|
Bill Gates once again speaks bluntly: "To eliminate the problem of global warming caused by CO2 emissions, we must eliminate part of the planet's population, using vaccines and other health resources."
Apparently, he forgot to include himself and his entire family on the list of "poor devils", as one of those who most helps global warming with their unbridled consumption and their comings and goings around the world on their plane particular. |
Spread this so everyone you know knows who owns the monopoly that created the operating system they are using. Don't fill the pockets of this shit anymore!
To access the full conference, click here.
Thanks Juan Domingo Pueblo!
I think it's incredible that I'm going to defend this guy.
Sorry, but this time they took something very out of context, and fiercely erred in the conclusions.
You should see that whole TED.
I am only going to clarify one thing: it is no bestiality to say that population growth would be reduced by improving health systems, by providing vaccines and medicines, by educating, by providing jobs, etc.
The more poverty there is, the higher the birth rate and infant mortality. There are several reasons, one is that increasing the number of children in the family, increases the work force, and increases the possibility that some will become adults, that they will become breadwinners, and that one day they may bury the children. parents. It may be very crude what I say, but I am not saying anything new when we find that the highest birth rates ALWAYS go hand in hand with the highest infant mortality rates. Survival is in the numbers. And it has always been throughout human history.
The more developed countries, despite the fact that the population lives longer and with a higher quality of life, have negative population growth rates. I'm not saying anything new.
The highest population growth is in underdeveloped or developing countries. But at what cost? At 40-50% infant mortality? It's fair? Wouldn't it be better if they had access to education, decent work, a universal health system?
It is a very complex issue, which we are not going to solve here. If we only start to study the reasons for these problems, we will never finish.
Most foundations, beyond their noble causes, are ideal for reducing taxes. And Gates' is no exception. But we must not be silly either: the Gates foundation, and with all that I dislike the company he founded and all the dirty policies they apply and apply to the competition (and the terrible lobby they use at all levels, organizations and states ), it is still one of the foundations that made and helps the most in the world.
There are so many other HDPs with the same dynasty in the world, who made them in much more dire ways, and who never gave back a bit to help others.
Let us denounce and claim what corresponds, that with that is unnecessary and fair, but if we start to invent things ... we will lower ourselves to their level.
It is my opinion, and as such, I hope not to offend anyone with it. I love the site, I recommend it and I always read it, but I don't agree with what I consider to be a fallacy, and neither Linux nor Free Software have anything to do with it.