Why is the number of GNU / Linux distributions declining?

Interesting article that they have published in datamation.com on the cause for which GNU / Linux distributions they have been declining in quantity, using as data the statistics offered by Distrowatch.

Why has the number of GNU / Linux distributions decreased?

Let's see what they tell us in the article I linked previously (in English), in this modest Spanish translation:

Number Linux distributions is in decline. In 2011,, the database de Linux distributions Distrowatch assets reached a maximum of 323. Today, but neverthelessare listed only 285. However, exactly why of slope that is carrying out and how much matters, not clear.

Distros They have always come and gone. In fact, Distrowatch list 791 distributions that have existed since it was founded in 2001. , although less than forty per cent You are never ha developing state asset at one point. These counts may not be complete, since some distributions probably never are registered in Distrowatch.

But until about 2011, number active distributions increase slow by each year, but only a few. Instead, the last three years has occurred just one decrease of 12% - a decrease too high that can lend itself to be a coincidence. So what is happening?

Part of the reason for this decrease, es than Linux every time es less a hobby and much more one business strategy. When fans can frolic, the commercial they are more concerned with the results - specifically in decreasing time to market and reduce costs developmental. With these worries, the are less likely to experience For the love of experiment, and more likely to prints its development in a concern existent.

Maybe also, supporters Linux they are getting old, y, Like the companies, do less time for your hobbies and fairer concern with immediate results. However, statistics about such a diverse group make this posibilidad something impossible to confirm.

Another reason for decrease it may be that the innovation center ha changed in the last years from the distributions for the desk. Although most of the distributions have un default desktop, most of the most important offer at least half a dozen deskyes, many of the that promote different Work habits en the users.

Except for the wallpaper and the themes, Generally is easier on these days know at a glance which desk these using and which one distribution is using. Due to the trend almost universal towards package installation in a print shop, you can't even know easily what system of package management is using.

The odds are, However technology you are using is de Debian. At least part of the decrease in distributions can to be that the technology of Debian dominate, and there is already derivatives Debian for all use that users can conceive easily. This idea is supported by the fact that, while the number de distributions It has decreased, the number based Debian or on more popular derived, Ubuntu, has gone from 63% of number total of distributions in 2011. to 70%.

Number derived from Debian has decreased in this moment, with a loss of four based distributions on Debian, y seven in Ubuntu. However, these figures are equivalent to 1,5% of losses, one eighth of the general decline in the distros. This descent es so small that can represent a bump statistical more than a trend. At least, debian-derivatives They are disappearing slower than any other distribution.

Whichever is the reason for the decrease in the distros, It seems as if border is starting to close. Some might say that decrease hardly matters. After all, 285 distributions is a figure that even users more avid don't wait test in their life unless that they do not dedicate their lives for something more.

Some might say also that Many of the distributions consist of so small y so personal that few people will realize his lost. Bliss loss could included be an advantage, Ya que the number of distributions means more contribute to laI know they survive.

Es likely to find it easier to developers for Linux if they have a smaller number of distributions. However, in spite of the disappearance of some distributions promising as fuduntu, few of those who have desaparecido could be considered very important. How to Live Aligned with the distros minors have disappeared in recent three years, the top ten among the most viewed in DistroWatch they've changed little except for up or down a position or two.

However, even yes most of losses he been minors, the trend is worrying. Defenders Linux They have always appreciated the diversity, and the loss of even a little bit of diversity seems matter of concern, even if is beneficial in some aspects. If nothing else, the tendency suggests that Linux is deviating from its roots, and maybe every time they are except the adventurers.

The trend is uncertain. Still, it's worth keeping an eye on her, just in case.

GNU / Linux distributions

My personal opinion

In some points I share the criterion of Bruce byfield in that article. I think that Linux for many began as an entertainment, a hobby, something that was worth trying just for fun, and that little by little has become something more serious. As I have been learning things myself, I have noticed that using GNU / Linux sometimes becomes boring. I've said it before, sometimes it makes me too stable.

Many companies have seen the use of GNU / Linux (and Open Source in general) as an excellent tool for a good business model and have focused on collaborating or putting money to improve it. Canonical, which began by launching a distribution for the desktop, has realized that it is not profitable by itself and has created (or is trying to create) an entire ecosystem that goes from the phone and the PC, to the cloud, because it is precisely there In the end, where your product has value, in services.

I support diversity and choice, but if it were up to me, 100 more distributions could die. In the end, there are only a few that really bring innovation, or its derivatives and those are the ones that should last forever. The same happens with desktop environments, 20 more can emerge, which in the end are used, maintained and renewed, the ones that have been around the longest, the most reliable.

Anyway, whether or not distributions are in decline, we should not worry because GNU / Linux is here to stay. It can evolve, it can improve (or worsen), but it will always exist as an alternative. And if it is not Linux (like Kernel), something else will appear sooner or later.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

*

*

  1. Responsible for the data: Miguel Ángel Gatón
  2. Purpose of the data: Control SPAM, comment management.
  3. Legitimation: Your consent
  4. Communication of the data: The data will not be communicated to third parties except by legal obligation.
  5. Data storage: Database hosted by Occentus Networks (EU)
  6. Rights: At any time you can limit, recover and delete your information.

  1.   nosferatuxx said

    Interesting article mister Elav. (little hand up)

    Regarding that there are no distros registered in distrowatch it is very true, as true as that on this side of the pond in Mexico there are distros like ALDOS and Aztli the most recent. Not to mention that there are some more that are still anonymous or are for specific use.

    1.    elav said

      That's right .. I think that the number of independent distributions that exist, almost reaches those that appear in Distrowatch 😀

  2.   Honoris Camacho said

    I think the important thing is the consolidation of the existing right-handers. And implement new developments and research on what already exists.

    1.    Ivan Barra said

      I think the same, anyway, if there is someone who wants to launch a custom x-distro and knows how, they have every right to do so, but generally those projects are in limbo, both in terms of time and resources.

      I find that a lot of talent is wasted, perhaps if all those efforts in creating, I don't know, dozens of distros based on Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, Arch, etc., did it in supporting the main project ... but of course, it is a utopia. But it's nice to dream ...

      Very good subject Elav.

      regards

  3.   eersy said

    Fascinating post.
    I must say that what happens is regrettable. So unfortunate that more people pull is their environment.
    It is the most beautiful thing that there is no convergence, each one is an individual, but part of a society.

  4.   cleaning said

    It is normal, many rare distros were experiments and they stayed on that, also the one that is more difficult to make your own distro since the disappearance of remastersys (although we still have system back but it is not so elegant).

  5.   mitcoes said

    It is normal, in reality the number of distributions does not matter, but their penetration, an image made with ManjaroISO for example is not a distribution, it is a selection of a Manjaro configuration. On the other hand, there are still many that simply use the repositories of others.

    Ubuntu Mint and debian take 50% of the users in all their flavors approximately
    Arch and derivatives such as Antergos and Manjaro over 25% with ample growth (this is a study)
    The rest together occupy 25%, which is also under study due to the wasted advantage of Fedora and SUSE with their advantage of being very profitable companies installed in the business environment that have not managed or wanted to reach the demanding public SOHO of GNU / Linux , Gentoo or Sabayon have lost to Arch or Manajro or Antergos as an advanced user bet

    That is what gives GNU / Linux muscle, it does not matter so much that there are hundreds of distros, but two (Ubuntu (based on debian) plus Mint or Arch - Manjaro and Antergos) that cut the cod, and that each one is configure as you want without that configuration being a significantly new distro.

    As for Arch (Antergos and Manjaro included) it is already really KISS if you use Manjaro in the sense that it is suitable for newbies, but with all the power, and it is almost a do it yourself with this good base, that you you know, and that is why, AUR (which takes a lot of PPAs), being a rolling release (a roll to reinstall every 6 months) and feeling somewhat more fluid even though the tests do not detect it because of what is growing.

    1.    joaco said

      What do you mean that it only matters that Ubuntu and Arch exist?
      If it is literal, you are wrong, because it only matters that Fedora and OpenSUSE really exist, they are the ones that contribute the most to the GNU / Linux ecosystem.
      The truth is that I do not believe much that Arch and family are more used than Fedora, in what area? According to what statistics?

      1.    Ace said

        Slackware is the distro that started everything.
        (and where openSUSE was derived from)

        and Arch has shown the Linux community the power of the Rolling Release Model 😉

      2.    Ace said

        and Ubuntu .. well in the beginning it was the best ..

        now it only works for those just starting out in the linux world ..

        and so that linux becomes more known .. oo

  6.   charlie brown said

    In my opinion, the best explanation for this phenomenon could be given by Charles Darwin: it is the result of natural selection, where the strongest or the best adapted survive ...

    1.    venturi said

      Excuse me, which branch of Debian do you use? It is that I am in Sid and it does not come out that I use Debian xD Sorry for the offtopic, but I did not know how to ask you in private!

      1.    charlie brown said

        I use Debian Wheezy with KDE. In order for it to show you everything you want, you must edit the values ​​of general.useragent.override in about: config. If you have doubts about how to do it, do a search on the site that there are a couple of articles where they explain it clearly.

      2.    venturi said

        Nah, it's fine like that, I was curious, I imagine that if I take a stable Debian then yes I would put it on xD I also use KDE, but that has nothing to do, here what counts is the info of the browser and the distribution hehe. Thanks for the reply anyway!

  7.   eighthpain said

    It is not so bad, it seems to me that there are still many distributions and that number will surely never tend to zero. In fact, many of these distributions do nothing more than change the appearance a lot and rely on the repositories of the others.
    It would be good to focus efforts on what GNU / Linux and free software is weak, such as office automation that even though libreoffice is good it does not compete with MSO, it has improved growth in games and continue to improve free drivers. Focus efforts where it is not enough, there are too many distros and about 50 can be considered a serious option, at most.

  8.   Pedro said

    Thanks Elav for the post, really an excellent discussion trigger.
    In my opinion, I think it is very good that there are hundreds, thousands of Linux distributions. Well, where others see fragmentation, I see diversity. And nothing better for the Philosophy of Free Software with its 4 premises, that there is a diversity of ideas, of systems. Can anyone believe that it is good that there are fewer ideas? Who can be the judge to determine which ideas or projects should be eliminated? With what authority? The single idea of ​​a single thought scares me. I prefer thousands of diversities because this way we are further from a single idea reigning over the others.

    On the other hand, I believe that the reason for the low number of Linux distros cannot be known without a large study that would consume a lot of monetary and human resources that I do not know if they would contribute anything. We can argue hypotheses, but we won't know for sure I think.

    Something that I think is quite real, is that the people who use Linux, the younger they have the longer. Then the "system", the way of life in today's world, accelerated, individualistic, takes time away. New obligations and responsibilities also arise that take time away from dedicating to Linux. But that should not be a problem, new generations emerge and the most veteran Linux players must prepare them and instill in them the creative, curious, critical spirit, so that they take the lead.
    Regards,
    Peter.

  9.   venturi said

    I think that there is no need to worry about this, as a colleague said, the important thing is that serious distributions are consolidated and that they continue to support the GNU / Linux operating system that has given us so much joy and will continue to give us. Honestly, it is the path, present and future of what software should be, GNU / Linux.

  10.   Jose Miguel said

    And if there were only 10 left, the better.
    For a good listener, a few words are enough.

  11.   Gabriel said

    Let's see, said a blind man, or how is the nut! (:
    Let's transfer this merecumbé (situation) to other areas, for example in the world of medicine it is known that exercising is good for health, those who do sports and I do not mean that they are professional athletes know that it is very beneficial for their health, if These same people transmit to their children, family, friends and make that experience of exercising and realize that it is good for them, those same people will feel good making a larger concentric circle transmitting that knowledge.
    Something similar happens with free software and especially the GNU / Linux world, if those of us who know transmit this knowledge about the enormous benefits of knowing linux and managing or knowing free software and especially its application to others, we will inadvertently become first hand evangelizers and I am 101% sure that the use of linux would multiply.
    It is necessary to understand and understand that all part of ourselves, it is useless to say "I know linux and it makes me sad that people do not use it or are reducing its use", I am not a teacher or anything but when I can and who I cross Along the way I put the bug about the use of linux, and the truth is that I am surprised that they are interested in learning and especially in using it, which is the most important thing, because that's how most of us learned, someone put the bug in us, we I liked it half or completely, we continue investigating with the ease of the internet and inadvertently we realize that we have and continue to learn about this wonderful world, to see who said that from now on I become an evangelizer? (:

    1.    rotietip said

      All that is false (except for the second paragraph that you put with a shoehorn) since to begin with, the article talks about the number of distributions with active development, not users, so that in itself you are starting from a wrong premise.
      Even ignoring that detail, it is not enough to just tell others "use Linux / Distro X" and now, you also need to generate enough interest for them to deign to try a distribution, which is very difficult if you do not know what they use their computer usually and what programs do they need, or if there are alternatives to these (and it gets even more complicated if you have to deal with conformist Windows or MacOS users who are not curious enough to appreciate other alternatives). This requires a lot of time, patience and a lot of research, something that few can give you the luxury of doing (unless it is a relative or a girl that you want to take to bed, in those cases you can make a concession).

  12.   Paul said

    Very good article. As long as Debian does not disappear (we will see what happens with DEVUAN), for me, let all the others appear. 🙂

    1.    rotietip said

      Confess, you're just a miserable systemd fanboy, aren't you?

    2.    @nagual_oax said

      I think both Debian and Red Hat are still some of the most visible, as Slackware was, although their popularity has dropped ...
      Red Hat from which Mandrake, SuSE, Yellow Dog (where YUM took), Mandriva ...
      Debian from which Ubuntu, Mint, BackTrack, Security Onion were derived ...

      So I see something complicated that will disappear ...

      Regarding SystemD, it is also something that I am following, I found out about it because it was mentioned in DebConf13 and that it was generating some noise among Debian developers, and also that there has been some kind of pressure or suggestion from Google and Red Hat for the implementation of SystemD, I have also seen videos and read some blogs where they mention the locks generated after modifying the binary logs that are supposedly safe ... and that's why I found out about Devuan ...

      Could something similar to LibreOffice happen compared to OpenOffice?

      From what I have found, several distros are switching to SystemD and some are resisting, CentOS like Debian that are popular for servers are opting for SystemD ...

      I will try to be aware of what more info comes out about it.

  13.   Augusto Xarlatán said

    The decline of the emergence of new distributions is caused by Ubuntu and its large number of derivatives, they really do the job well on the desktop, they look good and nobody wants to finish their heads installing / compiling a driver that does not work in another distro.
    The unfortunate thing is how closed Ubuntu and its derivatives are becoming, it sounds contradictory but it is reality. The strongest innovation has been systemd and faenza themes.

  14.   toñolocotelan_te said

    They are decreasing because Linux, in the field of desktop, can not with the overwhelming pace of Windows and Mac, both infinitely better

    1.    toñolocotelan_te said

      troll

    2.    Gabo said

      I was disgusted just seeing what you wear uu

    3.    Ace said

      April Fools Day has not yet arrived.

  15.   cristian said

    but how many of them should be called distributions, and not "pimp" of XXX ... it is an important point, for example deeping or kaos, they are efforts to take something and improve it, but with the pain of my soul, #! it's just a good configuration of openbox + tint2 + scripts on any debian

    More than the number of distributions, we should check the number of contributions to the kernel, who makes them, and the penetration rate of linux, and try to take off our leather glasses and look at the android model, since although it is not gnu linux, some kindred is

    1.    rotietip said

      The only thing that Android and Linux share is the kernel and a more or less similar directory structure, the rest is the Dalvik virtual machine working on top without the user knowing what's underneath.
      Even so, Android devices seem to have restrictions to use them if you don't link it with a Google account ... or that's what they want you to think, since in fact I discovered that you can do anything with them and put everything you want just root it, delete all Google applications (Play Store included, except those considered absolutely necessary) and then install Aptoide (With this wonder I can install all kinds of applications, whether free, open source or hacked, and without registering anywhere).

  16.   Tesla said

    Interesting article. It makes you reflect.

    Without questioning anything, it is curious how the distributions are counted. Surely there are many more distros and each with many reasons to create or disappear.

    However, I don't agree at all with elav's phrase: «I support diversity and the power to choose, but if it were up to me, 100 more distributions could die. In the end, there are only a few that really bring innovation, or its derivatives and those are the ones that must last forever. "

    In general (and I am not saying this expressly for him), I think there is a too "commercial" concept of the word "GNU / Linux distribution". Obviously, without strong distributions development would be much more complicated and without all the support we have today. However, many times I read things like: "it is irrelevant to me that X distribution dies, because it does not contribute anything new." And that's where I see that commercial vision of distributions.

    The fact that the general public does not make sense of the X distro is no reason why it is in development. The concept of GNU / Linux precisely motivates that each person can take what they want and what they don't and create something unique that adds value to it. If I, currently in Debian + Mate, want to have an iso with an installer that gives me the programs and configurations that I like and I want to publish it so that someone wants to use it, nothing prevents me from doing so and that is the richness of this ecosystem. Maybe only one person takes advantage of it, but what?

    For example, I put KaOS. It is the best example of how someone takes something and transforms it according to what he (she in this case) wants, supporting only certain software and certain architecture.

    Another thing that bothers me is the phrase: "if joint efforts were made and another distribution stopped being created, etc ...". We forget that most distributions come out of the free time of each individual without receiving anything in return and each person does with their free time what they want.

    Anyway, I do not know if I have explained myself, but many times I see that we take into little consideration what a distribution created by a certain person / s means to themselves or the effort of other people for the mere fact of not seeing sense of something.

    A greeting and thanks for the post!

    1.    Tom Mx said

      How about Tesla, I think the same argument is for both senses the same freedom to create ad hoc is the same freedom to choose something safe and stable and not "petate flares"
      Distros that are highly specific and with less dedication and resources may be the most likely to fade.
      I personally go with Deb because of what is behind that spiral and I know it will not be
      "Love of a few hours"

  17.   moa said

    How do I bookmark this post, without having to bookmark it in firefox

  18.   Pep Sanchez @PepInca said

    I'm getting old, but since Friday I decided to leave windows and start with LINUX. I'm 40 and I've been with the Spectrum 48kb, then Amiga 500 with its Latice C and then a 386. LINUX distros have a lot to die for, we know how to differentiate between those who want to take advantage of and between those who love computing and sharing.

  19.   yukiteru said

    Interesting article @elav and certainly many projects have died or have simply become mere ghosts, but the big ones are still there, and I think that is the important thing after all, since it is these distros that set the tone for where it is going GNU / Linux as a serious work environment in any field.

    PS: Now in Debian and the hated systemd, because my disk with Funtoo has died, waiting for Devuan to release serious repos to do a transplant 😀

  20.   synflag said

    I can tell you at least one case that I know of. Fuduntu, the other days I was talking with the creator about the disappearance of the distro, in #devuan and he told me that the main reason has been the appearance of systemd. They had been maintaining a parallel distribution or remix of fedora which totally lacked systemd and did not want to implement it because they considered it a 'bad joke', verbatim words. He commented to me that it was actually a lot of work to keep going without suspending for a whole year with systemd already in existence. The developers weren't able to clean packages, separate them, and repackage them without dependencies on systemd for time and quantity. They decided to stop the project until more developers appeared, since it was a lot of workload for few people and they could not stay in that state of extreme work for more than a year, removing the rpm from systemd, which was a lot. So before delivering something of poor quality or with systemd he preferred to stop the distro

    1.    rotietip said

      Since you and the developer of that distro are such friends, didn't you tell him to try uselessd?, at least that way you could keep those packages that require systemd as you find a better solution.

  21.   FernandoRJ said

    Do you know a Brazilian distro chamada Metamorphose? It is worth giving a conferred one.

    1.    rotietip said

      Español: And what makes Metamorphose so special that they no longer have the hundreds or thousands of distributions that are hanging around the internet (at least the ones that are kept up to date)?
      Portuguese do Google Translator: What is special about Metamorphose that have hundreds or thousands of distributions that are currently online (less so that they are kept with data)?

  22.   Darkmind said

    better ... having so much distro is silly

  23.   Gonzalo Martinez said

    I think diversity is taking place because of complexity. Each time the distributions are more complex, there was the change from kernel 2.6 to 3.0, the change from init to systemd, changes in the X, and complexity in the uses.

    I see that the general purpose distributions (Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, OpenSUSE, Arch) are growing more and more in use, and the more specific and specific ones are decreasing.

    A market that I have seen slowly die is low resource distributions, such as DSL, Puppy or VectorLinux, since 5 years ago a slow machine was a PIII, today a slow machine is considered a Dual Core E2160 and 2 GB ram, and the most popular distributions work perfectly in them, I think that nowadays more than to browse, nobody would use a Pentium III with 192 of RAM and 20GB of disk as a workstation.

    1.    ivanbarram said

      Of course, it is a very correct answer, Intel for example has had architecture changes every 14-15 months in terms of desktop computers, which makes for example an i5 2500k (like mine) is already an architecture « old ”, although that is very far from the reality, both in terms of performance and technology, unfortunately the market punishes the prices of those products a lot, despite performing very on par with their current simile.
      Regarding the other point of view, of course, nowadays, access to distributions is to ask, and we don't even need to burn a CD or a DVD to test, a 2GB pendrive is generally enough and that's it. In addition, I know many who have tried Linux just to get the nail out of seeing how it is and they end up staying, of course, they are still new, but I think that in all systems (Linux, Windows, Mac, Android, etc.) they are the immense Most of them, where the use is to consume the Internet, multimedia and office automation, people like us believe that we are the least and it is in us that this type of "custom" right-handed falls, for very particular and specific needs.

      Greetings.

  24.   David Myths said

    To begin with, I think the diversity that the GNU / Linux world offers you in terms of the number of distributions to choose from is good. But on the other hand, I consider that there are too many distros that are the variant of another variant (in this case those based on Ubuntu, which in turn is based on Debian). I only consider that there should be those that contribute something different, innovative, with respect to the others or that are useful to a certain group of users. There are distros that offer innovative solutions such as NixOS, Maui Linux, Porteus and others that we surely do not know about and that have a minimum number of developers supporting them, while others that are derived from Ubuntu and that would be 'more of the same' have communities more numerous. That is why I think that if you want to advance towards the conquest of the desktop, many distros 'that are still the same' as others, should disappear and their developers look towards innovative solutions that push the GNU / Linux world to reach new goals that they currently represent a challenge to the penguin OS.
    Then, in another world apart, there would be different technological horizons such as the development of memsistors, with which it is pointed to the appearance of another open source OS if Linux is not able to overcome the technological frontier that this innovation represents.

  25.   Oscar said

    Well, I'm a newbie and I'm actually very grateful to gnu / Linux since it has a great diversity of distros. Well, let's hope that instead of decreasing they increase…. I love free software

  26.   vicdeveloper said

    I am one of those who say that referrals do not contribute anything new and that we must help those bases on which the others are based.

    With so many derivations comes fragmentation and projects that come to light today and that tomorrow will no longer be.

    Regards!