According to calendar of Mozilla, in a few hours we will have with us Firefox version 11 (y Thunderbird I suppose) which will bring some improvements but nothing that encourages launching rockets.
Most of the changes we could already see in Firefox 11.0 Beta:
- Firefox can import Bookmarks, History and Cookies from Google Chrome.
- Now using Sync, the extensions can be synchronized, through several computers.
- Support for text-size-adjust property.
- outerHTML property supports elements HTML.
- To highlight the syntax of the code, use the parser HTML5 (#bug 482921).
- El Style Editor, is available to web developers.
- The web developers now they can view a page in 3D using Page Inspector 3D View.
- Added SPDY protocol, so that pages load even faster (#bug528288).
- XMLHttpRequest now supports HTML parsing.
- Files can be stored in IndexedDB (#bug 661877).
- Improved WebSocket support.
- New design of the controls for HTML5 video.
- Notifications in Firefox may not work correctly if Growl 1.3 or later (#bug 91662).
- List of bugs fixed in this version ßeta 1
- More information in Firefox 11: Features / Release Tracking
So for now we can only wait for the files to be uploaded to the FTP or make the official launch 😀
Hopefully it improves performance ... especially with KDE and the proprietary Nvidia driver. Now I'm with KDE with Firefox on Archlinux with a generic vesa driver (on an old machine) and the problem does not appear
Pueesss me in OpenSUSE, with KDE and the proprietary driver from Nvidia, no problem hear ...
That they had not released him on March 11?
ohhh very good thanks for the info ... let's wait for it to come out then .. 🙂 ...
PS: The user-agent thing is not true .. I'm still in my xfce, so they don't think that there is a Midori for Windows para
Well, I find myself between two waters ... On the one hand (the older one), it seems like great news to me, since it means that the project is alive and evolving every day, but on the other, I'm starting to get fed up with so much new version that I don't it is closely followed by corresponding add-on updates.
For example, after a couple of months of waiting for Key Manager to be compatible with Firefox 8, as soon as it is compatible, version 9 of FF comes out, then 10 ... and I'm still waiting for it to be compatible. It's just an example, I have a list of "permanently" disabled plugins, waiting for them to update at the same rate as FF.
Of course, this is not Mozilla's fault (or maybe it is, for not demanding a certain commitment from the plugin producers), but the developers. Of course, considering that they offer their work "gratis et amore" and we can use them freely without paying a penny, I also seem to have a tough face for complaining.
Ultimately, as a user, it starts to be annoying to me, because I am a human being, but I also understand that, although I have the right to complain, I must exercise it with some measure ... It is not well born who is not grateful. If I knew how to program as much as I would like, I would help out, but every day I feel less able to catch up ...
And now I wonder…. Why have I released all this stuff, if I do not ask or solve anything? ...
«And now I wonder…. Why have I released all this stuff, if I don't ask or solve anything? ... »
Hahaha… .because you are seriously thinking about switching to Google Chrome and you feel sorry for leaving FF?
regards
Very nice Chrome but ... I don't know, that being spied on doesn't appeal to me much xD
Nope ... I use Chromium, and also FireFox, but I like the latter less and less.
regards
Man I understand the problem, but it depends largely on the developers of the add-ons, Mozilla has a project to fix this issue and one of the solutions is to make all the add-ons compatible by default, but it is still under development. What I recommend is that you do what I have been doing for a long time, unless there are drastic changes between versions (like the one between 3 and 4) you can make the compatible add-ons yourself, download the xpi file , open it as a compressed file, and modify the install.rdf file by changing the value found in the line:
[Code]10.0.2[/ Code]
and you put the relevant value, I have not had any problem with the add-ons that I have enabled in this way in both Thunderbird and Firefox.
Okay Errata, the line in question is this:
10.0.2It seems that the labels give problems, I put in the image the line to which I refer
http://s17.postimage.org/6a0s3yzsv/Pantallazo.png
You have the option of Chromium or Iron too 🙂
We are all spied on using Google… and Facebook and this and that. If you don't see an article from Courage where we could see (part) the profile that Google had made for us over the years.
Anyone who thinks they are safe for using a certain browser (which by default brings the "Google spy" on their home page) is naive and anyone who lives fearing others by using another certain browser is a liar (unconscious or no).
Or is there real evidence that Chrome has something special with which it spies on us in a special way? If so, tell me that I don't know and I would like to meet him.
I think just the opposite. The developers are not at fault, they work altruism in their spare time for nothing, while Mozilla earns 300 million dollars annually. The creators of extensions are not to blame that Mozilla woke up one day wanting to grow their number for no reason. It doesn't cost Mozilla anything to get into those unsuccessful campaigns since they have a huge budget, but the developers are another story and with those things they tease them and spit in their faces.
Because you are dissatisfied, you want to not put up with those things anymore and vent them and that things change, but you have a (wrong) feeling of guilt where you must ask permission (for thinking about your discomfort) and forgiveness (for not being worth looking at in the eyes of "the seller").
HADUKEN !!! I hope I have no problems with the accessories
Interesting news… (:
buu I love rockets: S