As we already know with the output of Firefox the same version of the Mail Client de Mozilla: Thunderbird which in his version 10 does not have any relevant news.
If I have noticed a small change in the appearance with the incorporation of new icons in the buttons, but nevertheless, the consumption is somewhat high. Basically Thunderbird incorporates the ability to search the web, corrected some bugs with drafts and on some platforms.
Honestly I think the development cycle that is taking is somewhat stupid Mozilla in order not to really contribute anything new in the end. This could be the version 9.1 de Thunderbird. Anyway, you can download it from this link.
Hi elav, personally I recently started using email clients. I am comfortable with "idedove" 5, but knowing that it comes from mozilla, I was wondering which other can have a good development and be modest in resources for anyone who has not changed an old pc there, greetings.
Well I think that Thunderbird should not be very modest in resources
"Icedove" = "thunderbird" in debian
Already here in the blog we have talked about other alternatives. You have for example Sylpheed, or Claws Mail 😀
I do not use clients of that (to see if one day I start) but I have always heard that KMail is lighter, also Evolution and that last in the list would be Thunderbid (and likes). In short as who says, it all comes down to anything is lighter than Thunderbird.
Actually KMail currently uses Akonadi on a mandatory basis, and this makes it no lighter than Thunderbird as such 🙂
Because it is multiplatform it is better, but only for windows, outlook 2010 is much more complete than thunderbird.
Can you tell me what your dear Outlook 2010 has that my Thunderbird doesn't? Well, rather ... What does your Outlook 2010 have that you can't use in Thunderbird? Just to know.
Calm elav, calm. Whoever takes it is right.
A clear example is the total coupling with the entire Microsoft office suite, ease with hotmail, for example with thunderbird for some reason I could not see the mail from the spam folder, in case I had gotten a good message and so on Then I will pass a review that compares them, so you can see. I'm going to school now xd
Total coupling with the Suite? Of course if it is the same product, for the same product. Ease of mail? What's so difficult about sending an email with Thunderbird? Problems with IMAP? Can't you think that maybe the problem is Hotmail? It is evident that Outlook has to look much better because Hotmail is M $ .. Anyway, don't even bother to make a comparison, I don't think you convince anyone here to use Outlook for many good things according to you.
Of course I do not convince anyone :), it is not about Linux XD, I get the feeling that you speak like the person who is about the defensive because he knows that he is going to lose the discussion.
I don't know if it's a hotmail problem, but in kmail it was, so I doubt it's a hotmail problem.
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5648&review=Microsoft+Outlook+2010+Review+Whats+New+in+Outlook+2010
A teacher I respect very much taught me that when I go to a battle, be sure that I will win it. I'm not on the defensive, since Rayonant explained to you what the cause of your ills is, and as I was saying, the problem is not Thunderbird.
Relax Elav, we all have our opinions, although I would like Pandev to clarify what is not working for you, I have been a Thunderbird user for a long time and as far as I understand the problem is that hotmail does not support IMAP, only POP3 and There, what you say happens, because to me with my gmail email, and the one from the university that is also on the gmail platform, all the folders and others appear
The problem is thunderbir because with kmail if I see the spam tray.
ps: your teacher was more idealistic than carlos marx XD
pandem92:
When you say:
«Your teacher was more idealistic than Carlos Marx XD»
I think you are not using the appropriate term, since the theoretical system proposed by Marx (and Engels) begins as a critique of the idealist tradition (especially German idealism) and develops a current opposed to idealism that is called "dialectical materialism" (in its philosophical sense) and "historical materialism" in its sociological and economic sense.
Do not take my clarification wrong, I just think that if a judgment is made about something, it must be justified, otherwise there is a risk of showing ignorance or naivety.
Greetings.
I tell you that I was more idealistic and I tell you as a person with deep liberal feelings, because I studied Carlos Marx and when you arrive 2 or 3 months after reading his proposals, you realize that none of them is achievable, that's why I call it idealism or perhaps worse, illusionism.
Perhaps the proper term for what you are pointing to is "utopian" since "idealism" and "illusionism" refer to other kinds of things.
On the other hand, the description of the production system and the critique of capitalism made by Engels and Marx is still very current and precise.
What was naive or utopian were the predictions about structural change and the establishment of socialist regimes (leading to an advanced communism), since said process, if it were feasible, would be much more complex than they imagined.
Greetings.
Of course it is compatible with all ms office packages, that's what it's made for.
And of course it works with hotmail, they are from the same developer.
It's like saying that x is compatible with windows, when they are only products made for windows ...
Well that's it, that's what I'm saying, I like tools that complement the entire system and if it's possible to use everything the same, then better.
The coupling with the rest of the system can certainly be advantageous, the problem sometimes is usually the cost, and I do not mean the price.
Although Thunderbird is not exactly a lightweight application, it is lighter than Outlook, probably more secure, and also more customizable through extensions or by modifying its code.
In the interest of having arguments to be able to sell each new version of its applications, Microsoft frequently sins of feature creep by implementing new technologies in their applications (which may or may not be really useful for the application), without too many considerations regarding the consumption of resources or security, which inevitably causes all kinds of problems for users. This problem is not unique to Microsoft, but this company is usually one of those that best exemplifies it.
Regarding the appreciation of pandev92, I more than agree, being an ex-user of Microsoft products I recognize that they complement each other very well.
In GNU / Linux I use google docks and google calendar, I don't miss outlook at all.
Well let's use mutt ...
Personally, and having tried other email managers, I prefer this one, which if it would be necessary to differentiate something very pleasant for everyone, the use of themes (appearances) on the web as they are mixed, but the rest very good, still I cannot configure the browser within the manager but I put 8 points out of 10 for the rest, there is much to improve, but by far it beats the rest.