree and therefore practices in a field that requires a license that it does not have. The licensing issue is tied to the broader issue of the possibility of professions such as lawyers disappearing in favor of AI.

This artificial intelligence from the company DoNotPay works on a phone, listening to all the speeches in the courtroom and giving instructions to a client using it through a headset.

The complaint argues that:

“Unfortunately for its clients, DoNotPay is neither a robot, nor a lawyer, nor a law firm. DoNotPay does not hold a law degree, is not admitted to the bar of any jurisdiction, and is not supervised by any attorney.

That is why he attacks artificial intelligence for the unauthorized practice of law and calls for a court ruling that puts an end to any use of artificial intelligence in court.

The artificial intelligence DoNotPay was to be released in a speeding case in a US court in February 2023. This has no longer been the case because Joshua browder abandoned the initiative after threats of the interested parties of the legal body.

Precisely, the general director of the company explains that this solution responds to the burden of bureaucracy and helps to reduce the cost of fees. For example, China has been working to establish an intelligent judicial system since at least 2016 by integrating artificial intelligence into its judicial system. The approach would have saved it $45 billion in fees between 2019 and 2021.

The table raises questions about the possible disappearance of the legal profession and others such as promoter. In fact, a startup specializing in artificial intelligence predicts that “relying on humans to write computer programs will become obsolete in the future” and thus sounds the alarm about the possible demise of the profession of computer developer in the next few years. coming years for the benefit of artificial intelligence.

When we talk about artificial intelligence, two major schools of thought collide: that of third parties who think it is a tool, that, and that of stakeholders who believe that it is not just a matter of time before it becomes a threat to humans.

The biggest debate revolves around the possibility of seeing machines in the state in which they are endowed with "common sense", capable of causal reflection, that is, of that ability to reason about "why things happen".

Google, for example, secretly launches into the development of Pitchfork, or AI Developer Assistance. It is a tool that uses machine learning to teach code to write and rewrite itself. As ? Learning styles corresponding to programming languages, and applying this knowledge to write new lines of code.

The original intention behind this project was to create a platform that could automatically update the Python codebase every time a new version was released, without requiring the intervention or hiring of a large number of engineers. . However, the potential of the program turned out to be much greater than expected.

Now the intention is to give life to a versatile system capable of maintaining a quality standard in the code, but without depending on human intervention in development and update tasks. Such a goal could no longer be science fiction when we know that AI research teams already promise to reach the AI ​​stage in 5 to 10 years.

Finally, if you are interested in being able to learn more about it, you can consult the details in the following link


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

*

*

  1. Responsible for the data: Miguel Ángel Gatón
  2. Purpose of the data: Control SPAM, comment management.
  3. Legitimation: Your consent
  4. Communication of the data: The data will not be communicated to third parties except by legal obligation.
  5. Data storage: Database hosted by Occentus Networks (EU)
  6. Rights: At any time you can limit, recover and delete your information.