Jiya munyi tsokaci kan labarai cewa cin abinci, rarraba bisa Arch Linux con kirfa a matsayin yanayin muhallin tebur, Ina barin wannan Cokali mai yatsa don matsawa zuwa GNOME Shell. A cikin labarin na ba da shawara Manjaro Cinnamon Community Edition a matsayin mai yiwuwa maye gurbin cin abinci ga waɗanda ke neman wani rarraba bisa Arch con kirfa.
Da kyau, zaku iya mantawa da wannan shawarar domin Manjaro yanzunnan ya ba da sanarwar cewa tabbas an soke wannan fitowar. Sanarwar wannan ana yin ta ne da ban mamaki yayin gabatar da Manjaro Cinnamon Community Edition na 0.8.5, aka ƙaddamar jiya kuma wannan zai zama na ƙarshe da suke samarwa tare da Cokali mai yatsa de GNOME Shell. Dalilin? Daidai da waɗanda suke na cin abinci: rashin iya kiyaye teburin ci gaba kamar yadda yake a hankali kirfa akan distro wanda yake koyaushe kamar yadda yake Arch Linux. Tare da wannan kawai hargitsi biyu (kamar yadda na sani) bisa Arch cewa sun miƙa kirfa an riga an shigar dashi azaman daidaitacce.
GNOME 3.8: ainihin mai laifi
Marubucin bayan hutu tsakanin tebur halitta ta Linux Mint da dangin distros Arch ba kowa bane face iri daya GNOME. Sigar 3.8 Teburin Miguel de Icaza a halin yanzu yana cikin wuraren adana gwaji na Arch Linux kuma ana sa ran fara shigar da tashar tsayayye a cikin fewan kwanaki. Matsalar ita ce, yaran na GNOMEkoyaushe haka ake rigima Sun manta gabaɗaya game da daidaiton baya na GNOME 3.8 tare da fassarorinta na baya, saboda haka duk fakitin da suke amfani da dakunan karatu da APIs daga tsohuwar sifa zasu zama marasa amfani.. Wannan shine lamarin kirfa, wanda a cikin sigar da yake yanzu 1.7 kawai ke tallafawa har zuwa GNOME 3.6.
Sakamakon zai kasance kamar haka GNOME 3.8 zo, wanne bam na atom zai lalata duk wani girkin Kirfa mai aiki akan Arch Linux.
Kirfa da jinkirin juyin halitta
Duk wannan tambayar tana nan: me yasa kirfa ya zuwa yanzu baya ci gaban GNOME? Me yasa baku goyi bayan sigar 3.8 ba? Amsar ya bayar da kansa Clement lefebvre ‘yan kwanakin da suka gabata: saboda a wurinsu bai zama dole ba. Ba'a haifi Kirfa a matsayin aikin Mint na Linux mai zaman kanta ba, tun daga farko aka ɗauka ta zama teburin wannan distro kuma ba komai ba. Idan sauran rudani sun kawo karshen su zuwa wuraren ajiyar su saboda sun yanke shawarar yin hakan, amma ba a kirkiro Kirfa don hakan ba.
Kuma a cikin Mint ba su da sha'awar ɗauka kirfa a GNOME 3.8 saboda a rumbun adana su, haka kuma na dukkan dangin Ubuntu, har yanzu suna tare da GNOME 3.6 kuma zai dauki tsawon lokaci kafin su karbi sabon sigar. Kuma tabbas idan tazo ƙarshe tuni an ƙaddamar dashi GNOME 4.0, da sauransu, koda yaushe mataki daya baya.
Karshen Kirfa a wajen Linux Mint?
To me zai faru kirfa lahira? Ban sani ba da gaske idan akwai wata mafita, amma yanayin da zai faru nan da nan zai kasance zai fara ɓacewa daga duk ɓarna inda GNOME 3.8 ke zuwa. Na farko zai kasance kaddamarwa kamar yadda Arch (fakitin kirfa har yanzu suna cikin AUR amma watakila ba da daɗewa ba za su yi ritaya ko kuma aƙalla alama ba ta daɗe) kuma daga baya Semi-mirgina da duk waɗanda ke neman adana nau'ikan fakitin kwanan nan a cikin rumbunan su.
A ƙarshe ga alama duk wanda yake so ya yi amfani da shi kirfa a matsayin tebur dole ne ka zauna a ciki Linux Mint kuma a ɗayan ɓarnar za mu sami zaɓi kaɗan da za mu zaɓa daga.
Ta Hanyar | Linux sosai
Hakan yana faruwa da tebura tare da maintainan masu kula.
Kwallan kankara ya fara girma. Labari mara dadi ga Cinnamon.
Na gyara bayanin, don masu amfani da Kirfa.
Da kyau, kamar yadda suka faɗa a baya, Kirfa shine haɗin Linux na mint
Na riga na faɗi jiya
Cinnamon Har abada Kadai Edition.
da kuma tambayar dala miliyan, don netbook wanne ne zai fi dacewa da tebur? lxde da xfce ba zasu iya shawo kaina ba, akwatin budewa ya fi kyau amma ba tare da wata shakka kirfa ta kasance babban zaɓi ba ... kuma abokin aure zai faɗi haka?
Xfce yana ɗaya daga cikin mafi kyawun akwai, kamar lxde
Gnome da Kde na iya zama masu ɗan nauyi
Na goyi bayan sa, kodayake Cinnamon yana da ɗan nauyi kuma ba zan ba da shawarar ga mai amfani da netbook ba
Abinda kawai bana son LXDE shine tambarin sa: S.
LXDE ko OpenBox suna da kyau ga netbooks.
Har yanzu ban fahimci dalilin da yasa mutane ke watsar da cikakke da goge DE ba a can yau, KDE.
Yanayinta ya ba da damar daidaita shi zuwa ƙananan kwamfutocin PC masu ƙarancin ƙarfi (Aƙalla tare da gidan yanar gizo na Manjaro shigar da ISO Na gudanar da shi don yin aiki a cikin kyakkyawar saurin Acer One tare da 1 GB na RAM).
Hakanan, idan wannan bai isa ba dole ne ku kalli aikin KLyDE (jami'in KDE).
Kuna buƙatar koyarwar keɓancewa ta LXDE da XFCE, ya kamata ku ga canje-canjen da aka yi musu, ku neme su a kan intanet, wasu sun fi KDE kyau.
Wannan wani abu ne wanda mutane da yawa da masu haɓakawa suka soki, gami da Clem Lefevbre: GNOME yana canza abubuwa tsakanin siga, kowane saki kamar gwaji ne kuma muna damuwa game da dacewa da "aikace-aikacen ɓangare na uku". Masu amfani da GNOME za su gafarce ni, amma wannan aikin yana tsotsa.
Ranar da zan koma Gtk zan sake dogaro da Xfce. Bugu da ƙari, Ina ba da shawara ga masu haɓaka ku cewa su yi amfani da ɗakunan karatu ban da Gtk, watakila na E17 ko na Qt.
KDE, duk ranar da ta wuce ina ƙaunarku ... ƙari.
Manta game da bayar da shawarar wasu shagunan sayar da littattafai. Ba su da fun sake rubuta Xfce daga karce.
Na yarda, zaku iya yarda ko a'a tare da wasu shawarwari, amma lokaci ya tabbatar da Canonical dama game da abubuwan da ke faruwa na GNOME.
Manufar Canonical don ƙirƙirar ƙaramin tebur mai zaman kansa na GNOME, kuma na ga dalilin.
+1 Daga abin da na gani Qt shine hanya ... U_U
+ 10000000000000000
Na fada kuma zan maimaita shi:
Gnome baya sha'awar hada kai da cokulan da wasu suke yi na Gnome base…. Gnome yana da wasu tsare-tsare don canza yanayin zuwa tsarin aikinta mai suna GnomeOS.
saboda haka suna dauke da FAST workflow da ci gaba kuma basa nuna kamar sun waigo suna jiran wasu da suke yin cokula sun kama tunda su mutanen Gnome ne.
Kammalawa: Idan kana son amfani da kayan GTK, yi amfani da Gnome Shell ba wai cokulansa ba
Matsalar ita ce, kamar yadda GNOME ke son samun GNOME OS ɗin sa, yawancin aikace-aikacen Gtk ba su da alaƙa kai tsaye da wannan aikin. Abin da ya fi haka, za mu iya cewa a yanzu abin da GNOME ke da shi:
- Yanar gizo
- Rhythmbox
- Nautilus
- Totem (Ban san menene jahannama da ake kira yanzu ba)
Ko ta yaya, da sauran aikace-aikacen da za a iya samu a cikin aikin da na maimaita: Ba su da yawa, kuma ba su ne mafi kyau ba ... To menene game da su? Idan suka juya baya ga duk aikace-aikacen da suke can ko kuma basu tsammanin samun daidaito da su, to ina ganinsu sosai, sosai.
Ana kiranta Video LOOL, ba raha bane xd
To wannan shit ce iri ɗaya tare da suna daban .. Na ci gaba da SMPlayer / MPlayer, VLC har ma da Dragon Player ..
Duk wani ɗan wasa ya fi totem kyau, kuma dragon player idan kuna amfani da phonon vlc ko xine suna aiki da kyau a wurina. Kodayake ina harba gnome mplayer da mplayer2
Gaskiya ne, kuma kada ku damu, yawancin aikace-aikacen suna cikin Gtk2 kuma basuyi niyyar wuce su zuwa Gtk3 ba, a can muna da misali babban Firefox.
yaya saurin dangi yake, suna ci gaba da bayar da sigar kowane watanni 6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME#Versions (march, september) kamar yadda ubuntu.
Cewa ba sa son hada kai wani batun ne (tare da halin kin yarda da koma baya, adwaiata a bayyane yake), kuma ba wai kawai laifin gnome ba ne, shi ma cokula ne, daga mahangar samfurin shi bazai zama mai matukar farin ciki ba cewa ka canza wasu dakunan karatu (wanda shine yiwuwar kana da shi) kuma ka inganta shi azaman wani samfuri. Ba na wulakanta kowane DE, amma abu ne mai sauki, kowa ya soki shi kuma ya ce bari mu sake yin cokali, amma kamar yadda aka riga aka fada, idan kuna son ta cika to lallai ne ku gan su tare da dukkan laburaren da ke akwai da kuma samun su, idan mutane suka gani Idan ya kushe shi, da ya zauna a gefen masu haɓakawa a raye (aƙalla ta hanyar imel), wannan yanayin ba zai faru ba, kuma sama da duk mutanen da ke gaban ayyukan mutane ne kuma suna amsa kamar haka , ji bisa ga abin da suka gani a tsakiya (amma gano cewa mai yiwuwa ko ba hannun da ba a gani ba a baya). Da fatan nan gaba za a juya wannan halin, amma saboda wannan dole ne wasu abubuwa su canza kuma wasu hamayyar banza da aka ciyar da su na yearsan shekaru dole a keɓe.
Na gode.
Ina fatan ba a fahimce ni ba, don girka hadin kai a baka dole ne in zabi tsakanin gnome da hadin kai a halin yanzu, amma shawarata ce, cewa ba zan iya amfani da gnome 3.8 [gnome-unstable] da ke cikin gwaji ba, haka kuma ba zan iya amfani da xorg 1.14 (kuma a gwaji), yanke shawara ce
Don haka, suna canzawa zuwa samfurin mallaka kuma shi ke nan ...
Wannan GNOME da cokulansa sun riga sun yi kuka zuwa sama. Ci gaba da dunƙule BN; idan LXDE, XFCE da KDE suna wurin, suna cikin mahalli a cikin yanayin da ya daina lalacewa kuma zai ba ku kayan aikin gaske. Gaskiya, wannan GNOME da cokulansa sun riga sun iyakance akan abin ba'a.
Ina son gnome 2, kuma bana son Gnome Shell, LXDE, XFCE, KDE, ko Unity
Kuma saboda ba kwa amfani da matte, kwarewar kamar 95% na na gnome 2. Duk koyarwar gnome 2 tayi min a matte lokacin da nayi amfani da ita.
bari mu gani, abubuwa kamar yadda suke, abin da kuka rasa shi ne COMPIZ, lokaci, don haka kada mu dame abubuwa. Babu wanda yayi amfani da GNOME 2 ba tare da compiz ba; ko nayi kuskure? abin da kuka rasa kenan
Ina fata cewa a zahiri hakan ne da yuwuwar gyara sanduna saboda in ba haka ba ban fahimta ba. GNOME2 ya zama abin ban tsoro ne kawai ...
Ina tsammanin kun bugi ƙusa a kai tare da sharhin, ban yi kuskuren iz ba
Ko gnome da gaske ya riga ya tsotse, tunda an aiwatar da gnomeshell; don ƙananan kwakwalwa (kamar nawa) tsotsa! Da gaske ba ya aiki, Ina ba LXDE, XFCE dama
GASKIYAN !!!!! Ban taba son kirfa ba, na ci gaba da Mate wanda yake aiki sosai tare da Manjaro 🙂
Gnome ya zama mai yanke mahimmin dangantaka tunda fitowar Gnome 3.
Ba na tsammanin laifin Cinnamon ne saboda kasancewarsa "a baya", domin idan da za mu yi kwatanci za mu zargi Debian saboda yawan jituwa (na ga bugun gabatowa haha).
Cire jituwa ta baya kamar yin imani cewa kowa yana mutuwa don amfani da shi kuma cewa su masu mulkin duniyar tebur ne.
Na fi son MATE, yana da kyau, haske kuma yana kan madaidaiciyar hanyar da nake tsammani.
[elav ya shirya jemage uwa]
Ban sani ba bro, Ina tsammanin duka laifinsu ne, LM tabbas ya yi la akari da hakan kafin kutsawa cikin ruwa mai zurfi da hayaniya. Misalin wannan shine cewa Cinnamon baya aiki ba tare da dogaro da Nemo ba ko kuma basu da ma'aikata da zasu iya aiwatar da aikin wannan girman. A gefe guda kuma, LM ya yi fare ba daidai ba, ya bar LMDE gefe don Cinnamon ... "Ina neman crumbs maimakon cikakken burodi." #PicFail.
Yanzu LM dole ne suyi hankali, Mate shine babban aikinsa na biyu, yaya ribarsa? Bana tunani da yawa, a kowane lokaci aikin ya tsaya cak LM ya zama ba komai. Kwancen kirfa sun ƙidaya, menene LM zai kasance ba tare da kayan adon sa ba? Moreara karin distro tare da zane-zane daban-daban? Yaya rikitarwa, daga zama na 1 a cikin Distrowatch zuwa haɗarin ƙarewa azaman abu mai kyau wanda zai iya zama kuma bazai taɓa kasancewa ba? Ana biyan kurakurai kuma LM zai kasance mai tsada sosai don karyayyun jita-jita ...
Bro, kamar yadda na gaya muku a nan:
Shin akwai wanda yake da shakku kan cewa LM distro ne da aka cika ƙari game da shi a wannan wurin?
Abin mahimmanci, distro ne wanda ba shi da maɓuɓɓugan kansa, ƙirar ubuntu (a wannan ma'anar) ...
Ban ga dalilin da zai sa a sanya distro na musamman tare da kirfa ba, idan mutum ya ɗauki minti 2 don ƙara wannan harsashi a manjaro
🙂 https://blog.desdelinux.net/cinnarch-abandona-cinnamon-y-se-pasa-a-gnome-shell/#comment-45858
xDDDDDDDDD
Zan ƙarasa sa rubutu a cikin dukkan labarina da ke cewa: «Miguel, idan ba shi da matsala sosai, da fatan za ku karanta labarin gaba ɗaya kafin yin tsokaci, na gode.» Kuma dole ne in sanya shi a cikin take ɗaya saboda in ba haka ba ba zaku gan shi ba. 😀
hahahahahahaha
Na karanta clowns da yawa waɗanda suke cewa Cinnamon zai ɓace.
Wadanda suke magana irin wannan wasu na sayar da hayaki.
Wasu suna faɗin haka daga UNITY «» »Cewa zai ɓace« », dakatar da halayen yara kuma su girma.
Sunyi kama da wasu tsoffin matan unguwa da suke zagin maƙwabta kuma suna fatan mummunan saboda eh.
Haber, idan maimakon yin magana duk rana suna taimakawa da lambar don ba da ayyukan software kyauta.
Dangane da GNOME jirgi ne wanda ba shi da mashi, wata rana sai GNOME din ya so kashe Gnome Classic wata rana kuma sai su fadi wani abu daban su dauke shi daga cikin akwatin da ya mutu.
GNOME bashi da tsayayyen ra'ayi na gaba, wanda ke samar da mafita ga masu haɓaka, da alama yayi duk abin da zai iya dagula rayuwar wasu masu haɓaka.
[An rubuta daga Windows don dalilan aiki]
Ina amfani da Debian kuma ban kasance mai adawa da wannan cokali mai yatsa ba sai don jinkirin da wannan yanayin na teburin yake da shi. Abin da ya fi haka, Na fi son MATE zuwa waccan ƙirar KDE ta ƙarya.
Game da GNOME 3, na yanke shawarar maye gurbinsa da MATE lokacin da aka saki Debian 7 (Wheezy), tunda yana tseratar da jin daɗin da GNOME 2 ya bar ni kuma kuma, Ina jin daɗin kwanciyar hankali tare da irin wannan yanayin mai sauƙi da haske kamar GNOME 2 da XFCE (duk da cewa KDE kusan ya yi nauyi kamar na Windows, amma ya fi shi kyau idan ya zo ga kwanciyar hankali).
Koyaya, Ina roƙon cewa MATE a hukumance an haɗa shi da kwanciyar hankali na Debian kuma lallai yana dawo da abin da GNOME ya manta. A yanzu, Ina manne da sabuntawa na Debian 7.
Kirfa ya kamata ya daina dogaro da Mint, cewa Kirfa a kan tsayayyar Arch ya zama kamar kyakkyawa a gare ni. Amma software ba komai bane kuma yakamata ku tuna cewa akwai ma'ana acikin komai kuma muhimmin abu shine al'umma.
A bayyane suke kawai sun kashe Cinnarch ne kuma a zahiri zai ɗauki wani suna.
Ina tsammanin a ƙarshe wannan rarraba zai sami mafita kuma ya haɓaka tsawa don gnome 3.
Kodayake distros kamar Manjaro, ArchBang, Cinnarch, Chakra sun ja hankalina, ina tsammanin a ƙarshe komai ya fi rikitarwa fiye da yadda ya kamata. Na fi so in sanya komai cikin sauki. Its T…
Babban!
Da kyau, kamar ba da labari ba ne a gare ni, tunda gnome 2 Cinammon ya bar mu, ya zama muhallin da na ji daɗin zama da shi. Ina son Kde a matsayin tebur na duniya, amma yana gajiyar da ni cikin dogon lokaci. Ina son Xfce amma ban cika jin dadi ba. LXDE ko haskakawa kamar na zama koren. Kuma Hadin kai ko Gnome bashi yiwuwa kawai nayi aiki da shi. Duk da haka dai, ina tsammanin zan sami masu ɓarna da yawa amma ina son Cinammon kuma ina fata yana da kyakkyawar makoma fiye da yadda suke tsammani.
Ina tsammanin Gnome ya mutu lokacin da ya yi tsalle zuwa fasali na 3. Tun daga wannan lokacin an rufe ido, yana yanke shawarwari da ba za a fahimta ba, an motsa su a karkashin hujjar kirkire-kirkire, amma kawai sun sami wani bakon yanayi, komai sai dai ilhama da kuma daidaitawa. Kuma wannan halayyar (ta rashin goyan bayan sigogin da suka gabata, kuma wanda ban sani ba), ina tsammanin ciyawar ce wacce ta karya bayan raƙumi. Ya zama cin amanar mai amfani.
Me ya faru Cinnamon? Kun kasance sanyi kafin.
[An rubuta daga Windows don dalilan aiki].
Ina mamakin menene ma'anar yin cokali na yanayin da yake halin yanzu kuma ana sabunta shi? Yayinda Gnome ke cikin cikakken cigaba, me yakamata kuyi kenan? Jinkirta wannan cigaban don faranta mai yatsu? Zan iya tunanin haduwa tsakanin masu haɓaka ɗayan da ɗayan: - Kirfa: «hey, Gnome, kar ku haɓaka har yanzu saboda in ba haka ba ba zan iya ci gaba ba»; - Gnome: «To, Cinnamon, yana da kyau, ban ci gaba ba don haka za ku iya ɗaukar lokacinku ku gyara kanku»….
Kwarewar da ke faruwa a Cinnamon da Gnome Shell sun bambanta, saboda haka wannan cokali mai yatsu yana da dalilin kasancewarsa, yana ba da tebur na gargajiya tare da sababbin fasahohi.
Yanzu, da alama matsalar ita ce cewa daidaiton API daga GTK 3.6 zuwa GTK 3.8 ya lalace, wani abu da bai kamata ya faru ba, tunda ba GNOME kawai yake amfani da GTK ba, amma akwai ayyukan GNOME masu zaman kansu da yawa waɗanda suma suke amfani dasu. Na yarda cewa GNOME bai kamata ya jira wasu ba, amma banyi tsammanin akwai buƙatar karya API tare da kowane juzu'i ba (yi hankali, ni ba mai shirya shirye-shirye bane ko wani abu, wannan kawai daga ra'ayina ne).
+1 Abinda nake nufi kenan.
@cookie da elav: Ina tsammanin dukansu basuyi kuskure ba. Ba abu ne mai kyau a yi cokali da wani abu da yake ci gaba ba. Idan ana nufin Kirfa don yin cokali mai yatsa don ta yi aiki a cikin duk rarrabawa, wannan babban kuskure ne, sabili da haka akwai masu rarrabawa waɗanda ke watsar da shi. Kyakkyawan cokali mai yatsa shine Mate, alal misali, wanda aka yi don dawo da kusan Gnome 2.x kusan "binne"
Muna komawa ɗaya, shin da gaske ne ya zama dole a karya API don haɓaka? Idan kuwa haka ne, shin da gaske GNOME zai iya zama tsararren aiki (Ina nufin kwanciyar hankali a cikin ƙungiyar ku a matsayin aiki)? Yaya kuke tsammanin wani zai shirya ta amfani da dakunan karatu na GTK 3 idan daidaituwa ta karye da kowane sigar?
Wani abu, Clem ya ce Cinnamon BA aikin LM ne mai zaman kansa ba (a cikin gidan akwai hanyar haɗi da aka ambata wannan, idan kuna son karanta shi), ma'ana, ba a nufin yin aiki a cikin duk rarraba kamar yadda kuka ce .
@cookie: «… Clem ya ce Cinnamon BA aikin LM bane mai zaman kansa…»
Tare da wanene, duk tattaunawar cokali mai yatsu ko babu cokali mai yatsa ba ta da wani amfani, kuma, kamar yadda suka faɗa a can, a ƙarshe Cinnamon ya kasance ga LM abin da Unityaya zuwa Ubuntu, kuma idan ba mai zaman kansa ga abin da Clem ya ce ba, to sauran distros sunyi kyau sosai don kada su haɗa shi a cikin tebur ɗin su. Sannan suna sukar Gnome? Yaushe harsashin ku yake aiki a cikin sauran duka?
Kuma a nan mun sake shigar da madauki, cewa idan cokali mai yatsu ko a'a. Wato kamar yadda na fada a farko, tattaunawa mara ma'ana, kuma Clem ya gabatar da kansa ga Cinnamon inda ya fi dacewa….
Ya yi kama da abin da kuka ce "Kirfa ga LM menene Haɗin Ubuntu", saboda haka wannan cokalin GNOME Shell yana da ma'ana, muddin yana cikin Mint. Wannan ita ce amsar da nake so in ba tambayarku:
«… Menene ma'anar yin cokali mai yatsa na yanayin da ke halin yanzu kuma ana sabunta shi .. ..»
Oh, af, bana ƙin BANZA, a zahiri ya dauke hankalina; kuma banyi matukar farin ciki ba da suka hada da Kirfa da wasu hargitsi don irin wannan matsalar.
Na gode.
Yayi, yanzu idan muka yarda, ina magana da kaina a kan ɗayan ɓarnatar. Heh, kuma don yin tunanin cewa wani ɓangare na ƙungiyar Fedora yana la'akari da sanya Cinnamon ta tsohuwa, kodayake idan suka sami nasarar yin aiki da kyau, ƙungiyar Clem dole ne ta sami lamba don ɗaukar wasu azuzuwan ...
Ina ganin maganganunku a ƙasa da wauta.
«» »Kuma suyi tunanin cewa ɓangare na ƙungiyar Fedora suna la'akari da sanya Cinnamon ta tsohuwa, kodayake idan suka sami damar yin aiki da kyau, ƙungiyar Clem dole ne ta sami lamba don ɗaukar wasu azuzuwan ...« »»
Nau'in wannan wauta.
Idan masu haɓaka Fedora sun aiwatar da CINNAMON akan Fedora, suna son shi.
Tunanin CINNAMON an haifeshi ne a Linux Mint.
Saboda in ba haka ba masu shirye-shiryen Fedora zasu samar da cokali mai kama da CINNAMON tuntuni, wanda basu yi ba.
«Ba wani bane face GNOME kanta. Shafin 3.8 na teburin Miguel de Icaza », Gaskiya ne wannan mutumin, shugaban masu gutsuttsurawa a cikin yanayin tebur, ya buge ni kamar kullun a cikin matattarar, ba tare da la'akari da tsarin aiki da yake amfani da / ko ba ko kuma maganganun banza da yake saki daga bakin bakinsa, amma daga can don a zarge shi da sharrin Gnome 3.8 tare da ambaton sunansa kawai don a wulakanta shi ba abin yarda bane. Vicent zai zama ɗan takarar da yafi dacewa da wannan truño da aka sanya a gaban fan. Idan na yi kuskure kuma ambaton ku ya baku daraja, to kuna yin Federico Mena ne mara kyau.
A gefe guda, wannan wani abu ne wanda za'a iya gani yana zuwa, tare da tebur daga wani ɓoye, cewa kawai abin da ta san yadda ake yin shi da kyau (ban ce shi ne kawai abin da ta aikata ba), shine amfani da aikin wasu (ubuntu, debian, gnome).
Da alama duk laifin yana tare da Gnome don karya ƙwanƙolinsu, kuma ba tare da visoñez na masu haɓakawa waɗanda suka yi amfani da wannan yanayin a cikin ci gaba mai aiki azaman tushen su ba (misalai masu girman kai da ƙyamar juna wasu nau'ikan jinsi ne guda biyu waɗanda suke duniyan kayan kyauta).
Tunani na ƙarshe: Har yanzu yana da ban sha'awa cewa shigarwa biyu na ƙarshe game da kirfa a cikin wannan rukunin yanar gizon sun zo da ɗan jinkiri a ƙarfe 2 wanda aka sake shi a cikin Linux sosai, dukansu marubucin ɗaya ne kuma ra'ayoyin da aka bayyana a cikin biyun basu bambanta sosai ba wadanda suka zube a cikin labaran farko. Daga waɗanne hanyoyi El de la Fuente yake sha?
Kada ku ga yadda ake kulla makirce-makirce a wurin da babu su, na ce "Miguel de Icaza's desktop" kawai don kar in sake cewa da GNOME kuma a sanya shi ya zama mara aiki, kamar yadda na ce "tebur ɗin da Linux Mint ya kirkira" kada a ce Kirfa, ko " Arch distros »kar a ce Cinnarch da Manjaro. Kuma idan na zabi in ambaci Icaza saboda shi ne mafi sani ga waɗanda suka kirkiro shi kuma duk wani mai karatu zai san abin da yake magana a kansa, BA KOME BA.
Game da tushe na, kuna iya ganin su a ƙarshen labaran, ba wani sirri bane. Na koyi labarin da suka gabata ta hanyar karanta Somos Linuxeros; a zahiri, ban ga labarin MuyLinux ba har sai bayan da na buga nawa (Na yi rajista amma ban shiga cikin Google Reader ba duk rana). Kuma na sami labarin wannan labarin ta hanyar karanta MuyLinux kuma na kawo shi daidai.
Ban ga yadda labaran ba za su iya zama daidai ba idan muna yin sharhi kan abubuwan da suka faru. Koyaya, idan kun karanta tsokaci a kan labarin da ya gabata, zaku ga cewa mun riga mun bayyana da yawa daga ra'ayoyin da aka gabatar a cikin wannan labarin a can kuma ya zama kamar kyakkyawan ra'ayi ne a haɗa su don haɗa batun.
Gnome ne SARKI .. Idan wasu ba sa son su bi ka, yi abubuwa yadda kake so. Tunda lokacin da matsalar take gnome alhali a zahiri kwafin da aka gyaru ne ba zai iya bin sa ba.
Cewa an bar matattu su kadai ...
Da kyau, idan muna son yin amfani da Cinnamon duba Linux Mint, in ba haka ba mu bar kanmu zuwa hanyoyin yanzu.
Duk da haka dai, ban san gaskiyar ba saboda maimakon yin "ƙungiya" duk waɗannan masu haɓakawa sun ƙare da yin kowane aiki kuma suna ƙirƙira abu ɗaya na ɗayan kuma wannan shine dalilin da ya sa a ganina akwai rarrabuwa da yawa ..
Zuwa yanzu kawai aikin da nake ganin haɗin kai, cikakke kuma ba gaba ɗaya shine KDE.
Amma na fi son karamin yanayi kamar LXDE ko distro asii kamar Crunchbang 😀
Na gode!
Don wannan: https://blog.desdelinux.net/introduce-el-titulo-alarmista-aqui/
Don gamawa nan ba da jimawa ba, yin aiki tare da GNOME ba zai yiwu ba. Suna yin abin da suke so, ba sa saurarar ra'ayoyi, har ma ba a maraba da gudummawar lambar.
Na yarda cewa bai kamata su zama ba kaya amma kawai saboda akwai manyan tebura da yawa kuma babu buƙatar ɓata lokaci tare da shi. GNOME ya kasance yana da kyau amma yau ba komai bane sai shara.
Cewa wani yanki da baku so ba, Manuel, ba yana nufin cewa datti bane, kuna da ƙarancin manufa. Yana da kurakurai, gaskiya ne, amma daga can zuwa shara akwai hanya mai nisa. Zan iya faɗi haka game da KDE saboda ba shine abin da na fi so ba, kuma ban yi haka ba, kamar kowa, yana da fa'ida da rashin nasara. Naku yanzu ba mai tsanani bane.
gaisuwa
Yana da amfani na 0, APIs sun daina aiki tare da kowane ɗaukakawa, suna ci gaba da karɓar zaɓuɓɓuka, da kuma yadda aikin da kansa yake gudana tsotsa. Wannan shara ce a wurina.
Lura cewa ina magana ne takamaiman GNOME 3 da kuma kiyayya da Shell. Wannan bai haɗa da GNOME 2, Mate, Kirfa, Consort, da sauransu ba.
Hakanan Esque yayi la’akari da damuwar da kuke amfani da ita, aikin da wataƙila bai sami wata hujja ta ainihi ba kuma ga matasa ne, yin amfani da shi a cikin wani ɓarna kamar Arch haɗari ne. Horita wannan aikin saurayi ne kuma yana da ɗan tawaye, amma lokacin da ya balaga zai iya zama wani abu dabam.
Idan kana son ta yi aiki sosai, canza zuwa distro kamar Debian. Wannan watakila kuna da.
Tare da docks, widgets, mabuɗan musamman da kari zaku iya samun sabon ƙirar tebur mai aiki a cikin gnome 3.
Kuma da kyau, gnome 3 yana da ƙaramar hanya, ƙila ba kwa son daidaita tsarin tunanin ku da wannan ko ba ya da tasiri a gare ku.
Indexididdigar amfani ba shi da ma'ana, tabbacin wannan shi ne cewa akwai da yawa daga cikinmu waɗanda suke amfani da shi kuma cikin kwanciyar hankali. Kamar yadda @lawliet ya gaya muku, watakila ya dogara ne da rarrabawar da mutum yake amfani da shi, kodayake Gnome-shell yana da fuska da aiki iri ɗaya a cikin duka.
Kuma ga wannan wanda ya zo sanya nutsuwa kwata-kwata ... daga ina suka samo shi?
Na yarda da kai manuel ..
Shin akwai wanda ya san dalilin da yasa Alan Mcrae yayi tsokaci wanda mutane da yawa ke ɗauka mara kyau akan Manjaro?
Af, duk wani aikin da ya danganci Gnome zai ƙaddara a ra'ayina ya ɓace nan gaba kuma har ma da yanzu saboda canje-canje da yawa a wannan yanayin.
Gracias!
Wani yayi min bayani saboda ina ganin Kirfa tayi kyau. Yanzu idan babu wata ƙungiyar ci gaba da ke bayanta, abubuwa suna tafiya mara kyau.
Rarrabawa kamar Archlinux da maɓallansa suna amfani da sabon tebur na GNOME, yanzu suna kan GNOME 3.8.
GNOME da GTK (dakunan karatu da ake amfani dasu don kirkirar GNOME) masu gyara sun gyara Gtk API, basa bawa wasu masu cigaban lokaci lokaci don daidaita Forks da aikace-aikacen su zuwa GNOME
Shugabannin aikin GNOME ba sa jituwa da sauran masu shirye-shiryen FORK kamar CINNAMON kuma ba sa yarda da ra'ayoyin sauran masu shirye-shiryen. Suna ɗaukar canje-canje masu banƙyama waɗanda basa ba da izinin karban sauran Forks da aikace-aikace zuwa sabon GNOME.
Misali GNOME yana kan sigar GNOME 3.8 kuma yana amfani da dakunan karatu na Gtlk 3.8. Ganin cewa an shirya Kirfa don aiki akan GNOME 3.6 kuma ba zai iya gudana akan GNOME 3.8 ba
Tunda aikin GNOME yayi canje-canje mai mahimmanci ga GTK API da tebur.
Kuma baya ɗaukar lokaci don wani cokali mai yatsu da masu haɓaka don daidaitawa, dole ne ku saba da sabon API kuma hakan yana ɗaukar lokaci.
Wannan shine dalilin da yasa CINNAMON ba zai kasance cikin Cinnarch wanda ke amfani da GNOME 3.8 ba
a cikin abin da bai dace da CINNAMON 1.6 /1.8 ba (wanda ke aiki da kyau a cikin GNOME 3.6).
Cinnamon ba zai kasance a cikin cinnarch ba, saboda kamar yadda kirfa yake a kan ubuntu kuma ubuntu ba zai sami gnome 3.8 a cikin 13.04 ba, ban da ppa, ba su da sha'awar shigar da shi, amma zai zama, ba wani abu ba.
Mafita ga Mint shine komawa ga asalin ra'ayi: ɗauki Gnome Shell kuma "inganta" shi da "kirfa" ƙari…. ba rikitarwa ba don kulawa.
Ban ga cewa mutanen gnome sun damu da abin da jama'a ke fada ba.
Lokacin da suke haɓaka gnome 3, mutane da yawa suna adawa da shi, saboda suna ɗauka hakan canji ne mai mahimmanci game da gnome 2 na rayuwa, kuma duk da haka, sun yanke shawarar yin yadda suke so, fiye da abin da yawancin masu amfani da shi suke tsammani, kuma sun ƙare da yin wannan mamarracho wanda aka tsara don allunan, ba don tebur ba.
Babu wanda ya yarda da cewa sun cire karamin jerin abubuwan a cikin nautilus, tunda an yi amfani da shi sosai, amma, ba tare da la'akari da abin da al'umma ta ce ba, sun cire wannan aikin zuwa Nautilus, wanda ba su daina yankewa da yawa kuma suna ƙara shi da ƙari. .
Gnome 2, na gargajiya, mai amfani, mai sauƙi, mai fa'ida, an tsara shi don tebur.
Gnome 3, jerk.
Da kyau, ban ga hadin kai a matsayin babban tebur da aka tsara don kwakwalwa ba, gaskiyar ita ce, a gare ni asalin tsarin pc's shine kde da xcfe, wasu, amfani da tsakanin hadin kai da kwarin gnome lamari ne na dandano na mutum.
Ba a taɓa yin ruwan sama ba kamar yadda kowa yake so. Na saba da Gnome Shell kuma ban sake canza shi da komai ba. Ya dace da ni sosai: tebur mai kyau, mai saurin canzawa, mai mahimmanci (ba tare da maganar "compiz" ba) kuma tare da garantin kyakkyawan al'umma a bayanta.
Kuma menene ƙarshen MATE zai zama a matsayin wani cokali mai yatsa na gnome….
1.- Gnome ba teburin Icaza bane, aƙalla ba 3 bane, saboda lokacin da ya bar aikin ya daɗe kafin ya zama hanyar da ya ɗauka.
2.- Gnome ba abin zargi bane game da komai, komai ƙanƙantar jituwa da yake da shi, wannan shine rikicin sa kuma ya dogara ne akan manufofin da ta zayyana ga abin da zamu sani a matsayin GnomeOS. Domin wannan wauta ce kamar faɗar cewa Debian ya kamata suyi tunanin abin da Ubuntu, Snowlinux, da sauran 'ya'yansu mata da yawa zasu yi dangane da tsarin su.
Barka dai, ni sabo ne ga Linux, Ina so in san menene rarraba Linux ɗin na hoton.
ko yadda zaka bar Linux dina daidai daya ..